A Reality Check On ‘Change’

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: tjb0728 @ 09/14/2008 5:47:13 PM

    Alter, you said on PBS that you were awaiting a McCain apology . . . for what? He owes you nothing! On the other hand, you should apologize to him, and to Palin, and to the American electorate for waving the Barak America Obamanation banner. You and Olbermann can and will do whatever you want, however, you are both left wing nut cases that will likely need a straight jacket when McCain wins!

    • Posted By: vena45 @ 09/14/2008 6:53:03 PM

      The facts are the facts whether you like it or not. Obviously McCain and Palin's past history record shows itself that McCain/Palin are just simply more of the same as Bush policy. Get over it!

  • Posted By: vena45 @ 09/14/2008 6:49:07 PM

    Thank you for writing this article. I hope that the vast majority of people will read this newsletter and learn who Palin really is and what McCain really stands for on political issues. I learned quickly on during this election trail who would best lead our country which I will be voting for Obama. Not only that but I wasn't going to vote for another Republican after the fact that this country had failed since Bush was in office. But for most people who is still not convince that McCain/Palin is just more of the same, hopefully your article will help more people in opening up their eyes to realize what is best for our country. Thank you!

  • Posted By: BFid @ 09/14/2008 6:47:14 PM

    Record and temperment? I guess the fact that Obama's entire network of friends from college to present seems to be mostly radicals and racists doesn't merit a mention. Ayers, Rezko, Wright, Jackson, Sharpton and on and on. I'll take the anrgy P.O.W. any day over a guy who by his own admission gravitated toward the socialists in college.

  • Posted By: BFid @ 09/14/2008 6:46:44 PM

    Record and temperment? I guess the fact that Obama's entire network of friends from college to present seems to be mostly radicals and racists doesn't merit a mention. Ayers, Rezko, Wright, Jackson, Sharpton and on and on. I'll take the anrgy P.O.W. any day over a guy who by his own admission gravitated toward the socialists in college.

  • Posted By: Cantabrigian @ 09/14/2008 6:40:52 PM

    Can you imagine the media circus if it would have been Hillary Clinton who would have designed her own presidential podium?

    The media was so busy hounding Hillary Clinton like a pack of mad dogs that NObama was given a free ride, but then he has gotten this far with a free ride, so his arrogance is understandable.

    Is it not strange that NONE of the Columbia students remember NObama? Is it not strange that the press fails to question NObama's absence for the past two years from his Senate job. NObama started to run for president as soon as he arrived in Wasihngton.

    NOW, the press challenge the executive experience of Sarah Palin while ignoring the slim resume and the poor judgement of NObama. This is dejavu time. We have seen this before with Hillary Clinton who was far more qualified than this empty shirt NObama. Although, you would never think that given the hullabaloo that the press make over NObama.

    Remember Hard Ball Mathews and the tingles running up his legs while watching NObama? Charlie Gibson now wants to join the Hard Balls club with his questioning of Sarah Palin. How many countries did NObama visit before this campaign? How many heads of state did NObama meet before this election campaign?

  • Posted By: Moxiesmom @ 09/14/2008 6:11:46 PM

    Thank you for a concise and concrete assessment of both candidates??? records. After the avalanche of lies propagated by the McCain campaign and parroted by much of the media, even some of Obama???s supporters are defensive on his accomplishments and believe the puffery on McCain. I will email this far and wide. Keep up the good work. It is appreciated.

  • Posted By: tkjer @ 09/14/2008 6:02:26 PM

    The time has come for Obama to start leading his own campaign. He has all the supporting structures in place: great campaign staff, grass roots support, money, and issues. But the final necessary key ingredient is his ability to excite the 5%-10% of the electorate we need for victory. His supporters have done everything and more to make this a success. The rest is up to him. He can no longer pace in front of audiences trying to persuade with logic and the facts. He has to confront the attacks, the lies and the spin with authority, outrage and fire. He must become passionate from the gut. If he doesn't have this in him it's over, no matter how well he does in the debates. The final movement of voters to his side will come from non-spoken language of attitudes, energy, power, emotions and feelings. He has to show how he feels, that this matters to him. Not that it has to matter to voters; it must matter to him. If voters don't see him fighting for his life they will be unmoved. He has to lose his cool. Big time!

  • Posted By: timrogers @ 09/14/2008 2:19:51 PM

    I think the 'hothead' senator and the 'vindictive but holy' governor are a match made in heaven. They will not be afraid to attack anyone, anywhere, at anytime. The world will tremble and our enemies will shrink away to wait for a weak minded Democrat to finally get elected. John and Sarah will be ready on day one to nuke, bomb and obliterate in the name of righteous Republican values. We will rule the world once again. The world will be safe from the evil ways of liberals, feminists, muslims, gays, hipanic illegals, and above all atheists and heathens. I can hardly wait for the first mushroom cloud in Iran on CNN.

    • Posted By: brooksm13 @ 09/14/2008 5:18:45 PM

      I sincerely hope that this was meant tongue in cheek. We should always proceed carefully and with a small piece of fear. A world that trembles because of us will be preparing to attack us. And ruling the world should not be our objective. To lead the world is noble, but to rule the world is facist. And to call liberals, feminsts, muslims, gays, hispanics, atheists and heathens evil is not only asinine, it goes against everything that the United States of America stands for.

  • Posted By: UzhasKakoi @ 09/14/2008 4:32:00 PM

    One more thing, to your claims of McCain record, which is so easy to check, something tells me that Feinstein, Kennedy, Kerry (if he had any decency), and a few other Democrats that co-sponsored with McCain ground breaking legislations would may easily disagree with your left-wing lying depiction of McCain's record. John McCain would not be my first choice for the President, but given the "competition," it's no context, sorry.

  • Posted By: EclecticBlue @ 09/14/2008 4:19:17 PM

    Those of you who suggest that McCain is still a Maverick, &/or believe the self-proclaimed "Straight Talk," have not done any research into his real record past media & campaign spin. I respect McCain's service to this country, and I once respected the man a great deal, and would have seriously considered voting for him. However, the FACTS show he is neither Maverick nor change agent, and his "Straight Talk" these days is mostly falsehoods & lies.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 09/14/2008 4:17:06 PM

    Hey obamamohammeds...got some good news...it's not ya'lls fault....you are all victims.....it's a sickness....

    Psychiatrist Confirms: Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder
    As a clinical and forensic psychiatrist, Lyle Rossiter has treated over 1,500 patients and examined over 2,700 civil and criminal cases. Turning his hand to political psychopathology, the author of The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness, has diagnosed an alarming percentage of the population as suffering from the grotesque form of mental derangement known by some as moonbattery.

    Among Rossiter's observations:

    Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded. Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.
    A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity ??? as liberals do. A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population ??? as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state ??? as liberals do.
    The roots of liberalism ??? and its associated madness ??? can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind. When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.
    Basically liberalism is a willful failure to mature beyond adolescence that can have catastrophic consequences for society. With luck, the official diagnosis of this disease by a mental health professional will facilitate the search for a cure.

    NOBAMA!!!

  • Posted By: bruce5149 @ 09/14/2008 4:15:10 PM

    I can honestly say that Jonathan Alter can tactfully articulate exactly how the situation is and I have to commend you for your last 3 stories I read. You have a 100% accurate depiction of how things in this election are playing out. You deserve a Pulitzer Prize. I read an article in an Ohio paper that the Ohio Secretary of State (Jennifer Brunner) is chewing spikes over the Republican base sending a million absebtee ballots to Ohio voters with a micro small like at the bottom to answer yes or no if they are registered to vote. Most who get them won't read that little tidbit and it automatically be considered an invalid vote and be destroyed. This is the epitimy of the low life tactics of Republicans. The attorney general will be raising ?ell to nail them on this. If people would just accept the truth. I'm sure the Democrats are holding 4 aces yet and can keep the republicans guessing. Barrack Obama will be our next President.

  • Posted By: EclecticBlue @ 09/14/2008 4:11:15 PM

    Well written article about something that,few are bothering to seriously look at! History shows, over and over that the success of a President has little to do with "experience" (especially since the definition seems to be so subjective, altering dependent on who one supports), and a lot to do with temperament. How one runs his/her campaign has also been a clear indication of how one will govern.



    country,

  • Posted By: aef66 @ 09/14/2008 4:11:08 PM

    Thanks for putting some attention back on the issues. The media's (not to mention, the pubic's) focus on such distractions as the faux lipstick on a pig controversy and the rest of the McCain campaign's distortions only harms America.

    There are real problems to be solved. While I admired McCain in 2000, I find it hard to have much respect for McCain today.

    I've got more to say at my blog Torqopia.

  • Posted By: JCJanko @ 09/14/2008 4:06:05 PM

    This election gets funnier every day. Articles like this are why McCain is going to win very easily. The public sees through this garbage.

  • Posted By: Occom @ 09/14/2008 4:04:03 PM

    McCain Feingold doesn't count? You come across as desperate, either about the election or keeping in the good graces of MSNBC.

  • Posted By: Occom @ 09/14/2008 4:02:27 PM

    McCain Feingold doesn'y count? Jonathan, you come across as desperate. Worried about the election? Trying to keep your spot on MSNBC?

  • Posted By: daughtconfd13 @ 09/14/2008 1:08:55 PM

    Women...the "New" Deciders...

    The Presidential campaign has consistently tracked which demographic was having the most influence on the election.

    Senator Clinton and Senator Obama consistently had a firm grip on Women, other Minorities, and the Youth, while Senator McCain and the Republican Party have had a firm grip on White Males.

    With Senator Clinton and Senator Obama monopolizing campaign coverage, White Males and the Republican Party have been trying to figure out how to get back in the mix.

    They analyzed Senator Clinton's campaign and realized that "Women" had become the "New Deciders!"

    Enter Governor Sarah Palin...

    Now, women have to decide whether or not they want "Symbolic" gains with McCain/Palin OR "Significant & Substantive" gains with Obama/Biden.

    The Con Artist is a master at illustrating the metaphor "Never Let the Left Hand Know What the Right Hand is Doing."

    Women need to focus on the "Issues" and not the "Image" or the "Original Decider" will be back in office for another 4 years!

    • Posted By: cferns1530 @ 09/14/2008 1:28:40 PM

      I dont think women are the new deciders, it is the youth of the nation. This election campaign has energized millions of students and younger working class who actually believe in the economy. Republicans have always done a better job at the polls because they vote and this time democrats can make a difference. Either way i hope both parties stop bickering over lipsticks and get with the issues.

      • Posted By: cferns1530 @ 09/14/2008 1:30:48 PM

        I mean economic policies not current economy.

        • Posted By: mediabiasisfun @ 09/14/2008 3:52:48 PM

          This is repeated every election. Then, come election day, the youth are to baked to remember where the polling station is. Also, I would prefer the youth didn't vote. Quite frankly, the issues are too complex for people with no life experience to truly comprehend. And I'd say the same thing no matter who they supported.

  • Posted By: k@chicago @ 09/13/2008 6:43:00 PM

    RE: sex education. I believe in sex education in school; but but not in K-1st grade, it should be left to the parents to decide how much is too much. Knowledge is power, true... where does one draw the line on how much the gov't will decide for us? Children have the rest of their lives in this world, why rob them of their innocence when we don't have too? I've read the bill, and it absolutely does not seem age appropriate.

    • Posted By: PFflyerkid @ 09/13/2008 7:43:28 PM

      You're suffering from a bad case of spin bias and vaguely hearing the whole story. As someone already noted, Obama's goal had everything to do w/ teaching young children how to be aware of sexual predators and NOT anything to do w/ sex ed. My kid is 5 and I've told her to scream her lungs out and say "I don't know this person" if anyone grabs her. It's a decent world but there are creeps everywhere.

      • Posted By: mediabiasisfun @ 09/14/2008 3:40:34 PM

        Take your own first sentence to heart. The law ALSO stated that all sex education grades K-12 include discussion of the spread and prevention of AIDS. Personally, I believe McCain was wrong to go with this ad, and it is a certain misrepresentation, but no worse than those of Obama with his "100 years of war in Iraq" and "5-million dollar middle class" misrepresentations. Obama can cry all he wants, but he's just as guilty and actually repeated, many, many times, the Iraq comment before McCain had hit him all.

  • Posted By: BFHogan @ 09/14/2008 3:18:31 PM

    Obama...temper? Obama has been throwing a huge temper tantrum since the GOP convention, HOW DARE MCCAIN PLAY IN HIS SAND BOX!!! As for why become a community organizer, to drive the Chicago political machine you must first become a cog.....McCain has been an obstructionist to bills for both sides that would have been bad government. 1 of 100 makes it a difficult place to lead, he still made huge change (ei McCain-Feingold).

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse