What Happened to Family Values?

The Obama Campaign Sinks to a New Low in Decency

The Obama campaign, as it continues to flounder and sink in the polls, has descended to a new low, even for itself.

Recently it has launched a new TV ad in which a mocking narrator alleges that John McCain is so out of touch with the current generation because of his inability to use a computer.

The narrator does not admit that the reason John McCain doesn???t use a computer is because 5 and a half years of torture as a POW in the Vietnam war cause him to experience severe pain by attempting to do many of the day to day menial tasks which most of the American population take for granted.

Obviously the Obama campaign does not demonstrate any appreciation and respect for the veteran and current members of the US military!

The obamabot ship is sinking, and the crew are sure grasping at straws in their pitiful attempt to deceive the voting public. Yes, Obama approved that deceitful ad - it is consistent with his decrepit morally corrupt standards.

Obviously that empty suit has no heart, courage, sincerity, honour, and respect!

Do you expect a presidential candidate to be truthful in striving to win the election?
If so, Obama just doesn???t ???measure up??? in that consideration!

Obama is an unscrupulous do-anything community agitator who has revealed his true previously hidden self!

On November 4, you, the legal American voting public, have the opportunity and ability to cast Obama back to that slag heap of Chicago manipulators who permeate the slum areas of that city.

Obama grew up in a broken household and did not have the support of either his mother or his father. He was a black person raised by his grandparents when both his father and mother abandoned him. He felt like an orphan. he lived ins several different places and did not have a good role model for family life. Obama's father ran out on Obama. Obama was abandoned and as such is not sure of family values.

This column represents the ultimate in liberal cynicism (and hypocrisy). Mr. Weisberg, I imagine the National Socialists in 1930's Germany would applaud you as a loyal brother for your pragmatic approach to problems, including life-or-death decisions. Never again??? Not in Mr. Weisberg's view...which condones the very type of evil that America has fought against. Truly an example of sinking to new depths of inhumanity.

What happened to Obama's parents? And what is the definition of Dysfuntional family??

Mr. Weisberg:
Normally I am very open to the perspective of others, and can let it be what it is. However, I must let you know that you have no grasp of the pro-life stance whatsoever. In fact, I think that you should do some research on "the other side" before you try to tear down someone else's values. Let me educate you. The majority of people who are pro-life have no intention of controlling the lives of others. What we would like is for people to admit that they are taking a life. What we would like is for those who are anti-life (that would be the opposite of anti-choice, right?) to stop wallowing in their selfishness and take some responsibility for their lives, their bodies, and their choices. What we would like is to take away the option of using abortion as birth control.
If abortion on demand was off the table, people might actually think twice. Your platform that "the availability of legal abortion actually supports the kind of family structure that conservatives once felt so strongly about" is ludicrous. Do you really believe that those who are so selfish and irresponsible that they use abortion as birth control are going to one day step up to the plate and become selfless, responisble parents and spouses. You are delusional. The divorce rate is as high as it is because of those who are selfish and irresponisble. It goes hand in hand. I also think that you will find, once you've done some actual research, that many pro-life supporters are against abortion in any case because we want people on the other side to understand that they are TAKING A LIFE. As far as your claim that "a majority of the country agrees" that Roe v. Wade should remain intact, I'd love to see your statistics. Perhaps you are counting those who would make exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother as pro-choice. They are not pro-choice, they are pro-woman. Contrary to what many closed-minded people believe, many pro-life supporters are also feminists, including myself. If you cannot understand that there is room for both, continue your research. Pro-life means thou shalt not kill. Its not about control, its not about politics, its about human rights.

McCAIN HAS BEEN RUNNING ON CHANGE FOR 30 YRS.. HE HAS GONE ACROSS PARTY LINES TO GET THINGS DONE (IE;CHANGE!) HE HAS WAITED A LONG TIME TO HAVE THIS CHANCE TO MAKE REAL CHANGE IN WASHINGTON! IF ELECTED HE WILL HAVE A CABINET OF DEMOCRATS AND INDEPENDANTS AND REPUBLICANS THAT HE HAS WORKED WITH OVER THE LAST 30 YRS! HE KNOWS THOSE IN WASHINGTON THAT WANT CHANGE BUT WERE TO AFRAID TO SPEAK UP FOR FEAR OF THIER PARTIES REPRISAL.. SO THOSE FOLKS WILL BE APPOINTED TO HIS CABINET ! NOW A QUESTION FOR YOU WHO WILL OBAMA PUT IN HIS CABINET ? WHO HAS HE WORKED WITH IN HIS SHORT TIME AS A U.S. SENATOR? AND WHO DOES HE KNOW IN WASHINGTON THAT WANTS REAL CHANGE ( NOT THE LIBERAL VERSION OF IT ) WHO ? IF YOU WANT A NSWER TO THIS YOU HAVE TWO OPTIONS (1) GO TO MOVE ON .ORG AND SEE WHO IS PAYING HS WAY INTO THE WHITE HOUSE ! OR (2) LOOK AT THE COMPANY HE HAS KEPT FOR THE LAST 20YRS ! THAT???S WHO HE WILL APPOINT TO HIS CABINET MAYBE NOT THOSE FOLKS .. BUT ONES EXACTLY LIKE THEM !

PROCHOICE SHOULD BE A FUNDAMENTAL INALIENABLE RIGHT JUST THE RIGHT TO HAVE SEX. SARA SHOULD KNOW BY NOW THAT THE VOTERS ARE HER BOSS. IF SHE UPSETS THEM, THEN THEY WILL LABEL HER AS A "HATER." THERE ARE SOME WOMEN, AS WELL AS MEN, THAT DO NOT WANT TO HAVE A CHILD EVEN THOUGH THEY HAD SEX AND FAILED TO GET PROTECTION. IF THEY ARE FORCED TO HAVE THE CHILD, YOU MIGHT SEE CASES IN WHICH THE MOTHER OR FATHER WILL MURDER THE CHILD TO BE FREE OF THE OBLIGATION. PROCHOICE PREVENTS THIS COMPLICATION IN OUR SOCIETY. IT IS BASICALLY A CASE OF EMOTION VERSES INTTELLIGENCE WHICH I THINK PALIN HAS VERY LITTLE OF. IF A WOMAN AND A MAN WANT TO HAVE A CHILD, THAN THAT RIGHT SHOULD BE RESPECTED IF THEY ARE WILLING TO RAISE THE CHILD. BUT IF THE LOVE FOR THE CHILD IS NOT PRESENT, IT COULD TURN OUT TO BE CONSEQUENTIAL FOR THE FAMILY AND THE SOCIETY IF THE NUMBER OFTHIS TYPE OF CASE REACHES A HIGH AMOUNT IN A COMMUNITY. HOW DO I KNOW THIS? I WAS A JUDE FOR TWENTY YEARS. I MARRIED ABOUT TWO THOUSAND COUPLES. I ALSO HANDLED A LOT OF CASES OF JUVENILE DELINQUENCY THAT I CAN RELATE TO UNCARING PARENTS THAT DID NOT WANT THE CHILD IN THE FIRST PLACE BUT DUE TO A PREGNANCY, THEY HAD IT. THIS WAS IN A SMALL COMMUNITY. NOW GO TO THE DALLAS AREA AND OTHER BIG CITIES, AND YOU WILL SEE WHAT I MEAN. IN CLOSING, I SAY, HELL NO, SARA NO! HELL NO, McCAIN EITHER!

THIS RACE STILL HAS OBAMA AS THE RISK TO THE DNC AND THE NATION; THE FLAW. THE INCONSISTENCY AND ODDITY. HE'S A COPY CAT. AND ONLY DOING A RE-RUN OF AMERICANS SUCK FIRST!
AMERICANS SUCK FIRST IS THE PACIFYING BULL HORN ANNOUNCEMENT BILL CLINTON LEVELED AT THE COUNTRY FROM THE OVAL OFFICE AND LIBERALS ARE SOOOOO SOOTHED BY IT THE BELIEVED BILL CLINTON WAS DONING GREAT THINGS FOR OUR COUNTRY!
THE TECHNIQUE IS OLD AND NOT "CHANGE."
PALIN HAS HELD A FAMILY TOGETHER AND KNOWS WHAT A GALLON OF MILK COSTS!
AND SHE DEMOPNSTRATED SHE UNDERSTANDS NATO'S CHARTER AND PURPOSE.
BIDEN MAY UNDERSTAND IT BUT HE'LL HAVE A TORTURED WAY OF EXPLAINING IT. OBAMA WILL TALK ABOUT IT IN A WAY TO CORRECT IF (WHEM) HE FINDS OUT (LATER) HE WAS WRONG OR TALKING STUPID!
I DON'T BELIEVE WIESBERG IS AS CONSERNED ABOUT THE STANDING OF THE GOP, AT ALL! HE'S PUMPING LIPSTICK! POOR WHINEY SWINEY.

Palin's interviews on ABC showed how inexperienced she is to be a vice-president, and also showed her lack of knowledge about both the economy, and foreign policy. When she started talking about "family values" she just started sticking bot feet in her mouth as she spoke. With a straight face, she said, "a raped female should have to give birth to the rapist's fetus" unless the woman's own health is at risk "!?!?!? It is a woman's right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, a mentally-retarded fetus, AND A RAPIST"s fetus, not the fedral government's decision. We've got too many people across the world and at home that are trapped in the cycle of poverty and repression. What I really want to know is why she transferred colleges 5 times to get a four-year degree??? I'll take Senator Biden over her any day.