From Seneca Falls to … Sarah Palin?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Mwalimu @ 09/14/2008 2:28:16 PM

    Because I am only limited to 3000 characters, I couldn???t say all I had to say in my last post. Switching to the summer edition of USA@Work, I???ve found the following facts.

    `1. McCain opposes the Employee Free Choice Act which would make it easier for workers, including working women, to form unions. Working women would have to accept whatever hours, wages, and working conditions their employers deign to give them - without protest.

    2. Even though working women may be willing to accept cuts in pay and off-clock time, many working women can expect their jobs to get off-shored, especially of McCain pushes trade pacts like the one with Colombia. They can also expect to lose their jobs whenever employers decide to ???import??? workers as guest workers.

    3. If McCain gets elected, working women will need to accept more hazardous working conditions. The summer edition of USW@Work reports that in 2006 alone 5,840 workers were killed in work-related accidents. 50,000 to 60,000 worker died of occupational-related diseases. While USW@Work does not break these deaths down by sex, be rest assured all of these workers were somebody???s loved one.

    In addition from other sources I???ve noted that

    4. Although McCain pledges that he won???t let a government bureaucrat stand between a woman and her family and her doctor, he???s got the wrong person. It???s not the bureaucrat that the public needs to worry about, it???s an HMO. For example, aqccording to a recent article in AARP, should a woman get breast cancer, she should be prepared to shell out $10,000 to $30,000 in advance if she wants treatment. Hospitals are insisting on pre-payments because they ate tired of getting stiffed by insurance companies.

    9. I picked up this gem from a recent edition of the Los Angeles Times. When Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasilla, rape victims were billed $ 300 to $ 1200 for rape treatment kits. Wasilla had the distinction of being the only town in Alaska to do such a thing. Sarah Palin did not end this practice. The state legislature did.

    Again, I am wondering. Is this the sort of life women want to lead. If the answer is yes, they should vote for McCain. If the answer is no they???d better vote for Obama. You get what you vote for.

  • Posted By: HeyAreWeThereYet? @ 09/14/2008 2:15:40 PM

    I don't need a fiesty VP. I need a VP who is a critical thinker. I don't see that in Palin. I see a woman who gets her highs from doing what men do. Big deal. I want someone is able to ask questions, research the possibilities, listen to other points of view and then make decisions. People who are so sure of themselves that they have to mock others, reminds me of the middle school students I teach. As people truly mature, they stop acting like kids and become adults. Sarah Palin doesn't appear to have done that yet.

  • Posted By: HeyAreWeThereYet? @ 09/14/2008 2:10:07 PM

    We don't need a VP who can kill and "dress a moose." We need a critical thinker. I see nothing about Sarah Palin that indicates she is a critical thinker. I am seeing someone who gets her highs from doing what men do rather than being thoughtful, analytic, questioning, willing to listen to other points of view, and being able to make decisions only after those considerations. She shoots from the hip, it appears, and to me, that is exactly like George Bush. Fiesty is not what I want. I want thoughtful!

  • Posted By: cferns1530 @ 09/14/2008 1:51:04 PM

    The young voters should vote. Whether Republican or Democrat, they must get out and vote to help make this a better campaign. I'm not really worried about the Presidential debate. Itsthe VP debate thats going to make a difference, given that Palin and McCain already stand different on some issues.

  • Posted By: summerskin @ 09/14/2008 1:38:50 PM

    I'd never in a million years vote for a woman who approved a law so that RAPE VICTIMS have to pay between $300-1200 to receive a rape kit and possible further investigation, also banning sex education in public schools when studies have shown that when you do that STD's and teen pregnancy sky rocket. (Just look at her daughter) I'd also never vote for a woman who doesn't believe in a woman's right to choose. Just because she's female doesn't mean she has women's best interest in mind. Do your research. I'd also never vote for a man who voted against a bill that would make it so that women get paid the same amount as men for the same job. (Mccain)

  • Posted By: josemarti @ 09/14/2008 1:25:13 PM

    Senator Obama again tried to distance himself from Mr. Ayers today. Obama said: "The Mr. Ayers that has been portrayed by Fox News is not the Mr. Ayers I knew. When he told me years ago that he was sorry for his terrorist activities, I thought he meant that was remorseful. I did not know he meant that he was sorry he did not kill more people. Mr. Ayers is the most recent person to have disappointed. I was disappointed by my father. I am still trying to figure out how many siblings I got. I was disappointed by my high school basketball coach. Then the cook at Harold's Chicken in Hyde Park who would undercook the chicken. Then Reverend Wright disappointed me. Then Bill Clinton. Reverend Jackson. Father Pflagel. Then most recently Mayor Kilpatrick. I don't know why this keeps happening to me." Several reporters cried.

  • Posted By: benluclar @ 09/14/2008 11:11:45 AM

    What a sorry sight is this forum today. I am reading things I would ban from my computer if my children were still in the house.
    But they are not still in the house. They are raising children and trying to work at the same time. They are actually ''married'' (imagine that!) and they have children IN wedlock (imagine that!) and they EARNED college degrees through student loans and scholarships for GRADES, not sports (imagine that!). And they are ALL GIRLS (imagine that!). So the media portrays and Obama beats his chest and tells me that he represents the grassroots of America? What America does he represent?
    Yes, I supported Hillary Clinton, not because I agreed with everything she said, but because of the WAY SHE SAID IT. She was determined. She was BRILLIANT. She worked HARD. She was battered and beaten by the media and a politically-correct candidate's exaltation, and she took the beating with a SERVANT'S HEART.
    Who will I vote for in November? McCain and Palin.
    I want a TEAM who demonstrates to ME that they offer a SERVANT'S HEART. I do not have to be told which side of this candidacy represents service to OTHERS versus service to ONESELF.
    I feel sorry for Biden, who has always been a good and respectable man. He is being used as a token of experience, the lack of which is supposed to appease us all. But I would not have voted for an Obama/Clinton ticket because the CAPABLE candidate was in poor order, as is the case with Biden as well.
    What is ''supposed'' to represent grassroots to me in television sitcoms, sports, rap songs, chat rooms and now the race for the leadership of the USA is not what I view as REPRESENTATION at all. And I will not assist in sending more of this nonsense to lead us into more of the same.
    SERVANT'S HEART. Key issue.

    McCain and Palin represent

    • Posted By: chindognyc @ 09/14/2008 1:10:33 PM

      Wow, thats what Bush said. Let me ask you.....how are your kids doing? Unless your rich and an elitist, than you should vote for McCain. Like I said, in 2042 you will not be the majority and so you should collect your riches while you can.

    • Posted By: Independant Voter @ 09/14/2008 1:03:58 PM

      I think you missed the point of the article. It's about the issues - not the personalities. From your comments - I seriously doubt that you ever would have voted for Hillary Clinton.

  • Posted By: sognib @ 09/14/2008 10:34:11 AM

    Mccain never took earmarks

    • Posted By: Independant Voter @ 09/14/2008 1:09:20 PM

      That is correct - but Palin has taken a lot of earmarks. Remember the bridge to Nowhere - she didn't say "no but no thanks" - she took $233 million dollars of that earmarked money to Alaska and built the ROAD to Nowhere! Kind of ironic - no?

  • Posted By: sognib @ 09/14/2008 10:35:59 AM

    Palins mistakes pale in comparison to Whitewater

    • Posted By: Independant Voter @ 09/14/2008 1:05:30 PM

      SERIOUSLY??? Wow - how did "Whitewater" affect foreign or domestic policy?

  • Posted By: chindognyc @ 09/14/2008 1:02:18 PM

    Everybody talks about polls. Remember when Bill Clinton ran against the first Bush, he was loosing because they said he had no experience. He ended up winning. It is the young vote that will change. McCain picked Palin not because of the women vote, but because of the young women and men votes. The problem is, she is very hard to the right. She is not for most of the young people's votes and thats where they will loose. I keep feeling that it will be up to Ohio to pick our next President and Ohio already said that race play an important factor. Those same racist people who said that race plays a role will remember that they lost their jobs to NAFTA and soon CAFTA and McCain is a big supporter for CAFTA. Once they realize that their jobs will not be around (like McCain said to the people in Michigan), they will vote for Obama.

  • Posted By: Independant Voter @ 09/14/2008 12:59:17 PM

    Initially, I felt the historic excitement of Sarah Palin's nomination, like everyone else. Her speech was great - but then Day 2,3,4...12, 13, 14...it was still the same speech every day - and most of it has been dis-credited as either inflated, exaggerated, or straight out lying. Her foreign policy experience is that "she can see Russia from an island", and she has no idea what the Bush Doctrine is (no big deal - just the whole rationale behind the Iraq War!).
    This is an embarrassment now for everyone. Obviously, McCain made a rash decision in choosing her (over dozens of far better qualified women or men) - but I'm holding McCain responsible for this decision. He didn't put "Country First" when he chose Palin - and Obama did put country first by picking Joe Biden. I'm putting policy first this time and voting for those I know can lead - not for those who have no clue what our policies are in the first place.

  • Posted By: daughtconfd13 @ 09/14/2008 11:45:39 AM

    Truth Be Told...

    According to the United States' 2000 Census Bureau, the U.S. population is "75.1%" white and "50.9%" women.

    In this environment, Senator Clinton ran a tough and arduous campaign.

    Senator Clinton's campaign provided women with an opportunity to cross Party-lines and ultimately elect the "First Woman" President of the United States, but "they did not!"

    The Republican Party could have selected Governor Palin as a Republican nominee for President, so that they could show the country that they "sincerely" wanted a women to be President, but "they did not!"

    Truth Be Told...if white women want to know who failed them in their pursuit to elect the "First Woman" President of the United States, it's the "75.1%" of the U.S. population...it's the proverbial "Man in the Mirror."

    If white women in significant numbers unite to elect Senator Obama as President of the United States, their husband's will wake-up the next morning and ask with all earnestness, "Dear, is there something I can do for you?"

    ...and the women can respond, "Sure, iron my shirt!"

    • Posted By: chindognyc @ 09/14/2008 12:57:37 PM

      Very nice. You know what.....I would like to know why are white women blaming Obama. Who runs the media. Who have been running this country for all these years. It sure wasn't Obama or the black community.

  • Posted By: cferns1530 @ 09/14/2008 12:48:07 PM

    Her supporters chanted, "Run with a woman, win with a woman." This is an example of plain ignorance which is why the Republicans dont need to cry sexism over Obama's lipstick remark. To say that she would be ready when over a month ago she did'nt know exactly what a VP did.

    And the saddest part is she thinks Obama made the wrong decision on Clinton. From day one of her speech she was deployed by McCain to attract Hillary voters. If women who believe in the issues Hillary stands for are eager to select Palin just because she is a women, they dont need to cry sexism. They've answered themselves.

  • Posted By: hfny @ 09/14/2008 11:48:47 AM

    A liar's soul is what I see when I look at Palin & McCain. Their lies are so egregious and over the top, they almost make George Bush look like George Washington. My husband and I have raised our daughters to speak the truth, no matter the cost. We would never vote for McCain/Palin. They have crossed the line and set an awful example for the children of this country. The swift boaters will start their lying attacks against Obama this week, just as they did to Kerry and they will get away with it. These really, really rich Republicans will probably turn the tide again with their despicable lies and universal health care, equal pay for equal work (John McCain just voted against this legislation and was the deciding vote in its defeat), income inequality so great it hasn't been seen in almost 100 years will have to wait another 4 years. Americans will work harder and harder and end up with less to spend, just as we have for the last eight years. The middle class will get poorer and the rich will get richer, all because of the lies. This would appear to be a legacy no American would want to inflict on America's children but apparently it is acceptable to many.

  • Posted By: mport84 @ 09/14/2008 11:01:07 AM

    Sarah Palin's most vital "Identity" tag in this election isn't her gender. That element just screens the real issue.
    Sarah Palin's only qualification for VP is to "energize the Republican ticket" because of her religion. We need to stop being disingenuous about this, and discuss it. She is a representative of the TV base built by Pat Robertson, which brought us 8 years of George Bush and which McCain once opposed. She is also a representative of the "New Wave" of apocalyptic Pentecostalism, a lunatic doomsday cult with a bizarre theocratic aganda.

  • Posted By: mccainsupporter @ 09/14/2008 10:50:08 AM

    Barack Obama said small town rural Americans cling to religion and guns in tough times. It must have been tough times during in his first year of law school at Syracuse University that Joe Biden clung to his religion in deciding to use an academic product of his own faith, Fordham Law Review to commit plagiarism. Joe Biden did more than cling to religion, he clung so hard that he took a substantial chunk out of the Fordham Law Review and failed and had to repeat his legal research and writing class as a result.

  • Posted By: sognib @ 09/14/2008 10:26:30 AM

    Change you can believe in. Biden is no change. Obama has suspended taking earmarks till after election. How many of you have gone to Church and never heard one thing the pastor said? How many of you Have taken money from Rezko? How many of you didn't know Ayers and his wife were terrorists who bombed a police station? Mccain supported Bush 90 % of the time but Obama supported Reed-Pelosi 100 % of the time. Obama has been in office 2 years and has not submitted one piece of legislation to change anything. We need to rattle their cage if not turn it upside down. fool me once with Jimmy Carter but never again.

    • Posted By: chindognyc @ 09/14/2008 10:28:58 AM

      Ask Bill Clinton. He has taken money from Rezko. How much money did McCain take from Keating. McCain's pastor problems.

  • Posted By: sognib @ 09/14/2008 10:15:40 AM

    Change you can believe in--Why Biden -one of the earmark kings $ went to Church 20 years never once heard pastor say anything out of line.Will suspend taking earmarks till after election. Didn't know Rezko was a crook. Didn't know Ayers was a hero of Weather underground and was a terrorist who bombed police station. Senators are more qualified to be president than Governors such as Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Bush and the Roosevelts. Needs to raise taxes so Congress and Senate can steal more. McCain has supported Bush 90%of the time but Obama has supported Reed -Pelosi 100% of the time. Not one single bill since taking office to change anything. Please give me a break. fool me once Just not this time.

    • Posted By: chindognyc @ 09/14/2008 10:23:26 AM

      What the hell are you talking about. Lets not go into McCain's and Palin crooked past.

  • Posted By: chindognyc @ 09/14/2008 10:10:26 AM

    The Republicans promised that their will be less Government. Please show me that the Bush Administration has reduced the Government role in the American families lives. They can now tap into our phone conversation and now McCain is saying the same thing the Bush said. Give me a break.

    • Posted By: Murgo525 @ 09/14/2008 10:13:40 AM

      Pssst, Bush is not running for President. McCain is.

      • Posted By: chindognyc @ 09/14/2008 10:16:27 AM

        And he is using the same line the Bush used. McCain is not about change. Maybe changing his depends.

  • Posted By: chindognyc @ 09/14/2008 10:14:21 AM

    Why won't the McCain camp talk about the issues. All they can do is spread lies to try and take the White House.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse