SPONSORED BY:

Sad Brain, Happy Brain

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The fear system is extraordinarily efficient. It is so efficient that you don't need to consciously register what is happening for the brain to kick off a response. If a car swerves into your lane of traffic, you will feel the fear before you understand it. Signals travel between the amygdala and your crisis system before the visual part of your brain has a chance to "see." Organisms with slower responses probably did not get the opportunity to pass their genetic material along.

Fear is contagious because the amygdala helps people not only recognize fear in the faces of others, but also to automatically scan for it. People or animals with damage to the amygdala lose these skills. Not only is the world more dangerous for them, the texture of life is ironed out; the world seems less compelling to them because their "excitement" anatomy is impaired.

Anger Management
Until recently, there was relatively little research showing how the brain processes anger. But that has begun to change. Recent studies indicate that anger may trigger activity in a part of the brain not named as poetically as the amygdala—the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (abbreviated dACC). Like the amygdala, the dACC's function makes sense, given its connections to areas of the brain involved in recognizing an offense (he just stole my iPod), registering a feeling (I'm angry) and acting on it (I'm going to …). It also links to the reasoning centers in the front part of the brain, as well as memory centers, which play a role in angry rumination or stewing after the fact.

Researchers, however, have been more focused on one of the consequences of anger—aggression—probably because it can be observed through behavior. It's known, for example, that men are overtly more aggressive than women because of differences in male and female hormones. But the brains of men and women are also different, and some of those differences may affect aggression. In the front of the brain, the orbitofrontal cortex is recruited to help make decisions and temper emotional responses. It lights up when people are making judgments. Adrian Raine and colleagues at the University of Southern California note that, on average, men have a lower volume of gray matter (the bodies of nerve cells) in the orbitofrontal cortex than women. According to their analysis, this brain difference accounts for a healthy portion of the gender gap seen in the frequency of antisocial behavior.

Even a neuroscientist can see that murder and mayhem are undesirable. But a neuroscientist can also see why that trait might still be in the gene pool. The gene for sickle cell anemia survived because it provided protection against another disease, malaria. Similarly, aggression is often an advantage. Until recently in historical terms, a readiness to fight and the ability to kill was a way to consolidate control over resources for survival.

Fortunately, diplomats have also evolved. Some of our ancestors who understood that aggression carried risks as well as advantages used their creative human brains to devise better solutions for resolving conflicts. Our predecessors also originated symbolic diversions for aggression, like sports and chess.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: crowley@bit7.net @ 09/22/2008 3:14:05 PM

    Dr. Miller needs to re-watch "Duck Soup". Groucho Marx's mirror routine was not performed with his brother Chico. Harpo Marx performed the routine with Groucho. In later years, he performed it again on the I Love Lucy show iwith Lucille Ball.

  • Posted By: puddytat @ 09/21/2008 2:49:36 AM

    "Comment: So, my cat, whom I care for quite deeply, has no remorse, no compassion, self-awareness or, sadly, love."

    Just curious - how did you come to that conclusion? Rather than the opposite conclusion that we have our emotions in common with our fellow-animals, and for the same reason, that the purpose of emothions is to drive behaviours? To take just one example, is parental care by mammals driven by unconscious processes or by love? Observation and reason point overwhelmingly to the latter IMO. Not to say that all animals feel all the same gamut of emotions or to the same degree (fear being probably the most common) - but these are the very details that get fascinating.

  • Posted By: Kattt @ 09/16/2008 7:17:13 PM

    So, my cat, whom I care for quite deeply, has no remorse, no compassion, self-awareness or, sadly, love. Without these traits, her species has managed to survive just fine, both domestically and in the wild. To suggest that the love I feel from my woman, or the imagination and emotions that stir in my head when I listen to Bach is there because I needed it to "survive", genetically, is ridiculous.

    I agree that humans must endure being creatures living in the world; but I also conclude that we are more than creatures. What creature would kill itself because it's "sad"? A creature has no beliefs. Just because our brains light up in different sections when we're feeling different things, I find it disturbing that any scientist anywhere would have the audacity to conclude that they understand where love or remorse or compassion stem from (e.g. love being "created" in the brain instead of love being an outside force that the brain is reacting to).. Bottom line, homo sapiens would have survived and thrived without any higher understanding, love or compassion. We made tools and hunted well before we discovered any notion of God and the universe.

    These researchers, who can't even see GRAVITY in the universe, are trying to dissect love? And whose love was this? Who were these people who were asked to feel love while laying in a brain scanning machine? The only thing this kind of science is good for is facilitating the pathways of injured brains.

    What they've seen thus far in their scans is nothing more than our brain's animal responses to various stimuli. I'm sure my cat's brain would light up too if you show her a picture of a mouse. It doesn't mean she'll ever feel empathy for it.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now