A New Model Army

No matter how much we demote Russian Military,Russian military can take casualities where as Nato cannot.Is it not a factor to win wars..

>>>one Russian officer asked a NEWSWEEK reporter if she could lend him a Georgian SIM card for his phone; he also asked if she knew where the nearest Georgian front lines were***
curious moment.. perhaps georgians run so quickly that russian field intelligence couldn't be in time to trace them ))) >>>"Russian conventional forces are still decades behind most NATO countries"*** well, it's nice but why russains were more successful in afghan than NATO now?

as

What everyone seems to forget is that Russia (whether it's called The Soviet Union, the USSR, Czarist Russia or the Gulag Republics of PooTinstan) IS and always has been a Terrorist Nation - in the 20th century it was the leading Terrorist State on the planet... remember?
As I've said all along, Bush attacked the wrong area of the world with Weapons of Mass Destruction - duh - look who's sitting on a pile of them right next door to Europe. The 3 Stooges (Chairman Poo Tin, Dim Medvedev and a plaster-cast statue of Stalin) took on Georgia because it only has an army of 37,000 (compared to Russia's 1.1 million). Georgia is also a key in the Caucasus region - the roots of Europe... like the Chechens, the ancient Colchis & Iberian kingdoms influenced all the primary roots of European civilization. Anyway, Stalin's plan when he was a ???commissioner of the minorities??? way back in the 1920s was to eliminate ALL the tribes of Europe & replace them with Homo Sovieticus. Ya know what I mean? It's astounding that since the second Russian occupation of Chechnya (which Chairman Poo Tin ordered in 2000) the Russians still have been unable to eliminate (& conquer) those tough mountain peoples. Ingushetia (a captive nation inside Russia) has asked for help to "liberate" it from Russia - is that a hint to the EU or NATO? Or maybe Estonia, Latvia & Lithuania should become Nuclear Powers and ???liberate??? the oppressed minorities inside the federation? Did Russia open the doors (unknowingly?) to "liberating" its own captive nations by recognizing the so-called ???independence??? of Abhkazia & South Ossetia and creating "buffer zones" inside sovereign Georgia? Or is that a trap? No one has been allowed into the newly "independent" zones of occupation under complete Chairman Poo Tin control??? what is going on there? Are the army hordes being massed there for a total onslaught on Europe??? Paris??? Berlin??? Rome??? will the veterans of the Chechen genocide be allowed to rape, plunder & ravage the Continent? I mean, where else can they go? Iran? China? Let's see what kind of "buffer zones" the Chinese will carve out of Siberia... come on European Union or NATO even - get your act together and "liberate" Yakutia or Ingushetia or Chechnya or one of the other captive nations. Question the legitimacy of this rule by those 3 Stooges. Genocide is at your doorstep Europe - so what are ya gonna do about it?
!) Or is it all One Big Bluff??? nothing works & they???re just testing the West. The Test-the-West trick. The ole hammer-on-the-knee-reflex test??? remember that?

Russia does not need or want a heads up fight with NATO anywhere. It can however engage in a long game that costs the west far more than it will gain.. Russia can create problems in the UN, Markets, and by using military aid, arm those with conflict aims against the west. Instead of trying to match NATO on NATO's terms, Russia can sit under her Nuclear Umbrealla, and cause problems for pennies in the dollar.

The armies of Russia, China Iran etc. are always old and decrepit and useless compared to that of the west. SO YOU IN THE WEST WOULD LIKE THE THIRD WORLD TO believe, but why don't you go and compare what you would have us believe to how the Chinese communist DEFEATED THE KMT ARMY THAT WAS SUPPORTED BY THE usa WITH THE LATEST IN tANKS, aIRCRAFT, LOTS AND LOTS OF MONEY.

Did CHIANG KAI WIN IN THAT WAR ? WEAPONS DOES NOT COUNT ONLY LEADERSHIP COUNTS. Even Taliban has superior leadership than NATO, so why do you in the west think you can be better than Russia ?