A Police Chief, A Lawsuit And A Small-Town Mayor

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: careerdaytrader @ 09/15/2008 5:48:18 PM

    SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES

    Right now an employer has to pay BOTH sides of the Social Security tax on himself. Workers only pay half,

    their share!

    Obama wants to raise the 12% we small business owners pay on the first $102,000 of our incomes to $250,000

    or MORE!

    For any small business that makes $250,000 in income this is a $18,000 PER YEAR additional TAX!

    This will further reduce new jobs, investment spending toward the company and possibly cause some employees

    to be FIRED.

    The money has to come from SOMEPLACE! Democrats seem to think money grows on trees!

    Now Obama said this ADDITIONAL tax by raising the cap may be up to $500,000 of income.

    So for those like me that will mean $47,760 MORE taxes each year.

    This will DEFINITELY cause FEWER NEW JOBS!



    CAPITAL GAINS TAXES

    This may be Obama's WORST policy. Did you know that under the lower 15% capital gains tax rates that MORE

    TAXES WERE COLLECTED by the IRS than under the old 28% tax?

    Even though Obama has been TOLD this he STILL wants to raise this tax.

    What it will do is tax any profits you make on your retirement accounts, savings accounts, and college

    savings accounts for your kids. Because you will pay nearly DOUBLE the taxes you will have MUCH LESS MONEY

    for retirement due to the effects of COMPOUNDING!

    What this will also do is reduce money INVESTED IN AMERICA which means fewer new businesses, and FAR FEWER

    JOBS.

    Summary: Fewer new businesses, less growth, definitely fewer jobs and also some firings due to this!

    • Posted By: jiml1956 @ 09/15/2008 6:06:20 PM

      Been a subchapter-s corp before. If you pay 50 grand more in taxes, how many employees will you fire (or not hire)?

      • Posted By: naenae @ 09/15/2008 6:29:04 PM

        Not true! First of all, you get a break on the amount you pay self-employment tax on to begin with. It is only approximately 92%. You then get a credit of 1/2 of the self-employment tax that reduces your taxable income. You end up paying, in effect, about the same as other workers. I see you must have graduated from the John McCain School of Fact Distortion, as an honor student no less! I could go on and on, point by point, on your other topics, but I think this one should be enough to show how full of crap you really are.

        • Posted By: careerdaytrader @ 09/15/2008 9:13:30 PM

          Spoken from a true idiot who doesn't HAVE to pay both sides of social security.

          So what if HALF of the social security tax is deductible. It is nowhere near the same as an employee.

          Typical Democrat CAN'T DO THE MATH! 1/2 of my 12% of $102,000 is $6,120 Deduction, not the entire $12,240. You morons who have never ran a company, never had self employment income of over $100,000 really have no clue.

          So assume 28% taxes I would have had on this extra $6,120 is only $1,713.60.

          So while most EMPLOYEES making $102,000 pay their 6% approx on this income a self employed person is paying $10,526.40

          DO THE MATH.

          That's still $4,406 MORE than an employee.

          Spoken like a typical poor Democrat who has no clue on tax law!

          Now take this further, under Obama it means a self employed person making 200k pays $8,812 MORE than self employed individual.

          $400k income earners who are self employed pay $17,625.60 more.

          Dumb A$$!

      • Posted By: careerdaytrader @ 09/15/2008 6:33:32 PM

        Where's the money for these huge tax increases going to come from?

        Let's look at the WHOLE economy. I have 3 employees and whether I hire new ones or not is irrelevant and YOU know it. It's a Democrat smoke screen to AVOID the real issue.

        The real issue is that when taxes are raised WHERE is it going to come from and HOW does it affect the economy?

        It will cause fewer jobs, it will initially cause MORE firings, and/or it will raise prices that everybody pays.

        If you disagree please explain HOW in the beginning of what looks WILL BE a big Recession how drastically raising taxes WILL CURE the recession and all of the recession job losses AND ADD 5 MILLION NEW JOBS like Obama promises?

        Please EXPLAIN how this idiot think he can create 5 million NEW jobs? I'd be supprised if the economy ONLY loses 2-3 MILLION jobs under his administration.

        • Posted By: jiml1956 @ 09/15/2008 6:38:11 PM

          How is my question of how many you will hire or fire if you had to pay 50 grand more in taxes irrelevant?

          • Posted By: careerdaytrader @ 09/15/2008 9:00:38 PM

            Ok lets say I hire nobody. I am ONE business. What I do has no impact on the economy just like anything YOU do has NO impact. Are you that dumb?

            Answer my question, with Obama's huge income tax increases, social security taxes and capital gains taxes at the BEGINNING of a recession that looks to be DEEP how is he going to create 5 million NEW jobs? Stop ducking the question.

  • Posted By: fighting4u @ 09/15/2008 1:40:39 AM

    If McCain and Palin get elected, this country is SOL. I happen to travel to many countries. I would be hard pressed to find somebody abroad that doesn't feel Obama represents a new hope in the American dream. George Bush has taken us back 50 years! We are now less safe than we were Sept. 10th 2001. How sad it is that people will only vote based on right wing finatics that prey on peoples personal faith to gain power. The absolute opposite of what our founding fathers had framed in that document - the Constitution. Sarah Palin wanted to ban books from a PUBLIC library, As a Lutheran i am taken back that this could happen in America. Look yourself in the mirror and ask yourself, "What makes me an American." God bless us ALL

    • Posted By: rmelone @ 09/15/2008 1:21:28 PM

      Get your facts straight. Sometimes people are so angry that they can't see the truth. She DID NOT ban those books! Many weren't even in print when she supposedly banned books.

      • Posted By: Iconoblaster @ 09/15/2008 6:31:41 PM

        She didn't ban books. She just fired the librarian who refused to take them off the shelves. They call this "a distinction without a difference".

  • Posted By: Flintstone @ 09/15/2008 11:32:25 AM

    'Trickle Down' has really worked well hasn't it? Inflation rampant, the financial system veering toward collapse. Yeah, four more years of rich white guys in control. NOT!

    btw, daytrader... ever consider a productive job?

    • Posted By: careerdaytrader @ 09/15/2008 1:18:31 PM

      I have a productive job. I create software and have 3 employees. I also trade too but thats not my main income.

      Have you ever considered WORKING harder?
      Have you ever considered LEARNING more?

      If so then you'll realize how dumb you are and your assumptions are.

      • Posted By: GD38 @ 09/15/2008 2:32:13 PM

        Wow you can measure his IQ from a few sentences? Amazing. Calling him dumb accomplished a lot too. I'm sure he is all broken up now. Day trader huh. So you are one of these geniuses tied to Wall Street, huh. Having a good week, month, year are we? Oh and going back to taxes. The tax breaks from Bush have kept the economy strong how exactly? Oh wait, that's right the economy isn't strong. In fact the dollar fell again against the japanese yen, euro, pound and the Swiss franc. Yah so much for taxes being the root of all evil.

        • Posted By: careerdaytrader @ 09/15/2008 2:51:25 PM

          Actually this is a GREAT year for me, our business will end up doing over $1.3 million this year. I am in the financial industry and things are GREAT for us. We are diversified and have close to 2,000 customers in over 45 countries.

          It's so easy making money in this GREAT country. One thing you moron Democrats don't do is look at the REAL statistics.

          If you take out the illegal immigrants white Americans are up 9.6% in income after adjusting for inflation.
          Of course those millions of illegal immigrants skew the numbers a bit but hey WHY USE THE REAL TRUTH when lies will possibly get your socialist elected! LOL you are too funny moron.

          • Posted By: GD38 @ 09/15/2008 3:35:01 PM

            You do realize that I lost any real interest in what you have to say a couple of posts ago? It's just so fun getting you all riled up. That's my favorite thing about conservatives. Y'all take the bait so well. The temptations to shout everyone down with your ridiculous commentary apparently overwhelms you. I bet you have spittle coming out of your mouth now. You do don't you? Come on you can tell me, I promise not to gloat at being right. I wouldn't want to steal that thunder from you. Much better than just typing "IDIOT" in capital letters don't ya think. :)

            • Posted By: careerdaytrader @ 09/15/2008 6:23:21 PM

              I think its funny that you think I'm angry. We're winning in the polls and more importantly in the electoral college state by state polls. Coming from behind where Obama was crushing Mc Cain just a few short weeks ago, just WAIT for the debates. You will be EMBARRASSED you ever supported him.

              http://www.electoral-vote.com/

              Also I predict that Obama will find a way to get RID of Biden and put Hillary back on the ticket. It's his ONLY chance! But I think many Hillary supporters wouldn't go for that and his obvious sexist past and current behavior!

      • Posted By: Iconoblaster @ 09/15/2008 5:42:27 PM

        If trading ISN'T your primary source of income, why would you call yourself "careerdaytrader"? If being in the top 5% income group (even after taxes, that has to be a bundle) isn't enough for you, maybe the problem is that you are a greedy narcissist. MOST hard-working Americans would be more than happy with that... besides you spend too much time on these forums, and you are too oblivious to the burden carried by the working class, for anyone to believe that YOU are working all that hard.

        • Posted By: careerdaytrader @ 09/15/2008 6:18:48 PM

          Why should I NOT want money to go to MY FAMILY?

          After all taxes Business owners are lucky to keep HALF.

          Are you saying that after paying 50%+ in taxes to all Governments that I am GREEDY for wanting the other half of MY HARD WORK to go to me and my family?

          Pretty crazy you call ME greedy when top 10% of income earners pay 70% of the tax. The bottom 50% pay NOTHING! I'm not greedy and even YOU know it. That's just what they teach Radical Liberal Democrats in your blogging workshops. Sorry it doesn't work on me and other intelligent readers.

  • Posted By: Flintstone @ 09/15/2008 10:07:56 AM

    Hey Newsweek-- if your're interested in pursuing bad behavior maybe you should check out 'busgate.' I was told by an acquaintance who has family in AK that Track and friends were involved in vandfalizing school buses. The judge gave them the option of jail or military service (not an uncommon choice in backwaters). That's why Track is on his way to Iraq.

    • Posted By: ihateeveryoneincludingyou @ 09/15/2008 2:03:42 PM

      Nobody gets sentenced to the military any more. Nice try, though.

      • Posted By: Iconoblaster @ 09/15/2008 5:56:09 PM

        Well, not quite. Judges don't formally SENTENCE people to the military (and the military may not accept an enlistee who is subject to probation or to a pending criminal accusation), but defendants ARE often given a choice...the judge takes a defendant's enlistment (or sometimes, with privileged defendants, simply the persons expressed intention to enlist) into consideration in imposing a suspended or conditional sentence.

  • Posted By: johnintexas54 @ 09/15/2008 4:27:42 PM

    She makes Hillary look lame and tame. And the disgusting thing is that America is buying it!! Since when is being a PTA president, small town part-time mayor and governor of a one dimensional, small state for barely 2 years sufficient credentials for the world's most power job? Oh, I forgot...she's hot looking, is a hockey mom and parades her kids around while telling the media to leave them alone. Her answers to Charlie Gibson 's interview were beauty pageant fluff, not unlike the contestant a few years ago who wandered around on the topic of geography and maps. And we're swallowing this like pablum!!!! And to top it off, she has lied about her record, the bridge to nowhere, earmarks, just like it never happened. The last time I saw denial of the truth like that, Baghdad Bob was telling the international media there were no American troops massed outside of Baghdad. I hope America wakes up from their "affair" with the Alaska calendar girl.

    • Posted By: lcfbill @ 09/15/2008 5:04:22 PM

      hey john in texas... we are waking it that is why the polls are now moving towards her rather than putting the leading of this country into a guys hands who hasnt led anything or anyone. by the way you want to see how a leader is going to do? Watch them under pressure. she seems to be handling it pretty good ( i mean hey they are coming at her with everything) and wow have you seen obama? hes falling apart! whats gonna happen when we have another 9/11 of some sorts. i trust her ability to do the right thing and not panic over obama anyday

      • Posted By: johnintexas54 @ 09/15/2008 5:27:29 PM

        Then you don't know much about leadership because Obama was villified because of the Rev. Wright issue and he handled it beautifully. Then everyone made the same sort of comment you made about panic when Obama got beat by Hillary in some big state primaries, but he still won. Same thing will happen here I hope. If you think canned, superficial answers and flat out lies are the way LEADERS handle global problems and crises, then you know nothing about leadership. And there is nothing in Palin's background to suggest that she could handle a 9-11 even half as well as Giuliani, who I despite except for the way he handled 9-11. What is she going to do...field dress the Taliban?

  • Posted By: lcfbill @ 09/15/2008 5:13:53 PM

    i plan on supporting either candidate that gets elected. i know who i am going to vote for right now but i know that i may not chose the one most americans will chose. But was saddends me is that many will vote and becasue they lose they will go about wining and complaning and bashing the president. We are america and need to begin acting different than other americans - wow that sounded wierd. hey let me say this.... either side wins. its OUR country lets not distroy it to prove a point

  • Posted By: brimyrs @ 09/15/2008 1:11:35 PM

    You are so discussing! Since when is Newsweek so attuned to small town community gossip, in Alaska, nevertheless? Excuse me, but don't you have more pragmatic details to report. I was on the fence, but decided to hop over to the McCain/Palin pasture; simply because you think you can educate me to the otherwise.

    • Posted By: Iconoblaster @ 09/15/2008 5:03:17 PM

      I agree that efforts to educate you are futile.

    • Posted By: GD38 @ 09/15/2008 2:14:02 PM

      Oh that did it. I think I can here Newsweek retracting the whole story as we speak. Hmm, threaten a major magazine with a change of vote to get them to change their reporting practices. Yah cause that tactic has been just so successful in the past. (rolls eyes).

  • Posted By: lcfbill @ 09/15/2008 4:59:08 PM

    you guys are all idiots and the more you write about this stupidity the more stupid you look. hey watch the interview with the ex brother in law. HE SAYS he should have been fired!

  • Posted By: Justice4Wooten @ 09/15/2008 4:35:50 PM

    If Palin fired the Chief of Public Safety for the reason alleged then it further demonstrates her approach to handling corruption. This time the true corruption lies in Alaska State Trooper's hiding behind a union. Public officials, and more specifically, law enforcement officials such as Mike Wooten should not be allowed to hide behind union representation. Mike Wooten said on CNN he "never drove drunk" and he "never threatened anyone". What little the public knows about who he is should clearly demonstrate he is again lying. If not, then what lies behind union protection in his record does. If that doesn't reveal why he was a threat then the recently released Air Force Office of Special Investigations report concerning his drunk driving and threats should. The story in that report also clearly support his incident and wrongdoing at the Mugshot Bar which was similar however the latter, a report focusing on his abuse of power at another Anchorage bar The WoodShed when he threatened and latter made a 911 call to cover his actions will show the real Mike Wooten. That incident which the AST completely buried was with a Federal LE officer with a 20 year service record with not a single complaint against him. Bottom line: Wooten is a danger and hides behind his union. The ASTs leadership failed to protect the public from him. If Palin did fire a chief because he failed to lead then she rocks! Read the newly released AFOSI report on Wooten he drank over 7 drinks then drove with two married women to a bar then falsly reported a domestic while his girlfriend Angela Johnson begged him not to do so, and then told the 911 operator it was the wofe of the Special Agent he was reporting begging him not to make the call when all along it was his girlfriend who was married as was he. Mike Wooten is an accident waiting to happen and the current complainants and those harmed by him could sue the State and AST for not protecting them. Sarah did the right thing either way!

    • Posted By: jiml1956 @ 09/15/2008 4:42:21 PM

      got a link to the AFOSI report?

  • Posted By: tmcongdon @ 09/15/2008 11:19:53 AM

    Lets get real here . No matter who wins the white house, there will be tax increases due to the "economy stupid". The fact that we are in 2 wars, the list goes on and on. I will not even comment on your "idiot" slam. We are a diverse nation and I still have the right to think the way I want. for now anyway. This country is not a democracy, it's a plutrocracy. If you can't see that then you are ignorant.

    • Posted By: GD38 @ 09/15/2008 4:24:56 PM

      Thanks for the support but this guy can only hear how right he is. All we have ever heard is "Dems will raise taxes, Dems will raise taxes". Even if that is true, taxes are not what voters are complaining about. There is always big talk about taxation because it is a hot button topic. It's a great fear tactic too. But no President ever walks into office on the first day a flips a switch and, boom, taxes skyrocket. Tax law changes constantly. Bad tax laws can be repealed. Hey, wait a minute. Wasn't this suppose to be about how Palin is not qualified or soemthing like that? Whatever, these tangents are way more fun. We might as well start debating over whether or not the Pats have a chance without Brady. It's about as relevant to Palin as tax law is.

  • Posted By: mccainsupporter @ 09/15/2008 3:42:19 PM

    It is no coincidence that revelations of police misconduct from the Rodney King beating to CBS news Katey Couric recent expose on corruption in Chicago City Police drug task force involves video camera documentation of misconduct including separate incidents of beating up of innocent bar patrons and a female bartender by the officers involved. A Chicago Police officer implicated was audiotaped later conspiring to murder his fellow officers to prevent further investigation of wrongdoing that included multiple and systematic thefts of drugs and money from drug dealers and falsification of police reports and sworn affidavits. The revelation of misconduct did not come from so-called good officers coming forward to report on the misconduct of their co-workers. Only when there is independent videotape footage documenting police misconduct or dead bodies turn up as in the Atlanta wrongful drug bust and shooting murder of a 95 year old grandmother in her own home does a successful investigation and prosecution go forward.

    With Sarah Palin sister there will not likely be any videotape and no bodies found so it not likely that any of her brother-in-laws co-worker Alaskan State Troopers are going to come forward on their own to document any misconduct. Sarah Palin should not have had to wait until her sister disappeared before she intervened.

    Ten domestic violence related deaths in four different states involving four different sworn law enforcement officers is more than enough reason for Governor Sarah Palin to not have had to wait until her sister disappeared before she intervened. Alaska in the winter is a big state in which it is easy for someone to disappear or a suspicious car accident to occur. In light of the recent murders of spouses and girlfriends by police officers in four other states, any alleged intervention by Governor Sarah Palin involving her ex-brother-in-law was not unethical or unreasonable, rather it was probably the more prudent course of conduct. Sarah Palin should not have had to wait until her sister disappeared before she intervened.

    • Posted By: Iconoblaster @ 09/15/2008 4:16:15 PM

      I'm not a McCain/Palin supporter, but this post makes some very good observations about the double standard by which the law enforcement community (or should we say "police sub-culture"?) judges the behavior, and conceals the misbehavior, of law enforcement officers. I've heard more than one cop say "There are two kinds of people; cops and a__holes". And I think many of them believe it.

      Unfortunately, most of the political right seems not to notice this until one of "their own" (in this instance, Governor Palin), falls afoul of the double standard. Once again, it all depends upon whose ox is being gored.

  • Posted By: nerakami @ 09/15/2008 4:09:24 PM

    For the folks trying to make excuses for Palin's actions... remember George Bush... a lying, deceiving and manipulative President....

    Sarah Palin intervened AFTER her sister and the guy had split. Secondly, there is a legal system to deal with these issues... even though the case was already investigated and Wooten was suspended. The case was CLOSED when Palin decided to institute her own brand of personal revenge justice.

    Sarah Palin has a small mind and is a revengeful, petty minded individual. She fires people if they cross her. She is a DANGEROUS pitbull in lipstick (her words, not mine)

  • Posted By: mccainsupporter @ 09/15/2008 3:46:58 PM

    The Federal criminal statute Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban applies to everyone including all state and federal law enforcement and servicemen and servicewomen in the military. There are no exceptions. It does not matter whether Wooten was a bad guy or not or if he was a saint. Wooten became subject to a domestic protection order whether justified or not as reported in the Newsweek article. Once subject to a domestic protection order, he was ineligible at that point to be a law enforcement officer. He committed a felony under federal law every day he wore his sidearm to work. It does not matter that his sidearm was state issued or a personal sidearm. He was in possession of a gun while at work. The Alaska Public Safety Commissioner should have either fired Wooten or given him a leave of absence or suspended him until the domestic protection order was lifted. Even if there was no basis for the protection order, Wooten and the Commissioner were violating federal criminal law by continuing to maintain Wooten on the force while he was subject to a domestic protection order.

  • Posted By: mccainsupporter @ 09/15/2008 3:44:18 PM

    There is likely no merit in the ethics complaint against Governor Sarah Palin and Sarah Palin should not have to wait until her sister disappeared before she intervened. Even if there was any merit to the complaint one could argue convincingly that it would have been prudent for her to intervene in this case given the recent publicity regarding the disappearance and death respectively of the last two wives of former and now retired police Sergeant Drew Peterson in Bolingbrook Illinois a Chicago suburb, the apartment shooting deaths during a homecoming party last October of six young adults including the former girlfriend of a 20-year-old Crandon Wisconsin deputy and Crandon police officer Tyler Peterson who took his own life before his apprehension, the death of the nine-month pregnant girlfriend of convicted former Ohio police officer Bobby Cutts whose two year old son broke the case with the statement that mommy is in the rug, and the pending murder trial of Pennsylvania State Trooper and homicide investigator Kevin Foley for the stabbing murder of the soon to be dentist ex-husband of his live-in girlfriend that occurred two days before the effective date of the final divorce decree. Sarah Palin should not have to have waited until her sister disappeared before she intervened in the trooper case. In the Foley case, Pennsylvania Trooper Kevin Foley lived with the estranged wife of a dentist who was viciously stabbed to death and thrown through the window of his own home two years ago. Pennsylvania State Trooper Foley specialized in homicide investigations and allegedly had been quoted as repeatedly stating in a State Police barracks break room in front of other State Troopers and supervisors as wishing that the dentist ex-husband would be killed in a car wreck or would otherwise die. Reportedly, his fellow state troopers did not take his threats seriously although they told him to stop making the threats against the now deceased dentist. Remember also in the Drew Peterson case, there were 18 eighteen separate domestic disturbance calls to the Drew Peterson residence outside Chicago.
    In the eighteen separate domestic disturbance calls to his home, Drew Peterson was never arrested or charged by his fellow officers with whom he worked. The only person ever charged by his fellow officers in all of Petersons domestic violence cases was his now deceased ex-wife. Any investigation into the conduct of her ex-brother-in-law trooper by his own department, the Alaska State Police and Pubic Safety Commissioner, should have been viewed with the same skepticism as the eighteen separate investigations into the conduct of Drew Peterson by his fellow officers. It clearly can be argued that the prudent course of action was for Governor Sarah Palin to intervene given the almost near universal blue wall of silence that often prevents investigation of police misconduct by their fellow officers, superiors, and even other outside law enforcement agencies.

  • Posted By: mccainsupporter @ 09/15/2008 3:40:53 PM

    Newsweek reports that the trooper Wooten had once been the subject of a court-imposed domestic-violence protection order. Newsweek further reports that a court filing by Wooten's lawyer indicates that within months of being issued, the violence protection order was dismissed.

    There is no language in the federal criminal statute Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban that states or provides that Alaskan State Troopers are exempt from its provisions. Anyone including State Troopers are guilty of a federal felony punishable by five years in prison and a $100,000 fine for simple mere possession of a firearm if they are subject to an ordinary protective order for domestic violence. Importantly the reports state that the estranged spouse filed for divorce and a domestic violence protective order on April 11, 2005 against the State Trooper. Newsweek reports that a protective order had been issued for a period. In most cases protective orders are customarily issued. Under new federal law, anyone subject to a protective order or convicted of misdemeanor domestic assault or felony assault is subject to a ban on possession or use of a handgun for a minimum of five years or at least to the end of the protective order. Some have argued that the ban is forever even after the protective order expires. The Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban is a federal law that applies to everyone including police officers and servicemen and servicewoman. Anyone in the military is subject to a discharge if a protective order is issued against them. It is a felony to violate the federal law Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban and the penalty is five years in prison. Every day that the trooper wore his sidearm or rode in his patrol car with a shotgun in the trunk, he was committing a felony and violating the federal law. If a protective order was issued and the trooper became subject to the order, the trooper should have been ineligible to be a State law enforcement officer and it would have been a slam dunk to terminate him. The State Police Commissioner should have been aware of this law and should have terminated the brother-in-law without being asked. The State Commissioner failure to uphold the federal law should have been enough grounds for his own termination.

  • Posted By: achacha85 @ 09/15/2008 2:18:18 PM

    Obama got it worse with Islam ties and his lack of "experience". To put your name for such a high executive position in a country all candidates should expect equal probing, I don't expect Palin nor Obama to get any special treatment about their lives. If Palin has skeletons, people have the right to know and make an informed decision when preparing to vote. If Palin has problems with power abuse, I want to know because it indicates future behavior that she might fall back on whenever someone is not walking the line.

    • Posted By: Silver Sil @ 09/15/2008 2:57:10 PM

      Your are absolutely right all the elected officialls should have a deep background investigation and the CORRECT findings should be made public for the American people. But it is a real shame, that some stoop to make public UNTRUE stories, just to make their party look better.

  • Posted By: woodduck @ 09/15/2008 9:13:51 AM

    I called a long time friend who's lived in Alaska for almost thirty years to get his opinion on Sarah Palin. He said Alaskan's hate to see her go , they hope her replacement will continue the projects she's started.. The Liberal media will invent news on a slow news day. I predict Bidden will resign his vice presidential bid and Hilary will be the the vice presidential running mate.

    • Posted By: jiml1956 @ 09/15/2008 2:26:04 PM

      Of course Alaskans will be sad to see her go.

      They just received $1200 checks above and beyond the $2000 they get every year.

      Palin's family received almost 20 thousand this year.

  • Posted By: achacha85 @ 09/15/2008 2:21:01 PM

    Confused when Palin thought her life was private once she got nominated for this job. Everybody stuck it out and she better stick around for it.

  • Posted By: Konklifer @ 09/15/2008 2:19:27 PM

    After November 5th, Sarah Palin will be remembered as nothing more than a footnote in history.

  • Posted By: kevjohn @ 09/15/2008 1:19:23 PM

    I've said it before, I'll say it again: what's the point of having power if you don't abuse it?

    • Posted By: GD38 @ 09/15/2008 2:11:38 PM

      Word. Stalin. Hitler. Mao. They had it right. Stalin, Palin. Hmmm. Interesting.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse