While undoubtedly there is truth to what the article says, America has been pretty fickle with science and is not footing enough of the bill this time around, it marginalizes the substantial contributions made by Americans on the CMS and Atlas detectors. I would argue that this is merely contributing to the current problem with American science rather than remedying it. Rather than understanding that a large portion of the data from the LHC WILL travel through American electronics, the average American will believe particle physics are for Europeans and that his nation is no longer on the cutting edge. This would discourage Americans from going into the field and cause them to consider it a lost cause. (yes it's an external problem)
The truth is that the American contribution to the project, while essential, has been largely ignored by the news media. (don't even ask me about the original quote. "essential, but limited" it can be taken several ways) An excellent example is the nice picture of the endcap muon systems on CMS that almost every news organization shows. Conspicuously absent is the fact that the vast majority ( chambers, electronics, and frame(I think the frame)) of this particular section was made and designed by Americans. Does essential, but limited mean that if the Americans got up and took away their electronics, the LHC wouldn't have a detector for another five to ten years?
My take on the project is that, while their contribution isn't what it should have been monetarily, the American contribution has been concentrated in strategic areas. This means that the actual American footprint on the project far exceeds their financial contribution.
Land Of Big Science
The Large Hadron Collider is a symptom of America's decline in particle physics and, some fear, in science overall.
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
The eyes of the world are on Geneva, where scientists are expected to throw the switch this week on what may be the biggest experiment ever conducted. It's certainly the most expensive. The European Organization for Nuclear Research, or CERN, has spent roughly $8 billion digging a 27-kilometer tunnel on the outskirts of the city and filling it with equipment that pushes the limits of technology—superconducting magnets that operate at close to absolute zero, the temperature at which atoms cease all movement, and can accelerate particles to energies not seen for 14 billion years, and instruments that can detect faint whispers of particles far smaller than atoms.
Probing more deeply than ever before into the stuff of the universe requires some big hardware. It also requires the political will to lavish money on a project that has no predictable practical return, other than prestige and leadership in the branch of science that delivered just about every major technology of the past hundred years.
Those advances came, in large measure, from the United States. The coming decades may be different. The Large Hadron Collider, as the Geneva machine is called, is a symptom of America's decline in particle physics and Europe's rise. Many scientists and educators fear that it also signals a broader decline in scientific leadership on the part of the United States.
The LHC has transformed Geneva into something of a scientific mecca. According to CERN, more than 9,000 scientists have been working on the project, not only from nearby Europe but from countries as diverse as India, Russia, Japan, Israel and Turkey. Over the next few decades, they'll continue to arrive by train and by plane, stay in hotels and eat in restaurants, occasionally dangling their feet in the fountains of Lausanne. Not being a particularly freewheeling bunch, they will spend most of their time in the lab, relishing the data that will soon start pouring out of the instrument like a desert spring. Some will choose to live nearby—in Geneva, or perhaps France and Britain. Although particle physics is hardly a key driver of great economies, it is the most profound of intellectual challenges, embracing the most fundamental contradictions in science and attracting some of the best minds.
Europe's triumph over America isn't one of the talking points at the CERN press office. And for scientists, there's no percentage in offending the people they rely on for grants and for precious time to run their experiments on the collider. The project is represented as one of the greatest examples to date of international cooperation, which it may be. A third of the scientists working at the LHC hail from outside the 20 states that control CERN. America has contributed 1,000 or so researchers, the largest single contingent from any non-CERN nation. "CERN has always been enormously successful as an international collaboration," says Hans Boggild, a member of the CERN Council who plans to perform experiments on the collider. "This is a success both for Europe and the world."
A quick look at the numbers, however, reveals how far the United States stands to fall in leadership once the LHC goes live. The U.S. contribution amounts to $500 million—barely 5 percent of the bill. The big bucks have come from the Europeans. Germany is picking up 20 percent of the tab, the British are contributing 17 percent, and the French are giving 14 percent. Even the Bulgarians have chipped in less than 1 percent. Despite the U.S. dominance of recent decades in physics, most of the brainpower is European as well. "The contribution of the non-Europeans has been essential, but limited," says Els Koffeman, professor of particle physics at the University of Amsterdam.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Discuss