I understand Mr. Harris's views and respect the fact that he can hold them, but to lump all Christians into a collective idiot camp is contrived and disingenuous. Many of the greatest national and world leaders that have been able to successfully lead this nation among others have been Christian. Not to speak of the majority of founding fathers and historic presidents.
Even a brief assessment of Mr. Harris???s diatribe on the abilities of Christians to hold public office shows his disdain for all people of faith. This is a fundamental dichotomy which distracts from the realities of history and precedence. A casual observer of western civilization history would be hard pressed to assert the propositions that Mr. Harris has regarding the inability of people of faith to lead.
Recent history alone has shown that the same prejudice held by Mr. Harris is unwarranted and ultimately harmful to the dialog on policy and national interests. John F Kennedy was disdained by many, even Christians, as unfit to lead due to his Catholic faith. Ronald Reagan, a former actor and then governor, was chastised for his ties to the ???religious right??? but affected an unprecedented wave of democracy and freedom among the majority of the rest of the world including the former Soviet Union and communist Europe.
The hypocrisy of Mr. Harris???s argument is suppositional in that his obvious leaning toward the democrat ticket of Obama and Biden still leaves his arguments out in the cold. What faith do these nominees purport to hold to and follow? Whether Christian, Muslim, or the abject faith of modern humanism and Atheism ??? all form and shape worldviews which should be studied and understood by all voters and free thinkers as we approach this election.









Discuss