Campaign 2008

The GOP's Natural

For at least one night, Sarah Palin showed the Republicans a star power to match Obama

 
GALLERY
Game On

The also-rans attacked. And after much build-up, Sarah Palin took the stage.

 
 
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

This crazy election has more weird twists than "Trapped in the Closet." First Hillary seems invincible, then Obama wins Iowa, then Hillary weeps her way back into it, and McCain's dead in the water, except then he starts lugging his own bags, and people learn about Mormons, and somehow McCain wins—but, hey at least it's not Rudy—and then Hillary seems certain to lose but won't admit it, but then she finally does lose and some time later actually does admit it, and meanwhile her husband sulks, and Reverend Wright stews, and John Edwards, um, happens, and before you know it we've got a black nominee drawing crowds like the Beatles and history just pops off like firecrackers. And then we get Sarah Palin.

It helps to keep the backstory in mind when taking in Wednesday night's program at the Republican National Convention, the latest and almost-zaniest twist in the whole zany affair. Even after all the dazzling political theater of the last year or so, Palin's speech still had the power to astound—and mainly for reasons she intended. To say she is poised doesn't do her justice. Thrown onto the national stage with little time to prepare, she looked more at home up there than almost any of the elders who preceded her to a microphone, in either party's convention. And she's not keeping things safe and sedate. Like a certain obscure state senator four years ago, she has the knack that all really gifted performers have, of working the room on the fly, of drawing people to her.

Palin's speech was most potent when most personal. Lucky for her, a great deal of it was personal. She's pretty clearly running on biography. But with a family like hers, it's hard to imagine running on anything else. She is—again, like Obama—some peculiar mix of traditional American success story and envelope-busting freak show. At 44, she's running a state. But one of her children is—oh, let's skip the biography, you watched the speech too. How will the nation deal with somebody like this, a politician who addresses the multitudes while her six-year-old licks her palm to smooth the hair of the special-needs four-month-old right offstage? Just when you thought this election might start making sense, the country finds itself back in the uncharted part of the map, where the illustrations of dragons go.

Palin did a smooth job of bridging her story to the business at hand, i.e. getting elected. Though just about every speaker in the Twin Cities has found a way to present John McCain's military record as a grounds for making him president, no one has done so more effectively than she did with one golden line. "He's a man who wore the uniform of this country for 22 years, and refused to break faith with those troops in Iraq who have now brought victory within sight," she said. "As the mother of one of those troops, that is exactly the kind of man I want as commander in chief." But it's also telling that the only real energy dip in what was otherwise a raucously received speech came when she left biography behind and talked purely about issues. A little stumble on global oil security had the look of the trapeze artist sneaking a peek at the ground.

If the theatricality of Palin's speech pointed the way toward the future—after watching her and Obama, you have to wonder: are Generation X's political leaders just going to be way better at this stuff than their predecessors? —there were also times when her novelty fused with the thuddingly, depressingly familiar. Because with all due respect to whatever kid roughed up the young Barry Obama in Indonesia many years ago, he might never have been on the receiving end of a beatdown like this one. Palin last night revealed herself to be a culture warrior of the old school—a school that, alas, doesn't seem to be closed after all. From mocking his community organizing job—really? Social work is fair game now? —to taunting him about the "Styrofoam Greek columns" of his convention stage, she kept finding new and more vicious ways to abuse, and not just Obama himself: Small town folks, she said, "are always proud of America" —a not-so-subtle dig at his wife.

Now, I'm all in favor of a good political bloodletting. For the half hour or so before Palin took the stage, Giuliani did what he always does: firing off insults, making wisecracks, shamelessly spraying Rudyness all over the place. No matter how repellent you find the man or his message, it's hard not to enjoy how grotesque and delicious a show he puts on. But with Palin there's an edge that sounds new. While Obama is crafting a post-boomer politics by using his literary gift, life story, and golden tongue to bring people together, Palin, on the evidence presented so far, moves beyond boomer categories with her own original story, her own preternatural poise, and a method of political attack that is far snarkier and more up-to-the-minute than any you expect to hear coming from the mouth of someone who might very soon be the most powerful person on the planet. "What does he actually seek to accomplish, after he's done turning back the waters and healing the planet?" she asked of Obama. (For what it's worth, this is the exact angle that snark god Jon Stewart and his correspondents have been taking while mocking him lately.)

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Navarro-2008 @ 10/23/2008 7:58:53 AM

    And to think Bobbie told me you were smart!
    Another deluded individual.

  • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/16/2008 8:04:18 PM

    Obama's view of the future of America - Socialism which is the next step to Communism!!


    Under socialism a ruling class of intellectuals, bureaucrats and social planners decide what people want or what is good for society and then use the coercive power of the State to regulate, tax, and redistribute the wealth of those who work for a living. In other words, socialism is a form of legalized theft.

    The morality of socialism can be summed-up in two words: envy and self-sacrifice. Envy is the desire to not only possess another's wealth but also the desire to see another's wealth lowered to the level of one's own. Socialism's teaching on self-sacrifice was nicely summarized by two of its greatest defenders, Hermann Goering and Bennito Mussolini. The highest principle of Nazism (National Socialism), said Goering, is: "Common good comes before private good." Fascism, said
    Mussolini, is "a life in which the individual, through the sacrifice of his own private interests??realizes that completely spiritual existence in which his value as a man lies."

    Socialism is the social system which institutionalizes envy and self-sacrifice: It is the social system which uses compulsion and the organized violence of the State to expropriate wealth from the producer class for its redistribution to the parasitical class.

    Despite the intellectuals' psychotic hatred of capitalism, it is the only moral and just social system.

    Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as traders--that is, as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent.

    Capitalism is the only just system because the sole criterion that determines the value of thing exchanged is the free, voluntary, universal judgement of the consumer. Coercion and fraud are anathema to the free-market system.

    It is both moral and just because the degree to which man rises or falls in society is determined by the degree to which he uses his mind. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one's birth or station in life.

    Yes, there are winners and losers in capitalism. The winners are those who are honest, industrious, thoughtful, prudent, frugal, responsible, disciplined, and efficient. The losers are those who are shiftless, lazy, imprudent, extravagant, negligent, impractical, and inefficient. [What about the role of luck­being in the right place at the right time or the wrong place at the wrong time? R. R. Pope}

    Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice. This applies to both the business executive and the carpenter, the lawyer and the factory worker.

  • Posted By: good conscience @ 09/19/2008 12:21:31 PM

    To Jeremy McCarter: Although you make a couple of good points in your story, I think that all the praise you're giving Palin is a little thick and sugary. She truly did have a few moments of glory in her initial speech at the convention, but let's remember a few other points. A) The speech was written by some of the smartest political speech writers out there, ones who have been around for yrs and yrs, and who have a great deal of experience in their chosen fields. B) She was ordered to be as nasty and vitriolic as she was, something that you don't find in Obama speeches. Just because she found a way to adequately deliver her very scripted and rehearsed performance doesn't make her the mover of mountains that you're touting. C) I am highly insulted that you imply that no matter how sickening Rudy is, he's still great to watch. Just having his hideous visage on my TV screen is like chugging an entire bottle of ipecac on an empty stomach! So please spare me any ploy you may launch at colluding with everyone on the Rudy issue. He stinks.
    For those who've shrieked that Sarah had almost as many viewers as Barack did they forget that the only good reason for it was because she is very new, and everyone wanted to see what the brouhaha was about. It's very unlikely that even now, the McShame/Failin' ticket could muster a group of 84,000 and fill a huge sports arena.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg