SOCIETY

How to Fight Binge Drinking

Would lowering the legal age help colleges curb alcohol abuse?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Coalition Coordinator @ 09/12/2008 11:54:54 AM

    As we debate the legal drinking age, let's keep some proven facts in mind.

    Lowering the drinking age increases youth binge drinking and intoxication -- Despite conventional wisdom, European countries with lower legal drinking ages have huge problems with youth binge drinking. For example, France is battling high binge drinking rates among their youth. In an interview with Journal du Dimanche newspaper, the French Health Minister was recently quoted as saying, "Almost half of youths said they had had five glasses of alcohol on a single night on at least one occasion in the previous 30 days, which is the definition of binge drinking."

    Additionally, a recent study on youth drinking in more than 30 European countries shows binge drinking and intoxication rates far greater in Europe than in our country. Published by United States Department of Justice (www.udetc.org/documents/CompareDrinkRate.pdf), the report contradicts the belief that adolescent alcohol use leads to more responsible drinking.

    Research-based prevention programs work -- On their website, the Amethyst Initiative states: Alcohol education that mandates abstinence as the only legal option has not resulted in significant constructive behavioral change among our students.

    There are myriad research-based ways to prevent underage drinking including drug/alcohol prevention curriculum in schools; parenting programs; social norms campaigns that battle the misperceptions about underage drinking; and effective enforcement. The Centers for the Application of Prevention Technologies maintains information about evidenced-based prevention programs on its website:
    http://captus.samhsa.gov/national/resources/evidence_based.cfm.

    New brain science shows even at age 20, alcohol damages
    The Amethyst Initiative states: Adults under 21 are deemed capable of voting, signing contracts, serving on juries and enlisting in the military, but are told they are not mature enough to have a beer.

    New brain science shows that alcohol negatively impacts the maturing brain and learning. The American Medical Association states that brain growth doesn't end until around age 20. ???The brain goes through dynamic change during adolescence, and alcohol can seriously damage long- and short-term growth processes.??? The Underage Drinking Research Initiative at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism cites one study showing a ???single, moderate dose of alcohol can disrupt learning more powerfully in people in their early twenties, compared with those in their late twenties.??? For more information check out: www.alcoholpolicymd.com/pdf/brain3.pdf and http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/NR/rdonlyres/87033E59-822F-4491-B0B5-F08C7C955588/0/NIAAA_Brain_Fact_Sheet_508.pd

    Alcohol use by those under 21 is also related to numerous health problems including injuries and death results from car crashes, suicide, homicide, assaults, drowning, and recreational mishaps.

    • Posted By: denab1613 @ 02/08/2009 6:55:57 PM

      I'm under 21 and I have illegally been intoxicated. I have binge drank. I enjoy the effects of alcohol. However, i have not been or heard of any of my friends involved in 'injuries, deaths caused by car crashes suicide homicide assaults drowning and recreational mishaps. Sorry. The age needs to be lowered. It is ridiculous that I can die for my country but I can't drink a harmless drink. If you are safe, If you are smart and responsible and you surround yourself with responsible people you will be fine.

  • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 09/11/2008 2:48:55 PM

    If we are to believe the scientific information we are getting about the brain and brain development, we should be raising the drinking age to 25, not lowering it to 18.

    Since that isn't going to happen, there may be some other laws we could tweak.

    For one thing, it makes no sense whatsoever to tell college students between 18 and 21 not to drink, but have the NCAA March Madness tournament brought to you by Budweiser. It is time to take beer ads off tv during college sporting events, maybe take them off, period.

    The argument for lowering the drinking age is that kids have to try alcohol sometime - how else will they learn to drink it responsibly? Outlawing it clearly hasn't worked, but when the drinking age was 18 in many states, 18-21 year olds died in higher numbers on the road, and 16 and 17 year olds were binge drinking at private parties. I know - I was one of them.

    So rather than pursue the failed all or nothing strategies that haven't worked, how about a graduated drinking policy, similar to the way we license young drivers? At first, they can only drive with supervision, then they can only drive during the day, and finally, when they have some experience, they can earn an unrestricted license.

    The same could happen with alcohol. Perhaps we can allow any child to drink within the confines of their own home with direct adult supervision only. From 18 - 23 we can allow our young people to drink without adult supervision, but only at home - not in bars, not in cars, and not at public events. Any problems with drunken disorderliness, fighting, vandalism, etc - you lose the privilege to drink anywhere except your parent's home - act like a child, get treated like a child.

    At 23, provided you have remained responsible, you can drink like a grown up. (Pray that the grown ups figure out how to drink responsibly, but that's an argument for another day).

    18 year olds who volunteer to joing the military should be exempt from the graduated laws, answering the reasonable argument that if you are old enough to die for your country, you should be able to order a beer. After all, we allow our young people in the military special license to handle firearms and bombs, why not alcohol? The same rules about responsibility would apply - act like a child and behave stupidly, lose your privilege to consume alcohol.

    The deans of the colleges want public debate. Good idea. But let's find some alternatives to the old all-or-nothing laws of the past, because they didn't work. And let's do something soon - no parent should have to get a phone call from a dean that says your child is in the morgue.

    • Posted By: Midwestmom @ 09/11/2008 3:37:57 PM

      C. -

      I am impressed with some of your reasonings. I was an underage drinker, but was never a binge drinker. I attribute this to my mother sitting down with me and letting me get as drunk as I wanted 1 time (Back when parents didn't go to jail for serving their kids). From that one experience, I learned what my limits were and that I hated cleaning up the mess the next morning. I think if more parents could do this, we might alleviate some of the problem.
      Other issues that were not discussed in this article that may attribute to some of the binge drinking now occuring is the new generation of thinking. Kids from the last 5-10 years were raised differently than I was. There seems to have been more restrictions put on people born after 1981 (read the Millenial Gap article). These kids turn 18 and are turned loose on college campuses, hundreds of miles from home, without any kind of supervision for the first time in their life. Of course they go wild.
      I like your idea of a graduated system, however, I would like it to start earlier. Something along the lines of 16 while accompanied by a parent and nothing over a certain alcohol content (i.e. wine cooler). At 18 they can drink without a parent present, but still the lower alcohol content. Then, hopefully, by age 21, a certain maturity is beginning to occur and they can be trusted to drink what they want. - This will not fix all of the cases obviously, but might curb a few of the cases.

      • Posted By: kaeup @ 09/17/2008 5:31:30 PM

        For the record it is not illegal in some states for legal guardians to serve drinks to minors under their care. In that case the legal age in my state is 16. And my parents legally served me a half glass of wine at dinner on several occassions. Perfectly legal.

    • Posted By: NoToProhibition @ 09/11/2008 8:15:04 PM

      Prohibition is the problem. It doesn't work. Over regulation doesn't work. The government needs to get out of our personal lives and rely on adults to make their own decisions. If those decisions have consequences, then so be it, but I decided to make the decision. Increasing the drinking age will only move these statistics upwards. If the drinking age were 25, then we'd see higher deaths on the roads from that age group.

  • Posted By: ronwagn @ 09/13/2008 11:08:18 AM

    Alcohol should be banned from campus. Drunk and disorderly behavior on campus should be cause for probation and eventual dismissal. Alcohol testing should be done when students are arrested on campus.Same applies to recreational drugs. This should include all staff as well. The colleges are enablers of binge drinking, and drugging.

  • Posted By: EuroTrash @ 09/13/2008 7:12:59 AM

    Im really split on the issue of lowering the drinking age. I am an American raised in Italy, I grew up drinking beer and wine from a young age. When I was 15 my father decided it would be ok with him if I wanted a glass of beer or wine with dinner. I drank responsibly... and then I went to a US university, where there was nothing to do but study, drink and screw, and that's what I did. I think in addition to lowering the drinking age, there needs to be other reforms, like free rides home for drinkers, and finding other things for college students to do in their free time!

  • Posted By: Koori-Hatake @ 09/12/2008 6:55:24 PM

    I don't think people should drink in the first place. Both wine and beer taste nasty. Why drink something that tastes that bad when a glass of milk tastes 5 times better. If you want the "health benefits" drink non-alcoholic wine if you like the taste. Pure alcohol is a drug that I vote we remove from our society all together.

    • Posted By: Tacocat27 @ 09/12/2008 8:14:06 PM

      You've obviously never tasted a cool crisp bottle of Sierra Nevada yuuummmmm. I'm not sure if you are aware of this or not, and you might want to sit down because this will come as somewhat of a shock, but people have different tastes when it comes to food/beverages *GASP*. What tastes nasty to you might not to other people. I'll concur on the health benefit part though (expect for red wine, which can provide some nutrition).

  • Posted By: sieg6529 @ 09/12/2008 12:39:03 PM

    Forget lowering the drinking age, we should raise the enlistment and voting age.

  • Posted By: mrshampton @ 09/12/2008 11:02:41 AM

    I agree with paul.wells regarding raising the age of majority AND decreasing the drinking age. Most teenagers are NOT adult-like. Studies have shown that our brains are not full capable of critical thinking until we are in our early to mid-20's. The age of majority in Japan is 20 and driving is not allowed until age 18. I also have a hard time with the concept of allowing our young men and women to defend out nation, but not allowing them to relax and have a beer or glass of wine at the end of the day. I really believe that de-mystifying alcohol and educating kids about its use is also important. In our house we began to let our children have a small glass of wine with dinner as long as they weren't going anywhere later on - whether they were driving or not. My oldest daughter entered college at age 17. She turned 18 at the end of the next month. Having been exposed to alcohol at home made it less exciting to drink on campus and during her first year I know she rarely did. Does she now? Yes - but I do believe she is more responsible about it, having been exposed to its use at home.

  • Posted By: phiomalibumalibu @ 09/12/2008 5:38:23 AM

    Really, now are you kidding. Why would anyone except bev co's want this http://www.teeniegal.com has some really good articles for teens regarding drinking.

  • Posted By: nosoupforsharpton @ 09/11/2008 9:49:25 PM

    I think it makes more sense to let kids start drinking at 16 but not drive until 18. At least that way they would have a clue what alcohol can do to their system before getting behind the wheel of a car.

  • Posted By: paul.wells@wyohomes.com @ 09/11/2008 9:43:07 PM

    When I graduated high school at 17 the drinking age in our state (WY) was 19 for all forms of alcohol. I turned 18 over the summer and I went to school in SD where the age for drinking "3.2" beer was 18 and the age for drinking anything else was 21. That was a long time ago, it seems, but I liked parts of both systems (and not just because it meant I could drink younger). Also, let me say that I have three teenagers, and take this very seriously.
    The fact is college kids will drink if they want to, and by having a younger age in place, we did have organized and regulated businesses to go to to try it out. If you got out of control one way or the other, you were cut off. Being an ass in someone's backyard is a whole lot different thatn being one in a club. Also, I do have a problem with telling my soon-to-be 18 year old that he will need to sign up for selective service (a potential military draft), but he cannot be trusted to drink a beer.
    That having been said, I also do not believe it wise to allow kids in high school to drink. As there are and will be many high school seniors that are 18, including my son, a drinking age of 18 is problematic.
    My idea is this: make the age for both registering for the Selective Service and the age for drinking a lower alcohol content beer (light or the above-mentioned 3.2) both 19. Make the age for liqour, wine, and "high-point" beer 21. It's not perfect, as it does not take into account the young 18 year old college freshmen such as myself, but I believe it is much more reasonable and practical.
    If that is unacceptable to the MADD crowd, then please raise the age for Selective Service registration to 21.

  • Posted By: member101 @ 09/11/2008 3:27:32 PM

    Benjamin Franklin was ousted by his father from attending Harvard Theological School for binge drinking. This is not a new phenomenon. Laws cannot deplete the import of drinking as a rite of passage and the sanctity of athletes and businesses that on one hand denounce drinking but support its use...strongly. This is a money issue!

    I formerly lived in a state where the binge drinking is considered bragged about rather than lamented. However, following Junior Achievement classes the town???s businesses "march" to the local alcohol distributor for an evening of free beverages. The YMCA???s major sponsor is the local distributor. And every evening meeting is completed with the Lord???s prayer and alcohol.

    Regardless of how we feel about the issue, nothing beneficial comes from alcohol.

    I went to a national club???s regional meeting where immediately following the Pledge of Allegiance with Boy Scouts still in attendance, drinks were passed.

    Punish adults for not setting better examples. After all, consider the number of anti-depressants prescribed in an age where we have more ease than ever before. Jim

    • Posted By: NoToProhibition @ 09/11/2008 8:11:56 PM

      Alcohol, drugs and tobacco are a part of society and it's not going to change. The government is completely hipocritical in the sense that they say they're helping us by prohibiting or limiting access to certain substances. At the same time, they are on the take in Washington from all the entities who promote these vices. Liberty is about being free do say and do as you please so long as you're not endangering the welfare of another person. If I want to smoke pot or drink heavily in my own house, I should be able to do it. The government has constrained our liberties to the point of a police state and its time for some change. RON PAUL is this change....

  • Posted By: NoToProhibition @ 09/11/2008 8:06:48 PM

    While we're in the process of talking about lowering the drinking age, why don't we discuss the problem w/ Prohibition as a whole? As mentioned in the article, Prohibition only funnels money to the underworld and it continues to do so today w/ Cannabis which is completely illegal. Though less harmful than tobacco or alcohol, our government continues to outlaw a plant which has ZERO overdose deaths in documented medical history. Cannabis also provides a nice living for the drug cartels which we waste billions fighting every year. A common sense approach to the drinking age and the drug war is a topic that Washington needs to focus on. We're in debt, fighting wars and wasting money around the globe, yet we still haven't learned from history. It's time to start using common sense in this country. I know it will never come from either side because no one wants to touch the subject (except RON PAUL!), but we need to look at these issues and seriously change our policies.

  • Posted By: redblack&white @ 09/11/2008 7:21:18 PM

    I live on St. Thomas, in the U.S. Virgin Islands, where the alcohol is very inexpensive and the drinking age is technically only 18. The kids raised in the VI are socialized to drinking in a complete different manner than in the mainland United States. Binge drinking is just not an issue. Some serious socialogical studies should explore caribbean culture and it's attitudes towards alcohol and how that reflects on thier children, I think we would learn a lot about how this has become such a problem in America.

  • Posted By: Jake Clifford @ 09/11/2008 7:10:03 PM

    I am considered an adult by all law domestic and international but as of yet i still do not have all of the rights of an adult. i am all for a graduated system or almost any other system that you can think of as long as i am not treated like a second class citizen. the true argument hear is rights not drinking.

  • Posted By: Craig Brandon @ 09/11/2008 6:30:53 PM

    One of the problems is that the off-campus illegal booze parties attract as many high school drinkers as college students. It's harder for high school binge drinkers to find a place to endulge and these parties provide it. Changing the drinking age to 18 will mean that some high school seniors will be able to drink. What will that mean for high school parties? I explore many of these issues on my blog: Party Schools Exposed.

  • Posted By: gkronenberg @ 09/11/2008 5:06:01 PM

    I am writing from Choose Responsibility to ask that the spelling of John McCardell's name be corrected, if possible. Thank you for this excellent article!

  • Posted By: dbricheyii @ 09/11/2008 4:30:06 PM

    My parents allowed us to drink from a young age probably around 10. It was not uncommon to walk up to them and take a big swig from their can of beer. As we got older and our friends were starting to get crazy, it was not a big deal for my brothers and me. The "forbidden" fruit is always the most sought after. Our parents taught us that drinking in moderation was not a big deal. This is the way I am going to raise my two kids.

  • Posted By: mrduke14 @ 09/11/2008 4:07:51 PM

    I am somewhat close to the current age group, only 3 years removed from college and I completely agree with this. The majority of binge drinking that occurs from 18-20 yr olds is done in dorm rooms or basements away from supervision. I drank a ton while in college and binge drank quite often. You had to load up before parties and make sure to get enough in you to last the entirety of the party. Is this smart? Of course not, but it is a reality that most college kids go through. However, when I turned 21 and was able to legally drink at bars, there wasnt any need to get wasted before hand. I was able to get to a point of feeling good and keep it there at a constant pace. If college kids want alcohol they will get it, so why not try to get them to do it while being supervised by either cops or bouncers?

  • Posted By: jules63 @ 09/11/2008 3:20:03 PM

    When my 14-yr old was brought home passed out drunk I was surprised. That was in 1987. The next day I sat him down to explain why you pass out when you drink too much. I think we got through to him that he was lucky because he could have died. Do college age kids understand the concept of death and drinking?

  • Posted By: polarbeardave @ 09/11/2008 2:30:00 PM

    What percentage of 18-21 year old drinkers attend college, or Ivy League colleges? If the law changes to accomodate the "best and brightest", it will also change for those not so bright. The lowest common denominator needs to be considered. When you cave into the needs of 25% (est) of 18-21 year olds, you may very well be unleashing disaster on the others. When a 20 year old high school drop out kills your Harvard educated daughter, will the cost be worth it? The universities should teach responsibility, if somebody gets caught binge drinking, lowered grades, lost scholarships, and expulsion are tools available to universities. If these great schools cannot create ideas to solve their local problems without impacting all of society, maybe they are trying to solve the wrong problem.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse