Warned by the Court

Sounds to me like Trooper Wooten needed a good a** kickin* if he even remotely did what he was accused of.
I would like to have a sister like Sarah Palin who would do everything to get the jerk fired.

Please sign this petition demanding the truth at www.alaskatroopergate.com that states:

"We, the undersigned, call on Sarah Palin to fulfill her promise to cooperate with the Alaska Troopergate investigation.

We demand that GOP operatives stop stonewalling the investigation.

We as Americans say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and demand the information we are entitled to know to make an informed decision before election day!"

Please help get the word out!

Newsweek reports that Wooten had once been the subject of a court-imposed domestic-violence protection order. Newsweek further reports that a court filing by Wooten's lawyer indicates that within months of being issued, the violence protection order was dismissed.

There is no language in the federal criminal statute Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban that states or provides that Alaskan State Troopers are exempt from its provisions. Anyone including State Troopers are guilty of a federal felony punishable by five years in prison and a $100,000 fine for simple mere possession of a firearm if they are subject to an ordinary protective order for domestic violence. Importantly the reports state that the estranged spouse filed for divorce and a domestic violence protective order on April 11, 2005 against the State Trooper. This article reports that a protective order had been issued for a period. In most cases protective orders are customarily issued. Under new federal law, anyone subject to a protective order or convicted of misdemeanor domestic assault or felony assault is subject to a ban on possession or use of a handgun for a minimum of five years or at least to the end of the protective order. Some have argued that the ban is forever even after the protective order expires. The Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban is a federal law that applies to everyone including police officers and servicemen and servicewoman. Anyone in the military is subject to a discharge if a protective order is issued against them. It is a felony to violate the federal law Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban and the penalty is five years in prison. Every day that the trooper wore his sidearm or rode in his patrol car with a shotgun in the trunk, he was committing a felony and violating the federal law. If a protective order was issued and the trooper became subject to the order, the trooper should have been ineligible to be a State law enforcement officer and it would have been a slam dunk to terminate him. The State Police Commissioner should have been aware of this law and should have terminated the brother-in-law without being asked. The State Commissioner failure to uphold the federal law should have been enough grounds for his own termination.

I know someone eerily similar in her behavior to Palin. She, like Palin, seeks to destroy you if you cross her, She has two kind of people in her life, her Friends and her Enemies. Plain, like the one I know, will stop at nothing, will weven break the law to get revenge, not caring who is hurt, children and adults both. I predict that if Sarah Palin does become the Vice-president, it will be just a meeter of time berfore she is REMOVED FROM OFFICE for ABUSE OF POWER, SEEKING REVENGE, AND VICIOUS, VINDICTIVE ACTIONS. Seen her kind before. Hitler would be proud of their actions.

Trazer........ you're an idiot.

Most Americans if someone threatened to kill their parents would do anything possible to prevent it. Family and values are most important. The Democrats of the very tiny minority who don't value family values in Alaska are trying to hurt a great American leader. As usual, the Democrats hate WOMEN, FAMILY, and VALUES. The Democrats who like women, family, and family values will continue to thick highly of Sarah Palin if they put aside partisan interests.

There is likely no merit in the ethics complaint against Governor Sarah Palin and Sarah Palin should not have to wait until her sister disappeared before she intervened. Even if there was any merit to the complaint one could argue convincingly that it would have been prudent for her to intervene in this case given the recent publicity regarding the disappearance and death respectively of the last two wives of former and now retired police Sergeant Drew Peterson in Bollingbrook Illinois a Chicago suburb, the death of the nine-month pregnant girlfriend of convicted former police officer Bobby Cutts in Ohio, and the pending murder trial of Pennsylvania State Trooper and homicide investigator Kevin Foley for the stabbing murder of the soon to be dentist ex-husband of his live-in girlfriend that occurred two days before the effective date of the final divorce decree. Sarah Palin should not have to have waited until her sister disappeared before she intervened in the trooper case. In the Foley case, Pennsylvania Trooper Kevin Foley lived with the estranged wife of a dentist who was viciously stabbed to death and thrown through the window of his own home two years ago. Pennsylvania State Trooper Foley specialized in homicide investigations and allegedly had been quoted as repeatedly stating in a State Police barracks break room in front of other State Troopers and supervisors as wishing that the dentist ex-husband would be killed in a car wreck or would otherwise die. Reportedly, his fellow state troopers did not take his threats seriously although they told him to stop making the threats against the now deceased dentist. Remember also in the Drew Peterson case, there were 18 eighteen separate domestic disturbance calls to the Drew Peterson residence outside Chicago.

Remember also in the Drew Peterson case, there were 18 eighteen separate domestic disturbance calls to the Drew Peterson residence outside Chicago. In the eighteen separate domestic disturbance calls to his home, Drew Peterson was never arrested or charged by his fellow officers with whom he worked. The only person ever charged by his fellow officers in all of Peterson???s domestic violence cases was his now deceased ex-wife. Any investigation into the conduct of her ex-brother-in-law trooper by his own department, the Alaska State Police and Pubic Safety Commissioner, should have been viewed with the same skepticism as the eighteen separate investigations into the conduct of Drew Peterson by his fellow officers. It clearly can be argued that the prudent course of action was for Governor Sarah Palin to intervene given the almost near universal blue wall of silence that often prevents investigation of police misconduct by their fellow officers, superiors, and even other outside law enforcement agencies. In light of the recent murders of spouses and girlfriends by police officers in other states, any alleged intervention by Governor Sarah Palin involving her ex-brother-in-law was not unethical or unreasonable, rather it was probably the more prudent course of conduct. Sarah Palin should not have had to wait until her sister disappeared before she intervened.

This article states that a Domestic Violence Protective Order was issued and was rescinded months later.

The Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban is federal criminal law which the Alaska State Public Safety Commissioner had no discretion in not enforcing. If the State Trooper had a protective order issued against him, the State Public Safety Commissioner should have terminated the State Trooper without being asked by anybody. It is a felony to violate the federal Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban. News reports state that the estranged spouse filed for divorce and a domestic violence protective order on April 11 2005 against the State Trooper. Protective orders are customarily issued. If a protective order was issued, the federal criminal statute Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban should resolve all of the current controversy surrounding any inappropriate contacts between the Governor???s office and the State Public Safety Commissioner. If a protective order was issued, the State Public Safety Commissioner is clearly way out on a limb on the wrong side of the law in this matter. It would take one call to the court to find out if a protective order was issued and that would have been enough for the Public Safety Director to act.

This article states ???that Wooten had once been the subject of a court-imposed domestic-violence protection order. A court filing by Wooten's lawyer indicates that within months of being issued, the violence protection order was dismissed.???

There is no language in the federal criminal statute Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban that states or provides that Alaskan State Troopers are exempt from its provisions. Anyone including State Troopers are guilty of a federal felony punishable by five years in prison and a $100,000 fine for simple mere possession of a firearm if they are subject to an ordinary protective order for domestic violence. Importantly the reports state that the estranged spouse filed for divorce and a domestic violence protective order on April 11, 2005 against the State Trooper. This article reports that a protective order had been issued for a period. In most cases protective orders are customarily issued. Under new federal law, anyone subject to a protective order or convicted of misdemeanor domestic assault or felony assault is subject to a ban on possession or use of a handgun for a minimum of five years or at least to the end of the protective order. Some have argued that the ban is forever even after the protective order expires. The Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban is a federal law that applies to everyone including police officers and servicemen and servicewoman. Anyone in the military is subject to a discharge if a protective order is issued against them. It is a felony to violate the federal law Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban and the penalty is five years in prison. Every day that the trooper wore his sidearm or rode in his patrol car with a shotgun in the trunk, he was committing a felony and violating the federal law. If a protective order was issued and the trooper became subject to the order, the trooper should have been ineligible to be a State law enforcement officer and it would have been a slam dunk to terminate him. The State Police Commissioner should have been aware of this law and should have terminated the brother-in-law without being asked. The State Commissioner???s failure to uphold the federal law should have been enough grounds for his own termination.

Please sign this petition demanding the truth at www.alaskatroopergate.com that states:

"We, the undersigned, call on Sarah Palin to fulfill her promise to cooperate with the Alaska Troopergate investigation.

We demand that GOP operatives stop stonewalling the investigation.

We as Americans say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and demand the information we are entitled to know to make an informed decision before election day!"

Please help get the word out!

will somebodfy with some morals ask palin to resign already and do america a favor... she is involved in over 8 scandals already and she is not even the vp yet... i think obama should ask her to resign in the protection of national security. mccain obviously did not vet her at all other than looks at her boobs and butt on national tv with his wandering eyes...

Exclusive Video: Palin Backstab? Commissioner Praised Then Fired. Shows Sarah Palin Praising Commissioner, Just Months Before She Fired Him.
By BRIAN ROSS, JUSTIN ROOD, ANNA SCHECTER and MEGAN CHUCHMACH
September 11, 2008
SEE VIDEO: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5778856&page=1