The GOP's Natural

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Stay Focused @ 09/04/2008 2:11:26 PM

    As an independent that leaned with the Dems, I got put off during the Democratic primary by the sexism displayed by the Obama supporters and the dems in general. How nasty it turned out to be. the media too piling on with their grade A sexism. This of course done by liberals. As I watched last night at the Republican delegates, men and women, I was taken by their focus on Sarah. When interviewed they were genuinely impressed by her charm and fighting spirit., unlike the dems who supported Obama who would have been derogatory and alluded to Hillary with the "b" word. Not only have the liberals proved to the world that they are sexist, they now show their negative colors about age. All of a sudden experience is important to the second spot on the ticket but not the first. What logic! Well, Obama with no experience has Biden. McCain with experience is old and may not finish his term so experience is important for Palin. With a 96 year old mother, McCain's odds of finishing out his term are as good as any candidate's. Palin will learn more from working with mcCain in one year than Obama will learn from the 3000 people he needs to talk to before he makes an informed decision. Dems move over. You are showing your true colors and it is not pleasant. Yopur socialistic platform is retro and doesn't promote wealth and prosperity amongst the middle class. Your same old song sounded refreshing after listening to Bush for 8 years, but now that we have a space between the media and Bush, your same old song i has been playing too long. It's a broken record.

  • Posted By: gopsuxDOTcom @ 09/04/2008 2:10:20 PM

    REPUBLICANS:



    Proclaim - "Left wing" media sexism on Palin
    Reality - Audience members wearing "hottie" VP buttons


    Proclaim - "We're going to shake up the establishment"
    Reality - Isn't McCain the establishment?


    Proclaim - Palin's "personal" issues should be private.
    Reality - Spend $40 million on a Starr report into BC "personal" life


    Proclaim - We're the party of family values, country first, and God.
    Reality - Selective memory/unconditional forgiveness when it comes to their members and condemn all others.


    Proclaim - Palin: "I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a ???community organizer,??? except that you have actual responsibilities."
    Reality - Do I really need to explain this one?


    Proclaim - Palin has more experience than Obama/Biden.
    Reality - Passing ordinances for "Moose X-ings" doesn't count


    Proclaim - McCain is the change we need in Washington.
    Reality - McCain + GW = McSame





    p.s. The 80's called. They want their convention back! :)

  • Posted By: ApostasyUSA @ 09/04/2008 9:54:21 AM

    Since Palin's nomination last week, these issues also are raising eyebrows:
    _In her earlier career as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, Palin hired a lobbyist to help the tiny town secure at least 14 earmarks, worth $27 million between 2000-2003. McCain has touted Palin as a force in his long battle against earmarks.
    _Under her leadership this year, Alaska asked for almost $300 per person in requests for pet projects from Stevens, one of McCain's top adversaries. That's more than any other state received, per person, from Congress.
    _Her husband, Todd, twice registered as a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a fierce states' rights group that wants to turn all federal lands in Alaska back to the state. Sarah Palin herself never registered as a member of the party, according to state officials, though party members said she attended a 1994 convention with her husband.
    _The head of the firm hired to defend Gov. Palin in a state ethics investigation was previously her family's lawyer and is permitted to bill the state up to $95,000 for work in the current case. It involves the dismissal of public safety commissioner Walt Monegan after he refused to fire a state trooper who had divorced the governor's sister.

    All you so called conservatives can talk about is base ball?

    • Posted By: ELLENMILTON @ 09/04/2008 2:10:09 PM

      ApostasyUSA: She also left the small town of Wasilla in debt by 22 million to build a sports complex rather than build a water and sewer system improvement that they needed. Guess she needed someplace for her kids to play and for her PIT BULL practice.

  • Posted By: whiterock @ 09/04/2008 2:09:35 PM

    I just want to say that I listened to all of Palin's speech and I was impressed! I am not a Republican and never will be but she nailed it last night! She made a clear case for why she had more practical, hands-on and relevant experience than Obama. If this country is willing to accept a man with few accomplishments and experience to be president than they should have no problem accepting a woman with a similar level of expertise (perhaps even better) as a V.P. No, she is no Clinton but she's not running for president, either. We can't have one standard for a man and another for a woman. I'm sure if Obama was a female, the media and public would be screaming about his lack of experience, too! But...he's a man and apparently that "different"...

  • Posted By: mrzoid @ 09/04/2008 2:06:45 PM

    So she came off as a hero to the far-right conservative base. She came off as a smug, smarmy, well (i dont give a f*ck if it's not pc, cause this is America), bitch to the people already in Obama's camp. The funniest thing is that it made no effort to speak to those in the middle, except to say, "what are you waiting for idiot, John McCain is better, only a fool would vote for OBAMA!!". I'm sorry, but I didnt hear anything about Obama that i hadnt heard before, or McCain, or Palin for that matter. It was basically spit on Obama's life night for the GOP. How does pissing on the work of Community Organizers and volunteers help anyone, and how did it draw laughs? "HAHA, helping the poor, how utterly foolish. Say old bean, would you like to join me in a polo match tommorow?" . There was nothing in any of the speeches that said what John McCain planned to do for the country; hel, even the "specifics" were: cut taxes, create jobs, win the war, defeat terrorism, drill for energy independence. F.Y.I, those arent specifics, they're talking points. So other than establishing that the defeated primary guys and the "hockey mom" know John McCain was a POW, and they don't like Obama, and scoff at every act in his life, while at the same time swiping at his wife, what was the message?

  • Posted By: Rianna58 @ 09/04/2008 12:27:29 PM

    What saddens me is seeing how some women are biting into the Sarah Palin apple, paricularly so-called Democratic women (i.e., traitors to the party and everything it stands for), when it's so obviously filled with poison. She does not have star power. What she has is an attractive face, a certain malicious charm, and the slavering attention of the media. Everyone seems to be forgetting what she thinks about the issues. This anti-choice, pro-death penalty, big oil loving, representative of the "Christian" right, seems to be missing the point of Christianity entirely. As a Christian, myself, it enrages me to see these people absolutely spewing hatred, which is very far from the teachings of Christ--and making us look like a bunch of hypocritical loonies to the entire world. During the Ex mayor of NY's speech when he rallied everyone to actually laugh at Obama, an audience, I might add, almost entirely composed of white people, it reminded me more of a Klan meeting than a political convention. For their arrogance, for their lack of humility, for their outright lies, for their racism, for their already proven failed policies, these people deserve to lose. Please, wake up American! Vote Obama.

    • Posted By: devon41 @ 09/04/2008 12:50:51 PM

      You nailed if Rianna58. I've been reading these comments trying to find a good analysis. It looked every bit like a KKK meeting spewing lies, hatred and raw racism.

      • Posted By: 29AARepublican @ 09/04/2008 2:04:56 PM

        I am a 29 year old female registered african american republican. And I have voted republican religiously ever since I was able to vote. Last night caught me off guard. I was truly sickened by the way my fellow republicans carried on "rhetoric, rhetoric, rhetoric". If I didn't see the colors red, I would have throught it was a blue party! Sarah Palin really lost a perfect opportunity last night to enlighten the people of the US on her stance on the economy, homeland security, etc.... She decided to waste it on school yard name calling. This is not the republican party I fell in love with. It resembled more of a KKK rally. I am hurt and truly disappointed and will not be voting Republican this term!

      • Posted By: RiversideWarrior @ 09/04/2008 1:40:03 PM

        Rianna hit it right on, all you could see in the convention hall was an over 90% white well-to-do crowd slurping down the red meat of attack vitriol put out by Giuliani and Palin. Contrast this to the DNC in denver where we saw a crosssection of Americans of all colors, shapes, sizes and walks of life. One party is living in the past of "Leave it to Beaver" the other represents our present and future.

  • Posted By: RinD @ 09/04/2008 2:04:46 PM

    The genius of the Palin pick is that Obama's defenders are now trying to prove that he is more qualified than her, since he can't prove that he's more qualified than McCain. Achilles22: You're seriously suggesting that Obama's experience as a campaigner is what makes him qualified to be President ("for those complaining about Obama's lack of experience as a counter agrument to this valid argument - he has campaigned for 20 months and earned the nomination")? Seriously? The fact that he spent 20+ months of the 46+ months as a Senator on the campaign trail proves that he is experienced enough to hold the top executive office in the country? That's bold! And even by that measure, Palin beats him - she's already won not only a nomination to an executive office, she's won an election! She's been governing almost as long as he's been campaigning!

    Of course, his inexperience is not as troubling as his disingenuousness.
    * He proposes raising taxes and handing out money to people who don't pay taxes, then calls it "cutting taxes". He needs to either (a) get comfortable with the idea of raising taxes and redistributing wealth and not mislabel it as a tax cut, or (b) needs to propose an actual tax cut instead of an increase.
    * He talks about post-partisanship and new politics, even though his record is coming straight through the Chicago Political Machine without ever challenging it, and then voting on straight party lines as a legislator (when he bothered to attend and vote or to attend and vote something other than "Present"). That's not post-poartisanship and it's not leadership. If he believes in old-school politics and liberal orthodoxy, he should proudly say so, instead of pretending to be something he isn't.
    * In the primaries, he ran hard as being an unwavering opponent of the war in Iraq and being committed to immediately withdrawing troops, but in the campaign he is changing his position on keeping the troops in Iraq (not to mention immunity for telecom companies that helped the government investigate terrorists).
    * He talked big about unilaterally renegotiating NAFTA, while sending his economic advisor to reassure the Canadians that he was just saying what he thought he needed to say to get elected, and then telling the labor unions that he was just misleading the Canadians because he was really really serious about dramatically reducing free trade.

    Palin is not perfect. Neither is McCain. But Obama is inexperienced, more concerned with campaigning than governing, and willing to say anything to get elected. Which is he? A hardcore liberal who is lying about the policies he will pursue as President, or a committed post-partisan moderate who has been unwilling to challenge his Democratic Party on any serious legislative vote in his 12 years of state and federal office? His rhetoric doesn't match his reality, and that's either scary or sad.

  • Posted By: dsnyder @ 09/04/2008 11:49:26 AM

    And by the way, are those mini telepromptors I saw on either side of her glasses? Apparently, the McCain clan (Rove, Cheney, Rumsfeld) have found a way to modernize the 'Being John Malcovich' effect of controling the minds of others. Scary!

    • Posted By: mewalters @ 09/04/2008 12:48:07 PM

      You've certainly never worked in television. TeleprompTers are not scary. They are what people who produce television shows use to allow us to focus on the message instead of someone looking down at their script. Let's all put a stop to the Chicken Little antics here. Geez.

      • Posted By: dsnyder @ 09/04/2008 1:20:42 PM

        You missed the point. Perhaps that's why you continue to vote Republican.

        • Posted By: mewalters @ 09/04/2008 2:04:37 PM

          So now you think you know how I vote?? You are wrong....AGAIN.

  • Posted By: gopsuxDOTcom @ 09/04/2008 2:04:37 PM

    REPUBLICANS:



    Proclaim - "Left wing" media sexism on Palin
    Reality - Audience members wearing "hottie" VP buttons


    Proclaim - "We're going to shake up the establishment"
    Reality - Isn't McCain the establishment?


    Proclaim - Palin's "personal" issues should be private.
    Reality - Spend $40 million on a Starr report into BC "personal" life


    Proclaim - We're the party of family values, country first, and God.
    Reality - Selective memory/unconditional forgiveness when it comes to their members and condemn all others.


    Proclaim - Palin: "I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a ???community organizer,??? except that you have actual responsibilities."
    Reality - Do I really need to explain this one?


    Proclaim - Palin has more experience than Obama/Biden.
    Reality - Passing ordinances for "Moose X-ings" doesn't count


    Proclaim - McCain is the change we need in Washington.
    Reality - McCain + GW = McSame





    p.s. The 80's called. They want their convention back! :)

  • Posted By: Junglejim123 @ 09/04/2008 1:45:16 PM

    When Dona Brazile conspired with Karl Rove to knock Hillary out of the race so her man Obama could win, she certainly never expected someone like Palin to come along. Well they have met their match. Palin was brilliant, she is funny and down to earth - unlike the Obamas. DNC - you reap what you sow and you will totally destruct in November. Good riddens to the village idiots- Brazile, Pelosi, Dean , Reid etc...

    • Posted By: JustJazz @ 09/04/2008 2:02:03 PM

      Dear JungleJim,
      Do your homework before you fall for the HYPE!! First of all anybody with real sense will realize that McCain and Palin haven't brought anything with REAL VALUE to the table but,LAME ATTACKS!! The Democratic convention hit a GRAND SLAM and the Republican party has yet to fullfill those seats...LOL!! Just because Palin went on the attack like a female pitbull, doesn't make her right for the VP position!! Do your homework dude!! She has,well, Republicans have MAJOR CONTRIDICTIONS in there policies!!
      Much Love,
      Jazz

    • Posted By: MsChiTown @ 09/04/2008 1:58:01 PM

      You might want to tell your doc you need a stronger prescription.

  • Posted By: neocon @ 09/04/2008 1:28:49 PM

    McCain's choice of Palin is completely logical. The McCain/Palin ticket is a clear contrast to Obama/Biden. Contrast Obama's verbal flatulence with Palin's accomplishments and successes.
    The hypocrisy of the liberal Obama is underscored: while touting the equality of women, his minions rail against a successful woman. The Straight-talk express clearly contrasts with the corrupt Chicago machine influence peddling to crooks like Rezko and Ayres for cash and votes. Underpining this seamy gang of thieves is the corrupt MSM who dragged their feet over any mention of John Edwards, yet tripped over each other to villify Palin's 17 year of daughter. We haven't seen this much hypocrisy since the party of Women's Liberation was in the tank defending the debauchery of Cigar Willie Clinton

    • Posted By: Jurr @ 09/04/2008 1:42:45 PM

      WHAT PALIN ACCOMPLISHMENTS? Raising a pregnant drunken 17 year old? Supporting the bridge to nowhere? Lobbying for $27 million for her small town of 6,700 people? Abusing her power to try to fire a Respected state trooper and end up firing his boss who refused to do the deed? For having a husband who supported Alaska leaving the US & becoming their own country?

      My mom was a mayor of a town of 10,000- she ain't (revert to native texan when worked up) pretending that she is qualified to be in the white house and certainly not claiming to be ready to be POTUS when McHave-You-Seen-My-Depends drops dead from health & age issues?

      • Posted By: neocon @ 09/04/2008 1:53:47 PM

        I take it you don't have kid, because if you did you would know that there are THOUSANDS of family living through the same problems or worst. A for lobbying for her home town I have no problem with that. Just look at the earmarks Barry got for his friend iI belive its in the half BILLION range so people in glass houses. And as for troopergate the jackass should of been fired LONG ago. Mrs Palin said that Mr Monegan was removed for failing to fill vacancies and welcomed a public examination of her actions. Mr Moneghan said he was put under pressure to sack the state trooper Michael Wooten by Mr Palin's husband Todd and a senior aide.

        An internal trooper investigation had found Mr Wooten guilty of several infractions - using a Taser stun gun on his stepson, drinking on duty, threatening his then father-in-law and shooting a moose without a permit, the Anchorage Daily News reported .

        • Posted By: neocon @ 09/04/2008 2:01:28 PM

          In March Senator Barack Obama released a list of $740 million in earmarked spending requests that he had made over the last three years.
          The list included $1 million for a hospital where Mr. Obama???s wife works, money for several projects linked to campaign donors and support for more than 200 towns, civic institutions and universities in Illinois.

          Makes Sarahs 26 mil look like small potato.

    • Posted By: baybluv @ 09/04/2008 1:45:02 PM

      Who's more hypocrical than Palin teaching no sex and then turing around parading her pregnant daughter and her boyfriend on the stage like they are the national poster team for pregnant teens. This boy is not in the family yet. They claim they were planning on getting married before she got pregnant. If you believe this, I have a bridge for sale. If they were planning to marry before she got pregnant, what are they waiting for, the girl is five month along already. This boy won't marry her daughter because if he had plan to do so they'd be married already. As for Polly Pure Bred Palin, she needs to stop preaching morals and get some. He family is certainly not the holier than thou family that the evangelicals would have chosen but as long as she is pro-life, that's good enough for them. To hell with everything else. All they care about is protecting babies that aren't here yet, but what are they doing for the ones that are? They are only making it harder for single parents to support their children by voting the Republicans in office again. But that's the price they'll pay to protect someone else' unborn child. No, they don't want you to have free will, only their will and that's that you have your baby.

      • Posted By: ModerateVoter @ 09/04/2008 1:59:43 PM

        At least she didn't hide them from view.

  • Posted By: oldjoe1938 @ 09/04/2008 2:01:18 PM

    JMont: McCain did something when he was 26. He got shot down then beat up by those he was bombing. I might just do the same if I was being bombed. Nothing much else ever since. He's a cancer patient, 72 and didn't know there was a country between Iraq and Afghanastan. He picked a Sportscaster, Governor who's into big oil's pocket and you call it experience & wisdom. Good thing there's an election in November.

  • Posted By: Achilles22 @ 09/04/2008 2:01:06 PM

    Beyond the Palin

    When Palin can win a national primary (over a political dynasty no less), then she will have the standing and credibility to be mentioned in the same breath with Obama. This woman is not anywhere near the most qualified person to be tapped for the VP slot. Again, for those complaining about Obama's lack of experience as a counter agrument to this valid argument - he has campaigned for 20 months and earned the nomination with over 18 million votes from the American people (not to mention an 11 year record as a State and U.S. Senator from a state with an actual population to manage).

    Sarah Palin is no leader of a movement - she was Governor of Alaska for 18 months - which is the equivalent of a kid running a lemonade stand and claiming to have the experience to run Wal-Mart. How many states could she win in a primary?

    She was abrasive at best last night, and showed she could effectively read a teleprompter. The fact these Republicans can actually (pretend to) get behind her exposes a far more troubling issue for them; Poor judgement and desperation. In private, they freely admit that this was terrible for this campaign but are playing the only cards they have - Culture wars, Fear, and running to the right.

    It saddens me that McCain has turned in to such a sad, old puppet of the right. How could he name her as VP when he's met her once? Judgement? Country First? Really? One heartbeat away from the leader of the free world? Cute story, but let's get back to reality folks. The Republicans should be ashamed of themselves, and have lost any credibility they might have been clinging to.

    As far as the sexism claims - please get real. If She wants to throw her 19 year old heading to Iraq in our face, and her special needs baby, then she will need to field questions about her pregnant daughter as well when she wants to ban sex education......So I say to her stop using the kids and the media will stop asking, which is as it should be.

    The only thing more pathetic than Palin being named is that so many will actually vote for these clowns.

    Palin and these goons don't think we're stupid............They know we are.

    Obama / Biden 2008

  • Posted By: Konklifer @ 09/04/2008 12:44:11 PM

    If it were Obama's daughter, Republicans would call her everything but a whore. (No they'd probably call her that too). But all of a sudden, the conservative party thinks this is great and will use it to bolster theire pro life argument. The hypocricy is comical.

    • Posted By: onepoker @ 09/04/2008 1:05:01 PM

      You really don't understand conservatives at all. We did not call Monica a whore I believe that was your side. We did not call the girlfriend of John Edwards a whore. In fact if you bring a whore to a church we will feed her clothe her and tell her we love her and no matter what she has done God still loves her.

      • Posted By: revkate @ 09/04/2008 2:00:14 PM

        nor did we call Cindy McCain a whore regardless of her indiscretion with her now husband, the righteous John McCain

      • Posted By: mewalters @ 09/04/2008 1:57:40 PM

        That's right sister.

  • Posted By: football Mom @ 09/04/2008 1:59:28 PM

    I think the "double standard" by the Media, and Jeremy McCarter is comical. Mr. McCarter states in his article, "How will the nation deal with somebody like this, a politician who addresses the multitudes while her six-year-old licks her palm to smooth the hair of the special-needs four-month-old right offstage?" And "How much deeper in the insult barrel will Palin reach? There was no mention, for instance, of Obama's snoring." McCarter states that Palin is snarking Obama, but yet, when McCarter does it to Palin, it's considered "unbiased, good journalism". Why?? That's not unbiased, good journalism: that's a liberal media who's furious that she's everything they wish Obama was and isn't! The so-called "unbiased" media is leaning so far left, they're practically horizontal! And where is the NOW group? They're strangely silent thru all of this! If all they're for is women, then why aren't they supporting Palin? One last thing.....Palin got where she is on her OWN merit! The only reason anybody knows anything about Hillary, is because she's
    married to Bill. Do you think anybody would've voted for her if she'd run for office before Bill became President?

  • Posted By: kshortSD @ 09/04/2008 1:59:10 PM

    Okay, so she's a competent public speaker. Whoopie. Isn't that what the GOP has accused Obama of being? Just a good speaker? Everyday, the GOP does something to kill one of their own arguments against the Democratic candidates. Nice work...

  • Posted By: republicant @ 09/04/2008 1:12:38 PM

    Uh...Helloooooo.....
    She has a degree in journalism and was a news lady. If there is one area, and there may only be one, that she has experience in, it is reading off of a teleprompter. She didn't write ONE word of her speech. Like an anchor on the news, she is only a personality. At least when Obama makes a speech, they are his own words. I'd like to see how she holds up at a debate.

    • Posted By: josh22 @ 09/04/2008 1:57:15 PM

      Well, I know you are probably using hyperbole, but obviously she did write at least one word of her speech. At minimum at least 10% was hers, but I think she probably had a lot more input than that. This is so stupid. Democrats and republicans have had speechwriters, advisers, etc. forever. But obviously she does have input and final say in what she is going to deliver. And obviously she had gone over it several times before she delivered. And she had to feel comfortable with what she was going to say to deliver it how she did last night.

    • Posted By: louisiana1 @ 09/04/2008 1:55:49 PM

      How would she (Palin) look in a debate?
      it would like a back yard bar-b-que= the "Bull Dog" would eat you Man's Lunch. And the American people are going to watch and love it, even the Voters. Go Girl and All working women.

    • Posted By: louisiana1 @ 09/04/2008 1:29:29 PM

      you know she did not write one word? you know she read he lines? you know, you know you know?
      I KNOW you should be running for office gecause know.
      get a life, you have a way of being the big loser, I KNOW just by reading what you say you know. YOU KNOW.

    • Posted By: pumapurr @ 09/04/2008 1:26:16 PM

      "At least when Obama makes a speech, they are his own words."

      Obama has speech writers - Jon Favreau is the top one. The words that are Obama's own are "um.. er..., umm, ahh, er,...er...that is, er ...um, what I , uh, what I, what I, er." Favreau let's him add that all by himself.

      It's fortunate THE ONE doesn't have to debate Palin. She would wipe the floor with the tongue-tied messiah and then put him over her shoulder and burp him like the baby he is.


    • Posted By: Jurr @ 09/04/2008 1:21:41 PM

      Yea when Barack has time, he writes his own speeches, and even on the ones he doesn't write he will still proofread & edit as needed.

  • Posted By: T Havik @ 09/04/2008 1:56:49 PM

    3k to say this in?

    In short, Sarah Palin is a place holder. A ???bright shiny thing??? to distract and draw fire and to make everyone who opposes her look bad. For shame on anyone who attacks this hard working mother of five. One a soldier, another an infant with a terrible a malady, and yet another who has made a terrible mistake but will be doing the right thing. All fantastic fodder for the media machine. Get it while you can, she will not be around long. At least not in the role of VP nominee.

    I may be wrong, but I have a lot of money riding on the fact that in a few short weeks, Sarah Palin will step up to the microphone and step down from the position of the VP nominee. It may be because her young son, three month old Trig needs his mother???s time. Maybe it is because her 17 year old daughter will need her mother during this very trying time of teen pregnancy. It may even be that as a good woman of strong family values, her family is more important than the position as Vice President of the United States. It might be a combo of all three, which still would not have stopped her from being an excellent VP, but the constant attacks of the press have just worn her down, (Bad Media, go lie by your dish!!) and this good family woman just needs to have priorities.

    Boy oh boy. Governor Palin stepping down is sure going to put presidential nominee John McCain in a tight spot. He is going to need a new running mate, stat!! And I suspect Senator McCain will step up to the plate with a rapid replacement. It may not be some one he would have chosen originally, he/she may not be what the party wanted. But time is short, and this person is a damned good option at the last minute.

    I am putting my money on Senator Joe Lieberman from Connecticut. You know, that independent politician who has plenty of experience. He was incredibly supportive of John McCain at the convention a few days ago. Heck, he even has experience running for Vice President of the United States. He did it in 2000 on the democratic ticket, and we all know how close that election was.

    So if it is Senator Joe Lieberman, the detractors of the republican ticket can no longer play the ???lack of experience??? card on the VP nominee. Not only that, Senator Joe will likely carry a lot more of the undecided democrat votes with him than a little known Governor of a sparsely populated state.

    In the end, I have not yet made my decision on who I will cast my vote for this year, I am holding off until I see who our true choice is for the Republican ticket.

    One final comment to the left, right, and center. Back off with the negative comments and attacks on Governor Palin. If they continue, she will be so busy responding with righteous indignation that we will never get a chance to see who she really is in the time she has to show us. Be kind and give her that brief moment in the sun.

    With all that being said, this is a wrap.

    Douglas Sonora

  • Posted By: camcfarlane @ 09/04/2008 1:56:43 PM

    "Star power to match Obama's" - excuse me - there is NO comparison between someone who barely has an undergraduate degree and someone who went to Harvard Law and graduated at the top of his class and was the president of the Harvard Review! He got there, remember, and it doesn't happen to people who barely have undergrad degrees. Her rhetoric was predictable, boiler-plate, anyone could have written that speech, with it's low inuendos and absolute lies, broad brush strokes with no explanations!

    As a writer, please don't compromise yourself in this way by comparing prize apples with under developed fruit and an underachiever!

  • Posted By: ModerateVoter @ 09/04/2008 12:38:38 PM

    Democrats don't allow anyone to have an opinion other than their own. You can't discuss anything with them, for they will just keep attacking and attacking, crying and whining until they get their way. I'm so sick of hearing all the liberal crap. This is America, a land of many opinions, not just yours! And if you want to talk about hypocrisy, you have done nothing but rip this woman apart for the mere fact that she is a mother and an elected official. Never would have happened if she were a man -- and this is the liberal left-wing media doing it! Free speech, not in this country, unless you are on the left! I'm disgusted by the whole Democratic party, and their behavior. If they care so much about the "regular" folk, then why did Barack spend such an outrageous amount of money on the glitz and show at the Democratic Convention....what a total turnoff! Well, I'm glad the Dems can spend so much money on a party.

    • Posted By: whitehallvirginia @ 09/04/2008 1:04:53 PM

      Check in with the most recent editorial by George Will. There is a conservative who has appropriate creditials to carry the conservative banner. Not Moderate Voter. Also, MV is raging, is not thoughtful, and more importantly is flying his/her flag under false colors. There is no moderation in the tone or choice of words in the above garble of words. Also MV paints with too broad brush strokes. The Democratic platform is moderate. The difficulty is that the GOP leadershiip (not all Republicans) has become so reactive, so preoccupied with maintaining the status-quo in foreign and domestic policies that anyone who has a centrist position is labelled a liberal. Anyone who proposes plans that can, if implemented bring jobs back to this country and confidence In leadership back to the White House, is described as a radical. The writer also slams an attack on 'all democrates' which is not true and all media which is not true. This kind example of shooting from the hip without a clear purpose in mind except to wound is not helpful to purposeful living - your life, my life and all those effected by the government in Washington.
      I am voting for change: Obama, Biden, November 4, 2008.

      • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 1:54:35 PM

        The democratic platform is not moderate. It is socially and fiscally liberal. This is a fact, not an opinion. Universal pre-K and Socialized healthcare are liberal uses of gevernment, funded through taxation.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse