Bristol's Choice

all you need to open up. making abortion illegal is not stripping women of their rights but ensuring the rights of that child. life begins at conception not birth. the declaration of independece says that everyone has the right to LIFE liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this must be protected. in the event of rape or incest or what have you abortion is still not the answer everything happens for a reason and ood will come of it. people need to look at the other side and consider what they have to say but in this case anti-abortion is the right stance.

BRISTOL HAS NO CHOICE WITH A MOTHER LIKE SARAH PALIN. LMAO

NO YOU ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE AWAY OUR RIGHTS AS WOMAN THAT WE FOUGHT FOR SO HARD. LIVE YOUR RELIGION AND LEAVE US ALONE. BRISTOL'S ADULT FATHER OF HER CHILD SHOULD BE JAILDED FOR RAPE AND SEX OFFENDER AS SO MANY YOUND MAN HAVE TO WEAR THE CROWN OF SUCH AND BE LABELED SEX OFFENDER JUST LIKE ANYONE ELSE BUT THEN AGAIN ARE THEY LIKE ANYONE ELSE. NO THEY HAVE POWER. POWER TO MAKE YOU LOOSE YOUR JOB IF SHE PALIN DOENS'T LIKE YOU. POWER HER POWER IS USED FOR TO GREATER HERSELF AND HER OWN. THERE ARE LOTS OF YOUNG BOYS WHOM MUST GO THRU LIFE WITH THE LABLE UNLIKE BRISTOL'S BABY'S FATHER. WHY WHY WHY. SARAH SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST TAUGHT HER DAUGHTER SEX EDUCATION AT HOME. ABTINENCE DOES NOT WORK. IT'S US AS PARENTS TO TEACH THEM AT HOME IF NOT AT SCHOOL. YOU SARAH PALIN NOR YOU JOHN McCAIN IS GOING TO TELL ME IF I WERE RAPED THAT I DONT' HAVE THE FINAL AND ONLY SAY AS TO WHAT I NEED TO DO TO MY BODY. WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?

I'm looking forward to the valuable experience that Gov Palin will gain as VP. As a quick learner with executive experience, she is already being briefed on international hotspots . She is not pretentious or phony. She is honest and forthright as is Sen McCain. Regardless of your political views, we have two individuals that will work extraordinarily hard in making our country a better and safer place to live. I trust their honesty and judgment. I haven't been able to say that about any two politicians on the same ticket in my forty years of voting.

As an independent, i find it interetsing if not illuminating that the author chooses to pursue myths about the candidate. Ms. Palin has never mandated creationism. She may have fired the libarian for one day as an exercise. However, the lady retired from this same jobs years later. Palin has never opposed the equal pay of the success of women. She is anti-abortion. Mr. Pailn is also bound to follow Senator McCain who has no policy supporting the RNC platform on immigration, gay marriage, He did speak out against RoeVWade eight years ago. But, is silent today. Two factors may enter in. First Cindy is pro choice. Second the majority of Americans are prochoice making it impossible to over-turn RoeVWade. The court will never go back against the last decision.

Our priorities should be economic. Obama's suggestions fly in the ace of economic theory. If jobs are lost due to high corporate taxes and over-regulation, why then does he plan to raise corporate and capital gains taxes and press for more regulation. And, when tax magin increases tend to drive tax revenues down, how can he justify higher taxes for employers - in a recession..

You democrats seem scared of something. You attempt to destroy the person with myths and fear-mongering. I suspect you are beaten in Nov becauee you have driven out truth and the independent voter.

As an independent, Ifid it interesting that the suthor feels the need to falsify many facts. While the libarian was "fired" for one day as an exercise, she retire from her job yearss later, Palin never mandated creationism - ever. While she is anti-abortion, she has never worked for lower pay for women or that women can not succeed in business. In fact, her success is probably what galls the democrats. In the end, Roe V Wade is safe (while McCain does think it is flawed, he is silent today on the amendment. The author quotes an eight-year old statement, Palni is not only pro-women. She has budgeted toward that goal. Folks, the myths don't help. You sound like raging radicals with fear in their voices.

WHEN THE LIBERAL ELITE "MAIN STREAM MEDIA" INJECTS ITSELF INTO A NATIONAL US ELECTION, IT LEADS TO THE "LAW OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES"

IF THERE'S WAS NO "MSM" BIAS AGAINST HILLARY, HILLARY WOULD BE THE US PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE AND OBAMA WOULD BE THE VP CANDIDATE

IF THE TICKET IS CLINTON/OBAMA.....THERE IS NO SARAH PALIN EFFECT

IF THERE IS NO SARAH PALIN, THERE IS MCCAIN/ROMNEY REPUB TICKET

THEREFORE, THERE WOULD BE 8 YEARS OF CLINTON/OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

THEREFORE, THERE WOULD BE 8 YEARS OF OBAMA/KEANE ADMINSTRATION


BY US LIBERAL ELITE MEDIA BACKING OBAMA AND TRASHING HILLARY, THEY LOSE A POSSIBLE 16 YEARS IN POWER AND WILL PROBABLY NOW LOSE 8 OUT OF THE LAST 11 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

THE MSM DESERVES WHAT IT GETS

The Democrats have to inform the "white working women" about Palin's stand on Anti-abortion, about not believing in equal pay for men and women and making teaching creationism obligatory at schools. I bet a lot of them will vote for Obama than!!!
We are living in the 21st century and women have to KEEP their right to make decisions regarding their bodies.Abortion should remain legal and safe. Those who want to keep their babies get to do so and those who are not ready, have an abortion.
Not all women regret their abortions.

The Republicans found the perfect woman canditate to run for VP. She is stupid enough to destroy womens' hard won rights all by herself,After being a success herself,she wants to ruin every woman's chance in the workplace (no equal pay at the office) in her personal life (unti-abortion laws,amongst these the guy who will bugger off after finding out his girlfiend is pregnent gets to decide whether she can have an abortion) teaching creationism at school (please, we've landed on Mars.Let s open our minds) .I hope the Democrats will inform all those "white women" voters how Ms Palin is going to ruin their lives.

The man McCain who choose Sarah Palin for VP, well Palin is pretty- but does she have the needed experience in foreign policy, legislative policy and the national economy over all the GOP VP possibilities available?
Not even close!
There are 50-60 GOP legislators, senators etc. with far stronger and more viable resumes available!
Like I said Plain is pretty!
McCain choose Vanity over substance!

Now we know the definition of "Maverick!"
Same old GOP self-righteousness

Si shauri langu.
I wish I could find the exact English words for that Swahili expresson, but I can't. It means it's not under my juridiction or area of assigned (or even God-given) responsibility. That's my feeling about abortion. As a man I will never have to make that choice, so I'm willing to leave it up to women to decide.
I'm sorry to upset all the women who posted their attitudes about abortion on this blog, but I kjnow women who had abortions because they had no other choice and they do not feel the way you do. You're entitled to your beliefs, but you don't have the right to impose them on others. Getting rid of Roe vs. Wade will not eliminate abortions. It did not in the bad old days. If a woman is desperate enough, she will do any thing to terminate a pregnancy and that anything can be a real horror. Show.

Only Obama shows the intelligent judgemnt required. He made it clear that he supports an individual woman's right to make her own decision (as well as her religious beliefs.) but he does want to work to make abortion rare: that includes age-appropriate sex education, family planning, contraception and morning after pill. We have a high rate of abortion, not because it's legal (It legal in the Netherlands and their rate of abortion is much lower) -= it's because we do not do enough to prevent unplanned pregnancies.
This country needs to grow up.

Parents need to give their children vivid pictures and explanations what will happen when/IF they should get pregnant out of wedlock. Girls/Women must learn to be responsible when engaging in sex with boys. If they are not out of school and cannot support themselves, they'd better think twice before "fooling around." I learned this lesson from experience. I used to be Pro-Choice then and for many hears afterward, but through life I gained wisdom and now am pro LIFeE.

Under 18, I believe the pregnant teen should not be able to make the choice. She is still under her parents' guidance. The family is a strong Christian family and are following God's Word (The Bible). Women need to learn that there is great responsibility when engaging in sex...especially under age sex. That possible baby needs support. The couple should be sooo much in love and able to support a family IF the teenager should get pregnant. I am in agreement with John McCain re Roe v. Wade. I had two abortions...and used to be pro-choice. I have learned, through life, that it was wrong.

I agree with Stac73, and have my own arguments. Many people who are Pro-Life may not also think about the living conditions those children may face when born. Many of thoose pregnant teen moms never get anywhere because they have failed to achieve any higher education. Many can only get by with minimum wage and putting away dreams of a better life. People who have abortions do not set out on getting pregnant to INTENTIONALLY have an abortion. Many abortions are made of intricate situations. For example, my mother had an abortion when my father and her were raising my younger sister and I. They had an abortion based on the facts that they wouldnt be able to support three kids. They were still young parents and they had not yet found a career and so they aborted a child. Later in life they had my youngest sister, when they were able to support the three of us. I am not for abortions, or against it. I love kids, and I respect peoples choices. All Im saying is that goverment should respect the choices an individual has to face.

Sarah Palin. De Profundis. Tennyson knew you. Whitman sang of you. So did Homer. Our Athena. Our Pallas Athena. Pallin Athena.