Can You Say ‘Sexist’?

If you're a Republican, you'd better learn. The right wing that trashed the women's movement suddenly finds its inner feminist.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: netc@comcast.net @ 11/11/2008 4:12:53 PM

    I believe the real problem is that Palin is an actual christian. The real hypocrutes are those politicians from both paries who give lip service to being a christian while approving of killing full term babies during birth. They approve of the cross in urine and Mary, Jesus' mother, being painted with cow dung and calling and being displayed as art in museums. No christian presence in schools while muslims can give cpurses and provided prayer rooms.

  • Posted By: american gal @ 10/23/2008 6:26:49 PM

    When I see pictures of Palin with a rifle on Newsweek and sitting on a couch with a dead Grissly bear and a lobster on the table in the New Yorker it repulses me as a woman. If I were a Republican I would have crossed parties this year. John McCain is 72 years old and has had cancer for God's sake so their is very likely chance that she could be our next president. I think that the Republicans will blow this election because of Palin along with the fact that the GOP ruined our country this last eight years. I myself can not forgive Bush Cheney for all the evil that they have done and will not give the GOP another chance.

  • Posted By: jim43 @ 09/16/2008 3:21:29 PM

    Politics. Just an idea here. Dems are ticked Bush won not once but twice. Hillary lost because she wasn't Hillary Rodham Clinton she was Hillary Clinton, Bill's wife. Now lets trash this Palin person, a woman that has a family history unlike most "note unlike MOST" of the people that actually vote. Look in 2012 Hillary will probably win but Obama picked Biden and McCain picked Palin. Issues aside Mccain wins

    • Posted By: wendydk @ 10/22/2008 2:52:54 PM

      "Issues Aside"....sounds familiar. Isn't that the Republican ticket's platform?

    • Posted By: Lindalp @ 09/17/2008 12:45:01 AM

      Issues aside??? Do you hear yourself??? I pray God you are not right and I don't believe you are.

  • Posted By: neocon @ 09/16/2008 7:18:22 PM

    Sarah Palin has connected with a majority percentage of Americans and the polls reflect that connection. She poses a direct threat to Barack Obama's candidacy and the democrats know it. She's about to upset the applecart. She's about to undo much of what they've accomplished and it drives the crazy. Imagine Sarah Palin as a role model for millions upon millions of young girls. Imagine those young girls embracing life over death on the abortion issue, embracing true feminism over radical feminism. They absolutely can't allow that to happen and the progressives will stop at nothing to destroy her. We expect liberal bias from the media and those in academia. But this time around, the bias is off the charts. It's exposed the left for the sexists they truly are, and we have Sarah Palin to thank for it.

    • Posted By: wendydk @ 10/22/2008 2:51:44 PM

      I don't know what polls you're looking at. Every single one I've seen shows negative ratings. And the idea that she might be a "role model" for young women is scary. Not because of what she's accomplished, but because of who she is, what she says, and how she does it.

  • Posted By: trazer @ 09/20/2008 1:02:44 AM

    The approval rating for the Governor of Alaska is 86 per cent. Having actually visited Alaska and met with many locals, they have a wide diversity of thought like most states. However, the governor has done a very credible job. Its crazy that the lower 48 states and people in it trash a successful executive woman, simply because they know their candidate (Broken Obama and his white aged running mate Biden) is so bad.

    • Posted By: wendydk @ 10/22/2008 2:48:30 PM

      Considering Alaskans make big money off the rest of us, of course they're happy. Even Bush had a high approval rating less than two years into his presidency, so that argument does not carry any weight with me.

  • Posted By: gadeinin @ 09/24/2008 12:27:54 PM

    Shame on anyone who doesn't understand Quindlen's point! The point isn't that Palin is not qualified (which she isn't) or that Obama is (which he is). But honestly, for a woman to only support Palin because she is a woman is the most absurd thing I have ever heard of. Yes, women need to be in more political offices. Yes, it would be great for a woman to be elected as President, or Vice President. But are women stupid enough to be tricked into voting for just any woman? Why would you support a woman who doesn't stand for women? Voting for McCain/Palin does not support or advance women, it does the complete opposite. Don't be duped ladies! And shame on any woman who falls into their trap!

    • Posted By: allison florance @ 09/26/2008 7:57:41 PM

      What you don't get is that Palin DOES stand for women. You just don't like how she does it. You need to understand that those of us voting for her ticket SUPPORT how she stands up for women and familu.

      • Posted By: wendydk @ 10/22/2008 2:47:12 PM

        Explain how she "stands up" for women or families any more than Obama does??

  • Posted By: kerk @ 09/27/2008 8:08:30 PM

    Yes, it is sexist when sarah palins face is plastered all over the internet on someone elses body in a bikini.
    i don't see any bikini pictures of joe biden.
    as for your thought about abortion. Palin is correct in wanting to protect the unborn fetus. A woman choosing abortion is a very selfish thing. Does the fetus get to voice his/her opinion of whether it lives or dies? Does the father of the fetus get to decide if his tiny child gets to live or die? When 3 people are involved in a birth (the mother, the child , and the father) it is very selfish of the mother to decide whether the infant should die.

    • Posted By: wendydk @ 10/22/2008 2:46:21 PM

      I believe the woman who has to carry, birth and care for a child the rest of her life should be the one to make the decision. Nine times out of ten, the father talked her into it or would never consent to care for the child for the rest of his life, so don't pretend as though he would want custody, much less pay child support.

  • Posted By: scarcarsister @ 09/29/2008 2:33:09 PM

    Sarah Palin is as qualified to as Barack Obama. Just in different ways. She is a mom and that qualifies her to run just about anything. She is a working outside of the house mom , which endears her to most of us, but yes, if we vote for McCain Palin JUSTBECAUSE she is a woman, then we are not thinking clearly about what is most important to us.
    On the issue of abortion, why is this legal when the baby is not yet born but murder when it is born? What is the difference and when in the womb does a baby become a baby?

    • Posted By: wendydk @ 10/22/2008 2:43:08 PM

      Being a mom does not make you qualified to run "just about anything". I own a small business, and if a woman showed up with "stay at home mom" on her resume, it would make her not even close to qualified to work for me, much less run my business.

      What an assinine comment.

    • Posted By: TYME4aCHANGE @ 10/08/2008 3:11:29 PM

      I'm a working mother, but I would never think I had the know how, or may be even the intelligence it takes to run a COUNTRY. I live in a white house, but what makes me think I'm qualified to live "The White House" simply because I can balance my budget at home? I am in no way putting myself or any other single parent down because it is not and easy position. However, we already have people in the "White House," who thought they were qualified, and they too had little to no experience on running a COUNTRY. In this case, actions speak louder than words. I'm in favor of hockey moms, but that is not the criteria we should use to determine who will lead this messed up country of ours. That's all we need is another "want to be president" to finish us off. I'd rather go with a no named, unheard of, Harvard Law Grad, and not a lipstick wearing hockey mom who can't seem to run her own (white) house. Did someone say teenage pregnancy?

  • Posted By: wendydk @ 10/22/2008 2:40:35 PM

    I liked John McCain in 2000, and in fact liked him up until about a year ago. He is not the same man he was, does not stand for the same things he used to, and has not run the campaign he promised to. He did NOT pick Sarah Palin, she was picked for him by the neocons who run his party. She is the reason that I would not even consider voting for McCain in this election. I took an immediate and visceral dislike to her from the first time I heard her.

    It has nothing to do with her gender, or her looks. If you put a bag over her head, dressed her in a garbage back and digitally distorted her voice, I would still dislike her. It's what she says, and how, that makes her distasteful.

  • Posted By: slaxx @ 10/10/2008 3:34:08 PM

    p.s. - POUGHKEEPSIE RULES!

  • Posted By: slaxx @ 10/10/2008 3:32:33 PM

    Oh please. I've heard many conservatives, and others, bash Palin for working while having five children, one a newborn with down-syndrome. The only reason they're not speaking so loudly is because she's the nominee, there's nothing they can do about it, and they want to WIN the election.

    And their actions are also sexist. The fact that they cry foul and "sexism" at the least criticism or questioning of Palin shows that they believe that women aren't equal to men and should be treated with kid gloves. It's also politically convenient. The Republican party, which has rarely, if ever, been on the side of women are using women - including Palin. They shot down equal pay for women, are against many reproductive services and rights and programs that help women, yet they want us to believe that just becasue McCain picked a woman as VP, republicans suddenly care about women, view them as equals, want them to be equal, and will do soemthing to further the lives and conditions of women. Puh-leeze. McCain only picked her because he knew he couldn't pick Lieberman and he needed the conservative base.

  • Posted By: jw1293 @ 09/30/2008 2:53:10 PM

    You're so right! I find it only laughable that commentators who used to accuse Hillary Clinton of "hiding behind the apron strings" (read: "playing the 'gender card'") are ones who are calling party fouls on the Obama campaign. All of the sudden, we're seeing the GOP denounce the media for actually wanting to investigate Palin and to learn more about this overly-scripted and incredibly cryptic unknown figure from all the way out there.

  • Posted By: rube @ 09/15/2008 11:42:32 PM

    Finds is not the right word!

    Comment: Today bad news rolled in 550 point dow loss, worst day for "W" ( Bush and Wallstreet) in 8 years!
    People/voters will connect the dots and they will vote from their wallets and their
    checkbooks.
    Truth is the scadals such as s&L, subprime, mortage/wallstreet and banking industry meltdown
    have two names writen all over them! Not to metion unneeded wars based on duplicity and subversion that cost 3 trillion dollars- that may well last 100 years!

    the two names all over these falied policies are Bush/McCain!
    Connect the dots and you will see that A. Greenspan and a bevey of other finanacial experts are coming out on record to say- "we cant afford John McCain"!

    The truth willl set our nation free!

    Listen and read and leave denial at the doorstep!
    This has very little to do with a female running for a ticket as the same policies of that person have sent the nation into a headlong financial tailspin! Palin does not get our vote- three females in the ruiz family!

    Comment: Today bad news rolled in 550 point dow loss, worst day for "W" ( Bush and Wallstreet) in 8 years!
    People/voters will connect the dots and they will vote from their wallets and their
    checkbooks.
    Truth is the scadals such as s&L, subprime, mortage/wallstreet and banking industry meltdown
    have two names writen all over them! Not to metion unneeded wars based on duplicity and subversion that cost 3 trillion dollars- that may well last 100 years!

    the two names all over these falied policies are Bush/McCain!
    Connect the dots and you will see that A. Greenspan and a bevey of other finanacial experts are coming out on record to say- "we cant afford John McCain"!

    The truth willl set our nation free!

    Listen and read and leave denial at the doorstep!




    • Posted By: allison florance @ 09/16/2008 11:36:00 AM

      I guess this is your opinion, becaus all the experts here: Greenspan, Paulson, Bernanke AGREE that this current banking mess has NO NEXXUS to Bush, or any other president for that matter.

      • Posted By: Lindalp @ 09/17/2008 12:47:07 AM

        You summary of the situation is not what I have been reading, and I have been reading a lot. It is a direct result of republican policy allowing corporations to run rampantly unregulated with unsavory practices.

        • Posted By: allison florance @ 09/23/2008 11:33:29 AM

          Do a bit more digging and you will find that our Congress (both parties) are mostly responsible for this, pushing an agenda of forcing banks to loan to folks that couldn't pay back the loan---In 1977 , the Community Reinvestment Act was passed and did much of this damage, the other major contirbutor is bank regulators keep discovering the problems after it is too late, not before when they should.

  • Posted By: jm818588 @ 09/23/2008 10:27:03 AM

    Thank you for saying so eloquently what has been bothering me about Palin. It was the conservatives who trashed Hillary years ago for daring to be a working mom instead of staying home and making cookies. (gasp!) Palin stands against everying working women I know have been fighting for. You're right that biology does not trump ideology. I think most thinking women will see through this facade and realize that Obama is the one who is (and has been) on their side

  • Posted By: jm818588 @ 09/23/2008 10:13:29 AM

    Thank you for saying so eloquently exactly what's been troubling me about Palin. Hillary was torn apart by conservatives years ago for daring to be a working mom rather than staying home to make cookies. (gasp!) Now, the same party who demonized Hillary, suddenly finds Palin to be a folk hero! But as you point out - biology does not trump ideology. Palin is against everything so many women I know worked hard for. I trust most thinking women can see through the facade and realize that Obama is the one on their side!

  • Posted By: trazer @ 09/20/2008 1:00:48 AM

    Shame on Anna Quindlin. It seems that if you are a small peanut farmer in one of the smallest states in the US and if you are Male, then its ok to be president. Anna Quindlin thinks Jimmy Carter, a one term president is just fine. If you are a woman governor in the United States - an executive office - one better never have supported our schools or played a strong role in education such as leading the PTA> Shame on ANNA!

  • Posted By: Opinionated mama @ 09/11/2008 10:21:31 AM

    Thank you, Anna, for giving voice to the rest of us. While it is true that women have fought long and hard for the recognition of their talents, intelligence, and abilities, those women who do become truly successful and admirable are of a different caliber than Sarah Palin. It is possible to have it all, if that is defined as simply as having a family and a career, but that is not to say that it must all come at the same time. To sacrifice your family for the glory of a high-profile position only leads one to question that woman's priorities. After all, why, in this era, have children if you don't intend to raise them? We have all met women like Palin at the PTA, on the playground, at birthday parties...she's frentic, if not frantic, arrives late, always involved in too many things. The ability to juggle two Blackberries and a cell phone while driving to and from various events is not impressive. It simply again speaks to the disorganization of someone who wants to much, who doesn't choose to set priorities. And Palin should be held accountable for the comments in her acceptance speech at the Republican Convention. Her snarky laugh lines simply served to undo much of the progress made by women in the past. If you want to be accepted as an equal, don't play to the stereotype of being able to offer less. The basic rule of engagement is not to drag your opponent down to your level. Instead, raise yourself up and above. And being accepted as an equal does not mean showing that you can keep up with the boys. Not a lot of women voters are impressed by photos of hunting and fishing trips. Sarah Palin, in a very short time, has proven herself far from Presidential in her comportment. Her months as governor, exhibiting questionale leadership, are not as important as her command of the many issues facing America and the world today. In this regard she has very little to offer. She is simply not the right woman for the job and we can't be afraid to say so...just because she's a woman.

    • Posted By: News and Notes @ 09/11/2008 11:09:18 AM

      Personally I'm eager to see Palin in town hall meetings, debates, and challenging interviews. I'd like to hear how her policy opinions differ from her personal views. Until then I will reserve judgement. Although, if she does not get the exposure we need to make an assessment, I will not support her. Personally I think Obama should have done more of this as well

      • Posted By: marymmo @ 09/18/2008 2:41:54 PM

        Thank you! A voice of reason!

  • Posted By: JC in JAX @ 09/10/2008 12:10:15 AM

    Wow, what an article. It is amazing how statements can be strung together to make people look like hypocrites. The fact that Sarah Palin and her teenage daughter chose life for their babies is a wonderful thing in a society so warped that it considers the ability and legality for a woman to choose to kill her unborn baby a sign of freedom, power, and advancement. And I am sure the families involved have already dealt with the issues of teenage promiscuity--would it make Anna Quindlen happier if they replayed those scenes for all of us to see? "Conservatives" haven't suddenly decided that teenage sex is okay, but they have to acknowledge that it does happen and families should deal with it privately... "conservatives" don't need trash people publicly over something like this just to be sure Anna knows they haven't changed their beliefs and values. And I am sure James Dobson would still tell his staffers that mothers of young children, including Sarah Palin, should stay at home as much as possible. But, using the concept of "choice" more appropriately, each woman in our society can make that choice for herself, as Sarah Palin has. Does that make her a bad mother? No. But we would all hope that she does her best to maintain as much balance as she can for the benefit of her family and herself. And who says that Sarah Palin is supposed to be a substitute for Hillary Clinton? I don't think she would make a good substitute, and I don't think she wants to be one. I think what is really bothering everyone is that Sarah Palin represents a type of woman who has not typically been on the national stage, and she threatens the "modern" and "liberated" picture of a woman that has been so carefully devised and shoved down our throats by the "liberals" of our society. A woman can be successful, a leader, and even in the national spotlight if she so chooses, while still being a wife, a mother, and hold to traditonal values. She kind of ruins the whole thing for you, doesn't she? Being a woman isn't bad...I don't know why women have allowed the liberals to tell them that all these years.

    • Posted By: bwlear @ 09/10/2008 12:17:34 PM

      You seem to use the word Liberal as if it was a bad thing. Have you ever looked up the meaning of the word or have you accepted the defination that you have been told by the Conservitives? Do a little research on your own. You might be supprised at what you learn when you look past your party ties. You nor I have any ideal who this woman is or what she stands for other then ONE speech and what the propaganda machine of Karl Rove and the RNC have allowed you to hear. I guess it really is about winning the election with an " empty suit " and to hell with the ability to lead this country. Country first my A**!

      • Posted By: marymmo @ 09/18/2008 2:38:07 PM

        So if Palin can make her own choices, why can't other women? It is becoming pretty obvious from her past actions that if you don't agree with her, you get fired. Those are not the actions of a fair and balanced person. And I don't see how she is providing the care her new baby needs if she's not there; she went to work three days after the baby was born--that's a fact. Shouldn't she be bonding with that child as much as she can? Why is she encouraging her daughter to get married at her young age? The odds are totally against her having a successful marriage. Why not encourage her to give the baby to a loving, mature couple who can provide the emotional support that baby will need? Obviously the things Sarah Palin promotes aren't working in her own life like abstinence. She has shown herself to be vindictive and self-centered. And just because she's a woman doesn't mean I agree with a darned thing she does or believes in.

  • Posted By: KaPA1 @ 09/11/2008 2:35:07 PM

    Thank you Anna for reminding us all how women have achieved so much. And it was because we triumphed over views like gov Palin's. The religious right says that gov palin is to be admired because she "chose life". If Gov Palin has her way no woman will ever have to "choose" life again. That choiice will be taken from her. And in their worldview,how can morality exist without free will?

    • Posted By: News and Notes @ 09/11/2008 3:02:39 PM

      I'm curious to find out how Palin's personal views differ from her policy opinions. I'd like to hear what she has to say before rushing to judgement

      • Posted By: marymmo @ 09/18/2008 2:24:25 PM

        Her policy seems to be if that you disagree with her personal views, you get fired.

  • Posted By: LMAO @ 09/11/2008 2:49:56 PM

    It would be rather silly of me to find someone who believes in everything I do. Rather it is more important to look at what we have in common to get along. Is it only me who find it hilarious that Democrats preach unity and do not act it out? What makes them right? Now it is clear to see that when they speak of unity and reaching across the aisle they are saying it has to be on their terms. How insular!

    I am well read and have many letters behind my name. Yet Gov. Palin is an exemplar to me on why in the grand scheme your accomplishments trumps academic achievements. For it is accomplishments that truly move society forward. Can we say that Obama Ivy League degree has done much for anyone but Obama. However Palin's accomplishments have taken Alaska (Wasila) forward. Give me 1 Palin over 10 Obamas anyday. People are truly tired of empty rhetoric ...

    So you see Palin's appeal is not about whether she is Pro-Life or Pro-Choice. Her appeal transcends those issues PLUS cuts across gender (as both men and women find much to admire about her). Palin truly will be a Leader for the Ages. Think Joan of Arc (the young paesant woman) who saved the French from the British. So I am confident that Palin is up to the task of reforming America.

    • Posted By: allison florance @ 09/14/2008 5:57:16 PM

      You were able to express very well why you are confident about Palin as opposed to the reader that asked if you were the dumb vote--very un compelling

      • Posted By: marymmo @ 09/18/2008 2:21:40 PM

        Leaving a tiny city with a 20 million dollar debt is taking them forward? Must be a Republican way of thinking--creating debt now means you are moving forward! Wow! Then the U.S. must really be moving forward!

      • Posted By: marymmo @ 09/18/2008 2:21:39 PM

        Leaving a tiny city with a 20 million dollar debt is taking them forward? Must be a Republican way of thinking--creating debt now means you are moving forward! Wow! Then the U.S. must really be moving forward!

      • Posted By: marymmo @ 09/18/2008 2:21:34 PM

        Leaving a tiny city with a 20 million dollar debt is taking them forward? Must be a Republican way of thinking--creating debt now means you are moving forward! Wow! Then the U.S. must really be moving forward!

      • Posted By: marymmo @ 09/18/2008 2:21:30 PM

        Leaving a tiny city with a 20 million dollar debt is taking them forward? Must be a Republican way of thinking--creating debt now means you are moving forward! Wow! Then the U.S. must really be moving forward!

      • Posted By: marymmo @ 09/18/2008 2:17:37 PM

        Leaving a tiny city with a 20 million dollar debt is taking them forward? Must be a Republican way of thinking--creating debt now means you are moving forward! Wow! Then the U.S. must really be moving forward!

      • Posted By: marymmo @ 09/18/2008 2:16:31 PM

        Leaving a tiny city with a 20 million dollar debt is taking them forward? Must be a Republican way of thinking--creating debt now means you are moving forward! Wow! Then the U.S. must really be moving forward!

    • Posted By: tender @ 09/11/2008 10:54:14 PM

      So are you the Dumb vote?
      Or the values vote.
      Maybe youu are the Wal-mart vote.
      You tell me.
      All I know about Palin is that I'd probably do her, that's about it.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse