I was recently in Russia at the time of the Georgian conflict. I too heard stories that Russia was provoked and that Saakashvili was reckless in his actions. Granted, Russia did seriously overreach. I do not however support Georgia becoming a member of NATO. NATO is a defensive alliance requiring it's members to come to the aid of a member who is attacked. Georgia in reality brings very little to the table for the United States interests other than their friendship. Their joining NATO WILL provok Russia, period!!! Russia has always throughout it's long history, tried to buffer itself from threats (or perceived threats) in their south just like we have tried to protect ourselves from threats (or perceived threats) to our south. Remember studying the Monroe doctrine? How about Theodore Roosevelt's corollary (logical extension of) the Monroe Doctrine. Sounds like a form of current Russian policies to me. Crack open your history books folks.
We and Europe need to work with Russia more than we need to work with Georgia. Our interest is Georgia is limited to the pipeline that crosses Georgia. South Osetians appear to want to be part of the Russian Federation, and sooner or later, that's going to happen. In the end all Russia ended up getting was a very poor part of northern Georgia that wanted to be with Russia anyway due to their ethnic ties. Russia also scared the daylights out of the other former republics like the Ukraine. This overeaching action on their part will drive a number of the other pro-western, former USSR republics into the western camp. Adding Georgia to NATO and then going to war with Russia over a territory like South Osetia does not sound like a very prudent move in the grand sceme of things. Relations with countries are NOT writeen in back and white. At times they are colored in shades of gray and it is high time we start to recognize and deal with this reality.









Discuss