Trig's Promise

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: JeanJeanie @ 09/06/2008 7:26:05 PM

    I have a child with Down Syndrome. We have never hidden him or. . We include him in ALL we do. Shame on people who feel that Sara should not have included him.
    I am very happy that she did and proud. Good for her and good for baby Trig. Hooray!!!

    • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 11:21:01 PM

      We have never hid our niece either, and have no intention of doing so. Congratulations on your wonderful son, I am sure he is a terrific joy.

  • Posted By: annieb346 @ 09/06/2008 11:07:58 PM

    If Sarah Palin is AGAINST being "politically correct." why does she refer to her child as "special needs?" Is that being politically correct, or a sensitive way of dealing with someone who may be different from us? This is so much a case of what is sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander.

    • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 11:19:32 PM

      It has nothing to do with being politically correct. It is the generally accepted term for children and adults with disabilities. That way, if they care to share what the disability is, they can do that; if they don't, they don't have to right away.

  • Posted By: diddles0503 @ 09/06/2008 2:09:21 PM

    Sarah Palins son is 5 months old. She went back to work 3 days after giving birth. Does she really know what having a child with Downs is like? What his needs will be in a year or 5 years from now? She has not walked very long in our shoes and wont be for the next few months either. I also feel like she and the republicans are exploiting the fact that her son has downs. Everytime they mention her family they are quick to point out the he has downs. They also say that she "chose" to have him after finding out that he had downs, and that her daughter "chose" to have her baby - yet she doesnt want other women to have the right to choose. I dont trust her at all.

    • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 11:00:53 PM

      Does Sarah Palin know what having a child with Downs is like? Apparently after having one, she does. And unless you've had one yourself, she is a very large step ahead of you.

    • Posted By: loriw @ 09/06/2008 6:05:09 PM

      I don't know who you will vote for but would you trust a candidate like Obama...he has argued in committee and voted against the BORN ALIVE INFANTS PROTECTION ACT that provides that an infant that is born alive following an abortion be given medical care just as any other infant would. In other words...Obama voted in favor of INFANTICIDE. In Obama's own words he has said it is "too burdensome" to require and abortionist to call a doctor to provide care for a born alive infant. Reasearch it yourself on Jill Staneck's web site...she testified before Obama on behalf of a baby who had down's that was born alive after an abortion at Christ Hospital. The baby was left to die a lingering death alone in the hospital's dirty utility room until Jill Staneck found him and held him until he passed. She was so distressed by the practice of allowing infants to die in this way, some of whom were VIABLE that she blew the whistle on Christ Hospital and went on to advocate against this practice both in the IL legistature and at the National level. At both levels Obama opposed the legistation that would have assisted these born alive babies even if viable and normal! Do you think this is the kind of candidate who would really care about our children with disabilities? If there is someone NOT TO TRUST it is OBAMA not Palin!

    • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 5:46:40 PM

      diddles0503, I guess my brother doesn't know what it's like to have a disabled child, since he went back to work two days after the birth of his daughter, right?

  • Posted By: villandra @ 09/05/2008 3:57:29 PM

    I see a more immediate cause for worry about how well Palin will support services for handicapped children. It is not picking over her family's personal lives to notice that there has been no sign that her baby is getting the intensive physical therapy and stimulation that all Downs syndrome babies need for their brains to develop and to have a hope of leading productive lives. Perhaps her Neanderthal, small town mindset just is not able to grasp the value and critical importance of doing so. If she isn't even providing her own child with the care that it needs, she isn't going to appreciate why she should provide it to anyone else, especially as philosophically opposed to publicly funded services as she is.

    • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/05/2008 6:23:09 PM

      Precisely how did you come up with the diagnosis that Trig isn't getting any therapy just from a photograph and/or seeing him on TV?

      • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 12:18:35 PM

        So that means he can't ever leave the state? Interesting....by that analysis, every time my niece accompanies her parents on a trip to see her grandparents, her mother and father are deliberately denying her therapy.....when all along I thought she was just traveling like any other kid. If you don't know what Trig's therapy schedule is, you have no basis to question why he was there at the RNC, or by his mother's side when McCain introduced her as his nominee.

        • Posted By: swe123 @ 09/06/2008 9:41:02 PM

          he's not leaving the state to go on a visit...Sarah has said herself that he will be traveling with her on the campaign trail so he can continue to breastfeed. It's at least two months until the election and God forbid she is elected I'm assuming her job will entail some travel??

      • Posted By: swe123 @ 09/06/2008 10:20:31 AM

        he's not unless the taxpayers are also paying for a physical therapist, occupational therapist, and speech therapist to travel with them. He needs specialized early intervention from certified therapists that work with infants

  • Posted By: wsu1983 @ 09/05/2008 8:41:11 PM

    Why is it that the Repubs only become advocates when THEY are affected by an illness, injury, or death??? If they are not personally affected, you are on your own!!!

    • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 12:21:27 AM

      Gov. Palin increased the budget in Alaska before her down syndrom child was born.

      • Posted By: wildvisions @ 09/06/2008 1:10:32 AM

        Who are you anyway? Do you live in Alaska? She CUT spending for children with disabilities in Alaska, while at the same time approved pet projects for her home town of Wasilla. Get your facts straight.

        • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 1:30:13 AM

          She did not cut funding, she increased it.... Can you not click on the link and read the article?

          And what's it to you who I am? Take your own advice and get your facts straght. It's right there in black and white.

          BTW, I know you want Amerca to turn socialist... don't hold your breath.

          • Posted By: swe123 @ 09/06/2008 10:12:26 AM

            did you know she also vetoed a bill that would help pregnant teenagers?

            • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 12:12:43 PM

              Help pregnant teenagers do....what? Could you be any more specific?

              • Posted By: swe123 @ 09/06/2008 9:36:25 PM

                She cut more than 5 million dollars from a program that included Passage House which provides a place for teen mothers to live and learn skills that would help them support themselves and their babies. So, don't provide sex education, contraceptives, choices, and then when they get pregnant they are on their own!

  • Posted By: mauibarb @ 09/06/2008 8:01:54 PM

    I seriously doubt that anyone suggested Trig be "hidden", that's an appalling idea. I think the point is that he was very obviously brought in for votes. Have any other political candidates ever brought in an infant that age to an event of that magnitude?

  • Posted By: JeanJeanie @ 09/06/2008 7:27:41 PM

    I have a son with Down Syndrome and have NEVER hid him as some in this comment section suggest.
    Please celebrate the beauty and love for these children. I was proud and happy to see baby Trig going to Washington. Hooray!

  • Posted By: bernaschrs @ 09/06/2008 7:00:34 PM

    I wonder at the wisdom of having a special needs young baby on the floor and podium of the republican convention. It seems to me that this was merely pandering and did not have the child's interest at heart. I personally would not take a very young special needs baby into such an environment for a relatively extended period of time.

    • Posted By: suebee44 @ 09/06/2008 7:16:48 PM

      Pesonally, I can't stand the term special needs child and wonder why such a beautiful healthy looking baby boy should not be 'pandered' about. As a mother of a young Down syndrome boy only a few months older than Trig I can tell you he probably enjoyed the exposure far more than my 'typical' kids would have. I thought it was great to see him being shown off just like the other children of the Palin family.

  • Posted By: silentreader @ 09/06/2008 12:15:50 PM

    I would suggest to everyone reading each Candidates's plan for Americans with disabilities. I havee posted a link to Barack's plan here. http://www.barackobama.com/issues/disabilities/
    I also tried to post a link for McCain's plan, but I could not find any plan on his website under "Issues." There is a statement from a disabled American, but I did not see a plan. I have a autistic son, and a brother and sister who are level 5 mentally challenged so trust me, this is a HUGE issue for me. Having a child with DS does not an advocate make. Please do your research!

    • Posted By: loriw @ 09/06/2008 6:30:38 PM

      If you are considering Obama please see my posts above on his position on the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. He was the ONLY Senator that OPPOSED this act signed into law by President Bush.
      Please Google or search JILL STANECK who testified before Obama and was unable to convince him to vote in favor of providing medical care for an infant born alive after an abortion. It was a baby with down's syndrome that was born alive after an abortion that led Jill Staneck to blow the whistle on Christ Hospital in Chicago and advocate for these live babies all the way to our nation's capitol. BE FULLY INFORMED BEFORE YOU PULL THE LEVER! You won't find this Obama policy on his campaign web site.

  • Posted By: JoePomp @ 09/06/2008 1:30:34 PM

    When she says a "friend" what exactly does she mean? Gov. Sarah "The Reformer" Palin hates bloated and useless federally funded programs that might help anyone in need. She is nothing more than the worst kind of opportunist. One that will use her child to get sympathy and more importantly votes. Do not get suckered in. She won't do a damn thing to help and what's worse, will probably work to get the existing programs eliminated.

    • Posted By: loriw @ 09/06/2008 6:17:27 PM

      Please see my post above regarding the other candidate and his positon on the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. Obama agrued and voted against this legislation at the state (IL) and national level. The
      Act was written and signed into law by President Bush after Jill Staneck blew the whistle on Christ Hospital (near Chicago) where a baby with Down's Syndrome was born alive following an abortion. The baby was left to die in the hospital's dirty utility room until Jill found it and held it until it died. Obama stated it was "too burdensome" to require the abortionist to make a phone call to get another doctor to care for the born alive infants. Does this sound like a better candidate to elect to make decisions on the medical care for our disabled children. For a candidate who already supports INFANTICIDE it is only one more step to EUTHANASIA. Obama admires Europe so much.....Netherlands, in Europe, has legalized Euthanasia. THINK ABOUT IT FOLKS! Do some research on Jill Staneck...I'm telling you the truth!

  • Posted By: meowbaby7 @ 09/05/2008 9:45:52 PM

    She used her baby to play the "special needs" card. Who's the real McShame?

    • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/05/2008 10:02:37 PM

      Please, on what do you base this ignorant post on? A fact, not your so-called opinion.

      • Posted By: courtreporter @ 09/05/2008 11:17:26 PM

        I agree with meowbaby7 -- she claime "privacy" but yet paraded her children on stage last night -- and announced she would be an advocate of special needs. We will hear "down syndrome" from her as much as we hear "POW" from McCain. They can't help it: they're both panderers. Country first; family second.

        • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 12:19:16 AM

          The request for privacy was for her daughter, and came from all four candidates, including Obama and Biden. You people astound me. You criticize her for a false story about cutting funding for special needs, then criticize her for having her child on stage. Or should she just have perfect children on stage as Obama did? I don't see a post from you criticizing him for having his children there.

          • Posted By: swe123 @ 09/06/2008 7:57:10 AM

            it was disgusting to see a four month only infant on stage at 10:00 at night at the RNC...this was purely using that baby as a prop so we could see how maternal she was. I would have been more impressed if that baby was sound asleep someplace quiet. also, if the baby is now on the circuit with her, how is he getting the early intervention services he should definitely have been receiving since birth?

            • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 10:06:45 AM

              swe123, do you have good information saying Trig hasn't been getting those services, or are you just assuming that a stay at home dad like her husband is too clueless to get him to therapy?

              • Posted By: Aurexa @ 09/06/2008 11:41:12 AM

                EnWhere did this bullpucky about Todd being a stay at home dad start.? He wasn't before...maybe now he is, but he worked for BP on the and also commercial fishedter Your Comment

                • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 6:01:05 PM

                  So you finally admit that you could be wrong about his current occupation? About freakin' time....

              • Posted By: swe123 @ 09/06/2008 10:35:43 AM

                I know he requires a speech therapist, occupational therapist, physical therapist who are certified to work with special needs infants, so no Dad doesn't qualify. Do you think they are traveling with these people? and at whose expense? I have a masters degree in early intervention and have worked with special needs infants for 18 years so I do have an idea of what I'm talking about and Sarah's use of this baby makes me sick.

                • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 11:27:55 AM

                  You know he requires a speech therapist? You're sure of that? Lol... he was born five months ago! The truth is you don't have a clue about what kind of care this baby is getting or will receive in the future.

                  • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 11:52:12 AM

                    Actually, Pallisor, that's one thing that swe123 might have gotten right. Key word....MIGHT, My niece first started working with a speech therapist around that age, and she has Downs. It was to help her learn how to move her mouth to help her feed better. But simply because Trig has Downs, that does not mean he would require that help.

                    • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 12:01:25 PM

                      You're probably right. I have little knowledge of the needs of special kids. My point is that some here think they know what care or lack thereof that Trig Palin is getting. They don't. They also appear to be certain that Palin and her husband won't be able to handle the care and needs of their child if she is in office. How can they know that... it's speculation and guessing at best.

                      I appreciate your thoughts... they are well taken.

                      • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 12:36:52 PM

                        No problem! Thanks for the link about the funding, BTW. I didn't know that. I guess we're even. ;)

                • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 11:34:45 AM

                  Unless you are familiar with Trig's case file, you cannot state for a fact precisely what therapies he needs, how often, or anything like that. Each special needs child is unique. They do not come one-size-fits-all. If you are able to diagnose what Trig needs just by looking at his photograph, you are either the best educator the world has ever seen, or working your own political agenda. Guess which one I think is most likely.

            • Posted By: cmom @ 09/06/2008 12:02:09 PM

              If you have ever traveled with an infant you would realize that 10pm in MN was not 10pm for him - over the course of 3 days he would not change his sleeping routine based on time zones - remember they are / were on Alaska time. It would have been far worse for her to have 'hidden' her special needs child from the public eye - isn't that what families with special needs children / adults in their life are trying to get rid of? If she would have had all of her children other than Trig on the stage the media (and the disablity community) would have had far more to say than he is too young to be on stage? How many babies do we see in the hands of poliical candidates? I have had my children with me at numerous public events - late, with large crowds - not as a sympathy card but because I am a proud mother and there are times they should be included - this was definately one of them!

              • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/06/2008 12:35:43 PM

                Exactly, cmom! I don't think there was anything wrong with having Trig out in public. He is a beautiful little child, not something shameful to be hidden away.

            • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 8:19:26 AM

              So, then, be disgusted. That's your perorgative. You're speculating though. You have no idea of what care this child is receiving.

              Obama and wife brought their kids out on stage, but they didn't do so to show how maternal they are.

              Of course not.

        • Posted By: shultis @ 09/06/2008 12:16:20 AM

          Unfortunately, they all parade their families around on stage and want you to know everything about them, until it's something unpleasant, then, families are off limits.

          • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 12:47:29 AM

            Of course, no one wants the bad front and center for either side. Unfortunately, if someone lives long enough, there wil be a skeleton.... for some, like Palin's daughter's pregancy and Obama's drug use, it is young. He grew up, so will she.

  • Posted By: Susie17 @ 09/06/2008 3:56:29 PM

    I support Sarah Palin wholeheartedly. She is a real person and more in touch with real life than any candidate I can recall. No matter what she does in terms of her son she will be critisised. If she didn't bring him on stage, she would be accused of hiding him. I f she brings him on stage and holds him like any mother would with a 'typical child" she is accused of exploiting her child that has Down Syndrome. Trig has 2 parents. I'm sure Sarah's husband will also ensure Trig receives the therapy he needs, or is that only a WOMAN'S responsibility? Some of the views expressed here appear to be from the dark ages!!! I have a son that is 25 years old who has Down Syndrome. He saw baby Trig and heard that he had Down Syndrome. He proudly commented that Trig has Down Syndorme like me. Disabled Americans receive the greatest amount of discrimination.

    • Posted By: loriw @ 09/06/2008 5:54:19 PM

      Thank you Susie for your perceptive comment.
      Have you been as appaulded as I have by the comments made on other articles criticizing Sarah Palin for even haven given birth to Trig? I have heard comments like "that child should have been aborted, he will just be a drain on society for as long as he lives and people already don't have healthcare or food" and here's another..."she condemed her down's kid to a lifetime of he!! because of his disability". It makes me sick that people care so little for life and have so little understanding of Down's which like Autism has a wide range of disablility from mild (remember the actor Chris Burke) to more severe. But my experience has been that people with Down's have happier lives then these so called "normal" people do.

  • Posted By: loriw @ 09/06/2008 5:47:36 PM

    Before I get flamed here I just want to state for the record that I have an adult child with Aspergers Autism and ADHD so I know that you don't get help from the government for your kids and you pay out of pocket as I did for as much as I could.
    Now given that we all agree that it is "dam" near impossible to get medical care and assistance for our kids who have obvious needs ...why do you think that the same government will provide EVERYONE with adequate healthcare. Does every one here want to wait for their own healthcare just like our special needs kids do now? I work in healthcare and the last thing I want is more government in our healthcare system. Look at the medical care the government is giving to our injured soldiers... that's government controlled health care...do you want that kind of health care for your loved ones? THINK ABOUT IT FOLKS!

  • Posted By: JoePomp @ 09/06/2008 1:35:34 PM

    Ha! When she says. "friend" what exactly does she mean? The kind of friend that will get more federal money to fund programs for special needs kids? This is exactly the type of "wasteful" government spending that Sarah "The Reformer" is going to Washington to eliminate. They should call her Sarah "The Opportunist." And she is the worst kind. So far she has held up her pregnant daughter to underscore her commitment to "Life," now she is holding up her son to get sympathy from Special Needs parents. DO NOT GET SUCKERED IN! She will do nothing to help you and will probably work to get existing programs cut.

    • Posted By: loriw @ 09/06/2008 5:40:55 PM

      Existing programs are so wraught with fraud and waste that is why so many are not getting services...the government is a broken bureacracy that needs people like Palin to help fix them so that the money, instead of being wasted, goes to help those that truly need it.
      Medicare equipment department has at least a 35% fraud problem and that doesn't even include wasted equipment and personnel time.

  • Posted By: asiago @ 09/06/2008 4:38:37 PM

    So let's see, she line-items out the funding for special needs kids in Alaska's state budget, and then she births a special needs kid and suddenly she counts as a great supporter? All I can say is "in your dreams"; this is a woman whose positions shift like the winds, based solely on what's best for her. If this enough for her to get your vote, don't start whining when she's in office and suddenly YOUR special needs kids don't matter to her.

  • Posted By: Dryak @ 09/06/2008 4:20:31 PM

    She is just beginning the challenge and is totally unaware what is ahead. Besides,she must have help of she went back to work when he was 3 days old. I really think she belongs at home-being a Mother-rather than gone and putting her family second. She has not been honest with the Alaskan people-why would I think she will be honest with us. Sorry- but I think its another case of saying wat we want to hear.

  • Posted By: courtreporter @ 09/05/2008 11:14:48 PM

    Warning: she slashed special ed in Alaska! Is that helping?????????

    • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 12:07:30 AM

      No she didn't.

      • Posted By: swe123 @ 09/06/2008 7:51:23 AM

        yes she did....just google alaska's budget and you can see the line items...300,000 one year and an additional 300,000 the next year

        • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 8:13:32 AM

          Well now, that would be an increase, not a reduction.

          • Posted By: swe123 @ 09/06/2008 10:28:29 AM

            ummmm no, $300,00 the first year, and additional $300,00 the next year for a total decrease of $600,000

            • Posted By: Pallisor @ 09/06/2008 2:44:25 PM

              So you say. The link you had to this went nowhere.

  • Posted By: poohdrama @ 09/06/2008 1:46:55 PM

    http://www.gov.state.ak.us/omb/09_omb/budget/GovernorsTwoYearSavingsProposal.pdhttp://www.gov.state.ak.us/omb/09_omb/budget/GovernorsTwoYearSavingsProposal.pdff

  • Posted By: luckylarry @ 09/06/2008 10:31:10 AM

    I have two daughters with Autism and I know two years ago I intensely lobbied Congress to pass the Autism Spectrum Bill which had Republican support but very little Democrat support and it was one of the last things passed before the Democratic controlled Congress took over who had threatened to shelve it or scuttle it and/or vastly reduce it. The Democrats seem to be more inclined to cure Aids than help disabled children. At the very least we would have a Vice President who is aware of how hard parents of disabled children have it and just that is a start which is twice as much as the Democratic ticket is acknowledging. Many of the Democrats want to repeal the No Child Left Behind Act and replace it with nothing, my daughters have benefitted enormously from this act and I wonder without this where would they be? Most likely shoved in an isolated room with no hope.

    • Posted By: dcwblackhorse @ 09/06/2008 1:10:50 PM

      Speaking from a public school teacher's point of view...many of us want to get rid of NCLB because we are forced to give regular ed tests to special needs kids and include them in our percentages. All this does is bring down our test scores that NCLB demands be the ONLY assessment for student growth. If your scores aren't high enough you become a school needing "government" intervention. Which means more testing, more paperwork and frankly less time for using creative teaching that excites student learning. You are forced to use canned programs that are boring and do NOT teach creative thinking at all!

    • Posted By: swe123 @ 09/06/2008 11:09:19 AM

      The NCLB Act has more to do with focing school to do more testing than funding. Unfortunately, it's hurting special ed kids because when we provide inclusion (which is the right way to educate disabled children) test scores go down and funding is cut as a punishment. Even if the test scores are high enough, republican federal governments are cutting money to special education which impacts our ability to provide paraprofessionals and extra special ed teachers to enable these students to stay in general education. I hope to God that your daughters can continue to be provided with all the supports they are now receiving, but it will not be due to NCLB but a government that believes in supporting these students with adequate funding.

  • Posted By: katmdo @ 09/06/2008 12:04:39 AM

    I am the mother of a special needs child. He was also premature. I didn't jump on a plane to Canada when my amniotic fluid started leaking (although I had tickets) because I knew something wasn't right. I just can't vote for Palin. How can she put herself and her Down Syndrome premature infant at such risk? Any woman knows that (assuming she was pregnant) at 44 any pregnancy would be high risk

    How could any mother put her 17 year old daughter in such a position? Palin had to know what was going to happen. And why does she think if they happy couple get married everything will be A OK? How does her family feel about DIVORCE and single motherhood at 19?

    I think she needs to get her house in order before she even thinks about persuing her political career. Think about her children before her ambitions. She has no idea what to expect raising a special needs child. I realize her husband will do most of the raising but...

    • Posted By: silentreader @ 09/06/2008 12:58:46 PM

      I 1000000% agree with you on all of your points and it stopped me in my tracks last Friday when I heard what she did. I question the judgement of BOTH parents. My husband would have dragged me to the closest hospital if I were ever crazy enough to risk such a thing. If that is the judgement they practice with the health and safety of their own child, I don't trust them making decisions that would affect my family or my country.

    • Posted By: snowsnoop @ 09/06/2008 12:20:46 AM

      I totally agree..... ...

      • Posted By: iceteacher @ 09/06/2008 12:56:18 AM

        I totally agree with your comments. I also would add, what kind of FATHER would permit their child's mother to do this to their children. No that women need their husband's permission, but why one of those parents did not advocate for what is in the best interest of their children fist tells me NO WAY!!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse