An Apostle of Alaska

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: all4peace @ 09/07/2008 2:39:11 PM

    But She Didn't!
    http://ashleysaddicts.blogspot.com/2008/09/but-she-didnt.html

  • Posted By: chrismoody @ 09/07/2008 1:40:37 PM

    There are many issues (abortion, federal economics, etc.) to disagree with Palin on. As a conservative thinker, I don't disagree with her on most issues, but I find real Democratic arguments respectable and healthy. However, this article fails in the category of "a fraud". It obviously paints a negative picture about Palin at every turn it can, using half-truth (aka lies) to cause doubt and confusion. My #1 example: Read the sixth paragraph. It paints a picture of contradiction in her personality and politics. Then watch the videos (Womens' forum from March 08) in this very same article. She addresses that same issue, stating Alaska's dependence on Federal Government as a problem she's working to solve, not something she wants to contribute to. And this article would have you believe she waited til she was chosen VP to endorse McCain. When in these very same vidieos, she endorses him back in March.

    Plenty to argue with Palin on, but its articles like this that keep Americans misinformed and emotional. I like your intent of good-will Democrats. Please don't let articles like this manipulate you into believing that conservatives have none. Like your side, we have our bad Pols and good ones. Palin is being painted unfairly here today.

    • Posted By: SEA Observer @ 09/07/2008 1:52:14 PM

      Good analysis & I agree with you. Through the two conventions, my observation and conclusion are as follow:

      1. McCain/Palin: True patriots, not afraid to do the right thing for the nation. Does not mean they are right all the time but can be trusted to lead the nation.

      2. Obama/Biden: Slick politicians, speak with two tongues, pretending to represent change but so far everything that they do are same old politics. Can not be trusted to lead this great nation.

      3. The press: most are bias toward Democratic party. What a shame!

      4. The majority of the people on this bulletin have their blinder on. They pretend like they are thinking but most of them are just spewing party line talking points and can not objectively discuss or analyze anything...

      • Posted By: thinkingoutsidethebox @ 09/07/2008 1:58:13 PM

        Not all of spew party lines. I am not a Democrat, a proud Independent. And if you think about it, spewing hate and bigotry and keeping the common man down should be what both parties stand for. Unfortunately for the GOP that is what they stand for!!

        • Posted By: SEA Observer @ 09/07/2008 2:08:33 PM

          Alright, Thinkingoutofabox - keep you objectivity and tell me what the Bush administration done right for the past 8 years?.. don't be shy, list them all!

          • Posted By: thinkingoutsidethebox @ 09/07/2008 2:18:22 PM

            What have they done?
            Well, Bush made a classy joke at a press meeting about not finding WMD here or over here....
            Bush surrounds himself with mindless goons like him that have graduated from Pat Robertson's college (gee, there is no agenda there, is there?)
            He told a blind reporter in the White House Garden to take off his sunglasses and that he didn't need them...
            I don't want to list them all because I don't have time for mindless matters....

            • Posted By: SEA Observer @ 09/07/2008 2:23:57 PM

              Yep, an independent thinker (with blinders on!!!!!!)

              • Posted By: thinkingoutsidethebox @ 09/07/2008 2:36:12 PM

                What do you mean with blinders on? Those are facts....look them up!! I dare you!

  • Posted By: Jon Hodge @ 09/07/2008 2:24:05 PM

    We all have our favorite news networks we use to obtain the information we need to make a selection in this election cycle. For months I have watched the same network and supplemented it with visits to competitive internet sites. However, during the recent political party conventions I found myself constantly switching to the other networks to see what was ???going on???. Some of the networks seemed to put their own slant on the issues while a few clearly directed each question or comment towards a particular candidate. This is only to be expected since each of the 200 million plus voters has their own individual opinion on their favorite candidate. During this buildup to the election I have spent a significant amount of time reading the opinions of the political pundits and most importantly the comments submitted by their readers. However in the last 2 weeks I have seen more hate being spewed in the comments than ever before. Governor Palin has been the brunt of totally fantastic lies, many of which would have resulted in a Salem, Massachusetts woman being burned at the stake and others that are physically impossible. Barack Obama???s middle name of Hussein has caused many that are politically opposed to him to clam he is a closet Muslim. And everyone running for each of the parties has voters waiting for them to bite the heads off of bats.
    I have no idea of how many ultra left and right wing fanatics are spreading this filth. It might be as little as 5%, maybe much less, but they are only clouding the election for the vast majority of voters. No matter which direction your politics lean you must look at every last bit of information and consider the source, how plausible is it and what is the significance to the future of our country in these trying times? Hopefully the hate will not affect the results of the upcoming election.
    Remember, half of you will wake up on November 5th having voted for the party that lost.

    • Posted By: SEA Observer @ 09/07/2008 2:29:00 PM

      Bravo, Jon. Finally someone without hate!

      • Posted By: thinkingoutsidethebox @ 09/07/2008 2:34:00 PM

        Does that include you?

  • Posted By: Donna Yannotta @ 09/07/2008 2:33:17 PM

    Don't we want highly educated, well-read, well-traveled people who have seen and experienced many things running the country? Who better to represent and lead than someone who gets that every American has the right to his/her own beliefs and values even if those values don't happen to be fundamentalist Christian? It???s hard enough to be a Christian. People used to respect that. Now they just see us as hypocrites because too many of us can???t just do our best with our own struggle, try to reach out to others in love and let God do the rest.

    Also, I have heard a lot of nonsense about conservative folks valuing education, but no one seems to value the educated. Education provides a forum for broader views and exposure, which is what the leader of this country needs.
    Why is it fodder for ridicule for a man to add to the brain trust of small communities by bringing what he has learned back to folks that don???t know what is possible?
    Why is it instead celebrated that a man graduated at the bottom of his class? Why is it funny that because he didn???t study how to eject himself from a plane, he crashed and almost died? Why isn???t it sad that that didn???t change his resolve? Why is that maverick and not undisciplined? Why isn???t it suspect that he wouldn???t even vote for his own bills today? Why is it ok that Palin hasn???t even studied foreign affairs, the constitution (America???s) or higher economics? Do we know? Shouldn???t we?
    I???ve gotta say. I am angered by the mean and judgmental representation of Christian women my party has put forward. We are in the middle of a war and a situation where we are no longer respected around the world and McCain cares so little about this country that he picked a candidate who thinks it is somehow admirable to be a bulldog with lipstick. I'd be more impressed if I knew why her small town was $20m in debt after she left given our current debt to China (and how that makes her any different than Bush). Further, I???m an attorney and I have gained respect by being respectful. I???d be offended and rightfully so if anyone called me a bulldog, a barracuda or a bitch. It is neither cute nor acceptable on the adult stage.

  • Posted By: DR. PIERRE @ 09/07/2008 2:27:22 PM

    by the way you discribe "who sarah is", is a throw-back to early psycoligy. Skinner, Lock, Gestolt, ....all trying to "discribe the workings of the human mind". Everyone has a theory about how the "Mind Clock" is assembled. what moving parts, and gears.....ALL PHYCOLIGESTS ARE CORRECT. BUT USE DIFFERENT MECHANICS TO EXPLAIN RESULTS.....LOL.....FIGURE IT OUT.

  • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 09/07/2008 2:25:58 PM

    I'm tired of hearing all the whining. I'll be glad when this thing is over. Too bad we can't just let California, Texas, New York ( and whoever else wants to ) secede from the Union and run their own affairs. Instead we have this epic power struggle where 100% of the population is trying to make 50% do it their way. I'd rather we dissolve and give everyone a place to go, and dispense with all this political agitation. I could give a hoot whether we're divided or unified. In fact democracy would probably work better if the states were sovereign, because your one vote would count MORE.

  • Posted By: Marianne3 @ 09/07/2008 2:25:09 PM

    A bridge to nowhere: that's what this hard-nosed politician truly represents for America, at this crossroad. The fact she repeatedly bragged about killing this project as her "reformist" credential when her record undisputably points the other way, while ruthlessly distorting her oppoents records with total disregard of truth and fairness, with a charming smile too, amazes and disturbs me. What amazes me more is: it works, with more than half of American public! As a Canadian, observing the US politics with deep interest, it saddens and bothers me. Opportunism without integrity makes shrewd politician for sure. Politican like this can succeed for a while too, no doubt about that. That was what Nixon did for a big portion of his career, until this poisoneous combination brought his administration down, and the faith of the public with it. Equally disturbing was the dishonesty in the republican argument : McCain played the "experience" card relentlessly until he chose a truly inexperienced VP candidate (using his own creteria for "experience" against his opponent earlier on: national security and foreign affairs); after the nauseating partisan bikering at the GOP convention (which disgusted an outsider like me), he conveniently called for the "end of partisan rancor"; better yet, in a straight face, he changes his hand and is now the "agent for Change". And the American people are more than happy to oblige.
    I cry for you, America.

  • Posted By: hope1123 @ 09/07/2008 2:23:36 PM

    hey, to anybody even thinking of voting for McCain/Palin, are you prepared to live with that? More wars,(where are we going to get more men and women? Guess, we might just have to have a draft) more unemployment,(maybe, you'll be the one to lose your job, then your house, ect...) and what about heathcare,(maybe, you'll be the one underinsured) McCain/Palin offer nothing new, just the same old bulls*** !

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 09/07/2008 2:21:35 PM

    A matter of FACT...I any of us...ANY of us...need a security clearance, for any reason...AND...has the same type of long-term business, political, and social associations, as Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro...we would be denied.

    If he is elected...will he be refused a clearance...or will the rules be expanded for him...once again?

    NOBAMA!!

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 09/07/2008 2:20:39 PM

    NWSK: But she indignantly dismissed his opposition to drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as the politically correct???yet wrong???position of "Eastern politicians."

    Palin finally got the chance to meet McCain at a gathering of Republican governors in Washington, D.C., in mid-February. Weeks Later, even after the other Republican contenders had dropped out of the race, Palin still had not endorsed McCain....

    Note: Well until Palin got her 2nd call to run as his VP, Now the B!tch is more Popular than McCain, lets see how long that Sparkle & Shine will last, when the Media Exposes Palin's True Beliefs, oppse to IMAGE to the ...Generally MODERATE American Public !!!

    NSWK: Alaskans regard themselves as a breed apart???more rugged, self-reliant and free than other Americans. Palin shares that sense of exceptionalism. But the myth is contradicted by some inconvenient facts. Only 1 percent of the state's land is in private hands, and the economy is dependent on oil and other natural resources controlled by the federal government or Big Oil. As a result, nearly 50 years after statehood, Alaska remains deeply dependent on the federal government for support. Social ills are rampant. The state's levels of drug abuse, alcoholism, domestic violence and child abuse are above average or among the highest in the country.

    Note: This Dispells the Pure, Moral, Ethical & Upright "Christian Values" Image that these Alaskans and the mass Media has Perpetuated. The Mass Media has No Problems, Deaning and Highlighting the Moral Decay of Urban Cities, but this Shines a BRIGHT LIGHT on what is going on in SUBURBAN....BUT MAINLY .....RURAL AREAS..

    That these Peopel do the Same Things OFTEN SHOWN OR DISCUSSED ON THE INTERNET, NEWSPAPERS, TV AND RADIO, BUT THIS TIME IT WILL BE GLARING, BECAUSE THERES VERY FEW BLACKS, LATINOS AND ASIANS IN...THE GREAT, UPPER, UPPER NORTHERN REGION, WHO ARE SUPPOSEDLY THE SALT OF THE EARTH !!!

    HAA !!!!

    PEOPLE HAVE TO DEPROGRAM THEMSELVES FROM THE "RURAL & PURE SHAM"

  • Posted By: Just-Me @ 09/07/2008 1:37:47 PM

    I'm so disgusted with both VP picks that I'm probably going to sit this election out or pick a protest vote. While both running mates fill some void left by the candidates, they do so with so much baggage or inadequacies of their own, as to create an unacceptable choice. Bleh . . . who's running in 2012?

    • Posted By: thinkingoutsidethebox @ 09/07/2008 1:48:54 PM

      You get what you deserve if you don't vote!! You will also get what you deserve if you vote for MCCAIN!

      • Posted By: Just-Me @ 09/07/2008 2:14:12 PM

        So flip a coin? Seriously - these two teams are both so lacking it is embarrassing as a nation - a manifestation of our bizarre political process I suppose. Good thing we have a little time left before election day to see if one or the other implodes . . . to me its looking like a race to see who self destructs first

  • Posted By: WhiteHouseGOP @ 09/07/2008 2:01:07 PM

    ChooseWisely -
    "People that follow blind faith in regards to politics are lemmings " = truer words never said.

    One problem, though....this sentence should refer to the Obats following B. Hussein Obama and his Hollywood productionesque campaign. This man is the one who's terrifying and he's running for the number 1 spot!

    Nevermind being worried about Sarah Palin taking over - ZerObama is the one that's absolute insanity!

    • Posted By: thinkingoutsidethebox @ 09/07/2008 2:13:27 PM

      And the last time I checked Hollywood is in America and the actors and actresses that live there are American and are entitled to express their opinion for the election!! If Hollywood doesn't come out and have an opinion on the election the American public would see that as Hollywood not caring so it is a double edged sword. They are damned if they do and damned if they don't . The only reason GOP gets mad is because most of Hollywood ususally supports Democratic candidate. If it were the other way around there wouldn't be an issue. It is because they are artists in the craft and they don't want to see movies, books, music banned just becuase someone says a "bad" word.

    • Posted By: thinkingoutsidethebox @ 09/07/2008 2:04:41 PM

      Hollywood?? Wasn't Fred Thompson in a TV show and Paris Hilton's family gave money to the GOP and lets not forget about the twit Elizabeth Hasselbeck.

  • Posted By: ChooseWisely @ 09/07/2008 2:02:46 PM

    Wow. Anyone that risks this country's future by voting for a man that may not be alive in 4 years which in turn would make this extremely unqualified individual president, needs to have their head examined. Seriously. Hollyroller, your comments and propaganda are exactly the thing that is going to bring your party down. To rally around a politician (especially an extremely unqualified one) because of their devout belief in god makes you people lemmings. You can follow your nominees of the cliff, just don't ask the country to do so.

  • Posted By: hombre @ 09/07/2008 1:57:21 PM

    I just want to congratulate you on the objectiveness of this article. While exposing weaknesses and potential problems, you give just as much weight to areas of strength. I wish more media would follow your lead.
    In the end, Palin will either succeed or completely fail, but your objectivity in reporting is refreshing and you have certainly won a supporter. Sincerely, Michael Wilmot

  • Posted By: ChooseWisely @ 09/07/2008 1:53:03 PM

    People that follow blind faith in regards to politics are lemmings. You can follow your extremely unqualified VP pick off a cliff if you'd like, just don't ask this country to. It scares me to death to think that if McCain were elected and died within the next four years, we'd have this person running the country. That is absolute insanity.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 09/07/2008 1:48:51 PM

    (NEW YORK) Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton marched for labor and stumped with Democrats on Saturday, but sidestepped questions about the woman who has taken her place as the nation's most-talked-about female leader.

    Clinton brushed aside questions about Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin during appearances at New York City's annual Labor Day parade and later during a stop on Staten Island.

    hmmm.....Any chance the Clinton's are STILLSAYING..."Obama can kiss my ass"??? A Hussein victory is a Clinton defeat. They also are quite aware of his "Chicago Thug" mentality.

    Good for you Sen Clinton. At least some Dems are actually American.

    NOBAMA!!!

    • Posted By: thinkingoutsidethebox @ 09/07/2008 1:51:30 PM

      It was stated earlier in the week that Hillary was not going to mention Palin cuz she said she didn't need to! She was going to focus on McCain and his ignorant platform!! NO REASON TO GO AFTER HER WHEN WE HAVE HIM TO GO AFTER!!

  • Posted By: ChooseWisely @ 09/07/2008 1:49:20 PM

    Wow. Anyone that risks this country's future by voting for a man that may not be alive in 4 years which in turn would make this extremely unqualified individual president, needs to have their head examined. Seriously. Hollyroller, your comments and propaganda are exactly the thing that is going to bring your party down. To rally around a politician (especially an extremely unqualified one) because of their devout belief in god makes you people lemmings. You can follow your nominees of the cliff, just don't ask the country to do so.

  • Posted By: osbog53 @ 09/07/2008 1:48:42 PM

    It really funny and amazing to hear main media pundit took GOP's "that Sarah Palin will bring her ENERGY EXPERTISE into play" because she was the governor of ALASKA" line hook and sinker. These, even without a REAL defination of the person (thru unbiased, no hold bar interview). DICK C and W Bush are both "oil men" as they said, but where are we in our energy situation right now. The selection of Sarah Palin as Mc Cain's running mate is a "political" decision to make Mc Cain palatable to the GOP based, plain and simple. Having the "Country First" as a slogan for this GOP candidates is pure joke for the simple reason that based along on Mc Cain biography... he is in the fight not because of the love or service of the country... it's because he want to the President ... plain and simple. Now to give excuse that "we will have Gov Palin available to main stream media interviiew if the GOP campaign see it fits" is another proof that it's really Country First. Or maybe they are afraid (because again, she was choosen for convinience ) that having her in the "spot" and unable to articulate her position on real issues (economics, global warming, foreign affairs etc) will unmasked her as a "palin GOP mouth piece who's only credential is to deliver can message or speech such as the one she used last week.

  • Posted By: bataar_21 @ 09/07/2008 1:38:40 PM

    All we are saying is that, Let's hear what Palin stands for with "Meet The Press".

  • Posted By: mccainsupporter @ 09/07/2008 12:25:55 PM

    John McCain picked Governor Sarah Palin because he intends to follow through and make his Project Lexington for United States energy independence the dominant issue in this campaign. Governor Sarah Palin is a strong supporter of increased offshore drilling and she knows that Alaska has an offshore coastline greater than the rest of the country combined and is also comes in second among the states in oil production. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and John McCain understand that Obama and the Democrats would never consider government loan guarantees or tax breaks for a sure thing that will produce energy for the American gas tank. In fact Democrats are trying to put together a so-called windfall profits tax which will have the effect of discouraging future investment in the United States oil industry. John McCain also knows that Governor Sarah Palin family situation also illustrates that longterm Democratic leadership hostility and policies toward United States owned energy companies have caused our current energy crisis. Her husband works for British Petroleum but instead should be working for the former American owned Arco Oil Company. Arco Oil Company developed and explored the Alaska North Slope and formerly owned eighty percent of our proven Alaskan reserves. With its substantial oil reserves Arco Oil Company should have bought British Petroleum instead of British Petroleum buying out Arco Oil Company during the second Bill Clinton administration. With the right business environment and support from both political parties in the United States, Arco Oil Company might have been more successful and been able to buy out British Petroleum instead of British Petroleum buying out Arco Oil Company.

    Look at Apple Computer and Microsoft. Their success in the computer world have made them bullet proof to corporate takeovers. Longterm Democratic hostility and opposition to offshore drilling and periodic talk of windfall profits taxes contributed to the takeover of Arco Oil Company.

    • Posted By: jfff7773 @ 09/07/2008 1:35:23 PM

      Mc Cain is now firmly in the pocket of Big Oil, and his republican handlers have seen fit to pair him up with the friendly face of the mst deadly industry on earth. McCain doesn't have a clue anymore, and neither does anyone else who can't see that these people are nothing more than puppets of the oil industry, which sees its days being numbered in an Obama administration. You can "nobama" all you want, the future is coming- don't be left behind and bitter, clinging to your guns and your religion. truth often hurts.

    • Posted By: labman57 @ 09/07/2008 1:02:41 PM

      In other words, she's a "one-trick pony"?

    • Posted By: StormAZ100 @ 09/07/2008 12:41:31 PM

      And 'refiguring taxes on oil' to get revenue for a $1200 tax rebate to Alaskans is different than windfall profit taxes how?

      Sarah Palin is a female Dick Chaney with all the abuse of power and bludgeoning that goes on in the VP's office now. Again, it's more of the same.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse