The GOP's Natural

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: bestrongusa @ 09/04/2008 3:16:47 PM

    It seems that the Democratic Party and the Liberal News Media are running scared right now. They cheapen
    themselves with their petty but vicious rebuttles toward a woman doing the work of ALL VP nominees. They
    hate the fact that she has elecctrified the RNC and maybe others as did Obama in his speaches to the DNC and the country. You say "where's the beef"? She was very clear in her statements about energy independence playing a primary role in both the economy and our foreign policy decisions. Howevver, unlike the Far Left, she did share a plan based on what we can do now and to be followed by persistant efforts to resolve this situation in America. I have heard of nothing which comes close to a real alternative
    from the Dems. The Dems need to forsake their Far Left and get in touch with the most important issues
    facing our nation. When are we going to get off this pro-choice, pro-life argument. We have laws that govern this issue. I would like to believe that Obama is the man that I heard at the DNC in a wonderfully orated speech. But Sarah did point out what I considered a character flaw when she brought to our attention how he speaks to his audiences desires and therefore reveals himself to be inconsistant. I hope that Sarah is the real deal and will not speak one way to one audience and another to a differently orientated audience.

    I am not a fan of either the Far Left nor the Far Right. While I believe that niether party has clearly defined an
    economic policy, I am much more favorable to what I have heard from McCain/Phalin than Obama/Biden. As
    to foreign policy?? " A Strong America!!!! " Our foreign policy begins at home. Where is JFK when the country really needs a JFK. Sorry Obama, you are not a JFK. Niether is McCain/Phalin, but at least I have a
    good idea of where they stand and what issues are "within their pay grade". I have to vote McCain/Phalin
    this time.

    • Posted By: northcan @ 09/04/2008 3:40:37 PM

      Are you kidding me???? She's the best lovefest I've seen for Obama voters. This woman has seduced the pants off every man and woman at the convention...and your still walking around uncovered. Sarah Palin is the next "Pitbull with Lipstick" dumbass.....if her psychotic ambition thinks America bought her great scripted, practiced for 5 hours speech. I could do that, my young children could do that. It was her hilarious face expressions and childish rhetoric that got me laughing and frightened at the same time. She's a true extremist "Pitbull with Lipstick" and her campaign with McCain on HER ticket will be great in Georgia, oversees, perhaps even Russia....but, people want a real patriot, not a showboat like 'Anna Nicole Smith' s blind ambiiton. She has nothing any other mother in America doesn't have, or myself for that matter and I raised 3 children on my own income while holding down an executive position. My resume tops hers as many throughout this country do. Only, their staff didn't ask for her resignation or impeachment for both the Mayoral and governorship office as her's did. She had to leave.....this is a planned since at least January of 2008 to go against Hillary voters originally, that's why she met with Cheney in April....were she was offered it face to face, but actually offered it on the phone from V.P. Cheney in January when he spoke with her several times about the V.P. spot, before the Democratic Primaries started. Several of Cheney's inner circle new of this, also Fox News....who always gets the WH talking points. This was John McCain's Presidency under certain circumstances. Big oil Alaska, Hillary and the woman vote had so much relevance then, moreso now. It's not about Palins qualifications, but her state and her mouth.

  • Posted By: dragonspray @ 09/04/2008 3:35:28 PM

    lizpl writes: "You talk as if Palin wrote that 'wonderful' speech herself. When I listened to her speaking, it sounded as if she was simply reading words off a page that someone else wrote for her."

    And whose words are on the pages and teleprompter that Obama is reading from? Jon Favreau. Adam Frankel. Ben Rhodes. (please do your homework, dear commentor). Obama may read them better, but that only means he's a better actor.

