Team McCain and the Trooper

SARAH PALIN: NOT PROPERLY VETTED, IF VETTED AT ALL...

SHE ATTENDED 5-6 COLLEGES.

EARNED A DEGREE IN "jOURNALISM"

NOT POLITICAL SCIENCE OR US LAW OR INTERNATIONAL LAW !!

SOME OF THE COLLEGES PALIN ATTENDED HAVE NO RECORD OF THIS WOMAN ATTENDING THEIR COLLEGE NOR CAN THEY RELEASE HER GRADES !!

IF THIS WERE OBAMA OR BIDEN...

THEY WOULD BE NOWHERE NEAR OR SENATE MORE OVER THE WHITE HOUSE !!

NO POLITICAL SCIENCE OR LAWYER BACKGROUND, WHICH IS HIGHLY RECCOMNED FOR THE JOB AS COMMANDER IN CHEIF, WHETHER PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT.

MEMBERS OF THE (AIP) THE ALASKAN INDEPEDENCE PARTY, WHICH SUBSCRIBES TO SECEDING THE UNION AND MAKING ALASKA IT'S OWN SOVERIEGN COUNTRY AND THAT THE THE VOTE ON ALASKA BECOMING THE 49TH STATE IN THE UNION WAS ILLEGAL, CORRUPT AND THUS MAKES THE VOTE ON ALASKA BEING THE 49TH STATE IN THE UNION NULL AN VOIDABLE !!!

FACING AN INDICTMENT

SARAH PALIN: HAILING FROM THE VERY CORRUPT AND FROZEN FRONTIER OF ALASKA...

HE!! NO !!!

SARAH PALIN : THE ALASKAN "EARMARK LASS" OF THE YUKON...ONE HEART ATTACK, STROKE OR HARDENING OF THE ARTERIES AWAY FROM BEING PRESIDENT OF THE USA... NO THANKS

SARAH PALIN: ALASKA FIRST, ALASKA ALWAYS !!

SARAH PALIN: GAS PIPELINE THAT BRINGS BILLIONS, THOUGH THE GAS LINE WILL NOT BE FINISHED UNTIL (2019)

SARAH PALIN: I SOLD THE STATES PLANE ON EBAY, THOUH IT ONLY GOT ONE BID AND WAS LATER SOLD OFFLINE, TO A REPUBLICAN AT A 500,000 LOSS !!

A PLANE THAT WAS USED TO TRANSPORT PRISONERS TO ARIZONA PRISONS, WHEN NOT IN USE BY THE GOVERNOR...

WHAT FORM OF AIR TRANSPORTATION AND AT WHAT COST TO THE ALASKAN TAX PAYER, WILL BE THE NEW ALTERNATIVE TO TRANSPORTING PRISONERS TO STATESIDE PRISONS BE...HMMMMM

Like it or Not...

Rezko: Found Guilty

Rezko's Wife: Not Guilty or on Trial. Rezko's Wife Purchased and sold the Home and Land to the Obama's, it was a sweet Deal, Not Illegal. Sorry

The Obama's: Not even on Trial. They Bought a Home at a Great Price and sold some Extra Land to Rezko's Wife, who Sold that Land at a PROFIT...

Thats Capitalism, Not ILLEGAL A!! Wipe

Rev.Wright was Addressed, Rev. Wright Served his Country as a Soldier and with Honor, he Did Not say "God Damn White America" he said "God Damn America" which would Encompass Black, White, Asian & Hispanic America. But Actually Wright was damning the Government and what they do to Others around the World... But Wright Never Refused to Pledge Allegiance to the Flag, Nor say that the state of Illinois should Secede The Nation (USA) and beconme it's own COUNTRY...

Sarah Palin & her Husband Subscribe to this and were Members of the (AIP)

The Alaskan Independent Party... Tada !!
---------------------------------------

PALIN'S CASE IS A CASE OF A LACK OF MORAL AND LEGAL ETHICS AND A HISTORY OF ABUSE OF GOVERNING POWER !!

This story of the State Police commissioner seems improbable. He claims he was fired because he did not fire the brother-in-law as asked by the Governor Palin. It seems improbable that the Governor should even be dealing with the State Police Commissioner. Governor Palin should have contacted the local district attorney or state attorney general and have the case presented directly to a grand jury and thereby bypass the State Police Commissioner altogether. Because her ex-brother-in-law was a State Trooper maybe she felt compelled to exhaust internal channels and remedies due to her position as Governor and a desire not to embarrass the State of Alaska and state law enforcement, and so by that reasoning she decided to go initially through the State Police Commissioner. But the question becomes did the State Police Commissioner contact the FBI or United States Attorney or any outside agency such as an Alaska District Attorney or Assistant Attorney General because there was a potential violation of civil rights by the officer through the use of official oppression, his badge in harassing the Trooper???s estranged wife and threat to kill his father-in-law.

Importantly the reports state that the estranged spouse filed for divorce and a domestic violence protective order on April 11 2005 against the State Trooper. Under new federal law, anyone subject to a protective order or convicted of misdemeanor domestic assault is subject to a ban on possession or use of a handgun for a minimum of five years or at least to the end of the protective order. Some have argued that the ban is forever even after the protective order expires. The Domestic Violence Offender Gun Band is a federal law that applies to everyone including police officers and servicemen and servicewomen. It is a felony to violate the law and the penalty is five years in prison. If subject to a protection order as alleged, the trooper should have been ineligible to be a State law enforcement officer and it would have been a slam dunk to terminate him. It would be a felony for the brother-in-law trooper to wear his standard sidearm if subject to a protective order. The State Police Commissioner should have been aware of this law and should have terminated the brother-in-law without being asked. The State Commissioner failure to uphold the federal law should have been enough grounds for his own termination.

The Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban is federal criminal law which the Alaska State Public Safety Commissioner had no discretion in not enforcing. If the State Trooper had a protective order issued against him, the State Public Safety Commissioner should have terminated the State Trooper without being asked by anybody. It is a felony to violate the federal Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban. News reports state that the estranged spouse filed for divorce and a domestic violence protective order on April 11 2005 against the State Trooper. Protective orders are customarily issued. If a protective order was issued, the federal criminal statute Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban should resolve all of the current controversy surrounding any inappropriate contacts between the Governor???s office and the State Public Safety Commissioner. If a protective order was issued, the State Public Safety Commissioner is clearly way out on a limb on the wrong side of the law in this matter. It would take one call to the court to find out if a protective order was issued and that would have been enough for the Public Safety Director to act.

Conservative Republicans love Palin they think she is the best and most prepared of all four candidates.

Now after that vacuous, rudimentary speech she gave at the convention, and the stomp speech she finger read the next day, she is at home trying to find out if Dmitry Medvedev is the President of Iraq, and who is A.. Ama. . Aadja. Amadjjaja... Amadinajhad ... Ahmadinejad.

The Ayers topic is a very legitimate concern. Same with Rezco and Wright. Like it or not, you are judged by the company you keep and Obama has made some really bad decisions in this area.

1. The Bill Ayers Story is retarded, the Man is a University Professor, is not this Terror to the Nation as you would assess him to be... If Ayers was this National Security or TERRORIST THREAT to AMERICA...

Ayers would be... A.) In Federal Prison For Life or B.) Dead as a Door Knob...

The CIA, The FBI and the President would make Bill Ayers REAL HISTORY !!

So Stop the Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh & Anne Coulter A!! Wiping and Bull-Spitting..OK


2.This Story is not about Mike Wooten, who has Admitted to his WRONGDOINGS, he's STILL an Alaskan Policeman. Wooten was only Suspended 5 Days. he's still a Policeman. Everybody knows that policemen by an large are Steroided Out, Mental Cases, with a Badge an Most have Citations of Varying Degrees, based on how long they've served and what Department.

Note: Its the Man Sarah Palin Security Administrator and Palin's Administrations Constant Harassment and Bullying, via Palin's ABUSE OF POWER, THAT HAS HER P-SSY IN A RINGER...

NOT WOOTEN..I REPAEAT NOT WOOTEN....

WOOTEN IS THE DISTRACTION...IT'S SARAH PALIN THAT IS THE FOCUS, BASED ON "ABUSE OF POWER"

GETTING ILLEGAL ACCESS TO WOOTEN'S RECORDS.WHICH IS AGAINST ALASKAN STATE LAW, MAYBE EVEN FEDERAL LAW ?

WOOTEN IS SCOTT FREE...PALIN SHOULD'VE LEFT IT ALONE, LIKE NOT LEAVING THAT LIBRARIAN ALONE, WHO SUED AND WON AND HAS HER LIBRARIAN JOB BACK.

SARAH PALIN: IS A GOOD OLE GIRL POLITICIAN, WHO JUST LIKE ANY "GOOD OLE GIRL" IS DOING WHAT THE "GOOD OLE BOYS DO" NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL AND SHOULD BE SCRUTINIZED LIKE THE "GOOD OLE BOYS"

"A PIT BULL WITH LIPSTICK."...

HAVE YOU EVER SEEN A PIT BULL B!TCH DOG...AVOID A GOOD FIGHT..HMMMMM

HE!! NO...

THIS B!TCH IS A FRAUD, NOW THE PRO-REPUBLICANS ARE CALLING "SEXISM"

WHEN PALIN SAID THAT "HILLARY WAS WHINING"

THE B!TCH HAS BEEN ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL FOR 1 1/2 WEEKS AND ALREADY WHINING LIKE A B!CTH POODLE OPPOSED TO A "PIT BULL"

"A PIT BULL WITH LIPSTICK" HAD THE DEMOCRATS BRANDED HER WITH SUCH A LABEL, SHE WOULD AND THE PRO-REPUBLICAN MEDIA, WOULD'VE CALLED IT A SEXIST TERM !!!

Palin has said...

"The War In Iraq is for Oil"

"The War in Iraq, is for Natural Resources"

She also said that she "Like or Agreed with Sen. Obama's Energy Plan"

She also Thanked Obama for the "Stimulus Checks The Alaskan People and Americans Recieved this Summer, Because the Alaskan People were really being HIT HARD by the HIGH PRICE of GAS and OTHER EXPENSES"

How is this Witch going to be able to AVOID these Contradictions...How in the He!! will she be able to DANCE AROUND HER OWN WORDS !!!!

She was for the so called Bridge to Nowhere, until it was politically expediant to be Against it and the Governemnt REFUSED to give her MORE MILLIONS to accomplish the job.

The So Called Alaskan Gas Pipeline, Palin Bragged about in her Speech Wednesday, WILL NOT BE FINISHED UNTIL THE YEAR (2019) !!!

Palin is Not Against Government Hand outs, in EarMarks as she Claimed in her SPEECH, the town of Wasilla LIVES OFF GOVERMENT MILLIONS at then Mayor Palin's REQUEST !!!

The People of Kitchakin Alaska surely did not feel that their Town ws Nowhere they are Pissed at Palin for Demeaning their Town, their People and the Bridge She Supported !!!

You know "The Little Guys, the ones she is suppose to Champion, the ones she Promised she would help by building this Bridge"

This Witch is a FRAUD !!

So let me see if I've got this straight???

The state senator in charge of the investigation has admitted that his statements were inappropriate so another legislator asks that the bipartisan Legislative Council consider removing him in order to ensure the perception of fairness and due process. Sounds like a reasonable request to me no matter who the accused is. But the shrill angry left cries foul. I'll bet they wouldn't be so noisy if it were one of their own that was being scrutinized.

An earlier poster was absolutely correct when he/she cautioned you screamers to keep your eye on the ball. This subject has no legs with the people who are going to decide this election because they view Wooten is a scum-bag who should have been fired a long time ago and the commissioner as protecting one of his own.

Why does the Earmark Queen need so much protection from the press? Why is she in hiding? Where is Vickie Iseman? More Bush/Cheney-like secrecy. No doubt this is McBush all over again.

Another hidden McCain supporter; Why won't Palin answer questions from the press? This is unheard of except in the Republican universe. Why won't Palin cooperate in that state investigation as she said she would? Where is Vickie Iseman? Yet anotherr McCain cover-up. They are beyond belief.

More obstruction on behalf of Republican's, one would hope they would actually respect the citizens of this country and the rule of law even just a little bit, after all, if Palin has nothing to hide then why not cooperate fully and get it on the record to dispel any doubts?

"French today acknowledged that some of his public comments about the ongoing probe may have been out of bounds. "I said some things I shouldn't have said," he told NEWSWEEK."

Well, Mssr. Isikoff & Hosenball, aren't you going to discuss WHAT those "out of bounds" comments were?

Maybe it was the comment last July in the WSJ, in which French was ALREADY speculating on "worst case scenarios," suggesting that Palin could be impeached as governor and that she was "almost impervious to error." The man "overseeing the probe" was already chatting up Palin's Impeachment LAST July.

Perhaps it's the comment he made saying that the results of the investigation are "likely to be damaging" to Palin? Results? I didn't realize you had "results" until you had a conclusion. Evidently, Mr. French has already reached HIS conclusion.

Maybe it's the less than flattering comments he's made about John McCain? Or the very positive comments he's made about Barack Obama? Of course, Mr. French is, after all, an AVID supporter of the Democratic
ticket. And while Mr. French is busying himself with speculation about Palin's impeachment , he's spoken glowingly about both Obama & Biden, even citing the fact that Biden has a son heading for Iraq. Coincidentally, so does Gov. Palin. But French seems to overlook that.

I find it appalling that nowhere in this article do you delve into THESE issues. The very idea that Mr. French has ALREADY revealed he is far from impartial re: Gov. Palin (as fact that even HE readily admits) & that he is not simply "the Democrat overseeing the probe" but a Democrat-- that enthusiastically supports Mr. Obama-- overseeing the probe.

Word is only just beginning to get out (no thanks to articles such as this) as to the players in this farce. By being less that forthright about who these players are & their histories, the media will appear to be covering for the Democrats. And the more Democrats insist that this "investigation" go forward, the LESS credible the results.

There are many of us who will not sit idly by while Sarah Palin is pilloried yet again.

Obviously NOW there needs to be an investigation into COGHILL for OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and CONSPIRACY
b/t these GOP operatives.

"French today acknowledged that some of his public comments about the ongoing probe may have been out of bounds. "I said some things I shouldn't have said," he told NEWSWEEK."

Well, Mssr. Isikoff & Hosenball, aren't you going to discuss WHAT those "out of bounds" comments were?

Maybe it was the comment last July in the WSJ, in which French was ALREADY speculating on "worst case scenarios," suggesting that Palin could be impeached as governor and that she was "almost impervious to error." The man "overseeing the probe" was already chatting up Palin's Impeachment LAST July.

Perhaps it's the comment he made saying that the results of the investigation are "likely to be damaging" to Palin? Results? I didn't realize you had "results" until you had a conclusion. Evidently, Mr. French has already reached HIS conclusion.

Maybe it's the less than flattering comments he's made about John McCain? Or the very positive comments he's made about Barack Obama? Of course, Mr. French is, after all, an AVID supporter of the Democratic
ticket. And while Mr. French is busying himself with speculation about Palin's impeachment , he's spoken glowingly about both Obama & Biden, even citing the fact that Biden has a son heading for Iraq. Coincidentally, so does Gov. Palin. But French seems to overlook that.

I find it appalling that nowhere in this article do you delve into THESE issues. The very idea that Mr. French has ALREADY revealed he is far from impartial re: Gov. Palin (as fact that even HE readily admits) & that he is not simply "the Democrat overseeing the probe" but a Democrat-- that enthusiastically supports Mr. Obama-- overseeing the probe.

Word is only just beginning to get out (no thanks to articles such as this) as to the players in this farce. By being less that forthright about who these players are & their histories, the media will appear to be covering for the Democrats. And the more Democrats insist that this "investigation" go forward, the LESS credible the results.

There are many of us who will not sit idly by while Sarah Palin is pilloried yet again.

AlaskaTroopergate.com
Please sign this petition demanding the truth at www.alaskatroopergate.com that states:

"We, the undersigned, call on Sarah Palin to fulfill her promise to cooperate with the Alaska Troopergate investigation.

We demand that GOP operatives stop stonewalling the investigation.

We as Americans say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and demand the information we are entitled to know to make an informed decision before election day!"

Please help get the word out!

AlaskaTroopergate.com
Please sign this petition demanding the truth at www.alaskatroopergate.com that states:

"We, the undersigned, call on Sarah Palin to fulfill her promise to cooperate with the Alaska Troopergate investigation.

We demand that GOP operatives stop stonewalling the investigation.

We as Americans say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and demand the information we are entitled to know to make an informed decision before election day!"

Please help get the word out!

Please continue to follow this story. Alaskans want to be free of Sarah Palin and her husband and the GOP crush machine in Alaska. They are poor, promise of a energy credit is all they have right now. "They say Sarah Palin buying their vote but need the money.....desparate but not free in America the "FREE"