The GOP's Natural

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: meblaylock @ 09/04/2008 7:12:23 PM

    Obama is not a BSW, MSW, or LCSW- he is not a Social Worker. He was a Community Organizer. I did not see Palin's comments as an attack on the Social Work profession at all, simply on the ambiguous job description that doesn't qualify him to be our next President.

    • Posted By: vmarsha @ 09/04/2008 7:30:25 PM

      Does Palin have any experience dealing with foreign leaders? Didn't think so.. She would never gain the respect with foreign leaders that Obama has already gained. Not because she is a women but because she only knows how to dish out cutdowns and nothing of substance.

  • Posted By: zuberr @ 09/04/2008 6:40:20 PM

    Mr. McCarter, I think you left something out. Before Mrs. Palin ever spoke a word, Obama and his camp attacked her kids, her husband, and they some how forgot that she was the Gov. of Alaska. Just the facts. If Obama don't want mud on his face he should not be the first to sling it!

    • Posted By: bparmet1 @ 09/04/2008 7:28:18 PM

      Lies?? All the media (not the Obama Campaign) wanted were specifics that the McCain Campaign CHOSE not to share - or even worse never looked into in the first place!! This is EXACTLY what Obama has gone through for 19 months - she is being treated equally by a free press!

    • Posted By: scope213 @ 09/04/2008 7:26:50 PM

      I'm surprised you even knew how to leave a post on a website. Do some research before you post lies. Obama specifically told the media that Palin's family is OFF LIMITS! All you get fed are lies...selective hearing the next best thing to ignorance.

    • Posted By: CoffeeeCandy @ 09/04/2008 7:11:58 PM

      See more Lies about Obama

    • Posted By: TheVigil @ 09/04/2008 6:46:16 PM

      Wrong. Obama and his campaign have not attacked Mrs. Palin's family life. His supporters may have, but he has indicated that this woman's family life is sancrosanct.

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 09/04/2008 7:08:39 PM

        Obama's camp stayed far away - for now.

  • Posted By: MadTownMeg @ 09/04/2008 7:10:33 PM

    She delivered a speech written by Bush's speechwriter...it was a well-rehearsed stage performance. If you want a VP that can act, go for Sarah Palin. But what I saw as a woman was a sarcastic, condescending hack who can parrot the party line with ease. It's easy to throw insults, but I'd like to hear more about her stance on ISSUES that will make a real different to all those "small town blue collar workers" she claims to be so much like.

    • Posted By: patriot81 @ 09/04/2008 7:24:16 PM

      Stay tuned madtownmeg... I know you like reiterrating what your liberal spokes people say when critiquing her "written" speech but just wait until the vice-presidential debate when she goes against your beloved biden. Be sure to watch and then comment afterward. She will deliver guaranteed. Oh by the way, did you know that all speeches that have been given at both conventions were written by other people? Even your precious Obama's "Historical" Speech... do you know what's funny about that? Governor Palin has only been in the lime light for 5 days now and she already has attracted just as many viewers of Obama, who has been campaigning for his presidency for the past two years. Conservatism will always win over liberalism. Stayed tuned for that debate : )

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 09/04/2008 4:22:29 PM

    YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!!
    YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!!
    YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!! YES SHE CAN!!!

    Shoot...that's kind of catchy....Might become a campaign slogan. Almost as good as..........

    NOBAMA!!!

    • Posted By: bayravin @ 09/04/2008 7:23:59 PM

      Yes, SHE CAN!!! She can do many at the same time. All will be happy.

  • Posted By: Adigalia4obama @ 09/04/2008 2:35:36 PM

    Seriously "Game On"/ After that one speech? What did she say that was so relevant that people were jumping up clapping, and crying almost in this frenzied ectasy with that bridge to no where speech? After Palin finished trash talking all I got was..... nothing.

    • Posted By: careerdaytrader @ 09/04/2008 2:50:51 PM

      That's because you're an idiot! A person who is a drain on our economy who WANTS Obama's hand outs. Nobody would vote for Obama if they are successful in life and weren't part of the group who WANTS OBAMA'S WELFARE HAND OUTS!

      THose on here supporting Obama are basically saying you ARE un American, that successful people should be punished by higher taxes and the losers who are barely making it rewarded with WELFARE money.

      I have a solution to end poverty, if you have NO MONEY then do NOT HAVE KIDS! You yourself shouldn't have been born and are DRAGGING America down.

      • Posted By: TheVigil @ 09/04/2008 7:23:11 PM

        YOU

        ARE

        A

        DAY

        TRADER

        You have no credibility whatsoever to be talking about drains on the economy!

      • Posted By: Adigalia4obama @ 09/04/2008 3:41:48 PM

        Well I guess it takes a bigger idiot to anonther one.

      • Posted By: neos @ 09/04/2008 3:10:53 PM

        Hey, Daytrader. Glad to see you are live and well. Now, didn't we have a talk about these Ad Hominem attacks?

  • Posted By: bayravin @ 09/04/2008 6:37:04 PM

    Promising to be bipartisan in his administration, McCain chooses an attack dog to take the country to the last years of the Republican majority. Sarah will have McCain on a leash and divide our country again. Confrontation loudly with the US Congress for the next 4 years, there won't be any progress that our country badly needs . Sarah Barracuda will not be able to accomplish anything in Washington. No way, No Sarah, No McCain..

    • Posted By: debbieschreib @ 09/04/2008 7:22:54 PM

      have you been reading thiese comments the country is just as divided now as it was 4 years ago. We on the other side choose our words carefully and let our votes speak. that you should have learned by now.

  • Posted By: neos @ 09/04/2008 7:22:50 PM

    McCain blew his chance to roll out his VP choice in a positive light. Great for the right-wing Limbaugh listening base, but not so great for the majority of Americans who are tired of divisive Rove style partisanship and gridlock. After a brief attempt at an upbeat bio, someone cried havoc, and released this self-described pitbull of war. Palin came across as narrow-minded, mean-spirited , sarcastic, smug - well, essentially George W. Bush with a beehive hairdo. Speaking of W., his party kept him at satellite length and gave him less than eight minutes of their time - how pathetic is that.

  • Posted By: scope213 @ 09/04/2008 7:22:02 PM

    LOL her speech was nothing special. Generic at best. Only reason why the GOP are so happy (relieved) is she didn't make a mistake or falter in her words. Thats it, nothing more! Now they want to package it like she somehow inspired the nation GIVE ME A BREAK....ROFLMAO!! Maybe the moose hunters and gun toting moms in the wilderness.
    Wow a woman politian actually was able to read a piece of paper and memorize words....holy cow she's amazin'!!! Now that's sexism.

  • Posted By: sunoverla @ 09/04/2008 7:02:26 PM

    Why are all reporters saying she mocked his community organizing days and those same reporters are mocking her time as Mayor. What she said, was since the media looks down on her mayorhsip and praises barack's community organizing, she would tell all of you elites the difference. Get it? Good!

    • Posted By: nomoreMCSAME @ 09/04/2008 7:21:21 PM

      ELITISM: SARAH PALIN

      NOUN:
      The belief that certain persons or members of certain classes or groups ( ie.hockey moms) deserve favored treatment by virtue of their perceived superiority, as in intellect, social status, or financial resources.

      A.The sense of entitlement enjoyed by such a group or class.
      B.Control, rule, or domination by such a group or class.

      Come on now...you don't really buy that if God forbid Mcain and Palin are elected into office that she is really going to do away with the private plane, chefs, and all of the other ammenities that come with the Vice Presidency do you? Get real! Were you aware that while she was mayor of Wasilla, AK she raised taxes by 38%?

  • Posted By: hivanh @ 09/04/2008 6:38:30 PM

    Is it something in the water over there at NW, or something you are smoking? "Star power"? Surely you jest. She is a momentary starburst, a blip on the radar screen, a quick flash of errant lightning. She could not carry water for the likes of Barack. That would require brain power, sensitivity and compassion, none of which she has yet to display or give evidence of. Fawn and drool today, folks, for tomorrow ye may be weary.

    • Posted By: debbieschreib @ 09/04/2008 7:20:13 PM

      I hate to correct you again. this may surprise you sweetie us in the nw are just fine. you may think of us still as hicks but the world has changed. So if you are going to pick on locale better think again,

  • Posted By: vmarsha @ 09/04/2008 7:19:23 PM

    What is wrong with the media? Have you all forgotten what a good speech is? Palins speach reminded me of a highschool cheerleader audition. I am offended as a woman after this speach because, with the exception of a quick run through on energy, she said nothing of substance. I suppose the Republicans think that all a woman is good for is sligh remarks and underhanded jabs.

  • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 09/04/2008 5:20:03 PM

    WOW, all of these unhinged comments from you left-wing zealots is amusing! And exactly what I expected!

    Sarah Palin is obviously seen as a huge threat to the left-wingers and their planned coronation of The Messiah....LOL, this just gets better by the minute.

    The great irony is that she is demonstrably MORE qualified than Obama to be VP or President.

    Fasten your seat-belts, all you left-wing nutjobs; it's going to be a long Sept and Oct for all of you!

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 09/04/2008 6:04:50 PM

      Well Jim, if Sarah is seen as this huge threat by us as you say, what exactly is her threat? I'm still waiting for her to talk about the economy...not a word in her speech tuesday night..in fact, her speech was half bashing Obama and the Dems, and the other half sounded as if she were roasting a celebrity, McCain.

      • Posted By: Interested Reader @ 09/04/2008 7:16:16 PM

        I assure you, Sarah Palin is not seen as a threat but rather an easy target for the media. Why do you think the McBush Campaign waited until after the Deomocratic Convention is over to reveal their pick? Because her inexperience would get ripped apart! Unlike the Republicans, Democrats use a little something called fact in our leader's speeches. See the problem is, Palin seems to believe that being mayor of a small town and organizing community bake-sales to help raise funds for the local church choir somehow gives her more experience than Obama. I'm sorry Sarah, it turns out that United States Senators (hence SENATOR Obama) actually do have responsibilities. But considering you didn't know what the job of the VP is, certainly no one would expect you to know what a Senator does. They didn't have time to fit that one into the 2 day cram session did they? Darn it! Hopefully they had time to give you directions on how to get to Washington.

      • Posted By: rmcdonald2 @ 09/04/2008 6:49:36 PM

        Here's a comment, balanced budget and surplus in Alaska.

        • Posted By: AskPlus @ 09/04/2008 7:11:13 PM

          Here's another. Bankrupted a town as mayor, and slept with big oil. How about that bridge to nowhere?

    • Posted By: neocon @ 09/04/2008 5:28:14 PM

      You can almost smell thier fear in the air.

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 09/04/2008 5:36:28 PM

        Is that fear in the air - or blood in the water? She is a disaster. From what I can see, most of the left-wing nutjobs are celebrating. Celebrating the polls. Celebrating the latest fact checks. And they'll be celebrating the news that Ms. Palin initially endorsed Mr. Obama's Energy Plan - which is great because she said he never had a plan and never walked across the aisles. So celebrate with us, and stop calling us scared. Don't worry, we'll stay away from her little darlings - whatever that story is - but the media won't.

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 09/04/2008 6:08:36 PM

          Hi AP. I agree. Even my dad who is a big Hillary supporter who was planning on voting McCain( I know, I yelled at him!) has decided that he is now going to vote Obama.

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 09/04/2008 6:06:30 PM

        No fear from we Obama supporters in the air. I do smell the blood letting already for the Reps. in Nov. though. Can you say carnage?

  • Posted By: TheVigil @ 09/04/2008 3:57:31 PM

    I'm pretty appalled by Newsweek use of this woman's kids as debate points.

    And that's saying a lot, for those who might know me.

    Bear in mind, though, that that is a slam at Newsweek - not the Democrats - for those who might be inclined to suspect otherwise.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 09/04/2008 4:14:24 PM

      Virgil....I always did think you would come around. You are too smart not to.

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: TheVigil @ 09/04/2008 7:13:48 PM

        Don't go buying me any red sweaters, I just doubt I'll be wearing blue ones after this.

        I agree with the article over on the other Newsweek page that says that the choice of Palin has more or less laid bare a bunch of hypocrisy on both sides of the fence. I'm appalled at the other Democratic voters (I'm still voting for Obama) for dragging this woman's family into the fray and slamming her lack of experience after insisting for months that it didn't matter, and McCain hasn't won any points either by going after that same lack of experience and then choosing a VP that has less than he does. It would behoove all of them to shut the hell up at this point, I think.

        I'd heard Palin's speech was negative. I'm watching it right now on YouTube and I don't find it to be so, so I have to apologize for an earlier comment in which I indicated that she was. Personally the more I find out about her, the more I like her, as she has a reputation for *actual* trustbusting - against Big Oil! - in her own state, I don't think her family has anything to do with her ability to govern. I don't begrudge the woman her religion any more than I do Obama's. You may differ on that, Roller, which is why I'd prefer you not send me any red clothing anytime soon. I actually think hunting and fishing your own food - as she and her husband did for many years - is completely admirable, and yes, you need guns for that, and it may surprise people on these boards to find out that I fully support the Second Amendment.

        Personally, it's win-win for me. I'm still voting for Obama, but all of a sudden I have a lot more reason to be hopeful if McCain wins instead - I'd still be afraid of the Republican Party's deep ties to Big Oil, but it says a lot that McCain was willing to choose someone who had a HISTORY of taking it on in her own state - a real history, for anyone who wants to read about her.

        Basically at this point I'm just in a moderate state of horror over the partisan crap all over the board. I think Palin would make a fine VP - I do worry about McCain's military policies and the fact that the Bush foreign policy team is "coaching" her on the same. Having Bush Administration members teach foreign policy is like having Genghis Khan come in to give a speech on the Nobel Peace Prize. And I worry about both of their susceptibility to the influences of some of the rest of their party. I think McCain and Palin both have far more integrity than the lowest common denominator there and it would be an intense shame to see Palin have to bow on her trustbusting because of the oil connections the party has.

        But it's nice to have something to be hopeful about. Palin gets an A from me.

        You surprised?

  • Posted By: Achilles22 @ 09/04/2008 5:06:37 PM



    Beyond the Palin

    When Palin can win a national primary (over a political dynasty no less), then she will have the standing and credibility to be mentioned in the same breath with Obama. This woman is not anywhere near the most qualified person to be tapped for the VP slot. Again, for those complaining about Obama's lack of experience as a counter agrument to this valid argument - he has campaigned for 20 months and earned the nomination with over 18 million votes from the American people (not to mention an 11 year record as a State and U.S. Senator from a state with an actual population to manage).

    Sarah Palin is no leader of a movement - she was Governor of Alaska for 18 months - which is the equivalent of a kid running a lemonade stand and claiming to have the experience to run Wal-Mart. How many states could she win in a primary?

    She was abrasive at best last night, and showed she could effectively read a teleprompter. The fact these Republicans can actually (pretend to) get behind her exposes a far more troubling issue for them; Poor judgement and desperation. In private, they freely admit that this was terrible for this campaign but are playing the only cards they have - Culture wars, Fear, and running to the right.

    It saddens me that McCain has turned in to such a sad, old puppet of the right. How could he name her as VP when he's met her once? Judgement? Country First? Really? One heartbeat away from the leader of the free world? Cute story, but let's get back to reality folks. The Republicans should be ashamed of themselves, and have lost any credibility they might have been clinging to.

    As far as the sexism claims - please get real. If She wants to throw her 19 year old heading to Iraq in our face, and her special needs baby, then she will need to field questions about her pregnant daughter as well when she wants to ban sex education......So I say to her stop using the kids and the media will stop asking, which is as it should be.

    The only thing more pathetic than Palin being named is that so many will actually vote for these clowns.

    Palin and these goons don't think we're stupid............They know we are.

    Obama / Biden 2008

    Anyone have a retort to this hard dose of reality?

    • Posted By: ICYEYES800 @ 09/04/2008 7:11:18 PM

      What rock have you been living under????? Can you spell A-X-E-L-R-O-D??? HE'S THE MAN WITH THE MESSAGE....He is Osama's VOICE.....we've seen what disasterous things happen when Osama is left to wing it on his own.....First the pathetic performances with debates with Hillary, then the Saddleback fiasco....he couldn't look Warren straight in the eye to answer question..and between the answers he danced around...between the humm, ahhhh, duuuh, mmmmm, let me see..DUH.....Without Axelrod Osama would still be in Kansas...looking for Dorothy>>>>>

    • Posted By: vinman @ 09/04/2008 5:16:54 PM

      Senators do NOT MANAGE ANYTHING. NOTHING. And as far as reading a teleprompter see attached:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxBX8sz3tO8

      The man is an empty suit and a good speech.