  • Posted By: peachy101 @ 09/04/2008 3:28:21 PM

    Hey careerdaytrader you've forgotten about the middle class and lower middle class who in my opinion is the backbone of America. I'm an Obama supporter and I'm anything but Un American as you would say. I'd like to compare MY CLASS to that middle child who always tends to be left behind and out of focus. Funny how I don't depend on any government assistance IE., "WELFARE" but there is no SPECIAL tax cuts for us and we don't qualify for anything so it's about time we get somebody in who understands this unfair balance of lets help the rich get richer and the middle class can keep trying to make ends meet so sounds like you're an over indulgent brat that has no idea what it's like to struggle so people like you should stop DRAGGING America down by their self righteous attitude!!

    • Posted By: blackcourt @ 09/04/2008 3:33:09 PM

      Are you employed? When your employer is forced to pay more taxes to the government because of the decisions that Obama makes do you think your employer is going to pay for them? Do you think the corporations that Obama wants to tax are going to absorb those extra taxes? Or do you think its more likely that they are going to pass it on to you. Either by not giving you just compensation, smaller raise or maybe they'll just charge you more for whatever it is that you want to buy. Its great that you might get a $1000 less in taxes... until you realize that you are spending an additional $2000 to help those companies recoup those losses. Yeah... Nobama!!!

  • Posted By: Saved and not taking it anymore @ 09/04/2008 3:32:54 PM

    I would say please do not insult Senator Obama insofas Palin being a 'match' !

    But what I will say is please don't insult the rest of us Newsweek - your analogy of matching beneath you as a semi-trusted magazine.

    Any pit-bull (trained and untrained) knows how to attack.
    But where does this attack lead to? Does it equate to leadership?
    Do we really need a degree to answer these questions?

    I have earned my right to speak not as a democrat, but as a concerned citizen.
    I am a registered democrat and I have voted for a republican president since 1988 except once. Even in the great common wealth of Virginia I have crossed my party line voting whom I believe to be the best person for the job based on my conservative values.

    Liberal is no longer a dirty word to me, I am ashamed of what we as a nation have come to represent.

    The republican party has no honor, and what little remains are at risk. This party has proven that they will lie, steal, cheat and manipulate any truth! The state that our country is in??? is deplorable, we are in war on two fronts, our economy is putting families out of jobs and their homes. The audacity that ANY conservative (especially those of the Christian faith) to attack another citizen because they are frustrated and infuriated at what we as a nation have become. I used to support Senator McCain, but he is not a man of honor. News Flash???he was not the first POW, nor will he be the last. My father fought as well for his county putting his life on the line. His humility was lived by his actions. Senator McCain has one AMBITION to be president, not to lead and certainly no to serve.
    This is the best that America has to offer? Someone stated last night that Senator Biden should be scared. We all know he is not but every TRUE G-d fearing American should be concerned of the show that was displayed last night. Because I can smile in your face, wag my finger and call you everything but a child of God proves I got guts, but it does not equate to leadership of this magnitude.

    Senator Obama???s call to Senator McCain to come up and address the REAL issues of our nation has fallen on deaf ears. What we heard last night was an abomination ??? We the American people deserve better than what we have been offered.

    By the way, I am also ???evangelical???. I believe abortion is murder (5th commandment) yet I believe in a person???s right to choose ??? why because the bible says so; Book of ???Joshua says choose ye this day whom ye will serve.???
    I believe marriage is defined between one man and one woman! I believe homosexuality is a great sin ??? But perhaps if we as Christians TRULY represented G-d our Father, then we would not be double-minded in our walk and in our talk. Our pulpits have become platforms for politics and the advancement of individual ambition. The bible says, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature ??? when did the word of G-d become insufficient for spreading the word

  • Posted By: sunshinedaisy @ 09/04/2008 3:27:00 PM

    I do not understand why a Democrat would watch and listen to the Republican convention. Naturally you will hear criticism of your candidate. and now you are boiling mad. My friends, this is a partisan convention. Last week, I heard the same trashing and bashing done by the Democrat against the Republican.

    • Posted By: democratgal @ 09/04/2008 3:31:09 PM

      I watched the Republican convention as closely as I watched the Democratic convention - because if this is what we have settled on - two political parties - I want to express my support with a vote - and I want to do it feeling very confident of my choice. I can't do that without giving both parties the same respect.

  • Posted By: Mwalimu @ 09/04/2008 11:39:31 AM

    Palin is very definitely a "natural."
    In her debut, she already lied several times. For instance, she claimed to be an outsider, but she is no stranger to Washington, going there frequently to lobby for earmarks and porkbarrels for both her home town and Alaska.
    In addition, she lied about the energy crisis. More drilling will not bring down the price of oil. And nuclear energy, McCain???s pet pork barrel solution, contains many environmental risks.
    While she trashes Obama for being a community organizer and seeking to help workers displaced by the global economy, She also trashes Obama???s energy plan which would free us from fossil fuels in 10 years and provide millions of high quality green collar jobs.
    Although she loves to smear Obama, Palin seems totally that in 2006 alone, 5,840 American workers died in fatal workplace injuries, and that 50,000 to 60,000 workers died from occupational diseases. My source for this inofmration is USW@Work, published by the United Steel Workers Union, which brings up another irony.
    While Palin claims to come from a humble background, she hates labor unions and blames them for unemployment. If only American workers would accept the same wages and working conditions as the workers in Bangladesh, India, or Colombia, we would not have unemployment.
    This of course is the BIG reason Palin is the GOP???s North Star.
    She can successfully turn one segment of the working class against the other: the workers in American against the workers in Colombia, the blue collar workers against elitists like Obama and the Democratic party who want to help the little man. The GOP thrives on this sort of division because they want to keep a large segment of the population bitter, angry, frustrated, and divided so that the corporations an rob this underclass of every penny they earn. The GOP is of course joined by the mega-buck, mega-church preachers of the evangelical right, who use the Sunday offering plate as an additional way to rob working class people.
    No wonder the GOP hates Obama.
    Palin, as well as the GOP, assume that the Bubbas of this country are stupid. They fell for this plan of attack before - they???ll fall for it again. What we???re seeing is is Palin not a new, maverick, reformist GOP, but the same old GOP in a new package. (Old product, new label.)
    I just hope the working class of this country gets smart and gets smart fast.

    • Posted By: olderwiser @ 09/04/2008 11:50:16 AM

      Yes, Mwalimy, the "drilling in Alaska" solution to the price of gasoline is more "horse hockey" from the hockey mom. Most of that oil gets on tankers and goes to Japan. No problem. Oil is a worldwide market. If we buy it from Alaska, ship it to Louisiana or Texas and make gasoline out of it, it still costs the price of the worldwide market set by the major producers, mostly in Arabia and Russia. Gasoline remains the same price because the price of a barrel is set by OPEC, regardless of what comes from the ground in our country. Hockey Mommy wants more drilling in Alaska because Alaska gets a whopping share of the money from the sale of the oil, and screw the rest of the country on that deal. It's hard not to have a surplus of money there because of the awesome money coming in and the small population to receive it. No big job there. Give her credit for getting some of the crooks's hands off of it. Not much more available, though. Hope that Mc Cain lives through his term if they win.

      • Posted By: RiversideWarrior @ 09/04/2008 12:40:10 PM

        Concur 100%, they are banking on stupid people voting again like they have for the last 8 years of Bush.She struck me as an arrogant, cocky and self-righteous Christian Fundamentalist, something the kooks and crooks crowd that rules the Republican party for the last 8 years frequently has put on display. I look forward to the time when she will have to defend her positions on the accumulating debt and death of the last 8 years, being anti-choice, anti-contraception (something that apparently might have helped her 17 yr. old daughter rather than preaching "abstinence") and anti-equal pay for equal work between men and women. I relish the prospect of voters getting to know her position in these important areas rather than her being the PTA president of Wasilla City.

        • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 3:30:46 PM

          Of course, there is a price to ship oil across oceans in the volume our country consumes. That gets passed on to consumers, as well as costs of ethanol, which fluctuate with the futures market (as corn futures), and the cost to refine all the different grades of gas that are required by different states' standards.

  • Posted By: tiredoflies @ 09/04/2008 3:19:35 PM

    If the republicans win the election in November, they are going to be very happy campers. Normal.

    Then, shortly thereafter, reality will set in. Those well off republicans will be happy for the next four or eight years. They will enjoy life paying for whatever they want.

    But what about the republicans who aren???t so well off? Those that will struggle to pay their rent or mortgage payments, fill their tanks, pay for health care and even buy their favorite foods and all the other things that goes with the cost of living. Having been there, I will really feel sorry for them. Yes, many democrats will be there too.

    But, at the same time I will feel a great sense of justice knowing they are experiencing the effects of their own votes to put McCain in office and that I, as well as all democrats, did not contribute to their plight. They will NOT be able to have whatever they want or perhaps even what they need while their well off counterparts will. One thing they will have though and at no extra cost. That is their memory of the lies, distortions, and hate spewed by their rich republican counterparts against a very intelligent Harvard law School graduate and State and US Senator who wanted nothing more than to make the country prosperous, NOT just the well off, but for them as well.

    What they, and all of us, will have is just MORE OF THE LAST EIGHT YEARS . . . .
    or perhaps, something even worse. And even if you like Palin, she is NOT the decision and policy maker, McCain is.


    One thing is for certain:

    After November 4th, there can be buyer???s remorse but there can???t be any going back.

    • Posted By: nc independent @ 09/04/2008 3:30:18 PM

      Of course there can be "buyers remorse" it is impeachment, something we should have done 4 years ago when Bush stole the votes to get elected. We have noone but ourselves to blame that we are in such a state that only the rich can run and be elected. I bet Old Abe is rolling in his monument at how elite we have suffered our government to become without any reaction at all.

  • Posted By: republicant @ 09/04/2008 3:28:17 PM

    Ha!! Look, her impressiveness is subjective. Some people will find her likeable and others will reject her. The important thing here is the issues. Given the limited time she has been in office, she already has some concerns. Can anyone ofer an informed comment on her positions without throwing out the "well where does Obama stand on that...." defense.

  • Posted By: Jake1988 @ 09/04/2008 2:18:53 PM

    I love her John Stewart humor! She is much more qualified to run the country and is more intouch with the American people then Obama the Arrogant.

    UVA for McCain/Palin

    • Posted By: metzlerd @ 09/04/2008 3:26:35 PM

      Qualified to take over Hanity's show maybe, but not to lead the country.
      She would need to grow an honest bone in her body first.

    • Posted By: neos @ 09/04/2008 2:27:37 PM

      The difference was that John was poking good-natured fun at Obama, and Palin was spearheading a mean-spirited attack machine. Watch John Stewart for the next few nights and see his real take on Palin.

  • Posted By: perfumeandpoison @ 09/04/2008 10:34:21 AM

    The only thing Palin did last night was read back what former Bush speechwriters and Republican supporters wrote FOR her. Don't think anything in that speech was original aside from her biographical information.

    • Posted By: careerdaytrader @ 09/04/2008 11:43:39 AM

      Maybe but when the teleprompter got ahead of her speech she delivered it from memory and like an intelligent PRO!

      When Obama's teleprompter did the same he stammered and stuttered and acted like the IDIOT he really is! Good job affirmative action to let somebody like Obama into Harvard!

      • Posted By: perfumeandpoison @ 09/04/2008 3:26:28 PM

        Sure, delivery is important, but at the root, that's nitpicking. They had to hire "tutors" for her and one or two of those were speechwriters, Former Bush lackeys. The other - foreign aid experts. So already, that speech was going to be slanted. I'd like for her to deliver a few truly original thoughts, that don't include info about her unfortunate, overexposed family, the plane she sold on eBay or her vetoing the "Bridge to Nowhere". This election is not about them. It's about her, her inexperience. She has alot to prove and needs to make America a little less uneasy about Grandpa McCain picking her. I will give it to her, that woman is an excellent orator, but talk is cheap and McCain is old. We'd just like to know if this country is going to be in good hands, you know...just in case....

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 09/04/2008 11:23:06 AM

      No more so than Hussein's HOPE and CHANGE.....

      Sep 4, 2008 ... Obama's speechwriters: Jon Favreau Ben Rhodes Clarence B. Jones Adam Frankel and many more...... Obama has a huge team of speechwriters.

      NOBAMA!!!

    • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 11:18:58 AM

      Every candidate has speech writers.
      The conservatives address the conservative concerns and the solutions they have to correct the problem, and the liberals address the liberal concerns and the solutions they have to correct the problem.

      Nothing any of the candidates say is original.

  • Posted By: druboats @ 09/04/2008 2:59:23 PM

    "Go John and Sarah - Educate these moron Democrats and wipe the FLOOR with their blood when you're done with them!"
    hatred, fear and war mongering is no way to run a country. unless you're a republican. i will not be scared into voting for McCain. that speech last night pushed me right into the Democrats corner.

    • Posted By: blackcourt @ 09/04/2008 3:02:12 PM

      By the sounds of it you were already there. Otherwise you might have taken a look at Obama and realized that he has never really done anything but talk about himself. Thats exactly what we need for our next President. He can write a book about the all the personal discoveries that he was able to make in the oval office.

      • Posted By: druboats @ 09/04/2008 3:08:48 PM

        your simlplistic view of Obama shows you can repeat what you hear but have not read beyond a foxnews headline. read a little about the candidates and get back to me.

        • Posted By: blackcourt @ 09/04/2008 3:11:40 PM

          Perhaps you could offer some examples for those of us who are "uneducated" about what he has accomplished. I'd love to see a list of things that he has done.

          • Posted By: druboats @ 09/04/2008 3:19:24 PM

            then stop being a smartass and read up on history. start with the US Senate website, go from there. do you need help in the john too?

            • Posted By: blackcourt @ 09/04/2008 3:26:01 PM

              Is this you admitting that he hasn't done anything? Because that comment doesn't appear to have a list in it to me.

  • Posted By: DUMPLIN @ 09/04/2008 11:40:19 AM

    OBAMA IS CONSTANTLY TALKING ABOUT HOW BAD THE ECONOMY IS. WHY DON'T YOU IN THE MEDIA DO YOUR HOMEWORK AND TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT IT. WHEN BUSH TOOK OFFICE CLINTON LEFT THE ECONOMY IN A NEGATIVE GROWTH PERCENTILE. OVER THE LAST EIGHT YEARS IT HAS GROWN IN THE PLUS SIDE EVERY QUARTER BUT TWO AND IT STILL IS UNDER BUSH. IN SPITE OF THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS PUTTING UP BARRIERS AND THE MEDIA FABRICATING STORIES ABOUT HOW HORRIBLE THE HOUSING MARKET IS. THE HOUSING MARKET FLUCTUATES ALL THE TIME. THE REASON THE MEDIA DOES THIS IS TO MAKE THE AMERICAN PUBLIC BELIEVE THAT TAX CUTS ARE BAD, JOBLESSNESS IS ON THE RISE AND EVERYONE AND THEIR DOG IS LOSING THEIR HOUSE. I AM BETTER OFF THAN I WAS UNDER CLINTON AND GEORGE BUSH AND HIS WIFE HAVE CONDUCTED THEMSELVES HONORABLY. THE LIBERALS AND COMMUNISTS IN THIS COUNTRY AND OUR ALLIES JUST CAN'T SEEM TO UNDERSTAND THAT CONSERVATISM AND SELF RELIANCE ARE THE KEYS TO A FLOURISHING ECONOMY. WHEN THE COUNTRY AS A WHOLE DOES WELL THEN ANY ONE WITH DRIVE AND A WILLINGNESS TO DO HARD WORK CAN GET AHEAD AND HAVE PRIDE IN THEMSELVES.. HARD WORK ARE THE KEY WORDS HERE, THOSE WHO ARE NOT WILLING TO WORK HARD, THEY ARE THE WHINERS IN THIS SOCIETY.

    • Posted By: raddave @ 09/04/2008 12:28:24 PM

      Oh the media has fabricated the housing market story? Wow, I am so glad you cleared that up for me.

      • Posted By: akansan @ 09/04/2008 1:06:19 PM

        The housing market has followed the same path of the tech bubble. Please remember, the Tech bubble bust is what started all the negative comments on the economy. For the past eight years, the negative economy talk has continued. Yes, the economy looked good under Clinton, but it was fueled by overspeculation on high tech products that proved overvalued. The housing market has followed along the same path - everyone trading up to houses that they can't afford. (And should some of those people take some responsibility for their own problems?) The market is now righting itself. Houses that are selling in my area at 10% more than they were five years ago...and 30% less than they were one year ago. That's a correction.

        • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 3:25:05 PM

          That is correct. Different sectors of the economy fluctuate all the time. Their stock prices rise in one sector or another, and then the bubble bursts. The housing market is no different.
          I will also agree that the media has a lot to do with the flagging economy. I've can't tell you how many times I've heard that the "jobless numbers surprisingly shrank" this quarter. So many times there is good news to report about the economy, it is described as "surprising" or some other term that implies that there is some underlying problem.

          The run-up on oil over the last couple of years by speculators, I would venture to guess, is the biggest issue facing Americans' daily lives. The housing mess only effects a small number of people (when considering the national percentage of homeowners). Of course, it does effect builders and brokerages due to the trickle down effect, but that still doesn't affect the typical family the way gas prices do.

          The only viable answer to address the gas price issue is to diversify energy sources, INCLUDING tapping into our domestic resources until sustainable technology is implemented into society (be it electric, hybrid, or whaever). But first, the technology will have to be developed, then it will have to be mass produced and affordable. You can't just abandon your current system, you have to gradually migrate to a new one.

          OK, I went off on a tangent on the energy issue...but I think I'll still keep it in my post...lol

      • Posted By: 4astrongamerica @ 09/04/2008 1:56:52 PM

        This housing situation was also caused by people buying more house than they could afford. Explain to me how that is anyone else's fault? The reality is if you can't afford it - don't buy it. My husband works a second job because we needed a larger house so that we could help take care of my parents. We certainly didn't expect someone to just give it to us or give us a great rate because we were nice people. At some point personal responsibility has to come into play.

  • Posted By: democratgal @ 09/04/2008 3:24:34 PM

    By the way - if anyone thinks that any 'Hillary' supporter would wear a button that said "The Hotttest VP from the Coolest State".....think again! Those votes are NOT going that way!

  • Posted By: Mariann Pepitone @ 09/04/2008 12:54:50 PM

    Riverside Warrior: When your talking about crooked republican's remember these names, Farrakhan, Wright, Rezko, Ayers and Father P. Ring a bell? Those are the close freinds of Obama Hussein. And he learned how to be as crooked as them sabotaging the woman who ran against him for the senate. Obama and Pelosi both sabotaged Hillary on her delegates that's how he became the nominee. Hillary was a fool for not sabotaging him last Wednesday. You can bet that Palin would not stand for the DNC sabotaging her. She knows how to fight back, says what she means and means what she says.

    • Posted By: neos @ 09/04/2008 1:09:14 PM

      And in the name of Jesus I exorcise the demon Karl Rove from you! Out, demon out!

      • Posted By: nc independent @ 09/04/2008 3:24:13 PM

        Is that the only thing you can say is out Carl Rove? At least post a comment instead of that ridiculous rant everytime.

  • Posted By: lvbartman @ 09/04/2008 3:24:08 PM

    So, after tax evasion (agnew), can't even spell "potato" (quayle), shooting a "friend" (cheney), what repuclican hijinks are in store from palin?

  • Posted By: *KMP* @ 09/04/2008 3:04:06 PM

    I consider myself an independent, not belonging to either "party". I don't like to be labeled and are raising my children to be the same. I will never base my vote on party, race, or gender. What I do base it on is issues, facts, intelligence and what I would like to see and think should be mandatory is a "good speaker" yes like Barack Obama & Sarah Palin (it would be a refreshing change from what I've had to endure every time I listen to Bush or McCain try to speak). But what Americans REALLY should consider is foreign policy exposure, we need this so much more than ever at this time! What I hear from the Repulicans lately is an echo from the Obama camp, Now they're wanting the troops home, Now they're talking reform, ect... But let us Not forget---John McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time (not a leader, a follower), Palin is plain and simple NOT experienced AT-ALL in Washinton must less foreign policy! This person could be running our country???? I think if my tea-cup Yorkie was running under the Repulican Ticket They would RALLY and try to prove that he was experienced and ready on "Day One" to run our country!!!

    • Posted By: blackcourt @ 09/04/2008 3:24:01 PM

      So how exactly is Obama more qualified than McCain in running this country, its wars and its foreign policy? I mean did I miss something or has this guy been responsible for running something? At least Palin has been responsible for running a state and on top of it has an 83% approval rating doing so. The Senate... where Obama works... has a 13% approval rating. What a terrific record the Democratic majority has there.

  • Posted By: speakingthetruth @ 09/04/2008 12:28:09 PM

    Well said Beth Indiana. I was extremely disappointed with Sarah Palin's much anticipated debut. I was expecting to hear her tell us all what makes her so qualified to run as McCain's VP and what expectations she has of herself should the Republicans win the election. Instead it was the same 'ol same 'ol. She had no focus on why we should vote Republican but plenty of reasons why to not vote Democrat. If she wants to spend all of her time bashing Senators Obama and Biden, she may as well have cut down McCain's "experience" as well. Sure he may be a war hero but how does that make him better qualified to run a country? I certainly hope that the undecided women of this country do not vote for McCain/Palin simply because of Palin. Sure the idea of making history is great and all but at what cost? She doesn't even come close to representing Hillary's ideals so she's hardly a good substitute.

    • Posted By: fxs1958 @ 09/04/2008 3:21:02 PM

      I can only imagine the millions of calls received by mental health offices this morning .Liberals are losing whats left of there minds, a strong woman has just appeared on the national stage and didnt blame anyone for holding her back. My God whats the world coming too. I suggest you all just work it out with your shrinks take a Ativan and try to get a life.

    • Posted By: missconservative @ 09/04/2008 12:46:27 PM

      speakingthetruth, you've brought up an excellent point. I was so turned off at Palin's speech last night and her obvious attempt to evoke the spirit of Hillary, it fired me up! Although I never voted for Hillary in the primary, I'm ready to donate money to her post-campaign attempt to pay off debt. Palin cannot walk in Hillary's shoes and is NOT ready to go toe to toe with Dmitry Medvedev, Nouri al Maliki, or even Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. They would laugh in her face, just as I do now at her lack of experience. And I'm a woman!!!!

  • Posted By: tiredoflies @ 09/04/2008 3:20:47 PM

    Palin employs the ???bitter??? comment:

    About Obama???s ???bitter??? comment. It was totally misunderstood from the beginning. The media heard it and did NOT understand what Obama was saying as often happens when you hear only part of something.

    The group he was talking to in San Francisco understood what he was saying. Once the media ran with it, all Obama could do was distance himself

    What Obama was trying to say to people was this:

    Referring to the Upper Midwest region:

    You had your jobs, your pensions, your health care, your livelihoods ripped away from you. So the things you have left (your most valued possessions): your faith your families, your guns (because you???re a hunting community) your friends, you don???t want to have them taken from you as well so you hold tight to those. Holding on to these valued things are what helps get us through the tough times.

    WHAT HE WAS REFERRING TO WERE THE FIRST AND SECOND AMMENDMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTION. THE AMMENDMENTS THAT REFER TO ???FREEDOM OF RELIGION??? AND ???THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.??? HE WAS SHOWING THAT HE FEELS THE PLIGHT OF THOSE IN THIS SITUATION. HE WAS SAYING WHEN YOU LOSE EVERYTHING ELSE, YOU HAVE THOSE BECAUSE THEY ARE GUARANTEED TO YOU AND THEY CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.

    He was sympathizing with them and his comments were taken the wrong way by the MSM and that was the story from that point on, the misinterpreted story. And now the REPUBLICANS ARE TRYING TO INSTILL MORE HATE WITH IT

    Obama is the one who has suffered here just because he sympathized with them and the MEDIA GOT IT WRONG.

  • Posted By: garbo527 @ 09/04/2008 12:40:47 PM

    to latinaUSA- the reason why educated amercians use the term black is because that is what they are. black, brown, white. why is it that people want to seperate americans into african, asian, etc? we are all amercians. i would like people to say german-american from now on instead of white. I am american through and through and proud of it!

    • Posted By: Atlantagirl37 @ 09/04/2008 12:49:19 PM

      The reason white americans refer to blacks as African American is because the African American or black people, because they go out of their way to promote being African American with their specialized TV channels, Radio stations, etc. They promote that terminology, not just white people. They want to be known for their heritage more than they want to be known as an American.

      • Posted By: cwhite2008 @ 09/04/2008 3:16:07 PM

        If African Americans don't promote our tv, radio, and newspapers, etc., then what are we left with? Hum let me see I know, the right not to vote, cleaning white people houses, no forum to voice our opinions, poverty, no education. Yeah I get it now! That's what people like you want! You don't want us to be able to relate to anything other than the sound of a whip cracking across our backs! Go Barack!!!!!!!!!! Maybe he can begin to eliminate this stereotypical behavior of your bigot type culture!!!

      • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 09/04/2008 1:24:15 PM



        Every race celibrates their ethinic heritage! what is your point? i fail to see why you don't make this point? why is it that you only notice it when you see the black culture celibrate their history. is it because it offends you?

    • Posted By: Jack 8590 @ 09/04/2008 12:48:11 PM

      Holy Roller - if you eliminate Obama you get Clinton. She would take down McCain in a heart beat. Be careful what you ask for, you might just get it!

      • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 09/04/2008 12:53:15 PM

        Jack....I came to admire Hillary...Our country would have survived her. I know she LOVES this nation and would have done whatever necessary, to protect our homeland and children. Hussein Obama will not. He admires and sympathizes with Islam......and he is a silly little sissy.

        NOBAMA!!!

        • Posted By: Jack 8590 @ 09/04/2008 1:01:31 PM

          Holy - He's not as weak as you think. If he was able to take out "our" Hilary, he will demolish McCain, not to mention Palin. O'Reilly is an idiot - you are too smart to be watching that drivel. He's like Olberman on steriods.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 09/04/2008 12:44:37 PM

      When you say "we are all Americans"...you are basically correct....there are however, serious doubts about Hussein Obamas' citizenship. He is getting served today....the he gets to apprar on The No Spin Zone. Gonna be a blast.

      NOBAMA!!!

  • Posted By: louisiana1 @ 09/04/2008 3:13:24 PM

    Comment: read the head lines above folks: "a star power to match Obama". LOVE IT
    even Newsweek got it right. why are all you anti- Palin people doing here? you know the news is smarter than you and you are not even reading what they write. like Shep Smith would say "fair and balanced"

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse