From Seneca Falls to … Sarah Palin?

Here is a topic I would like to hear back on from Obama supporters. It is still in Obamas plan to pursue Global Wealth Redistributions as part of his plan should he become our POTUS. . . and what are your thoughts about this plan?


Obamas Plans For Global Wealth Redistribution
Saturday, February 16, 2008

This is not getting as much attention as it should:

Unnoticed by most Americans this week, the Obama/Hagel GLOBAL POVERTY ACT was quickly approved by a senate committee and cleared for the next step, debate in a democrat-controlled senate.

The GLOBAL POVERTY ACT is unique in its breathtaking scope. It is NOT FOREIGN-AID. The Act will require the President and Congress to set aside .07% of the annual Gross National Product - our GNP - to be DISTRIBUTED AROUND THE GLOBE to RELIEVE POVERTY at a cost of about $800 billion dollars annually TO TAXPAYERS. It is Barack Obamas response to the call of the Bali Global Warming Conference for a global carbon tax; a BLATANT REDISTRIBUTION OF THE PLANETS WEALTH to the powerless.

Coupled with his riveting stump speeches which generate huge emotional reactions from his equally huge audiences - speeches which literally CALL FOR A REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH right here AT HOME AS WELL - Barack Obamas sponsorship of the GLOBAL POVERTY ACT gives us a CHILLING PREVIEW of an Obama presidency.

Just to put that $800 BILLION into perspective, realize that IT IS MORE THAN HALF
of what we spend on entitlements now. What Obama is proposing is an approximately 65% INCREASE IN ENTITLEMENT SPENDING (huh?????), except that this time the ENTITLEMENTS ARE NOT EVEN FOR AMERICANS!!

That is an ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF MONEY that AMERICANS, already heavily burdened with taxes, CAN ILL-AFFORD to pay. So why should we have to pay it? Because OBAMA, the DEMOCRATS and their LIBERAL BUDDIES in the INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY have decided that it is what AMERICA???S TITHING SHOULD BE in order to achieve the rather VAGUE GOAL of FIGHTING GLOBAL POVERTY.

Of course, one would think that before Americans are required to foot this heavy new entitlements bill OBAMA and HIS COMRADES would have TO PROVE that any of the money America has spent before on FIGHTING POVERTY has moved us any closer at all to actually ENDING poverty; but that probably makes too much sense.

Maybe, INSTEAD OF FORCING AMERICANS TO PAY FOR THIS FOREIGN AID, Obama could just set up a new CHECK BOX on our TAX DOCUMENTS letting US VOLUNTEER to send the money if we want to. Because if his idea is a good one lots and lots of Americans would support it, RIGHT?

SOURCE article: http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_plans_for_global_wealth_redistribution

Not my original material, but it is so hilarious and spot on that I just couldn't resist sharing it...
***********************

I'm a little confused. Let me see if I have this straight.....

* If you grow up in Hawaii, raised by your grandparents, you're 'exotic, different.'
* Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, and this is a quintessential American story.

* If your name is Barack you're radical and unpatriotic, perhaps even Muslim.
* Name your kids Willow, Trig and Track, you're just a maverick.

* Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable.
* Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you're well grounded.

* If you spend 3 years as a dedicated community organizer, become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, spend 3 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs committees, you don't have any real leadership experience.
* If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20 months as the governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you're qualified to become the country's second highest ranking executive.

* If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising two lovely daughters, all within Protestant churches, you're not a real Christian.
* If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a real Christian.

* If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including the proper use of birth control, you are eroding the very fiber of society.
* If, while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no other option in sex education in your state's school system while your unwed teen daughter ends up pregnant, you're a responsible example for others. 

* If your wife is a Harvard graduate laywer who gave up a position in a prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community, then gave that up to raise a family, your family's values don't represent America's.
* If your husband is nicknamed 'First Dude', with at least one DWI conviction and no college education, who didn't register to vote until age 25 and once was a member of a group that advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA, your family is extremely admirable.

OK, much clearer now!

I thought this was interesting.....

"Politicians Lie, Numbers Don't"
"And the numbers show that Democrats are better for the economy than Republicans."
By Michael Kinsley
Posted Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2008, at 1:49 PM ET

If you're wondering why a formerly honorable man like John McCain would build his presidential campaign around issues that are simultaneously beside-the-point, trivial, and dishonest (sex education for kindergartners, lipstick on pigs), the numbers presented here may help to solve that mystery. Since the conventions ended, McCain has mired the presidential race in dishonest trivia because he doesn't want it to focus on what voters say is the most important issue this year: the economy.

There is no secret about any of this. The figures below are all from the annual Economic Report of the President, and the analysis is primitive. Nevertheless, what these numbers show almost beyond doubt is that Democrats are better at virtually every economic task that is important to Republicans.

In other words, there are no figures here about income inequality, or percentage of the population with health insurance, or anything like that. This exercise implicitly assumes that lower taxes are always good and higher government spending is always bad. There is nothing here about how clean the air is or how many children are growing up in poverty. The only point is that if you find the Republican mantra of lower taxes and smaller government appealing, and if you care only about how fast the economy is growing, not how that growth is shared, you should vote Democratic. Of course, if you do care about things like economic inequality and children's health, you should vote Democratic as well.

It???s amazing how the Obama supporters keep bring-up the same ole, same ole??? she???s a liar, she???s terrible, she???s horrible. And yet??? they forget that Obama was the only senator, the only one??? to vote against (NO) on an important piece of legislation created to help the most innocent and vulnerable in our country??? infants in need of urgent medical care.

We are talking about living, breathing babies, the result of botched abortions, who are OUTSIDE of the mother??? breathing on their own. Without this bill, those performing the abortions were strangling, smothering, and breaking the necks of these infants.

Why do you think the government had to step in and write this bill??? they had nothing better to do with their time with all of the other issues this country is facing??? even pro-abortion legislators voted, ???Yes?????? except Obama !!! That is a scary, dangerous character flaw, which speaks volumes to those who take the time to listen.

McCain-Palin are literally being phony and flip-flopping to adjust to whatever comes up, even copying whatever Obama says. Now Lieberman is trying to help and has touted that the surge was so successful and wants the senate to confirm that. The facts indicate that the only reason there has been progress and a significant decline in the violence is because the Iraqi's stopped fighting each other. The Anabar (sp?) Awakening obviously had a whole lot more to do with that and it started well before the surge. Now the surge didn't hurt and probably helped support the Awakening but the surge by itself very likely would have failed, even with more troops and especially over the long term, and possibly the Awakening may have even worked by itself. Senator Lieberman's efforts are again just more of the political shell game, trying to manipulate public opinion. Lieberman is apparently putting all of his eggs in McCain's basket and very likely will need to become a Republican after this election.

I just thought this was really really interesting and funny, it is an exerpt from n article on Huff Post. I know since it is not from Fox or Rush McCain supporters will not believe it LOL!

Second, sitting three-quarters of the way up the bleacher was Bristol Palin and her eighteen-year-old impregnator, Levi Johnston. Once I noticed them, I kept my eye on Bristol and Levi. What I learned provoked an odd empathy for the awful pickle Wasilla High School's hockey stick wielding homeboy now finds himself in.

Bristol and Levi sat shoulder-to-shoulder. But not once did they look at each other, speak to each other, or in any way acknowledge each other's physical presence. Not once. For an entire hour. Instead, Bristol stared straight ahead and Levi had the glazed look of a trapped feral animal.

Then when Sarah wound up her autograph signing and the people sitting in front of him on the bleacher began climbing down, Levi stood up and, without looking at or speaking to his betrothed, turned in the opposite direction and walked away.


You have to feel sorry for the guy, I know he is wishing that he used a condom LOL! Men you should really check out the family members before you just lay down with anyone LOL. Just keep poor Levi in your prayers because his life is going to be CRAP! PUBLIC CRAP!

I mean all this young man wanted was to "Shoot some Sh!t and be a F...ng Redneck and of course "He DON'T want NO KIDS" So much for the school system in Alaska !

Just in case anyone missed this insighful post.

Posted By: Floridave @ 09/17/2008 2:38:50 PM
Comment: That Hillary is one grumpy old hag. She loved being America's sweetheart (for lack of a better term), but now that she is being upstaged by a younger, hotter woman that made it on her own and not her husband's coattails.... all of a sudden she's gone all muenstral on us. What a beyotch.

Hope this helps!
Floridave

I thought this was interesting, at any other time it would be funny, now it is just scary.

Friday the Attorney General's office promised state witnesses would comply with subpoenas the Legislature issued last week. Tuesday the Governor's Attorney General flip flopped, and announced that state witnesses wouldn't comply because, well, and I'm paraphrasing here - - he's changed his mind. And in what has to be an idea hatched after a 4th Martini at Chilkoot Charlies, Governor Palin's attorneys have filed a motion to dismiss the ethics claim she filed against herself two weeks ago. Yup. She really filed a complaint against herself. Tuesday she said she's discovered, after a thorough investigation of herself, that she's done nothing wrong. Does anyone know how to get a hold of Jon Stewart and Tina Fey?

link to entire article:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/les-gara/round-2-of-mccain-trooper_b_127101.html

It really shouldn't matter in this day and age where gender matters as to who gets into office, it should be their qualifications and their record. In the case of Palin and McCain it is quite clear who shouldn't be in office....http://www.heartofthewolf.org/NoToMcCain-Palin.htm

I think you are a little behind the actual news here. There is a new blog out called "Women Against Palin". Check it out. There are so many woman trying to get their comments posted because thousands, YES thousands of emails from woman who are furious about Palin.

is a woman she is the ideal vice presidential candidate? In the article above I read that Women voters will most likely vote for Palin because she is a woman. And Democrats may switch sides. Well I'm a moderate I vote for the person and I vote for the cause...not by party. And this woman is not voting for some gun totting Governor who claims to see Russia from her house and wants to take my rights as a WOMAN away. I don't care who you are or what party you reside on...do you know what it was like for women when abortion was illegal? What's next, taking our right to vote away? It's not the point of abortion being right or wrong. I'm personally not for abortion; I'm for the right to choose. The point is our rights will taken away. Our RIGHTS that women like you and me have worked so hard to achieve. Maybe that's not a big deal to you or maybe you just don't care. But as a woman I do. And as a woman, I'm surprised you don't.

I'm shocked that Democratic Women voters are thinking about voting for Palin for the mere fact that she is a woman. I find that utterly ridiculous. I seriously hope that most women are not going to be so ignorant as to vote for her because she is a woman and instead really look at what she brings to the table. Hilary is no slouch - she is a smart, educated and strong woman regardless who she is married to. He didn't hold her hand through the primaries. She did that on her own. What happened to women standing up for each other? She was the first woman to get as close as she did, doesn't that count for something? So just because Palin is a woman she is the ideal vice presidential candidate? In the article above I read that Women voters will most likely vote for Palin because she is a woman. And Democrats may switch sides. Well I'm a moderate I vote for the person and I vote for the cause...not by party. And this woman is not voting for some gun totting Governor who claims to see Russia from her house and wants to take my rights as a WOMAN away. I don't care who you are or what party you reside on...do you know what it was like for women when abortion was illegal? What's next, taking our right to vote away? It's not the point of abortion being right or wrong. I'm personally not for abortion; I'm for the right to choose. The point is our rights will taken away. Our RIGHTS that women like you and me have worked so hard to achieve. Maybe that's not a big deal to you or maybe you just don't care. But as a woman I do. And as a woman, I'm surprised you don't.

I would love to see a woman as President in my life time, or vice pres. for that matter. That being said, I want an honest woman more than anything, one that won't stretch the truth or outright lie, even after all respeced news organizations have exposed the lies. Sarah Palin has lied about the "bridge to nowhere", the chef she supposedly fired, the ebay jet, the faulty teleprompter, her now not cooperating with the troopergate investigation, her politic-speak answers to Charlie Gibsons questions, I feel like they should name a bus the "Circular talk Express" and put her on it. She would have suited herself better to stick to her true accomplishments. I would respect that more. I just see more Bush tactics here. McSame and Pain are all they have. They are counting on the sheep to elect them. I am not convinced she is the right woman for the job.

The one largest reason for today's problems is Bush-Cheney, with the strong and full backing of the Republican Party, and their concentration on benefiting Special Interests while ignoring their responsibility to the people. Dishonesty is the cloak that all other negatives hide behind and the last eight years have clearly demonstrated that lesson well. If we now buy into more of the BS, then we really can???t complain when we get crapped on again. Some, with their biases, prejudices and emotional attachments, would really like it to be different but the reality simply is that this time around the only chance for real change, that benefits the majority of Americans, is through Obama-Biden. The choice is literally for more of the same, no matter how disguised and rationalized, or instead for a chance for change with the focus being on the people instead of Special Interests. Hopefully voters can find their conscience and make the rational and objective decision that we all will benefit from, otherwise get ready for more of the same.