Are Voters Feeling Alienated by Palin?

Flip-Flopping on Family Values?
Jacob Weisberg's observation that the conservative values of promoting the nuclear family and preventing abortion are in fact at odds is a thought-provoking one ("What Happened to Family Values?" Sept. 15). Few would consider teen sex, pregnancy and marriage ideal. Most people applaud the bipartisan goals of reducing abortions and strengthening families. But by suggesting that the GOP moderate its stance on abortion, Weisberg misses the deeper issue. The essence of the anti-abortion argument is not that it promotes the American Dream, but that the life in the womb is as valuable as the life of the woman. Viewed through this lens, Sarah Palin's choices—both to raise a baby with Down syndrome and to encourage her pregnant teen to wed—are the most logical. Her son's disability and her daughter's pregnancy will no doubt complicate their lives, but neither of those inconveniences legitimizes the taking of a life. That a pregnancy may disrupt a young woman's life, shattering dreams and directing her toward "poverty, frustration and disorder," is indeed tragic. More tragic still would be to protect a woman's happiness and financial success at the expense of her child's life.
Mandi Mangler
Fair Lawn, N.J.

Jacob Weisberg is foolish to accuse Republicans of flip-flopping on family values when they prefer unmarried parenthood to abortion. One might as well call an up-from-poverty wealthy man a hypocrite if he gives to charity. But Weisberg is quite correct that repealing Roe v. Wade "could be the best thing to happen to liberals since the New Deal." Since Roe, otherwise liberal-leaning voters have created the electoral majorities putting Republicans in office. How much liberal legislation on health care, education, environment, housing and gun control has been sacrificed to the cause of choice? For every pro-choice vote and dollar given to Democrats to "protect a woman's right to choose," more has been given to the GOP to "protect the lives of the unborn." If abortion had been kept out of the federal courts and remained in the hands of state legislatures, there would have been no Moral Majority, no Ronald Reagan, no George H.W. Bush and certainly no George W. Bush.
Lou Shapiro
Pacifica, Calif.

On a Quest for a Cancer Cure
I've lost people dear to me from cancer, and I don't appreciate the suggestion that inspiring success stories like Lance Armstrong's are distracting hyperbole circulated to keep morale high in a war we are losing ("We Fought Cancer … and Cancer Won," Sept. 15). The truth is that using sad stories like Robert Mayberry's, in addition to describing the number of cancer deaths each day as "equivalent to three jumbo jets crashing and killing everyone aboard," is no less hyperbolic. The simple fact of the matter is that so much about beating cancer depends on the intangibles, and stories of triumphantly overcoming the odds are the contents of the well from which our hopes spring eternal. They are every bit as valuable as any other form of treatment, and in our search for a cure, what will bring more funding to the table: hope or cynicism?
James Palumbo
Wilmington, N.C.

© 2008