They [Steven Rosen and Kenity Weissman] had learned the alleged secrets in meetings with high-level government officials, including then national security adviser and now secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice. If the National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice had disclosed this information to Rosen and Weissman and if the information was indeed classified, the it is Condoleezza Rice who should be facing charges of giving confidential national security information to agents of a foreign power. So why have charges not been filed against her?
From the article: ???Addington refused to provide Leonard's aides with access, claiming that the vice president's office was not covered by the executive order because, technically speaking, Cheney was not part of the executive branch.??? I am amazed that Cheney and Addington were allowed to get away with this. Article 2, Section 1 ??? The Executive Branch clearly states ???The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold hs Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice-President chosen for the sama Term, be elected as follows: ....??? So the Office if Vice-President of the United States is defined in Article 2, not Article 1 ??? The Legislative Branch!!! I guess it is difficult for Cheney and his legal staff to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States if they don???t understand it.
If the alleged ethics issue is presented to the judge and the judge issues a determination that Leonard should teastify, then he is pretty much off the hook. If he were to be told that he cannot teastify, then the defense could make a reasonable motion for dismissal because critical evidence (Leonard's expert teastimony) is being withheld and is preventing the defendants from a fair trial.
Regardless, Rice should be charged with a national security leak of confidential information to a foreign power. She can then deal with her own trial for a year or so.









Discuss