      • Posted By: Achilles22 @ 09/04/2008 5:20:54 PM

        So Palin could earn the presidential nomination of her party? Has she done anything comparable? Being mayor of 6 people, and Governor of Moose Xing signs for a few thousand for 18 months?

        • Posted By: rmcdonald2 @ 09/04/2008 7:03:34 PM

          I think you underestimate her appeal to small town America. You know, those bitter, bible thumpers who cling to guns. This is a woman REAL women can identify with.

        • Posted By: neocon @ 09/04/2008 5:25:40 PM

          News Flash she is NOT the presidential nomination. She's got you rattled don't she.

          • Posted By: Achilles22 @ 09/04/2008 6:08:21 PM

            Looking for responses using proper english -

            But no. I would have been rattled if he picked someone qualified.

        • Posted By: vinman @ 09/04/2008 5:27:57 PM

          I ask again....what had Obama accomplished. Aside from MISSING 290 votes during the current congress.

          • Posted By: Achilles22 @ 09/04/2008 6:07:01 PM

            McCain has missed as many votes - Obama's resume speaks for itself. He has WON the nomination of his party for President. He was not appointed, like McCain has done for Palin (truly scary). Nothing Palin has done qualifies here to be anywhere near the top of the list as a VP for the Libertarian party, let alone the Republican Party - The arguments you are making have been rejected already, so it's not a very sound strategy you're clinging to.

            Good Luck

      • Posted By: neocon @ 09/04/2008 5:34:49 PM

        Don't forget that if a senator leave office before thier term is over the Governor get to appoint the replacement senator. So, a senator ranks lower that the governor of the state.

    • Posted By: Jmon @ 09/04/2008 5:20:21 PM

      Here is a retort. Barack Obama has a very hazy record as a state senator from one of the most liberal districts in Illnois i.e, the abortion/infanticide thing, For him to be elected senator in 2006, then campaign for 19 months means that he has done absolutely nothing to qualify himself to be president. People voted for him because he is a brillaint speaker that knows how to manipulate voters hatred of Bush and mistrust of Hillary Clinton. Gov. Palin has had jobs that recquire responsiblity and has actually governed over American citizens. But most importantly of all: SHE IS NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT! John McCain has experience that no one can dispute, he will be the decider on day one. Barack Obama admitted that he has no idea what the hell he is doing when he picked a Washington insider like Biden to be his running mate. Your arguement is nothing but a double standard and shows that Palin scared the crap out of the Dems with her excellent speech. McCain/Palin 08'

      • Posted By: Achilles22 @ 09/04/2008 5:52:44 PM

        I'm sorry, did someone say intellect? Judgement? Vision?

        Seriously - for those of you low information voter targets of the Rove machine, let's make something very clear: McCain appointed Palin as his running mate in one of the most disasterous decisions in campaign history. His judgement here is clearly poor specifically because she will be a heartbeat way from the Presidency. You can't be serious when you say she is only the VP......McCain is old, and that makes this decision more breathtaking considering her empty resume.

        Obama has WON his party's nomination for President. Nobody appointed him. All of these arguments were rejected in the primaries.

        No worries - Obama wins this thing as he should - it's just really sad that it will be even close.

        Funny these guys are running as outsiders when they've had 8 years to run this country into the ground.

        Not this time.

        • Posted By: Jmon @ 09/04/2008 6:17:21 PM

          If running for president makes you qualified for the job, then I suppose Ralph Nadar is the most qualified candidate in the history of American politics. Obama offers nothing but stilted rhetoric and pie in the sky promises. A Mile High and one inch deep! McCain/Palin 08'.

          • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 09/04/2008 6:30:20 PM

            McCain has had eight years in DC to do what he says he will do as president. Why wait?

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 09/04/2008 6:16:11 PM

          Excellent comments, Achille! Thanks. I like your name, btw.

      • Posted By: brinder @ 09/04/2008 5:41:46 PM

        Thank John McCain has experience, true. (He is 72 years old). The important question is what his track record tells us about how he will govern. What does it demonstrate about his character? What does it tell us about his priorities? What does it tell us about his ability to understand complex issues? What does it tell us about his intellect? What does it tell us about his sense of fairness? These are some of the important questions each must decide on before they vote. Experience is one way to get to those answers, but certainly not the only/best way.

        The one with the longest resume is not necessarily the best one for the job.

  • Posted By: CoffeeeCandy @ 09/04/2008 7:09:58 PM

    My Big question is Why are you all comparing this woman with Obama ??? She is not running for President .. You all act as if McCain is DEAD .. What is wrong with America ???

  • Posted By: dragonspray @ 09/04/2008 4:31:21 PM

    Once again, the purpose of party conventions - be they Republican or Democratic - are the official nominate their candidates and give partisan speeches to rally the partisan troops. They are not think tanks. They aren't for giving state of the union addresses. They are not debates. They are not policy forums. They are political pep rallies. In case you haven't noticed, Sen. Obama has been very short on specifics regarding his "plans" - and I'm not faulting him for that. Historically, candidates from both parties will keep their "plans" vague and offer few specifics until after the conventions when they are officially nominated (except, of course, for John Kerry whose only specificity about his plans was that he "had a plan"). Now that the conventions are over, you will hear both McCain and Obama (and to a lesser extent Palin and Biden) begin getting into the specifics of their respective plans. There will be head-to-head debates. The talent and swimsuit portion of this campaign is now over. It is now time for them to take center stage and explain to all of us their vision for whirled peas.

    • Posted By: bayravin @ 09/04/2008 7:07:51 PM

      Darn it!! I missed the swimsuit segment of this show. I heard she was HOT!!! Well, there's always a tomorrow. (Isn't McCain's show tonight)

    • Posted By: metzlerd @ 09/04/2008 5:09:51 PM

      BLUEPRINT FOR CHANGE. I know its a lot, but if you want details they are there.
      If you don't, thats fine to.

      I realize conventions are cheerleading camps, but that is no excuse for out and out lies.
      I'm not saying people don't do it anyway. I'm just saying they deserve their just rewards.

      I'm not talking about embellishment, but things like the opposite of reality.
      Not talking about the press adding opinion; but the VP candidate themselves making false statements.
      That is what Palin and some others are guilty of during the convention.

      It is time to stop making excuses for their actions, and start making them accountable.

  • Posted By: Mindy1 @ 09/04/2008 11:24:39 AM

    I do not feel Sarah Palin is a match for Obama. Her speech was full of lies and lacked substance. Heaven help our country if she ends up in the second highest office in the land. We will continue to be fed lie after lie just like these past 8 years, if that happens.

    • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 11:29:14 AM

      What lies did she tell, specifically?

      • Posted By: dsqard @ 09/04/2008 4:44:22 PM

        While running for governor in September 2006, Palin assured the Ketchikan Chamber of Commerce she was all for the bridge.

        ???The money that???s been appropriated for the project, it should remain available for a link, an access process as we continue to evaluate the scope and just how best to just get this done,??? Palin said then, according to a story in the Ketchikan Daily News. ???This link is a commitment to help Ketchikan expand its access, to help this community prosper.???

        ???I think we???re going to make a good team as we progress that bridge project,??? she told the audience.

        And in a written questionnaire for the Anchorage Daily News the following month, October of 2006, Palin was asked directly, ???Would you continue state funding for the proposed Knik Arm and Gravina Island bridges????

        Her answer: ???Yes. I would like to see Alaska???s infrastructure projects built sooner rather than later. The window is now ??? while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist.???

        Palin???s position began to shift once she became governor, however.

        • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 5:14:07 PM

          it also began to shift when the cost of the bridge went from ~$240 million to over $400 million.

          perhaps she changed her stance because the expense had nearly doubled.

          of course, the put-down "nowhere" description of the place and people affected by the bridge is certainly hard rhetoric toward American citizens. Probably a turn-off for investors, too.

          There's a bunch of thoughtful folks in Congress, huh?

          • Posted By: dsqard @ 09/04/2008 7:06:54 PM

            Long before Palin killed the project, Congress washed its hands of the bridge. In the transportation spending bill that included money for the Ketchikan bridge, Congress deleted the wording that would have directed money for the project, though it left the money in place so Alaska officials could decide which transportation projects to spend it on. As a result, Alaska diverted much of the $223-million from the federal government to other projects, leaving the Ketchikan-Gravina bridge project woefully underfunded, and with no prospect of additional federal funding. That was the point at which Palin formally killed the bridge project.

    • Posted By: gan7114 @ 09/04/2008 11:29:25 AM

      Umm, what "match" do you speak of? Palin is running for VP, Obama is running for President. They will not even be debating directly against each other this fall. Your comments prove you're a dumbass.

  • Posted By: ghostdance7 @ 09/04/2008 11:17:04 AM

    All I got out of that speech was "McCain actually fought in a war...he rocks," "I'm a mommy...mommies rock," "My boy's a soldier...soldiers rock," "My baby's special needs...special needs kids rock," and "Obama is a bleeding heart lefty who's not ready to lead!" I'm afraid that given Palin's limited record (not much to discuss) and rather eccentric positions (GOP doesn't want to discuss), this kind of pandering is all we can expect.

    • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 11:47:12 AM

      So tell me about Obama's record. I am still waiting for that information. I can't seem to get anyone to tell me what he has done.

      • Posted By: dsqard @ 09/04/2008 7:04:37 PM

        Here's some more information that is not off of Obama's web site:
        Obama has co-sponsored bills with members of the other party, some of which have been noteworthy. Obama and Republican Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, for instance, teamed up on an initiative to lock down and secure both nuclear and conventional weapons worldwide, such as the shoulder-fired, anti-aircraft missiles that have been proliferating in recent years. According to a report on the bill by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the legislation "enhances: (1) U.S. cooperation with foreign governments to destroy conventional weapons stockpiles around the world; and (2) the United States' ability to provide assistance to foreign governments aimed at helping them detect and interdict weapons and materials of mass destruction." Lugar hasn't objected to Obama's characterization of their partnership or the bill, which became law in 2007, in his ads.

      • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 1:01:30 PM

        ...still waiting....

        • Posted By: ghostdance7 @ 09/04/2008 2:06:22 PM

          Really? If you don't know Obama's record you're not really looking. His entire voting record is available online. There are websites where you can clearly see his position on every substantive issue. All of his speeches are available as podcasts. I know...it's a lot easier to just parrot "we don't know anything about him" than it is to perform a couple of simple internet searches. Educate yourself...you have until November.

          • Posted By: ghostdance7 @ 09/04/2008 2:29:31 PM

            Here you go...took me fifteen seconds:

            http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/01/14/obamas_strong_record_of_accomp.php

            It lists many major accomplishments while in both State and U.S. Senates.

            • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 3:37:13 PM

              Voting on a bill or voting present isn't an accomplishment, it's a job responsibility as a senator.
              I am very capable of looking up a voting record, and have done so, even on our state reps before voting for them.
              What legislation has Obama authored? What committees has he headed? What part of his proposed agenda has he submitted legislation for? What changes that improve people's lives has he LED the fight for in the state senate or in Washington?

              I have still found nothing notable.

              • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 3:50:36 PM

                My bad, I never looked at his accomplishments listed on his own website...there's a credible source. I'll try to find a more neutral source to see what he has actually authored.

                • Posted By: ghostdance7 @ 09/04/2008 4:26:09 PM

                  Yeah, I'm sure nobody from the GOP or the press has checked whether the information on Obama's website is accurate. You go ahead and fact check it for them...

              • Posted By: ghostdance7 @ 09/04/2008 4:00:36 PM

                Honestly... if you are truly a "Texas conservative" as your handle suggests, and you "still found nothing notable" then the problem may not be in your lack of research. It may be your inability to set aside your political biases in the face of information with which you disagree. If that is the case...neither I nor anyone else can do much to inform you. You would have to make the choice to accept uncomfortable truths. Best wishes all the same - it's your America, too.

              • Posted By: ghostdance7 @ 09/04/2008 3:54:28 PM

                Why do you need this from me? It's called Google...try "Obama legislation authored" or "Obama committees served." It's really not that tricky...

                And the link I provided didn't simply show bills he voted on, but also bills he authored. But in case you need more, here's example of bills he authored (or co-authored) and that passed:

                In 2005, he co-sponsored the "Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act" introduced by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) He later added three amendments to the "Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act", which passed the Senate in May 2006, Lugar-Obama" expands the Nunn-Lugar cooperative threat reduction, Honest Leadership and Open Government Act", which was signed into law in September 2007. Obama also introduced the "Iraq War De-Escalation Act", Obama sponsored with Kit Bond (R-MO) an amendment to the 2008 Defense Authorization Act, provision from the Obama-Hagel bill was passed by Congress in December 2007 as an amendment to the State-Foreign Operations appropriations bill, Obama also sponsored a Senate amendment to the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)

        • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 09/04/2008 2:20:12 PM

          ...still waiting...

  • Posted By: GregHere @ 09/04/2008 5:18:32 PM

    ...........................Palin is getting the attention now from the media but soon what she has been saying and doing will be revealed to be not what America really wants to be taking place in the next four years of their lives. This is a Big Show that the Finatical Right Wing Republicans are taking in, this well positioned group that is a small part of our population but who have been enjoying choice elitist lives since childhood. America is ready for a change from the George Bush philosophy where the Multimillion Dollar CEOs and others well connected enjoy the constant perks they take from our economy while the vast majority do without or do with little in so many areas of their lives. These Rich Republicans at the Convention are chanting USA...USA...USA......but what they really mean is Me...Me...Me...Me. These people are far from being Patriotic...they are greedy elitists who want to live extravagantly while they limit their fellow Countrymen and Countrywomen to what trickles down from what they do not consume for their pleasures......Look at the faces of the people cheering for McCain tonight and you will see the "select winners" in America's economy!!!!

    • Posted By: ModerateVoter @ 09/04/2008 5:43:55 PM

      You are out of your mind. Not everyone who is Republican is rich, in fact, far from it. I know many that are not, but do not have your liberal left wing views. It's only what you choose to see. I saw quite a few people in the crowd last night that represented all different races, etc. Seems like there was much more money being wasted and thrown around at the Dem Convention than I see here.

      • Posted By: RinD @ 09/04/2008 6:01:16 PM

        Speaking of wasting money, renting Invesco Field and recreating the "Clash of the Titans" movie set cost more than anything at the RNC. But a Juke Box Hero has got to have his stage!

        • Posted By: bayravin @ 09/04/2008 6:58:46 PM

          If you calculate the $$/attendee, you will find the Dems spent less. It was open to anyone, instead of a 'chosen few' for the Reps.

  • Posted By: pammygamherst @ 09/04/2008 5:13:44 PM

    i hope at the vice presidential debate biden chews her up and spits her back out - he had better not cut her any slack because she's a woman. to hell with the gender bias and all that CRAP....if she wants to play with the big boys she had better learn to play the game.

    she is a worthless excuse of a politician...she has absolutely no record and has the audacity to attack obama's credentials? obama is the best thing to happen to politics in a LONG, LONG time....all democrats, independents, and disillusioned republicans (and after last night there should be a ton of you) have to vote so these 2 idiots don't get in office.

    • Posted By: rmcdonald2 @ 09/04/2008 6:57:14 PM

      When the Democratic Presidential candidate's experience is being compared to the Republican VICE PRESIDENTIAL candidate's, who do you think comes out on the short end regardless. It must be really embarrassing for you to have a candidate who is so unqualified. No wonder the left is loosing their minds. I don't remember Republicans going this nuts when Joe Biden was announced.

    • Posted By: RinD @ 09/04/2008 5:50:21 PM

      When you say things like "absolutely no experience" and then refer to Obama's "credentials" when he doesn't have many, it undermines your credibility and casts doubt on your candidate.

      Actually, as good as Obama is at campaigning, he could become the Democratic version of Karl Rove! Great organizer, great fundraiser, great at spinning a message to win voters who wouldn't be happy if they knew the reality!

    • Posted By: neocon @ 09/04/2008 5:17:00 PM

      Please give me some od his credentials credentials. The world wants to know.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse