Oral Exam, Part II

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: sunshinedaisy @ 09/03/2008 9:47:57 AM

    To all the bloggers that resorted to name calling and trashing. I have a question for you and this apply to both the Democrats and Republican supporters alike. Do you really think these politicians care about you? You are fighting like cats and dogs for them who does not give a damn about you. All they want is your votes and nothing else. After the G.E. life will go on in Washington. The big donors' interests will be the one served, not yours. So think about it. By this time, I know most of us already know who we are going to vote for base on our ideas and values. Can we al least respect each other descision?

  • Posted By: mccainsupporter @ 09/03/2008 7:42:19 AM

    Joe Lieberman and Fred Thompson made wonderful speeches and made the case for a John McCain and Sarah Palin ticket. Both Joe Lieberman and Fred Thompson are eloquent speakers and both would also have been great on the ticket. They both truly believe in John McCain. As to why John McCain picked Governor Sarah Palin, John McCain intends to follow through and make his Project Lexington for United States energy independence the dominant issue in this campaign. Governor Sarah Palin is a strong supporter of increased offshore drilling and she knows that Alaska has an offshore coastline greater than the rest of the country combined and is also the leading state in oil production. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and John McCain understand that Obama and the Democrats would never consider government loan guarantees or tax breaks for a sure thing that will produce energy for the American gas tank. In fact Democrats are trying to put together a so-called windfall profits tax which will have the effect of discouraging future investment in the United States oil industry. John McCain also knows that Governor Sarah Palin family situation also illustrates that longterm Democratic leadership hostility and policies toward United States owned energy companies have caused our current energy crisis. Her husband who works for British Petroleum should be working for the former American owned Arco Oil Company. Arco Oil Company developed and explored the Alaska North Slope and formerly owned eighty percent of our proven Alaskan reserves. With its substantial oil reserves Arco Oil Company should have bought British Petroleum instead of British Petroleum buying out Arco Oil Company during the second Bill Clinton administration. With the right business environment and support from both political parties in the United States, Arco Oil Company might have been more successful and been able to buy out British Petroleum instead of British Petroleum buying out Arco Oil Company. Look at Apple Computer and Microsoft. Their success in the computer world have made them bullet proof to corporate takeovers. Longterm Democratic hostility and opposition to offshore drilling and periodic talk of windfall profits taxes contributed to the takeover of Arco Oil Company by foreign owned British Petroleum.

    • Posted By: just me & my 2 cents @ 09/03/2008 9:40:48 AM

      Okay, if Lieberman and Thompson both truly believe in McCain as you say, why did they ever run for president? Shouldn't they have just campaigned for McCain all those times he has campaigned before? Second, what does Palin's family situation have to do with "democratic leadership hostility and policies toward US owned energy companies"? It's my understanding that companies are sold and bought all the time and usually has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with 'BUSINESS." Palin's husband still has a job and that's more than I can say for some people when their companies are sold.

    • Posted By: just me & my 2 cents @ 09/03/2008 9:32:27 AM

      Okay, if as you say "Lieberman and Thompson both truly believe in McCain" why did they ever run for president ... why didn't they just campaign for McCain all the number of times that he has tried to be president. Second, did McCain personally tell you that he "knows that Governor Palin's family situation illustrates longterm Democratic leadership hostility ... etc, etc, etc." It's my understanding that companies are sold and bought all the time and it does not necessarily have anything to do with politics, just BUSINESS

    • Posted By: kle5507 @ 09/03/2008 9:10:45 AM

      Apple Computer and Microsoft do not make approiate anology for what's happening in the oil market. Apple and Microsoft own's Intellectual Property (IP) Rights which is the number thing US used to lead, now it's losing grounds to the Koreans and the Chinese. And Apples and Microsoft are not prone to Take Over. It is a corporate company and if the Saudis want it, they can buy it out right with Cash from all the oil it has.

      With more driling, you've done nothing to alleivate America's addiction to Oil. You have to consider alternatives such as Wind, solar and natural gas as T. Bone Pickens is pushing. You need to bring down the demand for oil to bring down prices. Look at the national gasoline prices per gallon. It has drop due to the sharp drop in demand, not with the threat for more drillings. But you don't give a coke addict more coke in hope that he'll quit. Instead, you give him treatement to get him off of his addiction. Drilling = more coke.

      The DEMs are not against drilling. They are against the fleecing of America, land that belongs to you and me. The oil company have only drilled/explore on 25% of land already set aside. They should drill/explore on the remaining 75% of the land already set aside before asking more. Do you give a kid more cake when he only eats 25% what you've already given him. If you do, you're spoling your kids. The oil company under Bush/Cheney/McCain are spoiled! We need to stop giving them tax breaks when they are making record profits. I can sure use a tax break on their behalf.

  • Posted By: navymom06 @ 09/03/2008 6:50:02 AM

    It was the same old republican garbage will listen to evert year. The country is falling apart so they invoke Ronald Regan (Who by the way only republicians like) 9/11 if you put a DEM in we are all going to die ,even though 9/11 happened on Bush's watch . Oh yeah and all DEMS are baby killers. , gove me a break. Lets talk issues real issues like yhis country is in horrible shape and MCBUSH will do nothing to change that. As for his choice of VP i am so glad that her daughther made a choice to keep her baby but it was her CHOICE and that should be allowed for every person in this country not just what far right iwants

    • Posted By: BexHi @ 09/03/2008 9:38:05 AM

      THE COUNTRY IS NOT FALLING APART!!!! Our country is doing extremely well, if yuo dont like our country then you could find another country to live in where you may be happier - but you didnt move out of here since ther eis no better country than the USA. Its time you all stop complaining and saying that USA is doing bad since it isnt. Our economy is doing waaay better than it did under Clinton's power. 9/11 was planned under clintons power - incas eyou havent followed the news in those days - they were even warned however Clinton did nothing to stop those plans. 9/11 was planned for several years BEFORE Pres. Bush came into power so how can you blame him for this - he was in office for all of a really short time so to blame him for this is my dear friend completely NOT justified and you know that - dont kid yourself. When you have a leader who believes that killing a new born baby is ok then his followers will beleiv ein that too and will actually follow in that path - would you like to corrupt our country by not valuing people lives no matter how young they are? If your leader doesnt value newborn babies lives what makes you think he would be able to lead a country full of humans???

    • Posted By: Grumpy Old Man @ 09/03/2008 8:50:59 AM

      Personally I am sick of the genuflection of the parties at the altars of presidents past. The Republicans shout hosannas to Reagan, while the Democrats wax nostalgically for the "Camelot" of JFK, conveniently ignoring the fact that Camelot was a story of marital infidelity and incest. Let???s look at these guys in the facts of the history that they spawned. Although JFK managed the Cuban missile crisis well, it came about in response to a blunder of his at the Bay of Pigs, and he started American involvement in Vietnam. Reagan was never the warmonger that his leftist opponents charged, but he ran up huge amounts of debt, and had his legacy saved by the first Bush.
      I am fairly confident that history will give this Bush a mixed review. Meanwhile the Democrats, who give us so much vacuous claptrap about their future orientation seem like they are locked in the past, running against Bush, who is not on the ticket. They also complain about high energy prices, while promoting policies that reduce supplies. In spite of the fact that there is a combined 44 trillion dollar unfunded mandate from Social Security and Medicare, they want to increase governmental obligations while cutting taxes. Duh! Can you say Fantasy Land? There primary campaign was all about race, gender and surrender. Finally, they treat Roe v Wade with the same fundamentalist fervor as Biblical literalists treat genesis and ultra conservative Catholics treat papal infallibility. Yes, there are a lot of issues that the current administration has flubbed, but they are not advancing proposals for any change that I can believe in. Were I to run for office, I would start with the slogan "get real"!

  • Posted By: cerrojim @ 09/03/2008 1:39:33 AM

    Well Joe, you have it wrong as usual. In fact, I am a 65 year old white male, highly decorated, retired military officer who proudly served in Viet Nam, with a Phd. I have traveled and worked as a consultant in over 450 companies in 27 countrys. You on the other hand, I'm sure, are not and have not.

    Please share your credentials Joe. I'm sure we will all be impressed. And, just what is the real purpose of America? Rich get richer? War after war? Middle class eliminated? Torture? Rendition? Gitmo? More people in jail? Executing doctors who perform abortion and mothers who abort? Arrest and detention for any reason or no reason? Shadow government by big oil?

    Just answer on question for me. What would America be like with 8, 12, 16 more years of Republican rule? Would you want your kids living in that world? I think not.

    • Posted By: joewoj @ 09/03/2008 1:59:57 AM

      You are a exquisite example of many liberals today. You answer questions for others, assuming you know what is best for them. You obviously feel that formal education gives you more credibility that others with less than you(I have a Master of Science). The real purpose of America is to ensure that the bullies like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, and Kim Yong-nam, do not take what is not theirs.
      And, if you are as welll travelled as you claim to be, you should know that the U.S. is the most blessed country in the world. You sound a lot like one of those conspiracy nuts that run rampant through the liberal community. But, I'm not sure, and don't want to make a character conclusion based on simply a few comments.

      • Posted By: TheVigil @ 09/03/2008 3:19:17 AM

        All those decorated military officer liberals who form the backbone of the Democratic Party.

        Wait, no.

        To me it seems this man is an independent thinker...and he has the right, especially after years of military service, to express his point of view...

        • Posted By: mcrochip @ 09/03/2008 9:37:21 AM

          Fred Thompson made a valid point last night... being a POW does not qualify you to be president.

          McCain's military service is to be honored. That honor does not require that he become president.

      • Posted By: rube @ 09/03/2008 3:28:02 AM

        I too have worked all over the U.S. (32 states.) I have worked on nearly every American Indian Reservation in the West.
        I have also worked in social programs to help the unfortunate and the poor.
        I am blessed with all these experiences. I am a liberal. The character of such people I have worked with was also liberal!
        I know what Senator Obama is about-
        grass roots organizing from the bottom up.

        I am bi-lingual, I have lived and worked in Mexico as well.
        I wished I spoke more languages, I wished I knew more about why things are they way they are???

        And I do realize that the American middle class is the great blessing of this country. ???The great story.???

        With out a healthy middle class the nation is a shadow of its former self!
        Yet the working class has been stiffed for the past 8 years.
        The GOP has socialized the debt as they continue to privatize the wealth!

        I believe that the middle is where our nation will rediscover its potential! There is little to believe that the nation was managed and run from the middle by the GOP! Their results are indisputable???

        The economy is in shambles, lack of vision regarding energy policy, foreign policy is in shambles, lack of political oversight regarding the sub-prime crash, katrina, record federal debt, health care and education in shambles. Lose of home equity and record job loss! I could go on and on???

        What is not to understand about this fiasco!
        The GOP took our great nation and in eight years ran it into the ground!
        This is not subjective hog wash this is the reality we Americans now live in!

        No more self-righteous callous conservative rhetoric will save our union- we just had two terms of it!

        Senator Barack Obama represents new blood, a turning of the page???
        Intelligence over egocentrism???
        Substance over vanity???
        Union over divisiveness???
        Inclusion over narcissism???

        I recently read an article that made me proud!
        Since 1940 the GNP
        of our nation was 15% higher during liberal presidencies than conservative!
        Obama will be a great president! He???s all apple pie with a little chocolate pudding on the side!

      • Posted By: cerrojim @ 09/03/2008 2:23:41 AM

        And no, we are not the most blessed country in the world. Far from it. Try New Zealand or Australia or many others who are not fighting unnecessary wars, whose economies are sound, whose people are safe, who live free, who worship in peace and leave other countries alone.

        And, don't give me any crap about us being the saviors and protectors of the free world. We act in our own selfish interests. Iraq had oil. Sudan and Darfur do not. Which one did we invade? Can't stop genocide, but we sure can protect that oil.

      • Posted By: cerrojim @ 09/03/2008 2:11:07 AM

        Oh, it is hard to call anybody a bully when you are an American.

      • Posted By: cerrojim @ 09/03/2008 2:09:51 AM

        And just what is it that "is not theirs?" Whose is it? Is it ours? Are they after our oil or our power? Are they after my house, my car, yours? My god, here they come now ... their after my lawnmower. Pesky varmits.

        Get a clue Joe. Start thinking about America.

  • Posted By: GD38 @ 09/03/2008 9:18:25 AM

    If it's an article about the GOP you are going to get comments that totally bash the Dems/Left and praise the Right. Completely predictable. If it were an article on the Dems, the inverse is true. The truth is everyone who has posted a comment made up their mind on their vote long before reading this. The country could vote right now. I know I could. I won't say who I support because what does it matter? Is my lauding what I like about my candidate going to make anyone change their mind who didn't like him before? Please. People just like to vent and stir things up so they post comments and I'm no exception (obviously). Only I won't waste my breath saying what I think, casting my vote will accomplish more.

  • Posted By: Press Release @ 09/03/2008 4:13:57 AM

    Comment: To understand this plan, you have to understand the full impact of the plan. McCain doesn't only want HRC's defectors, as so many are suggesting, he also wants Obama loyalist, the undecided and the independents. By choosing a woman, immediately a very small unintelligent group of women will vote for McCain because he chose a women. This is a small group but worth mentioning. On the larger scale women don't vote for women because they are women, and simply putting a woman on the ticket won't compensate for their policy positions. The McCain Campaign is not worried about the larger scale of women who are intelligent and has high expectations concerning the broad issues on the economy, domestic and national security and health care. The McCain strategy is of no respect of a woman's intellect but her emotions. Here is the gamble of the McCain campaign.
    Not if, but when the McCain campaign provoke the Democrats to attack Mrs. Polin, or when the McCain campaign plant a man in their audience to heckle Mrs. Palin with a gender remark like " Go home and raise your five kids" or when the Obama campaign says anything to Mrs. Palin, the McCain Campaign will continue to cry foul by reason of gender bias. women all over will get upset, take offense and think that the democrats are attacking her because she is a women. Then the women all over the U.S. will throw their votes to McCain and Palin. Thus making it a good game play that lead to victory for McCain. Sadly Mrs Palin would have served her purpose and so would the American women also be of no more use to McCain. It will happen. So will the American women be ready to stand firm and don't fall for the McCain sneak-attack hype?


    • Posted By: undecided voter @ 09/03/2008 9:16:39 AM

      I think everywhere you have "woman" you can insert "african-american" , everywhere you have "Palin", you can insert "Obama" , and everywhere you have "gender" insert race and you have the same arguement for the democrats pick of Obama. Aren't there a lot of Africian-americans that haven't voted before that are going to vote for Barack simply because he is african-american.? Is there really anything wrong with that? - I don't know but don't call any woman who votes for another woman unitelligent. It makes you look bitter, sexiest, and immature. Come up with a real arguement that someone can understand. If it weren't for the "race" issue Obama wouldn't have a chance. He is an eloquent speaker, young and hansome, and apparently a very likable guy. I can see that. I am still waiting for someone to tell me why he should be president besides those admirable but not very presidential traits. It can't come down to an emotionally charged issue like abortion - no one is ever going to win either side of that arguement. I want to know what is he going to do about illegal immigration; what if there is (God forbid) another 9/11? How will he handle it? How is he going to reform the "business as usual politics" in Washington. REALLY what is he going to do about the fuel issue on a global basis - it's not just about the US. And what about rolling back all the tax breaks? What does that mean and how will it effect the average (by this I mean $70K - $150k) American family. Obama seems to be full of a lot of rhetoric and the left is eating it up with a spoon and not asking any of the hard questions. There has been more scrutiny of Sarah Palin in the last four days than there has been of Obama in the last 18 months. I say, bring it on - at least we will know where she stands and what she has done. I don't hear any republicians crying "foul" either. This is what the democrats do everytime something fishy about Obama comes up.

  • Posted By: susan6095 @ 09/03/2008 9:08:30 AM

    It is so obvious that you dislike this candidate that I do not believe you are writing acurately. Obama must be your man as dumb as he is. I can't wait for the debates when Obama can't answer a question without his words in front of him and time to think. Palin and McCain will run the numbers up just in that time period after debates showing that they can think, react, move on a dime, run the country without taking three days to react. This will be so much fun. I believe they will win Sir!

  • Posted By: Waljas @ 09/03/2008 8:58:07 AM

    The "devil" made me do it!, passe or no not Politically Correct? The new way to satisfy the Holier then Thou block is to take credit away from the devil and give " GOD" credit for the ill's of the present and hopefully not future republican administration with its "Its the Will of GOD" attitude ,which to me is the same thinking or teachings of the Jihadists. WJas

  • Posted By: benluclar @ 09/03/2008 8:30:52 AM

    As a Republican-turned-Hillary-now-on-the-fence voter, I have to say that the discussions here on the REPUBLICAN subjects are more interesting and enlightening than the fist fights which have gone on this board previously during the Obama Democratic convention.
    Reading viable and informational postings is definitely the scenario I see here as the type of discussion that is good for the soul ... and the VOTE.
    ISSUES are what we want to read and discuss. These past few weeks reading Obama-BOTS was just frightening, not enlightening.
    I am voting Republican in this election, because it is easy to see the RIGHT from the wrong.

  • Posted By: wildlifeusa @ 09/03/2008 3:02:05 AM

    THIS IS VERY DISTURBING... PLEASE PASS IT ON.
    Scott,

    Do me a favor, take the time to read this.. who ever posted this is amazing news. If you know any republicans, foward it to them, please.




    Personal, individual, independent life begins at birth. Until that event, the fetus is not an independent person. It is physically attached to an independent, self-viable human being in order to sustain it. The independent and viable human being, the mother, with all her rights as a citizen in a free society, has the right to make decisions refarding her own body and its processes, including pregnancy. Until the fetus is viable and able to sustain independent life as an individual, the decision on its termination rests with the mother. That is just.

    That is the wisdom of the law of this land, The United States of America, in Roe v. Wade.The misrepresentations and theologiical quotes do not belong in the forum of society based on reason and not on falsehoods or ancient and foreign superstitious doctrine. As in all other issues, the Republicans and conservative intend on destroying America with foreign influences, be they financial, as in the alliances with nonAmerican plutocrats from communist China to the princes of the suadi royal family. The American economy can shrivel and die as far as they're concerned, especially the labor unions whom the Republican party has persecuted for over a century, as long as the global economy and every person with anything less than unshakably stalwart and self-perpetuating independent wealth has been enslaved. That is the elitism they the Republicans embrace and solely represent.


    They don't care a thing about this country, except that it can be sucked dry. As the the fascists did in the Republics of Germany, Spain, Italy, and Japan. These antiAmerican movements are the model for this "neo"conservative Republican party. Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan were worse for America than Lenin or Stalin, because they were able to do effect their corruption of this country from the inside. bush is a continuation of this effort for moral, economic, political, governmental decay. Fred Thompson, the professional liar, the professional fraud, the mal-actor.

    Accused others of feeling the need the need to apologize for America. That is a lie. The liberals ad progressives feel no need to apologize for America. The conservatives and Republicans are not America. They are liars and traitors and desire to destroy America. It is the conservatives and Republicans and Fred Thompson, if they have any shred of decency or shame left in them, to apologize and answer for being the enemies of a free and prospersoud America. Rev. Jeremiah Wright's damnation was misplace. Every freedom-loving patriotic American should condemn the conservatives and their insurrectionist party, the Republican party. to the hottest, darkest and foulest corner of any hell that might exist.







    • Posted By: freshMeat @ 09/03/2008 4:25:04 AM

      Agreed, life does not begin at conception... take for example Jesus.

      • Posted By: edupro @ 09/03/2008 8:16:05 AM

        And we allow a law based on the perpetrated lie that "Roe" was a real case, define our society today? "Roe" herself has exposed the two female lawyers who set up this false scenario. If you are not aware of this information, then you do not read original source material and must rely on biased interpretations by others. Roe v. Wade is a bad law because it was based on false information. Define now what is wisdom and what is just.

  • Posted By: patriotusa1776 @ 09/03/2008 4:00:50 AM

    I love how the ignorant fool Liberals can say " Pro Choice...let the woman decide how to live" but yet, they make the same stupid laws that take our individual right to choose away like for example, by telling us to wear helmets, seat belts, taking guns away or taxing us to pay for welfare. All of that is ok, but its not ok to protect a little life that was created because a woman and man made a concious decision to have sex. You liberals need to pull your heads out of the sand....how STUPID YOU ARE!

    • Posted By: edupro @ 09/03/2008 8:02:31 AM

      Here! Here! It is high time we expose the fact that the CHOICE does indeed take place, and that there is total freedom of choice, to engage in activity. How ridiculous and selfish an argument "choice" is when it is actually a choice of preferred consequence and level of responsibility.

  • Posted By: Press Release @ 09/03/2008 4:32:11 AM

    The Alaska Legislature is investigating the firing of public safety commissioner Walt Monegan. The investigating committee disclosed the attorney's hiring on Monday, releasing an e-mailed letter it had received from the firm on Friday ??? the day McCain announced Palin would be his running mate.
    A senior McCain adviser, Tucker Eskew, said the law firm's hiring was part of a "weeks-old effort to provide this governor defense in a series of outlandish politically motivated charges" that were unrelated to the presidential campaign.
    The investigation will be conducted by a state-hired investigator working for a Republican-dominated legislative committee.
    ___
    Associated Press writer Steve Quinn contributed to this story from Anchorage, Alaska

    • Posted By: edupro @ 09/03/2008 7:52:30 AM

      Byron York, 9/2: From our conversation, it was clear that the McCain campaign paid a lot of attention to the so-called ???Troopergate??? issue. After all, unlike the ???fake baby??? story that has preoccupied the press, it is a real issue involving allegations that Palin abused her power. Last night, the McCain campaign distributed a "background guidance" memo to reporters on the issue. In our conversation, the strategist recounted much of the substance of that memo.

      ???Of course this issue came up in the vetting, and this is what we discovered,??? the source said. ???The man who was fired has said on the record that he was never pressured by the governor or the governor???s husband on the issue of firing Trooper Wooten. The governor had a vision for how she wanted that department to be run. The commissioner had a different vision.???

      ???The reason that members of the Palin family were having discussions with the head of the state police about this state trooper, who was her ex-brother-in-law, was because he had made threats against the family. He threatened to kill the governor's daughter, her father, and her sister. He tasered her 11-year-old stepson. And that is why the Palin family was concerned about this trooper.???

  • Posted By: Mavsreader @ 09/03/2008 7:26:57 AM

    Too bad, central to their "Country First" slogan, is another party does not put that first too. The "theys" Thompson kept referring to. Sorry republicans. You don't pass the "sniff test". Except for the war (which I guess they get a 'pass' for inexplicably), republicans will have to point to what they plan to do put 'country first'.
    Tonight should be fun night. Gov. Palin is qualified, because the republicans keep SAYING she is? Don't question us. That my friends is the republican-way. There should be a new word, to describe what republicans do, "republicanspeak". That's their ability to explain literally everything, that you might want to question or contend.
    This "republicanspeak" explains how Americans can both be far too liberal and NOW conservative too for the republican party. How does that work?

  • Posted By: GregHere @ 09/03/2008 6:45:38 AM

    ...........................Joe Lieberman is the epitome of the Slick Politician....he has no honor and will not stand up to who he is.....Joe is not a Democrat but he uses the title as political leverage.........he is not Independent either but a slippery Republican who is a bad example for anyone observing politics in America.

  • Posted By: loriw @ 09/03/2008 5:07:18 AM

    Here are the Lori awards for political convention coverage:
    Worst Political coverage award winner in several catagories... CNN! For Monday night's Anderson 360 when Cooper did not catch or question Obama when he compared running his campaign with Palin being mayor of Wasilla. Cooper did not inform Obama that Palin is Governor of Alaska and ask him to compare runnig the campaign to being a governor.

    • Posted By: loriw @ 09/03/2008 5:11:36 AM

      Worst Political coverage award winner CNN continued....Campbell helped by showing how an interview should NOT be done by displaying unprofessional and down right rude behavior toward the person she invited to the interview. But the real clincher was the Youtube humor video of McCain and Palin that CNN tried to pass off as "news" on the afternoon of the first full day of Republican convention coverage. Congratulations CNN on your "hard hitting "journalistic efforts.

      • Posted By: loriw @ 09/03/2008 5:16:39 AM

        In the MOST IMPROVED category for political convention coverage was NEWSWEEK. They managed to learn from past mistakes and are no longer placing Obama ads next to every pro-Obama article. But most importantly they have begun to provide some article on the other candidate, McCain, that weren't blatantly bashing and actually managed to write some articles that included the VP pick Sarah Palin.
        Congats Newsweek for your move in the right direction for unbiased reporting .

        • Posted By: loriw @ 09/03/2008 5:25:40 AM

          Now for the award for BEST POLITICAL COVERAGE ......GLENN BECK for his program Tuesday showing the true comparison of Obama and Palin. Unlike Cooper who totally missed the comparison that Obama tried to make with his campaign and Palin's MAYORAL term....GLENN BECK, being the thinker that he is, did a true comparison of Palin as GOVERNOR and Obama as campaign "manager". BECK has execellent yet so simple graphics of the vast differences in budgets and "employe" numbers. Let's just suffice it to say THERE IS NO COMPARISON...Palin wins by a landslide based on BECK'S research. GLENN BECK if you haven't already put those comparisons on your web site , Please do so in case some viewers missed them.

          • Posted By: loriw @ 09/03/2008 5:35:01 AM

            It looks like we have double catagory winner....GLENN BECK for most creative political satire since the JIB JAB video! Go to glennbeck.com and put in the search bar National Anthem and see the Russian national anthem with new lyrics about Obama. It can also be found on Youtube. CNN perhaps you would like to air the National Anthem as done by GLENN BECK on your "news" programming to balance out the "journalism" you had on Tuesday with the McCain youtube clip.
            What could you lose, CNN? You already are at the bottom, you could only go up!

  • Posted By: cerrojim @ 09/03/2008 2:31:32 AM

    GOP = Get Our Piece

    • Posted By: freshMeat @ 09/03/2008 5:27:02 AM

      GOP = Grand Oil Party ... Dig here, dig there, you can even dig in back yard of my 7 homes....

  • Posted By: mholmes @ 09/03/2008 3:18:02 AM

    Fred Thompson's speech was an A. Lieberman deserves an A+ just for stating the facts as he sees them. As a long-serving member of Congress (like McCain and UNLIKE Obama), he has seen the endless debate over issues that is attributable to party line pressure. We need our politicians to work together to make America better on a daily basis, not waiting around for another Pearl Harbor or 9/11 type of event to galvanize the country into a cooperative whole that can accomplish any task set before it. The first step in the correct direction would be the "line item veto" and a President who would wield that power evenly across the board. CUT THE PORK!
    ON THE OTHER HAND, Barack Obama doesn't have the pedigree to be President - he has passed no bills, sponsored no bills, thinks he is on the Treasury committee, or called it his committee when he claimed credit for legislation they passed while he was on his campaign tour of the middle east and Europe???? (not enough time to visit the wounded soldiers, though) - he's got nothing to do with that committee. All Barack Obama has done is campaign for higher office - in Illinois and while in the US Senate. His wife Michelle, said, after Barack secured the nomination, that it was "the only time, in my adult life, that I've been proud of America". What rock has she, and, I'm assuming, her husband been under? She was born in 1964, so I know she remembers the US hockey team beating Russia at the Olympics or Mary Lou Retton and then Kerri Strug (on one foot) winning Gold in gymnastics. She probably remembers the demolishing of the Berlin Wall, but must think it was because Ethiopia was sending Gorbachev nasty letters. Now, this woman presumes to tell me, or any other red-blooded American, about American family values??? Please.

    • Posted By: freshMeat @ 09/03/2008 5:24:28 AM

      I could respect the fact you disagree with Obama's views that is legit, but questioning is patriotism and experience is a joke.

      FYI Bush II is with the Carlie Group (bed with Saudis you know the people, not the Iraqis, that attacked us on 9/11) and had executive experience as governor of Texas so how do you think that experience has helped America prosper? Facts: Surplus gone, dept to our ears to China, more poverty, people making less then they were 8 years ago yet working more..

    • Posted By: freshMeat @ 09/03/2008 4:22:23 AM

      Give it a rest on Michelle Obama unlike the extreme right views of Palin she is not running for office.

      • Posted By: mholmes @ 09/03/2008 4:30:25 AM

        Why, freshMeat?? She is important enough to give a speech at the DNC and is a very well educated woman - is there some other reason her comments and beliefs should not be heeded? I would think that she reflects a lot of Baracks' views. It might be that to maintain the lie, she needs a teleprompter, just like her husband.

        • Posted By: freshMeat @ 09/03/2008 5:05:48 AM

          You are right she is well educated, self made, black women who has already said she loves her country at the DNC speech. Do you really believe that as her husband is running for president she is going to say I hate this country? Give it a rest. She miss spoke, people make mistakes... just like Palins daughter.

  • Posted By: Press Release @ 09/03/2008 2:17:55 AM

    To understand this plan, you have to understand the full impact of the plan. McCain doesn't only want HRC's defectors, as so many are suggesting, he also wants Obama loyalist, the undecided and the independents. By choosing a woman, immediately a very small unintelligent group of women will vote for McCain because he chose a women. This is a small group but worth mentioning. On the larger scale women don't vote for women because they are women, and simply putting a woman on the ticket won't compensate for their policy positions. The McCain Campaign is not worried about the larger scale of women who are intelligent and has high expectations concerning the broad issues on the economy, domestic and national security and health care. The McCain strategy is of no respect of a woman's intellect but her emotions. Here is the gamble of the McCain campaign.
    Not if, but when the McCain campaign provoke the Democrats to attack Mrs. Polin, or when the McCain campaign plant a man in their audience to heckle Mrs. Palin with a gender remark like " Go home and raise your five kids" or when the Obama campaign says anything to Mrs. Palin, the McCain Campaign will continue to cry foul by reason of gender bias. women all over will get upset, take offense and think that the democrats are attacking her because she is a women. Then the women all over the U.S. will throw their votes to McCain and Palin. Thus making it a good game play that lead to victory for McCain. Sadly Mrs Palin would have served her purpose and so would the American women also be of no more use to McCain. It will happen. So will the American women be ready to stand firm and don't fall for the McCain sneak-attack hype?

    • Posted By: cobalt6 @ 09/03/2008 2:25:08 AM

      Or will women be smart enough to see through all of Obama's BS and inexperience!!!

      • Posted By: freshMeat @ 09/03/2008 4:40:05 AM

        What you mean like Pro-Choice?

  • Posted By: Press Release @ 09/03/2008 4:31:32 AM

    Van Flein said that prior to his hiring by the state's Department of Law on Aug. 21, "We represented the governor and her husband privately." He declined to provide further details on that matter.
    The attorney said he doesn't know whether Palin suggested to the Alaska Department of Law that it hire him and said he bid for the work. Van Flein and another lawyer in his firm are billing the state $185 an hour under the contract.
    Lawyers aren't prohibited from such dual representation, but it could cause more than just billing headaches. In representing the governor's office, Van Flein's allegiance is to the office itself, not to Palin personally. Depending on where the investigation leads, that could put him in a difficult situation if Palin's interests and the interests of the public office diverge.
    The arrangement could also get murky if the case spawns a criminal investigation. Conversations between a client and her attorney are private but the laws nationwide are inconsistent over whether similar conversations between a governor and her lawyer are private in a criminal investigation.
    That's why both President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have consulted with private attorneys from time to time.
    George Kuhlman, the ethics counsel for the American Bar Association, said there is no ethical prohibition under guidelines for dual representation for the governor.
    "Until you have all the particulars, there's no reason to say there's even likely to be an inherent conflict of interest," Kuhlman said. "It's going to be completely dependent on what the facts are."
    David Jones, an assistant state attorney in Alaska, said the law department conducted a limited competitive solicitation that adhered to state law. Jones said the department contacted four lawyers and received two responses, from Van Flein and another attorney who proposed an hourly rate $142 more than Van Flein's firm.

  • Posted By: Press Release @ 09/03/2008 4:30:23 AM

    Lawyer Thomas Van Flein, who also previously represented the Palin family in another matter, said there was no conflict of interest in the dual representation arrangement. Van Flein is permitted to bill the state up to $95,000 for work in the current case, in which Palin is accused by the state legislature of having the public safety commissioner fired after he refused to fire a state trooper who divorced the governor's sister.
    Van Flein saw no problem with the arrangement. "Our representation is dual but the billing is not," he said in a telephone interview from Anchorage. "Matters involving a personal issue will not ??? and have not ??? been billed in the government contract."
    Van Flein said that prior to his hiring by the state's Department of Law on Aug. 21, "We represented the governor and her husband privately." He declined to provide further details on that matter.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse