Struggling School-Age Boys

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: MomofAandM @ 09/10/2008 2:20:54 PM

    We're a loving family, we emphasise self-discipline and responsibility, and believe firmly that it takes a village to raise a child....but when a section of the village elders believe that it is 'their way or the highway', emphasising that your child will get lost on the highway of life if they don't pass this test or achieve that grade, or get into this school, and they'll be miserable failures (with fear as the deterrent, or (for some) the so-called fires of hell) - (just for info I'm an atheist raising my kids in a hotbed of christianity ) it's a long struggle against difficult odds. Where is the time for children to be just CHILDREN, creative, different, energetic, wonderful....

  • Posted By: MomofAandM @ 09/10/2008 2:20:15 PM

    Calling from Jamaica - It seems to be everywhere these days. I notice all comments with such interest because we are ALL aware of what's happening and yet feel helpless in a way, rather like a monolith out of control. Why all the tests (and more and more of these as days go by) that prop up failing systems? Why all the judging of children as ADHD, ADD, whatever - just because at 5, 6, 7 years of age they are required to sit like little robots for hours focusing on the above mentioned tests (and further pieces of paper).....and oh, the shame of it if they are not reading properly by age 5,6, 7....Here in Jamaica we have government tests for all 3rd, 4th and 5th graders to ensure that they are 'up to standard' (question mark - whose standard???). Then there is the GSAT test just to enter high school. School books are more and more expensive (and bigger - my 10 yr old has to have one of those wheeled mini-suitcases just for his books) and yet less and less completed!! Because there is no TIME for teachers to teach all that is 'supposedly required', they rush everything, leaving many children behind (supposedly failing, thereby causing many parents (and their children) anxiety and stress, only to send them to yet further 'extra' lessons, costing yet more and more money, and more stress).....how can we end this vicious circle. Here in Jamaica there is such an emphasis on getting into so-called good schools then college/university....just to turn out another white shirt, business-suited, SUV driving, big house owning, DEPRESSED, human being....another accountant, lawyer, doctor, business manager (can someone please, please, PLEASE tell me - how many of these do we need in the world today)......no respect seems to be given to alternative choices...and hardly anyone wants to get their hands dirty! It seems the way we measure success is being passed on to our children; bigger cars, designer clothes, latest cell, plasma tv oh you've made it my son/daughter - but an honest, honourable being with no pretensions to this 'greatness' is regarded as almost retarded.....and god forbid if you want to become a farmer and raise cows and vegetables....or even be a dancer because heavens above, isn't the dance world full of gay people....or a wonderful artist because oh well, it's just like painting a house wall!! 'Scuse my sarky comments but ENOUGH IS REALLY ENOUGH.

  • Posted By: Once you try to deceive @ 09/10/2008 2:18:38 PM

    Wow1 the author left out a few points:1) Most of the studies done in the past have been directed to girls, organizations like NOW, National Organization of University Women, etc. have pressured for sauch studies to show how females have been left behind. 2) The same grouops have diverted funds, try title X , to females when it was at the cost of male sports, other scholarships and grants have been for females only, again leaving males out of the mix. Note ratios in college, more females are now professors than males, more females are becoming doctors, lawyers, etc at the cost of males. by the way, how many organizations are purely devoted to males in our society? The writer, a female, should have answered these questions herself.

  • Posted By: Maverick7 @ 09/10/2008 2:17:14 PM

    Things that we make and buy, like for instance a piece of un-assembled furniture or a new stereo system usually always come with an owner's manual. Who made this manual? the one who created the product because they know how it works and or how it is put together. In some cases there are also trouble shooting solutions in these manuals.
    " What we need to do is brush off the dust from our manuals that we have been provided and read it. Who made this manual ? The God that created us. He knows how we work and how we were put together and it has all the answers and trouble shooting solutions. I think one thing we could do from here is form some type of nation-wide group with our manuals in hand and start organizing to go after the ones who created this problem. They made changes that we now seeing the ill effects of. We too can make the changes and correct the problem.

    We took God out of schools, out of society, out of our Government and out of our lives. Now we are reaping what we have sown. You can see it all around you in globally abroad

    Comment: I agree 100% with the previous comments. It seems the majority of teachers are women. Women can be just as qulified to teach as men but boys do not have the male role model to look up to in school anymore. They need that just as much as at home. I agree it is due to alot of this liberal mindset that has gone too far and I believe it is the "man haters" behind the scenes that are the root cause. I see it in my sons grade school also. What is up with this "no tag"? My son's school has the same rule. I would like to find out the reasoning behind this which most likely came from women. I heard it is because they don't want the kids to get hurt playing tag and getting too rough... WHAT???. That's funny beacause my son can play tackle football during recess but not tag??? Don't get me wrong, women can have just as good teaching skills but they cannot fill the void boys are facing like men can.
    Then of course all of theses so called "experts" come up with their weak human solutions which just makes society worse and think they can solve all of our problems when they just create more complex problems to solve and the cycle progressively continues to get worse. I think the scheduled lives we create for our children are also to blame. They get so use to always doing something, constanly on the go, that when it comes time to just relax, they can't stay still. The answer is not drugs, it's not counsiling, it's not these so called "experts" who think they know everything about children. How did they become experts??? from other human beings who call them selves experts. What a crock !!!

  • Posted By: madelinegangi @ 09/10/2008 2:14:09 PM

    As a mother of four boys I adamantly agree with this article. I believe that we are medicating our children to often. In our schools district they have decided to cut out any recess our children had and add thirty minutes to learning time. They have added in leap test which clearly only has increased the work load in learning and has only benefited their short time memorization. (Leap Test shows if a teacher has been teaching) I am all for education and living up to their fullest potential but in our case I believe the school district is harming the children. With recess children would use some of the energy that needs to be released and they would not be squirming while trying to sit in their desk. It would make them much more attentive, which would help them learn even more

  • Posted By: camry77022 @ 09/10/2008 2:08:32 PM

    This is a great article. The school year is only 3 three weeks in progress and i'm having the teacher sending note to me about my son. They have more rules at his school than the army. My family more to a new school district and need to adjust to his new environment. The teacher want zero errors from the children. They can't miss a day of school. They can't forget to turn in their weekly homework folder. They can't ever talk in class out of turn. And this list goes on and on about what my son can't do. Moreover, if he break any of this rules he won't be able to have recess and/or be sent to detention hall after school. OH yeah he better not forget to write his complete name and date on all home work ot that is an automatic 10 points off his paper. Keep in mind this is only second grade. The children are not perfect. It seem like the teachers need to think of ways to make learning interesting to not only the boys but the girls. They want the parents to sign papers that your child will be perfcet each each day. We all know that boy or girls are not going to follow a book of rules each day. Boys need and outlet to burn off some of the energy they have built up inside. My son is intelligent and learns very fast. infact he ask alot of questions that sometime i have to stop and think how to answer his questions. I sit down with him each night to assist him in his work. However the new teacher want to be very strict on my son because has a lot of energy. I telling her that if you take away my son recess after being in class for 5 to 6 hours you are inviting behavior matters. I'm all for rules that goes with out saying. The school system must understand that boy and girls learn and ack different. Medication is not the answer nor will I allow any of my children to be put on it. When i was in grade school in the 60's we learned just find with out the medication but with good sound rules in place. We got to get back to that time where we allowed children the time to be children and not robot. Let's stop all this focus on passing test and look into the needs of not only our boy students but what work for all out students. I admit we have a problem in the school system when it come to leaching our male children. The school system need reforming to get our boys back to a time where they can be themself and be great men someday. Remember our boy will be men and we need to see that they will be outstanding once they are adults . In a very concern farther in my sons future. J of Texas.

  • Posted By: techresmgt @ 09/08/2008 8:25:04 PM

    An abysmal situation, to say the least. The feminists have made a mess. This female-centric society focuses almost exclusively on women, mother's, and their DAUGHTERS. Watching TV commercials will prove my point. One will find almost 88% of ALL television commcercials (and probably sitcoms) focus exclusively on women and their daughters. This is patently gender discrimination. If it were the other way around, the women would be HOWLING. Men better wake up and grow a backbone and realize what this trend is doing to young men and boys. The message in the media appears to be that girls and women are more valuable that boys and men. This trend must be stopped on legal grounds. It is sexist and gender biased, and completely unacceptable. The feminists will counterattack (big surprise) and defend their position with weak and hypocritical arguments. Easy enough to ignore. They really want and expect it 'all'.

    • Posted By: Fort Begay @ 09/10/2008 1:23:45 PM

      TV, media, and commercials might be geared to the females because they are the ones who can sit still long enough to watch/read it. Most consumers are women. Don't worry, for the actively minded there is Super Bowl Sunday, the only day of the year that puts morewomen in ER or injury-related harm. The violent video games that you buy for your son or grandson are just an extension of it. We've raised boys to believe they need to rough house, and then we blame female teachers if our sons and/or brothers lose it via school shooting. All those boys probably have one thing in common, cuddling mothers who pointed fingers at girls or female teachers.

      • Posted By: gemioncourt @ 09/10/2008 2:07:06 PM

        Bullcrap. The idea that more domestic violence rates increase on Super Bowl Sunday is an Urban Myth at best. I know it has shown up in books, articles and speeches for years. Heck, I think Law & Order SVU even referenced it one time. However, it is not true. Check out snopes.com. All the references are there for you to check. Here is the direct link http://www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/superbowl.asp

      • Posted By: gemioncourt @ 09/10/2008 2:05:47 PM

        Bullcrap. The idea that more domestic violence rates increase on Super Bowl Sunday is an Urban Myth at best. I know it has shown up in books, articles and speeches for years. Heck, I think Law & Order SVU even referenced it one time. However, it is not true. Check out snopes.com. All the references are there for you to check. Here is the direct link http://www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/superbowl.asp

    • Posted By: Esencia08 @ 09/08/2008 10:33:00 PM

      The US is in no way a female centered society because it if were, we would not have rape, domestic violence and men would not be committing 85% of the violent crimes in society. Furthermore, in case you haven't noticed this society is very much MALE DOMINATED, from the proliferation of male violence in the media and popular culture, to the phallocentric language used as default for women and men, to the veneration of masculine fetishes of power (weapons, militaration of society). This country is not feminized enough!

      • Posted By: deadgrrl @ 09/10/2008 7:31:20 AM

        Esencia08: Crime rates do not draw a valid picture that males dominate society. It's a moot point, regardless; we are talking about the generation that is growing up right now, not the ones that are already grown. As a mother of young sons (both age 11), I have noticed how girls in our school and the surrounding schools are catered to, fawned over, encouraged to succeed. They should be, but boys need encouragement and attention as well. I agree with itspat in that the media, including several children's programs, all have bumbling males kept in check by smarter females. There MUST be a middle ground that allows both sexes to succeed, that tells both Johnny and Susie that they are wonderful and full of potential.

    • Posted By: itspat @ 09/09/2008 3:30:37 PM

      I agree. Feminism has created this mess. What I've also noticed is how men are treated in tv commercials. Men are made to look dumb while the women are portrayed as smart. Another thing to think about is the fact that school shootings are done by young men and not young women. These boys are acting out in rage. Bonnhoffer told us that the way to judge a society is by how it treats its children. Well, I think we're failing as a society especially where boys are concerned. By the way, I am a female.

  • Posted By: stephencruse @ 09/10/2008 2:01:13 PM

    There is No One Cause to this problem. But I can think of several that come to mind.

    Priority on changing the school curriculum to accommodate Title X to ensure equality for girls in education opportunities has caused the boys to be forgotten and now they are the ones in need but because it brought GOOD results for girls it will require a major change in society's thinking to set it straight.


    Court systems systematically cutting fathers out of their son's life in leading to decreased discipline. Remember almost 50% of male children do not have a biological at home and 4 days a week doesn't give you the time to parent or discipline.

    Society's changed attitudes towards men over the last 2 decades. Man continually portrayed as stupid or unimportant. If Women and Mothers were treated like this the media would be all over it. Just look at Obama's Father's Day Speech. If a candidate had said such things about Mothers he'd be impeached immediatel;y.

  • Posted By: dncnjoe @ 09/10/2008 2:01:07 PM

    Let's consider another factor and that is unfortunately many boys have been forced to grow up without two intact parents. In many cases the single mother, who is having to work a full time job and maybe two, is forced to become both the mother and the father to the son. I'm sorry if I sound sexist, but a woman does not possess the code to teach a boy to become a man in much the same way that a man does not posses the code to teach a girl to become a woman. Ask any single father who needs to teach his daughter about applying makeup. The problem is that the son needs to see a role model of his own gender and understand what it means to become a man. The boy needs to experience what it means to be with dad first hand to know how to transition from boyhood to manhood. To show him how to work on a car, go fishing or camping or whatever the two share together that will stimulate and engage the sense of adventure that a boy instinctively feels. The problem is that electronic stimulus has replaced these adventures. Or in other cases, where the family is intact, the dad is hardly home because he works too much to try to afford the standard of living at the cost of missing out on spending time with his son or daughter. I feel that the decline of a boy's maturing can, in part, be attributed to the absent father and the boy who is forced to fill that vacuum with electronic gadgets and gizmo's.

  • Posted By: Wetzelfam @ 09/10/2008 1:57:11 PM

    Yes, I agree that children need much more active playtime. But I strongly disagree that rules and curricula in school are causing boys to struggle. I am a 53 year old woman; girls of my generation and earlier ones were taught to mask our intelligence so that boys could succeed. Now that is no longer the case, boys don't want the competition, and they view sitting still, listening to the teacher, studying, and achieving in school as "girly" things that should be avoided at all cost. And by the way, a male:female ratio of 60:40 at the university level is not a catastrophe. Strange how a 70:30 male:female ratio was never considered a problem.

  • Posted By: bigjohn2 @ 09/10/2008 1:32:52 PM

    The reason boys are doing poorly is sexism, especially in the school systems. The 21st century public school system is based on the premise that boys are supposed to perfom worse than girls in every subject. When data shows the opposite, then the schools institute programs to rectify the situation, thus we have girl only math and science glasses to correct a 5 to 10% gap in test scores in favor of boys but zero corrective programs to correct a 10 to 15% gap in reading and writing skills in favor of girls. Knowing this, the people who develop an run the SATs caved in to pressure from a group of left wing bigots and added the mandatory writing sample to the SATs so boys, who had been doing slightly better than girls, would automatically do worse than girls on the SATs!

    Teachers also engage in more subtle forms of sexism such as phrasing test or homework questions using only femine pronouns (something I have personnally seen), as if the boys are supposed to disappear. I'd like someone to justify to me this bit of idiotic sexism. Why can't the schools respect both genders? Perhaps it is time to teach boys and girls separately.

    Its time we men started to take more interest in how our sons are taught. Perhaps we need to create an advocacy group like the American Association of University Women that will fight for the rights to a good education for the young men of this country.

    In the larger society, we now have a situation where, despite all our accomplishments, you can't anything good about men and nothing bad about women. Also, in the media, especially TV, men are largely portrayed as stupid, lazy, louts and women are portrayed as intelligent and capable. Maybe its time we turn off the TV and take our sons and nephews out to a ball game, or a hike, or maybe a game of horse at the nearest basketball court.

    • Posted By: myartteacher @ 09/10/2008 1:55:41 PM

      You're right--why aren't men stepping up to the plate? Why are so many of our young male students telling me, "I don't have a dad?" and why are so many young male students behavior problems? I think parents ARE NOT SPENDING QUALITY TIME with their kids, and schools are forced to spend too much time on academics and not enough time on social development, manners, civility, creativity--it's pass the test, or loose the money (thanks to our oh-so-intelligent leaders and No Child Left Behind). Our kids seem to have every material thing they want, but they value nothing. Kids are not taught (anywhere) to be motivated by the sheer joy of achievement--the fullfillment of helping others--to be intrisically motivated to succeed because of our own abilities to achieve. Kids are taught that if you want them to perform, you'd better have some kind of material reward. I'd love to have parents also be honest about their kids--be open to admit that their little ones are not always angels and are not always followers. but are sometimes mean, sometimes the instigators, and sometimes the distraction.

  • Posted By: jlaeye1575 @ 09/10/2008 1:55:14 PM

    As a parent of all boys (my last two are 20 years apart), I have seen many familial and social changes in the last few years. My youngest is a day care baby from Day 1, and my others were not. Gone seem to be the days where we just let "kids be kids." I, too, have taken my youngest to a doctor because of repeated behavioral problems in school, day care, and latchkey. I refuse to put him on medication and have committed to "behavioral modification." We're constantly searching for that fine line between being in control (in other words, conforming to the structure laid out in each and every environment my son encounters) and allowing him the freedom to be just a normal nine-year old boy who has the ability to function in today's world. I think this article is right on the money.

  • Posted By: myartteacher @ 09/10/2008 1:46:39 PM

    Hallelujuah! (and that's coming from a non-religiuos person!) This article expressed what I've been saying for years. I've linked an article on ADHD and Trauma you may also find iteresting http://health.msn.com/health-topics/adhd/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid3D100191637&GT13D3100120 I am an art teacher and have an MA in Psychology Counseling with an interest in community/multicultural counseling and trauma (or perceived trauma).I've always wondered why there are never any developmental psychologists on curriculum writing/test development/or educational policy making panels! No Child Left Behind has certainly left Piaget, Maslow and the normal curve long behind. How will society function if everyone turned out to be CEO's, Doctors, etc.? Our county's school day was extended by 10 minutes this year--I was hoping it would give a little room for transistion time/recess and/or lunch--but of course those minutes were added to Language Arts (do you know any adult who could sit through 2 1/2 hours of Language Arts?--sure not me). I started teaching at the end of the time when classroom teachers did art activites in their room as part of a lesson so I did much more original, creative projects (leaving the "crafty stuff" for the classroom). But now I have to spend more time teaching kids even how to hold scissors and squeeze the right amount of glue because they don't do that anyplace else (parents sure don't seem to want to spend the time doing it)! I worry about the creative developments our country will make in the future because we've taught kids how to NOT think for themselves. I once read an article (can't remeber who or where) by someone who urged parents to teach their kids SELF CONTROL instead of self esteem. I agree! Parents need to stop being kids friends and start giving them direction and guidance. The only question I have is why aren't parents actually seeking help for their kids (we have parents going through messy divorces, terminal illnesses, probably abuse, military seperation, etc--doesn't this count as a need for counseling)? Because parents don't even realize the responsiblities they have--blame is constantly put on the teachers while parents continue to be over-indulgent--allowing their kids to get whatever they want without having to EARN it. This kind of parenting promotes a lack of empathy, compassion and authenitic self esteem. We, as a culture, need to step up to the plate and tell the idiot politicians who are just trying to cover their you-know-whats with this "let's LOOK like we're trying to do something about education" (then we don't actually have the time TO DO anything productive!) talking about test scores--all test scores prove is how wealthy a neighborhood is--not how hard the teachers are working to try to get kids to succeed!

  • Posted By: nicole06 @ 09/10/2008 1:40:51 PM

    As an educator and mental health professional, I adamantly agree with all points of this article. I do not believe that medication should be the primary source of treatment for these boys. I do agree that it is a community problem that is rooted in the family environment. The fundamental principles of "growing up" have been replaced by electronics and an access of scheduled activities. I am the mother of a 2 year old, and I too, have been guilty of turning on a Nickelodeon DVD for my son to watch while I got a task accomplished around the house. I think there is a difference, though, in just popping in a tape versus actually interacting with the child AND the tape. ("What is Diego doing, baby?" or "you see the moon?")

    Teaching to the test isn't effective, either. I am appauled by school's removing recess or not requiring any sort of physical education for the students. And our nation wonders why the child obesity rates are on the rise...don't they know that physical activity increases oxygen flow to the brain?! (thus enhancing the learning capacities)

  • Posted By: nicole06 @ 09/10/2008 1:40:24 PM

    As an educator and mental health professional, I adamantly agree with all points of this article. I do not believe that medication should be the primary source of treatment for these boys. I do agree that it is a community problem that is rooted in the family environment. The fundamental principles of "growing up" have been replaced by electronics and an access of scheduled activities. I am the mother of a 2 year old, and I too, have been guilty of turning on a Nickelodeon DVD for my son to watch while I got a task accomplished around the house. I think there is a difference, though, in just popping in a tape versus actually interacting with the child AND the tape. ("What is Diego doing, baby?" or "you see the moon?")

    Teaching to the test isn't effective, either. I am appauled by school's removing recess or not requiring any sort of physical education for the students. And our nation wonders why the child obesity rates are on the rise...don't they know that physical activity increases oxygen flow to the brain?! (thus enhancing the learning capacities)

  • Posted By: Yamira21 @ 09/08/2008 11:26:13 PM

    Bravo!!! As a teacher I am worried about the boys too. Worried that we are being to hard on them. Todays schools look more like boot camps than elementary schools. When I was a child I remember having 3 breaks, and playing before and after class on the playground. In my school we have a 30 minute lunch were the monitor reprimands kids for sitting at the tables with other classes, turning around to speak to other kids and even punish kids with silent lunches for speaking too loudly (mind you its almost impossible not to speak loudly in a crowded cafeteria). It was so hard for me to watch how my students were being treated that I allowed them to eat lunch in class. I first thought my kids were crazy to want to eat with their teacher, I can't imagine wanting to do that when I was a kid but my kids love it because they acutaly get to socialize, something that kids with autism, ADHD and ADD need to do. Now kids are looked down on if they do not sit still, and do work silently for hours. When I was in college in a 3 hour class, we took a 10 minute break every hour. Today my 4th graders are expected to recieve instruction for 4 hours without a recess. Recess is not just about burning enery, its about clearing your mind to better absorb further instruction. This kind of set up does not favor boys one bit, it frusturated them and makes them hate learning. But in this age of testing, it is easier to just get a kid who is hyper or not easily engaged tested for special ed, that way you can CYA if they don't pass their state test. I am also sad to admit that some teachers have less patience and are more judgemental on both kids and parents, than before. Many teachers forget that kids say the darnest things and many times dont follow the rules the first time they are told, then again aren't most adults this way too? Teachers parents and the community in general, need to give our boys a break and accept that they are a little more adventurous and energetic. We shouldnt discourage this but undersand it, and I personaly would love to see more men in schools who are usualy more understanding of boys and help us women educators accept boys the way they are too.

    • Posted By: Marnet @ 09/08/2008 11:37:40 PM

      My mom often said one of the biggest problems with boys in school is that they've spent their entire lives being bossed by women -- their moms and grandmoms, babysitters, Sunday school teachers -- and by school teachers who are almost exclusively women. Not surprisingly, at some point they just plain get fed up with being bossed by women and want the freedom to run and shout and be little boys.

      • Posted By: Fort Begay @ 09/10/2008 1:35:14 PM

        You forgot to add wives. I bet you do some fine bossing of your "little boy" husband.

  • Posted By: JustAnotherWoman @ 09/10/2008 11:38:59 AM

    First I'd like to say that if you expect a young child to sit still through a whole day of school, you are crazy yourself and maybe you should take some medication yourself. An antsy child doesn't make them an ADHD child, he is just a child. Second, exercise is important, but the suggestions of yoga and meditation are not the way to go about it at that age. We don't need to teach kids to exercise, they need to play actively. What happened to when kids used to join community soccer and baseball teams? Are you telling me you actually want your child to do aerobics and yoga instead of just having fun running around? It shocks me that schools take out recess and things like art and music at such young ages. By all these "teach to the test" schools, we're raising little robots. And as far as teachers needing to learn to handle "rough-housing little boys", that's crap! Yes, boys will be boys, but being a boy gives them no excuse to not have to behave like the rest of the class. Maybe if you taught him some discipline at home, he would have some sense of discipline at school. The way kids behave at school at that young of an age hugely reflects how you are letting them behave at home. I think the issue has a lot to do with the schools and the new structure of learning, but I think people are entirely ignoring the parent's role in raising their children. Don't expect the school to raise your child for you. Expecting the school to teach them discipline and sharing and simple lessons when they are young takes the responsibility out of your hands. And when you blame a teacher when they fail a class in high school is allowing them to shift the responsibility to someone else. Take some responsibility when they are young and make them take that responsibility as they grow up.

    • Posted By: chismfamily @ 09/10/2008 1:34:51 PM

      We could all use some yoga and meditation. Good habits and practices start young. Some countries are
      experimenting with it in the workplace and getting good results. Certainly by age 8 or 9 they could at least
      try it.

  • Posted By: writer_08 @ 09/10/2008 1:34:33 PM

    I've worked in an elementary school for two years and I can tell you that the problems most boys are experiencing are not the teacher's faults. Nor are they the result of poor parenting. We can't blame a changing culture either. Assigning blame is only slowing us down and hindering our progress in helping the boys AND girls who are suffering (and yes, I've personally seen the effects that these labels have on children) from behavior issues. This problem is a colmanation of issues that act as an avalanche trapping us and our children in a perpetual round-about of blame assigning and no progress. The fault lies with biology, and lack of time put forth to find real answers, with over testing and forcing kids to grow up too fast while simotaneously trying to counteract the negative affects by coddleing them in other areas, it's the laws fault for not protecting the kids who really need it and for accusing the parents who are just trying to raise their kids of doing more than that. This issue isn't going to go away because the laws of education are not changing any time soon. Legistration has been ignoring us for years and I doubt they'll suddenly pay attention. So as parents, it is our responsibility to make up for the losses that other people, other systems have provided for our kids. It may not be all our fault, but we're the only ones who can change anything with our kids. We're the ones who have to fight for them. If we want things to change, we have to change them. And if the only thing we can do is help our kids with their homework during the week and take them to the park or bowling (some physical activity) on the weekends. Society isn't changing, but home is the one place where we have total control, and maybe changes there will begin to slowly change the world outside our doors.

  • Posted By: stayback @ 09/08/2008 10:46:58 PM

    This is no surprise to anyone who has noticed that the "John Wayne" school of thought, shall we say, has given way to a pendulum swinging the other way. We encourage our boys to cry and get in touch with their feelings. This all said and done, but when they were encouraged to be stoic, silent and strong, there seemed to be less of these types of issues. Where John Wayne, Lee Marvin and cagney were the male role models in the public eye from entertainment, they have been replaced by a new definiation of manness with Bradd Pitt, Leonardo DiCaprio and Johnny Depp. Can anyone else tell the difference?

    • Posted By: Fort Begay @ 09/10/2008 1:33:12 PM

      I see, you miss the shoot-'em-up, the only good Indian is a dead Indian style of manliness. Your definition of masculinity might just be consistent with the mindset of a school shooter. Thanks, I'll remember that.

  • Posted By: Arizona @ 09/10/2008 1:29:33 PM

    Boys are supposed to be rough,tough and active. And I think that when you try to suppress that natural behavior, the boys will rebel. They are only doing what comes natural. Also some people just let there kids run wild and don't set rules for them.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse