‘Jim Crawford’ Republicans

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: josemarti @ 09/12/2008 1:00:15 PM

    Barry. You have to get Biden off the ticket. You only have one week to do it. Tell him to feign an illness. Something. And then withdraw. If he won't do it, then dig up some dirt on him and MAKE him. Then choose Hillary. She has to be on the ticket by the time the VP rolls around. You don't have much time. Gotta dow it NOW. You have to do it. You may not have a chance to be President again.

    • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 09/12/2008 1:10:12 PM

      That would be a first me. A candidate flip flopping on their running mate? Wonder how the Liberal press would spin that one...lol

      • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 09/12/2008 2:40:05 PM

        I;ve heard a lot of talk about having Biden drop out too. I wonder if it really would help Obama? Would the press actually report it factually that, Obama was trying to pander and play identity politics. He already is but the press won't tell you..

        • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 09/12/2008 2:53:40 PM

          Yeah Biden was the Obama answer for not having experience. Now that McCain has selected Palin he doesn't need him. However, pandering to the Clinton voters would in my opinion, guarantee the white house to the Dems. But flip flopping on a running mate, what does that say about Obama's judgement?

          • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 09/12/2008 3:07:37 PM

            I'm just wondering if the Clinton Dems that are supporting McCain will be fooled by it though? I don't know if they would. How many of the Obama people would leave though, since most of them hate the Clinton's anyway....you know the whole Hope and Change would be right out the window since going that route would give the Clinton's an enormous amount of power in an Obama Administration, effectively making Obama just the party head but not in charge of anything. Everything would go through the VP office first.

            • Posted By: sharenews @ 09/12/2008 4:51:07 PM


              Zombie, it would not change my vote now for McCain/Palin if Obama somehow managed to switch out Biden for Hillary. I really dont think that is in any way going to happen though. He is stuck with the choice he made.. LMAO.

      • Posted By: josemarti @ 09/12/2008 1:38:23 PM

        Biden was setting the stage for his resignation the other day when he said that Hillary would have been a better choice. I am betting that he is gonna claim that he has some kind of medical problem (perhaps another berry brain aneurysm) and will excuse himself. It is clear that his heart is not into it.

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 09/12/2008 1:19:21 PM


    BARACK OBAMA and BILL AYERS (unapologetic Washington Terrorist Bomber) both worked on the Woods Funds Board as directors in the 90s.

    Here is one example of many radical groups they had for clients:


    ACORN: A LIBERAL ACTIVIST GROUP, notorious for voter registration FRAUD and even paying for votes using crack cocaine.

    Operating in at least 38 states (as well as Canada and Mexico), ACORN pushes a highly partisan agenda, and its organizers are best understood as shock troops for the AFL-CIO and even the Democratic Party.

    Acorn and its affiliates have pulled some real stunts in recent years. In Ohio in 2004, a worker for one affiliate was given crack cocaine in exchange for fraudulent registrations that included underage voters, dead voters and pillars of the community named Mary Poppins, Dick Tracy and Jive Turkey. During a Congressional hearing in Ohio in the aftermath of the 2004 election, officials from several counties in the state explained ACORNs practice of dumping thousands of registration forms in their lap on the submission deadline, even though the forms had been collected months earlier.

    Given this history, its not surprising that ACORN is so hostile to voter identification laws and other efforts to ensure fairness and accuracy at the polls.


    Source article: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2008/03/obamas-problematic-directorship-woods.html


    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    OBAMAs Resume. . . The ACORN Years: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SOhlcu5dJw


    Reports on SCOTUS Voter ID and ACORN Fraud:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5VgzvzIJ04&feature=related

    OBAMAs ACORN Exposed - PART I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8Ep1tkNOUU

    OBAMAs ACORN Exposed - PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=625jUE78zjE

    • Posted By: keepitreal50 @ 09/12/2008 2:29:50 PM

      Now what do you have to say for the behavior of your ancestors. Would we be ok to use the same practices to start on the path of getting back what was stolen from us. Huh?

      • Posted By: sharenews @ 09/12/2008 4:45:32 PM


        How Obama working with voter registration orgs and paying for their support knowing they are frauds is beyond me as to how that relates to my Irish-French ancestorship. LOL. Good lord, you are OUT there. LOL

  • Posted By: bronte34 @ 09/12/2008 2:15:52 PM

    Do you take us for morons, Mr. Alter? First of all, any state that requires a driver's license for identification will also accept a state-issued ID card, which is easily accessible and does not require the ability to drive. Second, do you have a statistic somewhere that says poor people don't know how to drive? Third, why make the asinine assumption that blacks are being excluded because they're the 'poor people'? Fourth, are there no poor people voting Republican? What an absurd argument, start to finish. Back to the drawing board for you. -----Signed, a poor white Independent who drives

    • Posted By: kle5507 @ 09/12/2008 4:43:53 PM

      Hey poor white independent guy, let's hope that when they check your state issued ID against "the List" that your name won't be on a felony - not allow to vote list. You missed the the important part of the article which is the state id is no good if it's checked against a bad list as it was in 2000. As for you being poor white independent, as the old GOP saying goes" if you're poor, it's your fault". Go ahead and vote for McBush and PaCheney. You sure won't get rich under them.

    • Posted By: keepitreal50 @ 09/12/2008 2:31:57 PM

      But read the wrong history book

      • Posted By: doctorofcommonsense @ 09/12/2008 2:39:51 PM

        Take an intro college course in economics. Or psychology. Or sociology. Or political science. Or logic and reasoning. There are social inequities. I am quite sure (purely in a sarcastic sense) that people who work two jobs will take the time out of their day to obtain the necessary I.D. card to be able to exercise their civic duty. Are you suggesting that Maslow's heirarchy of needs had it backward - political expression is a more fundamental need than food and shelter? I believe that you were missing a few adjectives in your signature.

    • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 09/12/2008 2:39:17 PM

      Just a bunch of liberal media spin, nothing more. He banks on the uneducated and the misinformed. NOBODY said a Drivers license is a requirement to vote. A license is a form of ID, but to say you need a valid ID would make people say...So, whats the problem?

  • Posted By: newsveek @ 09/12/2008 4:00:09 PM

    In heavily Democratic urban areas, particularly in places like Chicago and New York, it's fairly common to find people being driven to the polls and paid to vote. I guess that's called "community organizing." In fact, in some parts of New York City, even the dead vote. Democratic, no doubt. Ain't America great?

    • Posted By: kle5507 @ 09/12/2008 4:04:27 PM

      Ah, the great myth about dead democrats voting. How come the DOJ under Bush who had made it a priority to investigate this kind of voting irregularity failed to find proof of it? Best keep this kind of BS under the lochness monster and big foot conspiracy. You're starting to sound looney.

      • Posted By: newsveek @ 09/12/2008 4:13:22 PM

        Maybe because it's almost impossible to find proof of so many voting irregularities in the first place. The people who have used this tactic for years are pretty good at it. They're not stupid or looney. Just corrupt.

        • Posted By: kle5507 @ 09/12/2008 4:27:22 PM

          So you're smarter that Bush's DOJ (which is not saying much). If you can't trust your own party, who can you trust? Maybe you should offer your help to frett out these corruption as you've stated. Can you offer evidence or is this just another Rush and Hannity nonsense? If you have evidence, contact the DOJ.

  • Posted By: glimps @ 09/12/2008 2:18:46 PM

    this article helps me understand why the polls are so close in this election yr... fraudulent elections are a complete sham

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 09/12/2008 2:34:57 PM

      No they just give you another excuse to use when Barry loses. All Alter is doing is giving you justification to hate the GOP, in case Barry goes down the tubes even more than he is now. Everyone knows the first reason all of the Obama supporters are going to use, here is another one. The Dems are just setting themselves up for failure again.

      • Posted By: keepitreal50 @ 09/12/2008 3:23:07 PM

        When Barack loses MY FRIEND, you will lose along with the rest of us and that should make you proud.

        • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 09/12/2008 3:31:30 PM

          Oh I'm sorry. Yes because Barry will enlighten us all and force us down a new path right? Sorry I don't believe in any god and I don't need a savior. If you think you need to lead to the promised land, hey fine by me.
          You seem to be forgetting that, when Barry loses, McCain will have to deal with a very pissed off Congress. What you should be worried about, is if Congress will roll over and pass everything McCain wants, like they have doing for Bush the last 2 years?

    • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 09/12/2008 2:36:16 PM

      I agree completely. Now can you find proof of voter fraud other then all the dead people who voted Democrat the last 2 elections?

  • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 09/12/2008 3:00:57 PM

    Gallup: If These Numbers Are Sustained Through Election Day Republicans Could Be Expected To Regain Control of the U.S. House of Representatives

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/110263/Battle-Congress-Suddenly-Looks-Competitive.aspx


    I'm sure it's all due to voter fraud. Oh I know Barry supporters go put on your tin foil hats so the nasty GOP doesn't use their new brainwave control device on you. That's why the Polls show McCain higher...it just has to be.

    • Posted By: keepitreal50 @ 09/12/2008 3:27:30 PM

      Polls smolls. Polls never told the truth about Obama's success. When they said he was losing he won. Point made.

      • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 09/12/2008 3:28:58 PM

        Which polls are you referring to? Oh and maybe you should read the article it's talking about GOP gains in the House...not Barry's chances in November.

  • Posted By: doctorofcommonsense @ 09/12/2008 2:54:18 PM

    It seems that this is so acrimonious that America is headed for an idealogical civil war. Being a liberal, I know we would lose - we don't have sufficient hatred or guns (the acrimony spills out of me). But I wonder - how would conservatives survive without liberal things - education, peace, and the New Testament?

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 09/12/2008 3:19:37 PM

      Typical class warfare rhetoric. Where is the Post Partisanship that Barry kept on promising? Where's the Hope if your already going to a defeatist mentality?

  • Posted By: RiversideWarrior @ 09/12/2008 3:00:29 PM

    I think we face becoming a fascist theocracy where an angry killing god is glorified in a spirit of self-righteous evangelical furor, where celebrity, fashion and lies are spewed forth by the Goebbels-like Republican Ministry For Propaganda in an attempt to steer the election away from the issues confronting the American people. The American Taliban of Christian Fundamentalists seeks to establish a one party theocracy (easier to do when you get rid of the poor or minorities) that will dictate their values and way of life on the rest of us similar to Iran and Nazi Germany. These people mean it when they chant/sing "Onwards Christian Soldiers, Marching As to War", they are actively seeking the end times of the Apocalypse and Armageddon regardless of whether the rest of us want any part of it or not.

  • Posted By: MsChiTown @ 09/12/2008 1:22:11 PM

    I notice a lot of people here are so gung-ho to stereotype people they didn't take the time to actually read the article. In one of the very first paragraphs it states "the incidence of individual vote fraud???voting when you aren't eligible???is virtually non-existent." That being the case what prompted these officials to take this action? The fact that the process is so selective - in some (electorally decisive) states but not others, certain counties of a state, but not the whole state, looks suspiciously like an attempt to hold down the vote total in some areas. The GOP isn't stupid. Everyone is aware that the majority of black people vote democratic. Their ruse is policitally astute, but morally repugnant. If they don't want a charge of racism then they should have done it in heavily democratic white areas also or it should be nationwide. The failure to do so makes their intent obvious. If in the Jim Crow south only some people were required to do something extra besides register to actually vote, and only some are being asked to do something extra today, what is the difference? I don't want to bring up the lipstick on a pig thing again.

    • Posted By: paproudmom @ 09/12/2008 1:34:53 PM

      Actually I did read the article. Just because a statement is made does not make it true. Evidence of voter fraud is not virtually non-existent. That statement is false. In addition, the statement about Indiana's voting requirements was false. Check your facts and don't automatically assume every statement is true. It is not.

      • Posted By: MsChiTown @ 09/12/2008 2:02:17 PM

        I'd be happy to. The author cited a study by the Brennan Center for Justice. Your source?

        • Posted By: paproudmom @ 09/12/2008 2:25:09 PM

          Try the US Election Assistance Commission Report, but there are also others.

          • Posted By: MsChiTown @ 09/12/2008 2:59:05 PM

            Do you mean the original report that concluded voter fraud charges were overblown, that the Comission REFUSED to release? Or are you referring to the altered one? Maybe these will help.

            http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-10-10-poll-fraud-report_x.htm

            http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/11/washington/11voters.html?ex=1333944000&en=fdeb2bb80fd0b00f&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

        • Posted By: keepitreal50 @ 09/12/2008 2:23:30 PM

          MY FRIEND, it is not so rampant that these measures need to be taken to the extreme the republicans want us to believe. It is a so-called justification that allows them to revisit the ways and effects of the jim crow south. They just see more ways to justify it. And they are using Black peoples failure to secure IDs to bolster their claim. Like I said, in this regard Blacks are not helping themselves but that doesn't negate what it clearly an attempt to further surpress the Black vote by means other than that.

  • Posted By: keepitreal50 @ 09/12/2008 2:49:43 PM

    This was an interesting conversation not to be belittled on either side. Hope there are no hard feelings as this is a topic that has emotion inherent with in it. I learned some things, maybe someone else did too. Dialogue is good. Hate is bad. We can politely agree to disagree.

  • Posted By: glimps @ 09/12/2008 2:23:14 AM

    14 characteristics that are nation is becomming Fasicist (by Dr. Lawrence Britt political scientist)
    1. Powerful and Continuing nationalism
    2. Disdain for the recognition of human rights
    3.Identification of enemies/scapegoates as a unifying Cause
    4.Supremacy of the Military
    5. Rampant Sexism
    6. Controlled Mass Media
    7. Obessission with National Security
    8. Religion and government are interwined
    9. Corporate power is procted
    10. Labor power is Suppressed
    11. Disdain for Intellectuals and Arts
    12.Obession with Crime and Punishment
    13. Ramant Cronyism and Corruption
    14. Fraudulent Elections

    this was wrote by Dr. Britt, political scientist, about "Fascism" ( 2003 pg.20) incase some bloggers want to look it up...

    McCain /Palin is Danger...... no party is perfect but this is the wrong ticket.

    • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 09/12/2008 11:47:19 AM

      3.Identification of enemies/scapegoates as a unifying Cause

      Democrats unite agains't all Republicans/Its all their fault/no more same ole same ole

      You know, quite a bit of these sure do fit the Democrat party like a glove right?

      • Posted By: glimps @ 09/12/2008 1:42:23 PM

        3. the one that you picked out of the 14 ( people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eleimate a perceived threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialist; terrorists ect....)

        • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 09/12/2008 2:13:10 PM

          5. Sexism
          t Hilarys presidential bid. Sexism at it's finest

          6.Controlled mass media.
          Wanna look at MSNBC, NYT,NEWSWEEK,Bill Maurer, ENQUIRER, ALL LIBERAL PRESS!!!!!

          7. Fradulent election.
          How many dead people voted Democrat in the last 2 elections anyway?

          More? Let me know......

  • Posted By: cuppa jo @ 09/12/2008 6:45:20 AM

    Excuse me, but showing an ID to vote is NOT something I would consider a problem. It will reduce voter fraud. If we didn't have corrupt groups like ACORN maybe we wouldn't have to worry about it. This is another ridiculous, liberal article.

    • Posted By: THE RAVEN @ 09/12/2008 9:11:11 AM

      Voter fraud? Who in the hell wants to vote so badly that they will commit fraud to do it? Stupid--it's hard enough to get people in this country to vote in the first place. How many times have you people heard about ANYONE being busted for voting illegally? As the writer said, this almost NEVER happens. And if it happens, white are doing it. Just a bunch of racist crackers afraid that a black man is going to be the next President. .

      • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 09/12/2008 10:43:09 AM

        A half white/half black man who was raised by white people, the only people who cared enough for him to take him in and make sure he received an education at the best of schools while raising him in Hawaii. Tell me again why you think white people are so afraid of him again? lol

        • Posted By: THE RAVEN @ 09/12/2008 1:11:18 PM

          The very same whites that you are boasting about sound like liberals--the kind of white people that white people like you hate--right? What's your point? You know they wouldn't have gave a damn if he was ALL black--and not a relative. His family IS white--you make it sound like they were doing him a favor, and not acting out of love.
          People like YOU, racist, are afraid of Obama simply because he IS black. I can tell you why, but I can't explain your irrational fear and hatred. Bigots like you are also cowards--you're afraid to admit you don't like him because he's black. Nobody could explain your type of stupidity and racial hatred. We are in the 21 century, and you pigs never change. Obama was right--not even with lipstick on.

          • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 09/12/2008 2:06:56 PM

            How dumb would you feel if you actually know me? And then knew you couldn't have been further from the truth? I live in cincy, oh. You know, where my friends tell me I'm not white, I just have pigmentation problems. I think you know what they mean by that don't you?

      • Posted By: 4astrongamerica @ 09/12/2008 1:18:55 PM

        Is it racist to want fair voting regulations OR is it racist to think that you are entitled to have your vote count more than someone elses? The writer has exhibited poor journalistic judgment. He obviously did not care about the facts. There are in fact proven cases of this across the nation and even elections that have been overturned because these irregularities were verified. Don't be fooled. It is to the Dems benefit to keep the African-American community playing the victim and beholden to the big strong government and politicians to protect them. As long as the black community continues to use past injustices as an excuse for the state of their communities, finances, and even their family unit, the problems that they face are going to continue to exist. They have to take responsibility for themselves and encourage the people around them to do the same. Work hard, get an education, make the family unit a priority again, stop the violence against one another and strive to excel not just exist.

  • Posted By: josemarti @ 09/12/2008 2:06:08 PM

    Biden did it again today folks. After a speech at the Rosenberg Memorial, he was confronted with Obama having said that "bitter" Americans "cling" to religion. Biden said: "Barack was simply echoing what Karl Marx said more than 150 years ago. OK? Religion is the opium of the masses. I don't know of a single Ivy League political science professor who would dispute that. Allright? OK? " Unbelievable. What is he going to say next? Stay tuned.

  • Posted By: borg.sixofnine @ 09/12/2008 1:46:26 PM

    I think its rediculous to call this "racism." Every American is expected to have a valid ID to do just about anything official. Saying that blacks are exempt from this rule IS racist. Why can't we see this as an attempt to treat everyone equally by requiring an ID from EVERYBODY. They could, maybe, argue that this is an attempt to keep the poor class from voting. But be reasonable...if you do not have an ID isn't that alittle suspicious? What are you trying to hide?
    We have to stop declaring racism everytime blacks think its unfair. Its not unfair. Its a standard, something we ALL are expected to do.

  • Posted By: Dutch40 @ 09/12/2008 1:37:08 PM

    It amazing that liberal whites Alter and Kenyan-Whites like Obama are so in touch with American blacks.

  • Posted By: techresmgt @ 09/12/2008 11:59:45 AM

    Look, I am Caucasian and the same thing happened to me during the 2000 elections. Why does everything have to be conspired to be about race? The never ending inflammatory allegations are like women claiming sexism every five minutes. It's mostly inflated propaganda to try and keep some on the defensive. Anyone with knowledge of current events knows Oprahma Nation is an abomination.

    • Posted By: keepitreal50 @ 09/12/2008 12:13:12 PM

      Because in the political arena and in the justice system, it always has been. Read the history. See, you guys don't want to hear that. Where have you been. You missed something. There's no excuse made. These are thing that history has recorded. Things you guys obviously still have a hard time wrapping your brains around. Enough. said. Why do folks deny it? Can you explain that. Be genuine. Can you explain that?

      • Posted By: bosco123 @ 09/12/2008 1:33:08 PM

        HEY ,i GOT A NOVEL IDEA, IF YOU HAV THE DRIVE TO VOTE THAN HAVE THE DRIVE TO GET A I.D.

  • Posted By: MsChiTown @ 09/12/2008 1:22:54 PM

    I notice a lot of people here are so gung-ho to stereotype people they didn't take the time to actually read the article. In one of the very first paragraphs it states "the incidence of individual vote fraud???voting when you aren't eligible???is virtually non-existent." That being the case what prompted these officials to take this action? The fact that the process is so selective - in some (electorally decisive) states but not others, certain counties of a state, but not the whole state, looks suspiciously like an attempt to hold down the vote total in some areas. The GOP isn't stupid. Everyone is aware that the majority of black people vote democratic. Their ruse is policitally astute, but morally repugnant. If they don't want a charge of racism then they should have done it in heavily democratic white areas also or it should be nationwide. The failure to do so makes their intent obvious. If in the Jim Crow south only some people were required to do something extra besides register to actually vote, and only some are being asked to do something extra today, what is the difference? I don't want to bring up the lipstick on a pig thing again.

  • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 09/12/2008 1:20:10 PM

    Hey I missed the DNC. Did they serve CHEESE with all that WHINE?

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 09/12/2008 1:15:51 PM


    BARACK OBAMA: COMMUNITY ORGANIZER OR RADICAL ACTIVIST?

    VIDEO: HTTP://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/WATCH?V=2KR3GEFQRD8

    Part 1 of 2:

    EXCERPT from above link:

    A Community Organizer is a euphemism (a nicer sounding term) for a Radical Activist. I came across this term a few months ago when I was doing a video about Barack Obamas mother. And USING THAT TERM now, RADICAL ACTIVIST, instead of Community Organizer, perhaps you CAN BETTER UNDERSTAND Barack Obama and how he could have sat in Reverend Wrights church (www.TUCCorg ) for 20+ yrs. How he could sit in a church that gave Louis Farrakhan an honorary award. You CAN PERHAPS, now, UNDERSTAND how he could have a friendly RELATIONSHIP with WILLIAM AYERS (an unrepentant terrorist).

    Barack Obama has spent years being a Radical Activist. Baracks FIRST JOB as RADICAL ACTIVIST was working with the INDUSTRIAL AREAS FOUNDATION which is a training school for radical organizers. Obama actually spent several years working for them TEACHING OTHERS THE ALINKY METHOD which was DEVISED BY SAUL ALINSKY back in the 1930s.

    WHO WAS SAUL ALINSKY and WHAT WAS HIS METHOD OF ORGANIZING?
    Saul Alinsky had moved to this country from Russia and he was working as a CRIMINOLOGIST for awhile, but came in contact with Frank Nitty, also Al Capone, and he learned from them the METHODS THAT ORGANIZED CRIME used in Chicago. He learned many of the methods that were used by those that used to ORGANIZE UNIONS, and he devised HIS OWN METHOD incorporating their methods.

    He then wrote a book about his method which was called RULES FOR RADICALS; and he actually DEDICATED this book to ???Lucifer???, the first radical.

    To a community organizer, Saul Alinskys book, Rules for Radicals, is their Bible:
    You can see if you just browse thru this BOOK all the GAMES OBAMABOTS play:

    * Personal ATTACKS, * playing the RACE card, * trying to play the GUILT trip, * trying to make people feel GUILTY ABOUT SLAVERY when they had nothing to do with it, * calling people that DO NOT AGREE with them STUPID. ALL of these things come right out of Saul Alinskys book.

    * DO ALL OF THE OBAMABOT GAMES FROM SAUL ALINSKYS TECHNIQUE SOUND FAMILIAR NOTED ABOVE?

    (Continued in my post below - Barack Obama - Community organizer or Radical activist? )

  • Posted By: ginsk @ 09/12/2008 12:35:51 PM

    "To get an idea of how many African-Americans nationwide lack driver's licenses, recall Hurricane Katrina in 2005, when thousands were stranded without transportation"

    wow, so not having a car means you dont have a current license? and as a louisianian, i can tell you that the majority of those "stranded" werent stranded without aride, they had a ride and chose to stay, thinking the storm wouldnt be as bad.
    ridiculous

    • Posted By: keepitreal50 @ 09/12/2008 12:45:17 PM

      I'm sure you know that, that was the case. I'm talking about something that has historical proof to back it up. Not some assumption from someone speculating about what they think occurred in Louisiana. Those people were left to die that way because the gov. used a convenient circumstance to further their original intent that again, has its' roots in racial history. That's just one example of whatI can be proven.

      • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 09/12/2008 1:14:10 PM

        Left to die? C'mon man keep it real. They had video's of the rescue workers pulling up on flooded houses and the residents were waving them off. Can you dispute that the rescuers were on the news expressing frustrations due to being waved off when they showed up to remove them from the flooded area's?

      • Posted By: paproudmom @ 09/12/2008 12:54:10 PM

        In Indiana you can obtain a free photo id without getting a driver's license. Oh and by the way the governor of Louisiana at the time of Katrina was a democrat, as well as the New Orleans mayor.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse