Can You Say ‘Sexist’?

THIS LADY IS OUT THERE. YOU KNOW SHE WAS PREPPED LIKE HE DOUBLE HOCKEY STICKS FOR THIS INTERVIEW........THE THINGS THAT JUST WEREN'T WRONG BUT ABSOLUTELY HORRIFYING

1. LINKING 9-11 AND IRAQ. BUSH DOESN'T EVEN DO THAT ANYMORE!!
2. WAR WITH RUSSIA
3.NOT KNOWING THE BUSH DOCTRINE BUT BASICALLY BEING ALL FOR IT W/O HER OWN KNOWLEDGE.

SHE'S NOT JUST RIGHT OF BUSH, MCCAIN AND REAGAN.................................SHE MAY ACTUALLY BE RIGHT OF BUCHANNON. THIS IS THE ABSOLUTELY LAST PERSON WE NEED AT THIS MOMENT BEING LITERALLY A HEARTBEAT AWAY FROM THE PRESIDENCY.

Simply put, Hillary Clinton is a $20,000,000.00 political prostitute, owned by her "race baiting poverty pedalling pimp," Barrack Hussien Obama Bin-Liberal. Hillary and the rest of the left wing femi-Nazi's like the author of this article beleived they were owed. But they soon found out about the realities of the Real Good-Old Boy DNC network, it is the DNC and their male surrogates who are sexist and chauvenistic. I think it is funny you femi-nazi's took you panties off for nothing in the end but another heartache. Like they say, you can ride the DNC bus, but you can't drive it. Unlike at the RNC, it is a real 50/50 deal they can own and drive it anytime they want.

Hillary supporters who vote for Palin are cutting off their noses to spite their faces. And no amount of lipstick will cover that up!

I applaud Quindlen for this article, could not be said any better.

Mother of 3 children, a former Clinton supporter woman voter supporting Obama

OK Hillary supporters - do you think it will be easier for her to win in 2012 if you give Sarah Palin four years in Washington to act as the Republican Party Barbie Doll, with the party leaders parading her to fund raisers and events? I know it hurts, but you won't help Hillary by voting for McCain/Palin.

Anna is right - if Sarah Palin can't stand the heat of political scrutiny without hiding behind the skirts of women, then she needs to return to Alaska. As a professional woman for over 30 years in a male-dominated field, I have yet to see a single executive promoted because of PTA service or ability to juggle family and work or because she is a hockey, soccer or just plain mom. In the working world, you are judged on your ability to perform the task at hand - regardless of whether you are a man or a woman. Seeking answers to legitimate questions is not being sexist - it is exercising good sense. And I would bet that many of these same conservative men who are now conveniently crying "sexism" are the same men who helped build the glass ceiling.

There were any number of qualified women in the republican party McCain could have picked, such as Elizabeth Dole, staunch conservative, well-liked by the evangelical right, with a helluva lot more experience than Sarah Palin - who better to answer the phone at 3 am besides the former head of the Red Cross?

But McCain chose the motherhood apple pie beauty queen with little experience.

Why not chose someone like Dole? Because he couldn't manipulate her. Because he would have had to compete with her record.

Republicans have taken sexism to a new low.

I am a Democrat who will vote for McCain/Palin because of the viscious attacts. My party has always preached empowerment of women until they run- then look out!

Please....we have 3 people on the tickets whom the American public have known for years. To suggest that people not bend over backwards to figure out who this new person is with only a few weeks before an election that might put her near (or even in) supreme power strains credulity past endurance.
Thank goodness Obama has proven to have far better judgement on that score, as in many others. But that aside, getting back to the actual article, it does indeed seem hypocritical in the extreme to laud choices - yet seek to deny them to others, to benefit from a long struggle which your own party vilifies & opposes, and to make "family" a primary qualification for supremem executive power but to decry all attempts to examine just how that family is being run. No, that is not the hallmark of someone who is serious about such candidacy nor who has any respect for the American people

Thank you, Ms. Quindlen, for saying what needed to be said. I am absolutely livid about the response to Sarah Palin. If she's ready for the limelight of such a candidacy, she needs to be ready for the focus on her life, personal and professional, that follows for anyone who makes such a choise. The republicans' "outrage" at the way she is being mistreated is a joke - yet another veiled attempt to manipute and misinform the majority of Americans who don't take the time to understand the issues and positions of the candidates. There was a time when I thought John McCain might be an interesting option, someone who stood his ground and stood up for what he believed in, even if it was contrary to his party line. No more - he's shown himself to be a consumate politician, plain and simple - he'll say what he thinks he needs to say to get the vote, period. And his selection of Sarah Palin as running mate, in an attempt to pull "Hillary supporters" to his party indicates his true disdain for American women - any knowledgeable Clinton supporter would run, as far and as fast as possible, from Palin and what she stands for, which is totally contrary to what Hillary Clinton has spent her adult life fighting for. No, Mr. McCain, we're not all quite that stupid. Thanks, Anna, for pointing that out.