Sad Brain, Happy Brain
What cognitive neuroscience is uncovering about the fascinating biology behind our most complex feelings. As it turns out, love really is blind.
Is God All in Your Head?
09/14/08: Harvard's Michael Craig Miller on what happens in the brain when people have spiritual experiences.
The brain is the mind is the brain. One hundred billion nerve cells, give or take, none of which individually has the capacity to feel or to reason, yet together generating consciousness. For about 400 years, following the ideas of French philosopher René Descartes, those who thought about its nature considered the mind related to the body, but separate from it. In this model—often called "dualism" or the mind-body problem—the mind was "immaterial," not anchored in anything physical. Today neuroscientists are finding abundant evidence of an idea that even Freud played with more than 100 years ago, that separating mind from brain makes no sense. Nobel Prize-winning psychiatrist-neuroscientist Eric Kandel stated it directly in a watershed paper published in 1998: "All mental processes, even the most complex psychological processes, derive from operations of the brain."
Neuroscientists consider it settled that the mind arises from the cooperation of billions of interconnected cells that, individually, are no smarter than amoebae. But it's a shocking idea to some that the human mind could arise out of such an array of mindlessness. Many express amazement that emotions, pain, sexual feelings or religious belief could be a product of brain function. They are put off by the notion that such rich experiences could be reduced to mechanical or chemical bits. Or they worry that scientific explanations may seduce people into a kind of moral laziness that provides a ready excuse for any human failing: "My brain made me do it." Our brains indeed do make us do it, but that is nonetheless consistent with meaningful lives and moral choices. Writing for the President's Council on Bioethics earlier this year, philosopher Daniel Dennett made the point that building knowledge about the biology of mental life may improve our decision making, even our moral decision making. And it could enhance our chances of survival as a species, too.
Your heart, lungs, kidneys and digestive tract keep you alive. But your brain is where you live. The brain is responsible for most of what you care about—language, creativity, imagination, empathy and morality. And it is the repository of all that you feel. The endeavor to discover the biological basis for these complex human experiences has given rise to a relatively new discipline: cognitive neuroscience. It has recently exploded as a field, thanks, in part, to decades of advances in neuroimaging technology that enable us to see the brain at work. As Dr. Joel Yager, professor of psychiatry at the University of Colorado, has said, "We can now watch the mind boggle!"
Certainly, you won't find an entry for "mind-boggling" in the index of a modern neuroscience textbook. You will also have a hard time finding the words "happiness" or "sadness," "anger" or "love." Neuroscientists do, however, have a rapidly growing appreciation of the emotional brain and are beginning to look closely at these subjective states, which were formerly the province of philosophers and poets. It is complex science that holds great promise for improving the quality of life. Fortunately, understanding basic principles does not require an advanced degree.
Fear Itself
Fear is a good place to start, because it is one of the emotions that cognitive neuroscientists understand well. It is an unpleasant feeling, but necessary to our survival; humans would not have lasted very long in the wilderness without it. Two deep brain structures called the amygdalae manage the important task of learning and remembering what you should be afraid of.
Each amygdala, a cluster of nerve cells named after its almond shape (from the Greek amugdale), sits under its corresponding temporal lobe on either side of the brain. Like a network hub, it coordinates information from several sources. It collects input from the environment, registers emotional significance and—when necessary—mobilizes a proper response. It gets information about the body's response to the environment (for example, heart rate and blood pressure) from the hypothalamus. It communicates with the reasoning areas in the front of the brain. And it connects with the hippocampus, an important memory center.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: crowley@bit7.net @ 09/22/2008 3:14:05 PM
Comment: Dr. Miller needs to re-watch "Duck Soup". Groucho Marx's mirror routine was not performed with his brother Chico. Harpo Marx performed the routine with Groucho. In later years, he performed it again on the I Love Lucy show iwith Lucille Ball.
Posted By: puddytat @ 09/21/2008 2:49:36 AM
Comment: "Comment: So, my cat, whom I care for quite deeply, has no remorse, no compassion, self-awareness or, sadly, love."
Just curious - how did you come to that conclusion? Rather than the opposite conclusion that we have our emotions in common with our fellow-animals, and for the same reason, that the purpose of emothions is to drive behaviours? To take just one example, is parental care by mammals driven by unconscious processes or by love? Observation and reason point overwhelmingly to the latter IMO. Not to say that all animals feel all the same gamut of emotions or to the same degree (fear being probably the most common) - but these are the very details that get fascinating.
Posted By: Kattt @ 09/16/2008 7:17:13 PM
Comment: So, my cat, whom I care for quite deeply, has no remorse, no compassion, self-awareness or, sadly, love. Without these traits, her species has managed to survive just fine, both domestically and in the wild. To suggest that the love I feel from my woman, or the imagination and emotions that stir in my head when I listen to Bach is there because I needed it to "survive", genetically, is ridiculous.
I agree that humans must endure being creatures living in the world; but I also conclude that we are more than creatures. What creature would kill itself because it's "sad"? A creature has no beliefs. Just because our brains light up in different sections when we're feeling different things, I find it disturbing that any scientist anywhere would have the audacity to conclude that they understand where love or remorse or compassion stem from (e.g. love being "created" in the brain instead of love being an outside force that the brain is reacting to).. Bottom line, homo sapiens would have survived and thrived without any higher understanding, love or compassion. We made tools and hunted well before we discovered any notion of God and the universe.
These researchers, who can't even see GRAVITY in the universe, are trying to dissect love? And whose love was this? Who were these people who were asked to feel love while laying in a brain scanning machine? The only thing this kind of science is good for is facilitating the pathways of injured brains.
What they've seen thus far in their scans is nothing more than our brain's animal responses to various stimuli. I'm sure my cat's brain would light up too if you show her a picture of a mouse. It doesn't mean she'll ever feel empathy for it.