FACTCHECK.ORG

Belittling Palin?

A McCain-Palin TV ad accuses Obama of being "disrespectful" of Palin, but it distorts quotes to make the case.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: wknutson1 @ 09/28/2008 3:28:30 PM

    Yes, the military has a Code of Conduct during wartime, but one also has to put certain things into perspective. I'd like to ask the individual of the last comment, if he/she was ever in the military and, if so, was he/she ever been a POW in North Viet Nam or anywhere else. If this individual really knew anything about the Code, they would know that under interrogation captured military personnel should evade answering further questions to the utmost of my ability. There's a world of difference between what you see on CSI or Law & Order and what John McCain went through during his years as a POW. As a member of the U.S. Army for over 21 years, who knows a little more about the Code of Conduct, I kindly ask the individual who posted the previous comment to become more educated about the matter rather spout off at the mouth. One should also remember that Sen. McCain's father was also the Pacific Commander during the timeframe of his capture, so whether he asked for it or not, would determine some of the medical care he received. The North Vietnamese tried to use John McCain as a bargaining chip, which proved to be unsuccessful. If you want to criticize, maybe you should join the military and really learn what it's all about. Hooah!

  • Posted By: SARGE75 @ 09/16/2008 9:38:07 AM

    Who do you perceive yourself to be? The very reason why this country is so divided and screwed up is for idiots like you. You have the audacity to refer to Americans who happen to be of a different ethnicity than you as if they are manipulating some big government system? The EVIL spirited comments, such as you post, make me wonder how I can continue to go back and fourth to war's and military campaigns for the better part of ten years, knowing that I'm putting my life, my soldiers, and my families well being in jeopardy so some bigots can benefit from the rights we protect, defend, and die for. However, you are welcome.
    Now, if you don???t like a candidate???s policy that???s one thing. You are entitled to do so. Nevertheless, frankly, the undertone and tenor of your comments lend me to believe that you sir are a coward. Say it clearly as you yourself might be considered a minority due to your ethnic blood count. 1/8th rule set by the Census Bureau in 1896. Therefore, if you mean BLACK, SAY BLACK! If you mean LATINO, SAY LATINO. And that, SIR, is why you are closed to a particular candidate. You don???t care if he???s the smartest on the campaign. You don???t care if he truly does have a more sound position for the future of the US. You cannot vote for a Black!!! I???d respect you more, if you say it directly instead of being the spineless, divisive, lemming type COWARD YOU ARE, and continue with some ???minority??? comments. Like we ???MINORITIES??? ever had anything to do with the way this country has been run. You are the UN- American. And I hope it does make you angry!!! Don???t reply. You don???t have the capacity to debate me. Keep pulling your quotes from fox new, and the types that are Cowards, such as yourself, who truly believe this nation is rightfully yours alone. You are mental simpletons and I, along with the rest of the DIVERSE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA have all grown tired of you.
    By the way, just as you told many "minorities" when they voiced their opinions that didn't agree with your "majority,??? .....
    Go Back TO EUROPE !!!! Since you don't like the way, The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is run!!!!!

    • Posted By: helemano @ 09/27/2008 12:01:10 PM

      If you know anything about the military, you would understand the military Code of Conduct in war time. He Mr McCain was captured by the North Vietnamese military. He did not put Country first. he asked for medical help, but there were conditions. When captured you only give your name, rank and service number. He went beyond that by violating the Code of Conduct and he Mr McCain admitted this after 10 as a POW.

  • Posted By: ICYEYES800 @ 09/19/2008 9:14:14 PM

    "IF" the Republican party were willing to loose all ethics and accountability, as the Obama's have....IT could always give the comparison of Michelle Obama to a GORILLA WITH LIPSTICK.....but, it's not the REP. way...trying to hold honor and honesty above the in the pigpen tactics of dems.....They are looking increasingly shameful and childish....O needs to get some STUFF to talk about that is genuine and not try the smoke screen to avoid the FACT that he has NOTHING to stand on....

  • Posted By: John Am @ 09/18/2008 4:55:36 PM

    Have you noticed that occasionally during the news, a picture of Mrs. Clinton pops up for no good reason. Well I have and I am beginning to think that the networks and the democratic party in particiuliar are beginining their brain washing techniques to suggest that an alternative to Barach Hussein Obama could be Mrs. Bill Clinton.

    The tone and content of the democrats press releases also suggest that if the response to their subliminal political advertizements is positive then Hillary is ready willing and able to jump into Barach or Biden's spot. All this, I believe depends upon the results of their subversive activities to scuttle the growing interest in Mrs. Palin and the declining popularity of Barach.

  • Posted By: John Am @ 09/18/2008 4:55:04 PM

    Have you noticed that occasionally during the news, a picture of Mrs. Clinton pops up for no good reason. Well I have and I am beginning to think that the networks and the democratic party in particiuliar are beginining their brain washing techniques to suggest that an alternative to Barach Hussein Obama could be Mrs. Bill Clinton.

    The tone and content of the democrats press releases also suggest that if the response to their subliminal political advertizements is positive then Hillary is ready willing and able to jump into Barach or Biden's spot. All this, I believe depends upon the results of their subversive activities to scuttle the growing interest in Mrs. Palin and the declining popularity of Barach.

  • Posted By: Davole @ 09/17/2008 7:27:11 PM

    John McCain knew that Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac would collapse, and thereby unjustly burden the American public!

    In 2005, Senator John McCain cosponsored the Federal Housing Enterprise Reform Act to regulate the powers and procedures of Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac.

    These 2 massive federal finance agencies had been operating without controls in a blatant irresponsible manner, and had been found guilty in court of falsifying financial records and statements in order to provide supposed justification for bonuses to be given to their higher echelon administrators.

    These 2 organizations had been coerced by Democrats, who because of political opportunism, wanted them to grant mortgages to individuals who would be unable to make their required monthly payments. That would be in accordance with the irresponsible Democrat belief that everyone should be entitled to have their own home, irrespective of their actual ability to afford that luxury.

    Both of these mortgage lending institutions have contributed massive financial sums to support the political aspirations of Chris Dodd and Barack Obama.

    Senator John McCain realized 3 years ago that fraudulent transactions were rampant within these 2 enterprises, and that they would soon collapse if remedial action was not undertaken.

    Their bankruptcy would result in the American taxpayers having to go into debt to resurrect or ???bail-out??? these fraudulent Congress protected entities.

    As was to be expected, this proposal to institute meaningful financial reform measures was obstructed by the Democrats in the Senate, and the proposal failed to be adopted.

    This year, due to the Democrat furor over the collapse of Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac, the American taxpayers are burdened by having to pay a minimum of 450 billion dollars to ???bail out??? these 2 recklessly managed lending companies.

    John McCain exposed and opposed the corrupt lending practices of Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac.
    Barack Obama ???milked the system??? and profited by obstructing reform of their corrupt lending practices.

    Democrats have demonstrated that they can wreck the mortgage industry.

    Are you willing to vote them into office, and give them a blank check to mismanage the American economy, security, and health care?

    • Posted By: justamom41 @ 09/17/2008 11:53:20 PM

      Do you really believe your own bull$#!!! or are you hoping people will be stupid enough not to educate themselves. I really don't care how much money politicians take to run their campaigns or where they get it from, they all do it, and quite frankly I'd be worried if they didn't... I do care about such controversies as the "Keating Five," debacle, in which your boy McLie was a big contributor. He also admits he's against any sort of regulatory system when it comes to these huge investment companies (before he cried, Eureka!!! I think I'd better stop with the deregulator bullS#!!, the smart ones aren't going to buy it). I may just be a dumb woman Republicans thought would vote for SP because she has boobs and lipstick, but McCain's sudden epiphany on the economy doesn't pass the smell test. Smells like PIG to me!!!!

  • Posted By: Davole @ 09/16/2008 10:45:23 AM

    The Obama Campaign Sinks to a New Low in Decency

    The Obama campaign, as it continues to flounder and sink in the polls, has descended to a new low, even for itself.

    Recently it has launched a new TV ad in which a mocking narrator alleges that John McCain is so out of touch with the current generation because of his inability to use a computer.

    The narrator does not admit that the reason John McCain doesn???t use a computer is because 5 and a half years of torture as a POW in the Vietnam war cause him to experience severe pain by attempting to do many of the day to day menial tasks which most of the American population take for granted.

    Obviously the Obama campaign does not demonstrate any appreciation and respect for the veteran and current members of the US military!

    The obamabot ship is sinking, and the crew are sure grasping at straws in their pitiful attempt to deceive the voting public. Yes, Obama approved that deceitful ad - it is consistent with his decrepit morally corrupt standards.

    Obviously that empty suit has no heart, courage, sincerity, honour, and respect!

    Do you expect a presidential candidate to be truthful in striving to win the election?
    If so, Obama just doesn???t ???measure up??? in that consideration!

    Obama is an unscrupulous do-anything community agitator who has revealed his true previously hidden self!

    On November 4, you, the legal American voting public, have the opportunity and ability to cast Obama back to that slag heap of Chicago manipulators who permeate the slum areas of that city.

  • Posted By: ramesh @ 09/15/2008 6:33:01 PM

    Barack and Joe Biden have every right to tell the truth, and not think that they can bring the positions taken by republican VP. How many times she is not telling the truth about bridge to where? News jmedia has responsiblity to clearly ask her repeatedly that she is not telling the truth

    • Posted By: joseph jacir @ 09/16/2008 8:16:59 AM

      I fully agree......How far can the outlandish lies of sarita and Mcsame go?When she will meet the press one should ask ......And is the press accepting this challenge ?...It is time to wake up and let the Americans know more about Palin.....This is not sexism as the republicans say ...This is a right for the Americans to know more about a very possible next president

  • Posted By: isiseyes @ 09/15/2008 5:42:37 PM

    Oh give it a rest with the terrorist organizations saying they endorse Obama... The Klu Klux Klan endorses McCain. Do you really think that means he has any ties whatsoever with them?

  • Posted By: Papa T @ 09/13/2008 4:53:11 PM

    The Democrats don't need to say anything about Palin or McCain as the press will fabricate and sensationalize every negative aspect of both as much as possible over the coming weeks. If the press would do it's job and "report" the news instead of every article editorializing events it would create a level playing field. The press wants a liberal in the White House so badly they as a collective group would turn a saint into a monster to get their "man" in office. Hmmm. Let's think. Obama had 143 days in office before he announced he was going to run for the presidency. At least Palin has had 2 years in an Executive branch of government before joining the campaign. Let the candidates duke it out without the press posturing for a kill. Be fair.

    • Posted By: dumpthedems @ 09/13/2008 5:11:21 PM

      Papa T.
      We have seen this in last two elections, the liberal press will single handedly bury the democrackheads again because people aren't as stupid as they want them to be.

      • Posted By: j.Boski @ 09/13/2008 6:09:25 PM

        If your trying to suggest Palin is more qualified the Obama...The have talked about lack of necessary experience for as along as there have been elections. President Kennedy ,President Bill Clinton, and President Bush just to name a few So enough of the old tired argument of experience lets talk about substance. McCain has been in Washington for 27 years does he not get the Blaine for at least some of the things that are wrong with this country where as Obama is a relatively new comer to Washington that may need to be given a shot at it?

        • Posted By: sharenews @ 09/15/2008 1:31:56 PM


          J.Boski, well, for starters, Bill Clinton had 2 terms (8 years of executive decision-making) as Governor of Arkansas . . . and followed up after that with 2 terms (8 yrs) of a successful Presidency (the economy was going strong during the 8 yrs he was President). . . . . http://www.perkel.com/politics/clinton/accomp.htm

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 09/15/2008 1:18:41 PM



    Delaware Newspaper Calls Out Biden For Drunk Driving Lie
    Saturday, September 06, 2008

    TVs Inside Edition ran a story last week replaying Sen. Joe Bidens claim that Curtis Dunn, the truck driver who struck the car driven by his first wife in 1972 and which killed her and his daughter, was drunk at the time of the accident, bringing tears to the surviving daughter of the innocent truck driver. The Wilmington News Journal writes about Joe Biden's false claim that a drunk driver killed his wife and daughter:

    Since his vice presidential nomination, Joe Bidens 2007 statement that a guy who allegedly ... drank his lunch and drove the truck that struck and killed his first wife and daughter has gained national media traction.

    Alcohol did not play a role in the 1972 crash, investigators found. But as recently as last week, the syndicated TV show Inside Edition aired a clip from 2001 of Biden describing the accident to an audience at the University of Delaware and saying the truck driver stopped to drink instead of drive.

    The senators statements do not jibe with news and law enforcement reports from the time, which cleared driver Curtis C. Dunn, who died in 1999, of wrongdoing.

    FULL STORY: http://advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2008/09/delaware-newspaper-calls-out-biden-from.html

  • Posted By: ben 1010 @ 09/13/2008 11:29:58 AM

    A recent poll in Iran showed a majority wanted osama over McCain...if an enemy supports osama, Then McCain gets my vote1

    • Posted By: sharenews @ 09/15/2008 1:11:27 PM



      SAMPLING OF ENDORSERS OF OBAMA:

      What triggers radicals, dictators, terrorist groups, et al, to endorse Barack Obama? He may denounce such endorsers, but the fact still remains they totally support him. . .WHY?

      * HAMAS (terrorist org):
      http://www.cfr.org/publication/8968
      http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=64097

      * COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (CPUSA) - (Marxist-Leninist political party in the United States) http://www.aim.org/aim-column/communist-party-backs-obama/

      * THE NEW BLACK PANTHERS (anti-Semitic black supremacist party)
      http://bigheaddc.com/2008/03/19/new-black-panther-party-endorses-obama/

      * FIDEL CASTRO (former Cuban President / Dictator) - Endorsed Obama
      http://www.rpof.org/article.php?id=382

      * MUAMMAR GADDAFI (Libyan political leader)
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFvWqEwq2Yw

      * KIM JONG-IL (NORTH KOREA) http://freekorea.us/2008/06/22/obama-gets-another-unwanted-endorsement/

      * HUGO CHAVEZ (Venezuelan dictator) - Richardson gets another foreign endorsement for Obama: http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/28/video-richardson-gets-another-foreign-endorsement-for-obama/

      * CHARLES BARRON - (former Black Panther) - New York City Councilman (http://www.nypost.com/seven/11082007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obamas_bad_news_buddies_862967.htm

      * DONNIE MCCLURKIN (ex-gay gospel singer who has claimed that gays are trying to kill our children) http://www.nypost.com/seven/11082007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obamas_bad_news_buddies_862967.htm

    • Posted By: j.n @ 09/13/2008 6:29:53 PM

      McCains pow warden supports McCain and said if he could he would vote for him,do you think that McCain would be good for the Vietcon?.

    • Posted By: JOHNSON PIONEER @ 09/13/2008 12:42:44 PM

      I think it is very bad to refer to Obama as Osama. And in any case, why do you think Iran wants Obama?, Because he will dance to their tune? Your comment is totally baseless, and with no offense please ben 1010 senseless. Lets look at objectively please.

  • Posted By: Mimi13 @ 09/15/2008 10:14:19 AM

    McCain himself has turned Palin into a joke by making outlandish claims about her. For example, in an interview with Rob Caldwell, WCSH -TV in Portland, Maine, McCain said that Palin "knows more about energy than anyone else in the country." Really, Senator? More than all the scientists at MIT, CalTech, Georgia Tech, Stamford and other assorted universities with Ph.D. programs in engineering? More than corporate executives like T. Boone Pickens who have been working in energy all their adult lives? More than the heads of the Atomic Energy Commission and the Department of Energy?

    McCain has to resort to such hyperbole because Palin has no credentials. She has no expertise on much of anything except maybe little league hockey. It is really shameful how he lies to justify his cynical VP pick.

    BTW, kudos to Mr. Caldwell. A small market TV reporter conducted a more aggressive interview of McCain than I've seen any of the network bigwigs do. I'm glad there are some reporters out there in small markets who are still committed to bringing truth to the public.

  • Posted By: SayAHHH119 @ 09/15/2008 7:29:26 AM

    When one lies he or she is hiding what they are ashamed of. The untruth no matter the purpose it serves,leads to a person or a group of people being mislead. People our country is worth more than rubbish please listen; We are quick to raise our flag and say we are Americans but yet run from the truth. The past seven years was quite rocky to say the least but let us try to make our future brighter. He who lies does not have our nation first.

  • Posted By: SayAHHH119 @ 09/15/2008 7:12:25 AM

    When one has to lie, the liar is ashamed of a truth. It does not matter what purpose the untruth serves the end result is some person or group of people being mislead and taken advantage of.

  • Posted By: pineapple mist @ 09/15/2008 4:55:06 AM

    Years earlier restaurant owned by white american`s do`nt want to serve to black costumer`s, now they`re having black african muslim as president to run america ?? imposing higher taxes to working hard people and giving those money to the lazy one`s...do you agree with that??

  • Posted By: pineapple mist @ 09/15/2008 4:41:42 AM

    We must admit, politician`s have thier own lies, President`s have thier own private live`s, but America can never be run by a black african muslim president !!

  • Posted By: stevelley @ 09/13/2008 9:24:33 PM

    In our quest to remove the problem from the White House, please do not put another problem there to replace it. Obama is so mediocre that I would not even hire him to be the manager of my corporation. He cannot think on his feet, judging from the way he speaks and debates. Only in rehearsed campaign speeches does he do well, talking about all those altruistic themes as if we are all responsible for those people who fail in their lives. For a brief moment, those statements are moving. But if you think more carefully, they all mean you need to be taxed more to handle another set of Big Society programs that Lyndon B. Johnson pioneered and failed in the 1960s. The welfare state is long gone. China pronounced the death of socialism in 1979 and rose to a level rivaling ours. So we should vote socialism, allowing Obama to tax us to help the have nots? Why should I be taxed to support somebody else's kids? He claims he will help the middle class, when in fact his tax plans - increasing the income tax rate for families making just $75,000 or singles making $37,500 - tax both the middle class and the rich to help the poor. I do not mind giving to charity once a while. But I never want to be taxed day and night to support what the government determines to be worth my help. I myself rose from poverty without any help from the government, and I detest any notion that government should be the instrument of income redistribution. That's what he calls "CHANGE"?

    • Posted By: Mimi13 @ 09/14/2008 9:02:55 PM

      I can't figure out where your figures are coming from. Under Obama's plan, taxes would go up only on those families earning more than $250,000 -- NOT $75,000. Payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare) which currently top out at $160,000 income, would also be imposed on incomes over $250,000. All the analysts I've read say tht 95% of American families will see a tax CUT under ?Obama. Only 3% would see incresed taxes, while the remainder would stay the same.

      One thing to consider: Even though McCain says he will cut taxes, his health plan proposes to TAX HEALTH BENEFITS provided by employers at fair market value. For a lot of middle class families, that could make for a hefty tax increase.

    • Posted By: lamb413 @ 09/14/2008 9:07:46 AM

      Just want to know, who are "those" people? In addition, your taxes and my taxes have been subsidizing the people in Alaska whose taxes are less than those of us in the lower 48 states. Are not the people in Alaska, "those people" when they take more from the coffers of the government than what they put in? Your tax dollars and my tax dollars, under the Republican administration have gone into the pockets of "those that have!" McCain will take more from the middle class and the poor for those in the "have" category. So, what are you talking about?

  • Posted By: stevelley @ 09/14/2008 12:03:47 AM

    Oil prices nowadays are not controled by Alaska or even the Organization of Petroleum Exporters (OPEC). Recent hikes were due more to speculations in the petroleum spots market, as global investors could no longer play in the real estate or stocks market. England, Canada, Australia are all going through roughly the same housing crisis we experience. Many of their banks have also bought our sub-prme mortgage related securities and are on the verge of failure. With China and India going through successive red hot economic expansions and competing aggressively for oil, global investors found the right place to place their money. It went on for almost a year until everybody started to drive less and conserve everywhere else. The inevitable result is the recent decline in oil prices. No more speculation, at least for the time being.

    So do we expect Alaskans not to follow the global market when selling their oil? It would mean selling it at $80 a barrel when it is $100 at the spots market, or selling it to the 48 states at $140 when the spots market price is $120? It could only happen in a hilarious movie.
    I do not live in Alaska, never and ever. But as a political scientist, I do know that Alaska is not the only example in the 50 states when the state residents do not get back or get back more than what they pay in federal income tax. To strive to strike a perfect balance would be the most foolish thing to do in governance. In order to artificially cut or make up federal expenditure in any state to hit this kind of balance, you would need to make a series of foolish, if not stupid, policy and spending decisions, because individual circumstances do vary greatly from state to state.
    If Obama made this an issue, he would become the laughing stock of the nation.

    • Posted By: Mimi13 @ 09/14/2008 8:42:59 PM

      You missed my point (assuming that you are responding to me). Alsaka has four taxes on each barrel of oil. Palin also imposed a windfall profits tax (that thing that Obama supports but McCain says will ruin the economy). The net effect of these taxes is to raise the price of oil even higher than market so that the state can provide each and every Alaskan with a lovely windfall -- $3200 this year. And although it would be impossible to equalize taxes in and expeditures out across the 50 states -- I'm not sure why Alaska is valued at more than 10 times any other state -- except that it had an audacious senator in Ted Stevens and a greedy governor in Sarah Palin who went after every earmark they could garner. I'm not sure why the Bridge to Nowhere got funded and Minnesota was not able to tap federal resouces to re-build its crumbling infrastructure, for instance.

      The issue for the campaign is that Sarah Palin and John McCain (it's difficult to tell these day which one is really at the top of the ticket) are running on the supposition that Palin is a reform-minded governor and fiscal conservative who turned down federal largess and who opposes budget earmarks, The facts indicate -- no, scream -- the opposite. She may be against the earmarks for OTHER states, but she's a big fan of ALASKA's earmarks. She supported the Bridge to Nowhere until Congress let it be known that no more funds would be allocated for it -- at which point, she decided to take the money (about $300 million) and run --- and build a Road to Nowhere, a road that goes up to the bank where the bridge would have started. There is nothing honest in the way Palin and McCain present her positions on these issues -- and that fundamental dishonesty and lack of integrity should be an election issue.

  • Posted By: Peggy97478 @ 09/13/2008 4:44:55 PM

    I want to thank, in advance, the LIBERAL, BIASED media for the fast track you have all put McCain/Palin on in their quest for the Whitehouse. One more interview with a pompous boob like Charlie Gibson will make Sarah Palin the most popular person in America, if she is not already. This woman in infinitely more qualified to be PRESIDENT of this country than the Community Organizer who started running for the office as soon as he won his Senatorial election. If you want to talk about "hubris," Charlie, this is a perfect example. It's absolutely hilarious that you have all been duped by this empty suit, Barack Obama. Yes, he has charisma and wonderful oratory skills. And he also has more baggage than Grand Central Station. Rev. Wriqht, the racist, hate-filled cleric, William Ayers the mad bomber and America hater, Rezko the slumlord crook who thought he would have a friend in high places when he made the deal on property owned by Barack Obama. Barack Obama is no different than the average corrupt DC politician. It's time to clean house folks, and that is going to take someone like McCain and the gutsy Sarah Palin who made Charlie Gibson look like the partisan nitwit he really is. Time to give this country back to the people. Time to make all the bureaucrats cringe in fear of the change that is coming to Washington DC. Thank you, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, New York Times and Newsweek. Job well done!

    Vice President Palin in November, PRESIDENT Palin in 4-8 years! Yeah!!!!!

    • Posted By: dumpthedems @ 09/13/2008 5:25:25 PM

      Peggy
      Still the best comment of the day. I guess bustanti is more interested in John McCains e-wife than the anti- American, racist scum that Obama associates with.
      McCain/Palin 08....done deal

      • Posted By: Asante @ 09/14/2008 4:16:28 AM

        You're an idiot and an obvious racist. Get a clue.

    • Posted By: dumpthedems @ 09/13/2008 4:59:33 PM

      Best comment of the day. Thank you for the truth.

      • Posted By: bustanti @ 09/13/2008 5:16:27 PM

        Ms. Peggy, during Gibson's interview, Palin as most politicians failed to answer a direct question with a direct answer. She was asked the same question more than once and more than once she skirted the question. By the way who cares if she was called pig, when she can call herself pitbull. Chaney, Mcain can use the same phrase and its okay. The point of the comment it doesn't matter if the pig has lipstick or not, it "ain't" changing a thing. IT IS STILL A PIG??? get it???

    • Posted By: bustanti @ 09/13/2008 5:04:04 PM

      So Ms. Peggy, what are you saying that John McCain is going to croak soon. You speak of Palin as if though she is the presidential candidate. The lipstick comment was previously made by Cheney, Mcain and others. They talked about change or more to the point no possibility of change. Remember also that Palin called her self a pitbull with lipstick. I am sure there is garbage on both of the men running. I still want to know the facts about McCain and his exwife. Did Cindy really pick him up in a bar and thus a relationship bloomed? Way to go Cindy!!!!! He was kind of cute in his youth.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse