When Atheists Attack

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: Dr Rick @ 09/27/2008 6:56:22 PM

    From Mr Harris' website - http://www.samharris.org

    "Sam Harris: Sexist Pig and Liberal Shill"

    I???ve received more than the usual amount of criticism for my recent opinion piece on Sarah Palin, most of it alleging sexism and/or an unseemly infatuation with Barack Obama. For those who care, I???d like to briefly respond:

    My alleged sexism: It is true that I used some hackneyed, gender-slanted language in the piece (???get sassy,??? ???girl-next-door,??? etc.). This was deliberate. Clearly, I played this game at my peril. I can say that if Sarah Palin were a man of similar qualifications, I would have used equally slanted language to describe him. I might have called Mr. Palin a ???frat-boy??? or a ???lumberjack.??? I would have invoked some silly macho phrasing like,???Watch Cousin Jim flip Putin the bird.??? My concern is not that Mrs. Palin is a woman. My concern is that she is a totally unqualified and poorly educated woman who was added to the Republican ticket as a token woman (and Creationist wacko). For what it???s worth, the article was vetted by the two women closest to me (wife and mother) and by two female editors at the LA Times. If anything, the editing at the Times made the piece even more ???sexist.???

    My alleged Obamamania: Many McCain supporters have written to say that (1) Obama is also unqualified (or even less qualified than Palin) and (2) I have shown myself to be a hypocrite by not objecting to Obama???s religiosity. Briefly: My criticism of Palin should not be construed as uncritical acceptance of Obama. Needless to say, I find Obama???s religious pandering repulsive. The suspicion that he is pandering, out of obvious necessity, and not quite as religious as he makes out, is somewhat comforting, however. But even if Obama were precisely as religious as he appears, he is not a Creationist, Rapture-Ready blockhead. Palin, by all appearances, seems to be one. This is a difference worth noting. Whatever you may think of his politics, Obama is very intelligent and reasonably well educated. Palin thinks the universe is 6000 years old. Unfortunately, I wrote my article before some of the most disturbing signs of her religious extremism came to my attention.

    So, let me simply declare that I would be overjoyed to have a qualified woman in the White House. I would, likewise, be overjoyed to have a qualified African American in the White House. In fact, I would be overjoyed to have a qualified WASP man in the White House. I will be guardedly optimistic to have a very smart (and somewhat qualified) Barack Obama in the White House. And I would be frankly terrified to have a religious bumpkin like Sarah Palin in the White House. I think you should share this last conviction. Hence my latest opinion piece.

  • Posted By: kerk @ 09/27/2008 6:27:30 PM

    WHAT DID YOU THINK OF OBAMAS PASTOR? SIMILAR MINDS STICK TOGETHER YOU KNOW. OBAMA STUCK BY HIS INSANE BLACK THEOLOGY PASTOR WRIGHT FOR 20 YEARS! DO WE REALLY NEED THAT KIND OF PREJUDICE IN WASHINGTON?

  • Posted By: kerk @ 09/27/2008 6:12:33 PM

    Please look at the facts. Palin has more experience than Obama. Palin has been city council woman, mayor, governor, and commander of the national guard. obama only has been a 2 year senator. Obama is the one who is not ready to be president. obama lacks experience, and repeatedly points his acusing finger at everyone else but himself. Obama was part of this past administration, obama was in washington , so what did he do? joe biden was involved in ripping off the poor people with subprime mortgages.
    As far as atheism goes, do you realize that today scientists are conducting an experiment to find the GOD PARTICLE???? yes, it is an energy that nothing can exist without. What will all you atheists do when the GOD particle is found? Palin having a religion shows that she has a MORAL CONSCIOUS that she uses to guide herself with. How different that is from the corupt elite rich officials that are in washington and have mad a mess of things financially with their greed, lies , and cheating the people of this country!!!!!
    Why don't you look at obamas muslim upbringing (yes, he was raised muslim in indonesia). Isn't that a conflict of interest to have a post muslim president while our country is fighting against muslim terrorists???

  • Posted By: Dr Rick @ 09/26/2008 2:28:51 PM

    It appears that loriw has re-introduced the "Obama supports infanticide" meme back into the thread, again. Those who repeat this claim try to justify it by pointing to Obama's opposition to Illinois legislation that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if the doctors determined that the fetus had no chance of survival.

    Obama opposed the "born alive" bills as backdoor attacks on a woman's legal right to abortion The bills sought to define the term "born-alive infant" as any fetus, even one expelled as the result of an abortion, that shows vital signs separate from its mother. The bill would have established that fetuses thus defined were humans with legal rights. It never made it to the floor; it was voted down by the Health and Human Services Committee, which Obama chaired.

    Illinois law already provides that physicians must protect the life of a fetus when there is "a reasonable likelihood of sustained survival of the fetus outside the womb, with or without artificial support." Illinois compiled statute 720 ILCS 510/6 states that physicians performing abortions when the fetus is viable must use the procedure most likely to preserve the fetus' life; must be attended by another physician who can care for a born-alive infant; and must "exercise the same degree of professional skill, care and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as would be required of a physician providing immediate medical care to a child born alive in the course of a pregnancy termination which was not an abortion." Failure to do any of the above is a felony.

    By law a viable fetus will only be aborted if the life of the mother is at risk in later term pregnancy. In those very rare circumstances, Illinois compiled statute 720 ILCS 510/6 requires the physician to diligently care for the fetus as described above. The law was already on the books when the "born alive' bills were put forward.

    All of this has been explained before, but that doesn't seem to stop loriw from proclaiming over and over again that Obama is "PRO-INFANTICIDE". With behavior not unlike that of a corrupted hard-drive that just can't accept new data, she responds each time to information that contradicts her story by "re-booting" and either:
    1) regurgitating the same refuted claim later, and/or
    2) spewing even more insightful and enlightening comments such as, "you are so full of SH!T.....the bill was voted on by the IL Senate and Obama was the only one who voted against it". That is of course, like the claim of Obama being "pro-infantacide" itself, just pure fantasy; if Obama had been "the only one who voted against" the "born alive" acts, then the measures would have passed despite his votes.

    • Posted By: benkrapf @ 09/26/2008 2:51:47 PM

      Loriw is a rare one.

      She's the person standing in the backyard with a tornado behind her, shouting, "Did someone leave the fan on?"

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 09/26/2008 3:06:02 PM

        Lori is a little nuts.

        • Posted By: Davole @ 09/27/2008 6:09:58 PM

          Ask+ -

          You're a whole eighteen-wheeler truckload of nuts - and that's definitely not "a little nuts"!

  • Posted By: AskPlus @ 09/26/2008 3:57:01 PM

    Seems like Palin won't even be VP. With so much of the GOP calling for her ouster, we may see Lieberman in a couple of weeks. Every one wants her gone.

    • Posted By: Davole @ 09/26/2008 7:05:43 PM

      Ask+

      Your rant falsely asserting that "so much of the GOP (is) calling for her ouster", and "every one wants her gone" is ridiculous.

      Do you have any real facts to support the validity of your deluded statement?

      Obviously she terrifies the obamabots, and Republicans appreciate that!

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 09/26/2008 7:25:41 PM

        Mr Davole;

        Whe have I ever posted anything that could be deemed as untrue, or without a link? I don't even have to demean people to get my point across. There ARE five GOP-ers right now, not too happy with Ms. Palin. Cafferty just blogged for all of us to be "scared" post interview.

        Some bloggers actually read and disregard the "sign of weakness" need to be better than every one - Like Mark. Mark can read:

        Posted By: marksgershenson @ 09/26/2008 4:28:28 PM
        Comment: Prominent conservative columnist Kathleen Parker, an early supporter of Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin, said Friday recent interviews have shown the Alaska governor is "out of her league" and should leave the GOP presidential ticket for the good of the party.

        Bottom line, Palin is an airhead. You can make any number of excuses for her. Regardless, after seeing the Couric interview, can you look into someone's eye and say I think Palin would be an excellent president if heaven forbid something happened to McCain, regardless if you are a Dem, Repub, or Independent?

        • Posted By: Davole @ 09/27/2008 6:04:03 PM

          Ask+ -

          Obviously you do not understand the meaning of the term every one!.

          You claim that "every one wants her gone", and you ridiculously attempt to validate your false assertion by stating that marksgershenson has posted (several times, may I add) that one woman wants her gone, and then you also say that 4 other people want her gone.

          That definitely nowhere approximates every one.

          Now there is no need for you to retract your blatantly false boast that you do not post false comments - most viewers are aware of your lies!

  • Posted By: mikaelamoon @ 09/27/2008 5:33:28 PM

    The point about elitism and the concern of people wanting to "relate" to their political leaders is brilliant. I also agree that there are loads of fanatical Christians out there who believe these are the end times...but do we really want them to have the nuclear codes? I applaud your article.

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 09/22/2008 9:25:07 PM

    shawalli: The obvious answer is that it is totally out of character for the Republicans and then just represents another effort to do anything to manipulate public opinion.

    • Posted By: shawalli @ 09/27/2008 3:32:43 PM

      but wouldnt that also mean that democrats are shifting to the "republican" point of view to going for the elites and are guilty of the exact same thing?

  • Posted By: vicm @ 09/27/2008 2:52:16 PM

    Gee! Does Sam Harris hate the world, women and/or Republicans. Insert Barak Obama's name and gender in the appropriate slots and read the article again. I do not see many writers comparing Obama to John McCain. Many writers and critics (including Obama) tend to compare Obama to Palin. If Harris watched the debate (8/26/08), it would be obvious that Obama knows every little about foreign policy other than, "I voted again invading Iraq when it was not a favorable position." What was Obama's knowledge and "meeting with foreign heads of state" prior to his running for the office of President? In addition, what are Obama's knowledge of domestic issues? What was he doing to instill his "ideas" while serving the the ledgistature? Compare Obama's experience with McCain's experience - there is no comparison.

  • Posted By: Elitist Eliminater @ 09/27/2008 1:52:28 PM

    I would like to shoot the fat assand rid the human race of another "non-thinker".

    • Posted By: Dr Rick @ 09/27/2008 2:02:45 PM

      Okay, maybe she really is a non-thinker, but do you really think Palin has a fat ass, too?

  • Posted By: Elitist Eliminater @ 09/27/2008 2:00:01 PM

    I would like to shoot the fat assand rid the human race of another "non-thinker".

  • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 09/27/2008 1:57:00 AM

    Kathleen Parker, an early supporter of Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin, said Friday recent interviews have shown the Alaska governor is "out of her league" and should leave the GOP presidential ticket for the good of the party leave the GOP presidential ticket for the good of the party. Parker's comments follow those by prominent conservatives David Brooks, George Will, and David Frum who have all publicly questioned Palin's readiness to be vice president.

    And the above list of conservative commentators are some of the most prominent on the right side of the spectrum. Considering the facts and the commentary of these well respected journalists posting what they did, can you still look someone in eye, knowing that Palin could become POTUS, and say without hesitation, or trepedation that she is ready right now to lead our country after seeing Couric's interview with Palin?

    And don't give the bs that Couric was hard on her. If you saw the debates tonight, Couric's questions were easier than the ones that both McCain and Obama were given. So if you think Couric was hard, what is she going to do when she has her faceoff with Biden? Case closed.

  • Posted By: Debater09 @ 09/26/2008 7:56:15 PM

    This article is inspiring. It proves that Sarah Palin is not at all ready or qualified to be the next vice president (which her record shows). I believe that it is a cop-out on the side of conservatives to simply shun this article as more liberal nonsense. When you look at hard facts, like what Palin has said, her fundamental beliefs, and her past actions, it is clear to anyone that she is not ready. And the fact is, Sarah Palin is no idiot. But neither is she qualified to be a vice president. I don't trust my neighbor, or even myself, to lead the country. I may be smart, but I don't think experiences in life can prepare anyone to be a world leader. Only action can provide that.
    Davole, you need to think of an actual argument instead of "the media is against us!" Generic arguments like that prove that you neither have the capacity nor interest to create your own argument. The repeated use of the word "obamabot" exhibits immaturity. And when you say "defeat" Palin, as if she is some sort of evil force that the good guys are fighting, it yet again proves that, with the help of people like you, evil, ignorance, and "I can see Russia from my house!" will prevail, sending our nation into a spiral we can't afford.

    • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 09/26/2008 8:14:08 PM

      1. Sara Palin is very clearly and demostrably MORE qualified to be President than Barak Obama is.

      2. This article is simply another liberal nonsense hit job, just like nearly all of the articles now appearing on Newsweak online.

      3. #2 above is a clear indication of just how much the liberals fear Sara Palin, and a true measure of why she is a brilliant choice for VP

      • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 09/27/2008 1:45:10 AM

        Kathleen Parker, an early supporter of Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin, said Friday recent interviews have shown the Alaska governor is "out of her league" and should leave the GOP presidential ticket for the good of the party leave the GOP presidential ticket for the good of the party.

        Parker's comments follow those by prominent conservatives David Brooks, George Will, and David Frum who have all publicly questioned Palin's readiness to be vice president.

        Obviously you and Share fell asleep at the wheel when Palin was interviewed by Couric. Dan Quayle has been moved up to the rank of genius compared to her airhead commentary.

        And the above list of conservative commentators are some of the most prominent on the right side of the spectrum. So my question to Jim and Share, considering the fact of these well respected journalists post what they did, can you still look someone in eye, knowing that Palin could become POTUS, and say without hesitation, or trepedation that she is ready right now to lead this country?

      • Posted By: sharenews @ 09/26/2008 11:16:53 PM

        Jimbo,

        On #1, #2 and #3. . . ditto! ; - D

  • Posted By: babsthomson624@msn.com @ 09/27/2008 1:28:32 AM

    This very good articile by Harris tells it how it is. If McCain is elected, which sadly he might be, he will probably never serve a full term and the USA will have this woman as President--God help us all.

  • Posted By: JohnnyG @ 09/20/2008 5:19:14 PM

    To the writer of the above Newsweek article defending eliteism, I have one question: When did God die and leave you in charge ?? In my opinion, people like you make me sick. I don't know how you get top write an article in a public magazine, but I'm quite sure that you've never owned or operated a business, never had to balance a budget, never socialized with
    us "common" people, you probably "fratted" your way through an ivy league college at your parent's expense and now you want to pretend you have authority to tell us what to think about Sarah Palin ? Give me a break ! Your friend, Obama, is just as bad as you, having lived a privileged life with no claim to any significant accomplishment other than filling an empty suit, smiling ear to ear, and telling everyone how "great" he is. We "commoners" plan to get McCain and Palin elected whether you approve of us or not !

    • Posted By: JohnnyTLee @ 09/20/2008 5:54:41 PM

      Yes, vote GOP. They are the party which consistently robs you and send your sons to their death in order to line their pockets. SHAME ON YOU!

      • Posted By: icarus37 @ 09/21/2008 12:40:51 PM

        Isn't outer space where God is anyways? All we have to do is just look up right?! Just left of Orion...

        It's really simple: Irrational people shouldn't be in charge. If you find yourself speaking to an invisible man on a regular basis (and he tells you "things") ,you just might be irrational! But it could be worse. We could have a Christian Scientist elected. Now there would be someone who is out of touch with reality...they believe the world is an illusion and health care certainly wouldn't be an issue close to heart...
        Let's just wake up and keep our heads in the 21st century. Can we?

        • Posted By: rwrican @ 09/21/2008 2:41:25 PM

          "Sends you sons" are you so out of touch you dont realize our military is all voluntay? You know why Marines and Soliders are in Iraq fighting because they choose to be. No one joines the military in time of war with out idea they might go to war. No to mention a young man does not join the US Marines, Airborne, or Army infantry in time of war with out a desire to go to war. Most of these 19 year olds have a far mor mature idea about war then you average bush bashing dumocrate.

          • Posted By: jeffreylebowskijr @ 09/21/2008 7:28:13 PM

            How simplistic a view...do you know where the armed services get most of their recruits? From the economically desperate areas of our country with promises of signing bonuses and glossy futures (watch the ads during the NFL games today) -- ironically this same demographic elsewhere in the world is where they recruit their suicide bombers, but that's a matter for a different post.

            In any case, NO ONE in their right mind joins the armed services with a DESIRE to go to war -- they join to serve & protect, which does indeed at times mean going to war. This, however, was an entirely unjustified and unnecessary war. And by the way, McCain's on record as being for reinstituting the draft, so the whole "voluntary" point might be moot soon anyway.

            I would bet that you do not have a son or daughter in the armed services, am I correct?

            • Posted By: shawalli @ 09/22/2008 9:14:52 PM

              john mccain can't reinstate the draft, congress can. It's not the president wo makes that decision. learn how the government works before talking about policy

              • Posted By: hethrow @ 09/23/2008 3:24:55 PM

                McCain is on record as a Senator as being for the draft. Senator, as in congress. Check your facts before criticizing. Thanks.

                • Posted By: shawalli @ 09/27/2008 12:36:00 AM

                  we're talking about future presidents, not current senators

          • Posted By: Caldwell Young @ 09/22/2008 9:54:31 PM

            Terrible message. Young men join and go to war precisely because they don't really have an idea of what it means, what it costs, what it will do if they survive. It's been that way forever. That's why we send young men (and women) to war whether or not the war is justified or necessary. (THis one wasn't, remember?)
            By the way, I was in the service, so don't stereotype me, please.

          • Posted By: dark.energy363 @ 09/22/2008 3:26:25 PM

            What an idiotic statement. No one is opposed to our sons and daughters fighting in a necessary war but get this straight. I will never allow my son to fight in a war to fatten the pockets of the wealthy. Just because they consider our children expendable doesn???t mean we have to.

        • Posted By: star3 @ 09/21/2008 5:32:18 PM

          Icarus37, Jesus said "The kingdom of Heaven is within". Do you know what that means? Within can mean within ourselves, if we have the inclination to discover it, or it could mean within our own scope of reality, but unseen, because there are things we see with our physical eyes and hear with our physical ears, then there are things we see and hear with our spirtiual eyes & ears---if you have that ability to open them both up. The upper portion of the hemisphere is just that---space is unlimited, beyond comprehension, full of stars, planets, suns, and who knows what else, but one thing I do believe is that God is much closer than somewhere beyond Orion.

          • Posted By: jeffreylebowskijr @ 09/21/2008 7:33:19 PM

            Hey, there's my pal Star again. So you know why you've ever even heard of Orion? Because scientists -- rationalists -- managed to outwit and out wait your predecessors' inquisitions, burning of witches, destorying of libraries, etc. to get beyond the idea that the sun revolves around the earth, that the world is flat, and that there are sea monsters to blame for ship wrecks and witches to blame when the grain goes bad.

            Feel free to believe what you like, but please quit using it as a bludgeon against reason. Love your God all you like, but have the decency to keep your religion out of my affairs and well away from areas where reason, rationality, and logic are desperately needed to keep us from the very real and physical perils.

            • Posted By: star3 @ 09/21/2008 11:48:39 PM

              Jeff, so we meet again. I was not attempting to be preachy, since I hate that myself, but was only trying to explain MY concepts---not expecting anyone else to accept them as their own, unless they actually felt a sincere belief about it. Don't you realize you can't "give" someone a belief system, or even preach it to them enough to cause them to accept it; a belief is something that lives within you, to be nurtured to maturity by only yourself & God. He placed it in all of us, but we have to be the ones to allow it to grow, you can plant a tree, but if you don't water it, it will soon die. As for your realities and such, thats all well and good, but when you find that you have run out of all those things you have counted on, and things are still a mess, then what? You're going to need a back up plan. Oops! Sorry---I did it, didn't I? Got too "preachy". And here I'm the one who hates that sort of thing, the one who acknowledges that Jesus led, he didn't shove. O.K., I'll shut up. Enjoy your evening, I'm off here for awhile.

              • Posted By: jeffreylebowskijr @ 09/22/2008 12:12:41 AM

                Hey Star -- thanks, I actually really like your analysis there, and honestly I'm fine with whatever you believe so long as it doesn't interfere with what I believe. I'm not really looking for a backup plan -- if things go sideways for me, my country, etc., then so be it...I'm a realist at heart and I'm OK with just living this life without some future afterlife or what have you...I think this life is pretty great really and for me it's the better for not having to live by what I regard to be extraneous rules & superstitions. I like being responsible for my own actions and not foregoing what I love in the here and now for some possible future reward which I cannot conceive of. If you're right and I'm wrong then you'll have the kingdom of God here on earth and I truly hope you and the other true believers enjoy it and feel vindicated. I'll be roasting or whatever, but it's all I can do, as if this is the mind I was given by a creator, it cannot see Him though I have honestly and dutifully tried. Truth be told, I wish I would have been able to see and buy in -- it'd make my life easier, but that's not to be and so it goes. I'm off to enjoy the rest of the evening and my life. That's all I ask -- the freedom to live as I choose and have nothing dictated to me by others' beliefs. Over & out.

                • Posted By: star3 @ 09/22/2008 6:21:00 PM

                  Thanks, Jeff, you're ok, for a Democrat (just kiddin with you a bit). It seems as though you want to believe in something beyond the here & now, so I will say something here as way of explanation of MY belief, so please don't take it as an attempt to convience you. I compare faith to the wind, I have never seen the wind, but i have seen the effects of it, and i have felt its presence; sometimes, its gentle, sometimes its powerful, and sometimes its still. I, also, compare faith to the air we breathe; we can't see air (unless you live in L.A.!), but its always there when we need it. I can hold my breath until I turn blue, but as soon as I let go, and draw in a deep breath, its there, waiting for me to acknowledge that I can't live without it. So glad you enjoy the life you have, thats as it should be, and I'm not too worried about your afterlife, I have a feeling you're going to be fine there, as well. Take care, Jeff, and if you'll excuse me for this---God blessings be with you.

          • Posted By: Publicola @ 09/21/2008 9:38:53 PM

            "space is unlimited, beyond comprehension, full of stars, planets, suns, and who knows what else..." Giordano Bruno was burnt at the stake in 1600 for saying just that??? among other true things. Fortunately some independent minds survive that age to eventually develop the things like the internet, which you are now using???

    • Posted By: tpenna @ 09/25/2008 11:34:43 AM

      Do you know ANYTHING?

    • Posted By: tpenna @ 09/25/2008 11:21:21 AM

      Do you know ANYTHING?

    • Posted By: Caldwell Young @ 09/22/2008 9:41:44 PM

      Obama an elitist? No, he's someone bright enough to get to top schools, and do well in them, on the merits. I'm so tired of people who didn't learn in high school, didn't get a good education, don't read, don't think, barely repeat Republican propaganda, blaming their lazy ignorance on someone like Obama being an "elitist." He's smart, he worked hard. You're not and you didn't. If you knew anything at all, you'd know that Obama did not start out with a privileged life.

      • Posted By: star3 @ 09/24/2008 7:11:59 PM

        Caudwell, if he did so well in school, why doesn't he make his school records public? There is a big difference in being intelligent enough to do well in school and in being smart enough to run a country. Adolph Hitler was intelligent, but he was NOT smart.

    • Posted By: katies1978 @ 09/20/2008 5:57:46 PM

      You "commoners" also got George Bush elected (twice!) much to the horror of the entire world; thus enabling a trillion dollar war in an oil rich nation, triggering skyrocketing gas prices with then pushed up the cost of living not only inAmerica, but the rest of the world; enabled the death of 100 000 Iraqi civilians, and rather worryingly increased the enrollment and influence of Al-Qaeda who were barely a presence in Iraq prior to the US invasion. Whilst Americans have every right to elect an uneducated, intellectually limited person as their President, the sad truth of it is that the rest of the world has to pay for their ignorance.

      • Posted By: star3 @ 09/21/2008 1:37:56 AM

        Katie, the country was doing fine for the first six years of George Bush's presidency, so when do you think it started going to seed, and why? About two years ago? And just what happened a couple of years ago that changed? BINGO! A Democratic congress was elected! Not Bush, he was already in office; viters voted in a Democrat congress, so who do you think has caused all the problems?! BINGO, again! The congress! And who control the congress? Right---the dimocrats! Now, go chew on that for awhile before you go back to whinning about Bush.

        • Posted By: jeffreylebowskijr @ 09/21/2008 2:24:12 PM

          Oh. My. God. You have NO idea how our government actually works, do you? Not surprising, but just damn frightening how many dim bulbs we have that are so easily led. Educate yourself.

          • Posted By: star3 @ 09/21/2008 5:23:03 PM

            Jeff, my darling little innocent one, it appears YOU are the one who needs educating, you see, I HAVE educated myself, and that is why I switched from being Dimocrat to being a sparkling, bubbling fountain of knowledge on ALL aspects of their DUMMING DOWN of America policies, so I am now proud to say, i am smarter than the average bear, because I,now belong to the RIGHT side--The conservative party, otherwise known as Republican. Go tell it on the mountain, over the sea, and everywhere, just how much YOU know, little left over hippie. Hippie era, like the dinosaur era is extinct, but at least we can use dinosaur bones for fossile fuel.

            • Posted By: jeffreylebowskijr @ 09/21/2008 7:00:32 PM

              Hey Star...hmm...let's see. I have a graduate degree in history, run a successful business that employs over 200 people, and actually understand that if don't have at least 60 seats in the Senate that it doesn't matter what you want to accomplish as the president can simply veto your bill. You do know that part, right? I'm also in no way a hippie -- I *am* a social liberal, but a fiscal conservative -- your current crop of neocon amoralists are the *exact* opposite -- they are inches away from indebting all of us (you & me alike) to the tune of $1,000,000,000,000.00 to help make sure that the institutions who had an orgy on our dime these past ten years don't have to be held accountable -- all of which began with the Glass Steagall act passed by the Republican dominated Congress in 1998 with a veto proof majority. Now sir, you may call me whatever name you like, however I have a whole lot of *factual* knowledge (and yes, education) to trump whatever names you want to call. Bush, Cheney, Rove, and all their ilk since Reagan have sold out the economic future of our country, imperiled and embarrassed us around the world, done more to undermine the moral integrity of everything from our constitution to our principle of the separation of church and state, and to our respect for human rights from Iraq to Darfur to Tibet than the worst set of liberals you can possibly imagine. Don't mistake me for a Democrat -- I do not support much of what they stand for, but it is morally irresponsible and clearly against our self interest as Americans to give the Republicans one more moment of power after the massive disaster they've perpetuated on the entire world. You'd better hope that Mr. Harris is right and there is no God, because if there is and if His justice maps to your own book, then there's a slow, well-oiled spit ready for you and your ilk for following these false prophets.

              • Posted By: star3 @ 09/21/2008 11:29:59 PM

                Jeff, wow, you devoted all that space to lil old me, gosh I am, indeed, impressed. The scary part is, you actually believe all that nonsense. Yes, I know exactly how many delegates are needed, and what percentage is needed to pass a bill, and did YOU know that is exactly what happened, the democrats decided to go on vaccation just when the Republicans were attempting to get a bill voted on, Peloski took all the dimocrats out, turned off the lights, which the republicans finally managed to get back on, so there were not enough
                delegates to vote! How very "mature" of the dimocrats, wouldn't you say? Oh, and by the by, since you brought up the subject of careers, just let me say that I have a doctorate degree in psychology, which i would not normally mention, but, as I said, you mentioned your job, so just wanted to let you know you are not dealing with an under achiever. So, Jeff, anytime you think you may be in need of counciling, do feel free to let me know, and I will refer you to a good one.

                • Posted By: Ben323 @ 09/22/2008 1:27:09 PM

                  It always amuses me when a *pretender* tries to convince others of ones "credentials" in ways that expose the lie and, ultimately, and make the liar look foolish. Thank you star3, for providing the example case. As an interesting sidebar, it's seems as though it's usually those that are the least educated that feel the need to cite a "pretend" degree.

                  • Posted By: star3 @ 09/22/2008 6:28:43 PM

                    Oh, Ben, dear, misguided child....it really doesn't matter to me one way or the other what you believe concerning me, my credentials need no proof, as I am very comfortable with who I am, and as I gaze upon my diploma hanging on the wall, I know exactly who and what I am, so I need no certification from the likes of you, but appreciate your input. Have a nice day. :)

                    • Posted By: shayj @ 09/23/2008 4:50:25 AM

                      star3 - your condescending attitude alluding from your comments are more than anyone can stand. Stop it please!

                      • Posted By: star3 @ 09/23/2008 1:17:44 PM

                        Sorry, ShayJ. that was uncalled for, I'm sure you were just trying to be helpful, and so I will accept it as constructive criticism, and hope that was the context in which it was meant. Yes, some of my comments do sound a bit condescending, although it was not intentional. Guess, as with everyone, emotion often defies common sense. Anyway, thanks for your input, and I will try to refrain from sounding overly condescending.

                      • Posted By: star3 @ 09/23/2008 12:00:47 PM

                        Shayj, I am only condesending to those who ask for it; don't be one of those, and I won't "condesend" you.

                • Posted By: dark.energy363 @ 09/22/2008 3:33:55 PM

                  You might want to apply that counseling to yourself as it seems you have lost your grip on reality.

                • Posted By: jeffreylebowskijr @ 09/22/2008 12:03:37 AM

                  A psychology Ph.D. who can't spell counseling? Hmm...me thinks not. And what are you talking about delegates & Pelosi? Delegates to what? Do you mean senators? Study some history and political science and get back to me. Meanwhile, I will be spending my free time to save the world from you and your kind.

                  Here's a real question or three for you (being a psychologist and all): what do you think Mr. Milgram would say about the Republican's fear marketing operations? Or Mr. Pavlov about phrases like "tax and spend?" or Dr. Freud about your daddy/God? Read "The Future of an Illusion" if you haven't -- it's quite insightful as to the lesion Christianity has burned in so many brains...

                  Obama's going to win fairly easily when all is said and done -- I'd go ahead and save that recommendation for a counselor for yourself -- but of course, if it comes to pass the way I see it, then I guess God wanted Obama in there anyway, right?

                  'night.

        • Posted By: aleickwort @ 09/21/2008 11:11:39 AM

          Are you serious? Were you in outter space for 6 years?

      • Posted By: rwrican @ 09/21/2008 2:38:17 PM

        The war your talking about was approved by a DEM controlled senate with Joe Biden voting with GW.

        • Posted By: melbee1971 @ 09/21/2008 4:16:44 PM

          War was never declared, you need the permission by Congress to do that and George Bush never got that. He and his neocon cronies manipulated intelligence and promised limited strikes. Remember? Remember "Mission Accomplished?" Remember "Iraquis will greet us as liberators?"

          Congress approved funding for a proposal by the Bush team for what they promised would be a limited intervention into Iraq to get rid of WMD. Bush's team lied to the Congress. The Congress had no choice but to trust that the most powerful people were doing their jobs ethically. The evidence is clear, they were not. Chicken hawks and draft dodgers sent our brave sons and daughters to war based on exaggerated claims and outright lies. McCain is STILL their biggest cheerleader.

    • Posted By: nobodynoz @ 09/21/2008 1:38:59 PM

      "you probably "fratted" your way through an ivy league college at your parent's expense..."
      Isn't this exactly what G.W. Bush did?

  • Posted By: cani77 @ 09/27/2008 12:19:52 AM

    In a few weeks we will make a choice that will decide our future.
    I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly.
    Also, he perfectly predicted the current real estate market meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen in the next couple years
    is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.
    The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide the largest morgage bank in the world,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch which are 3 out of the top 5 wall street firms. Also, Fanny and Freddy Mae which hold 50 percent of the home loans in the United States.
    The government took them over because they are essentially bankrupt.If they didn't the entire financially system would virtually shut down, the stock market would crash and we would suffer beyond what any of us have seen before.

    McCain just like Bush " doesn't understand the economy".
    That not just my opinion its his own words. Not only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand exactly what is broken.
    It is no surprise that he doesn't. The people that make up these securities use complex mathematical models very few people understand.
    Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.

    Bush's economic advisor Phil Graham wrote the deregulation bill that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.
    Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain's economic policy.He is also McCain's choice for the next secretary of the treasury.
    No one in this country can afford for that to happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He either didn't care or didn't realize that anything was wrong. Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime.
    It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be
    even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a surplus like Bush did but a tanking economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit. Most of it Bush created and it will take decades to pay it back.
    If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.
    When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.
    So why are the polls even close then ?


    The chairman of McCains campaign recently said that people don't vote on issues they vote on a personality composite. Which means he is trying to sell you personality instead of results.

    He believes people will vote against their own interests.

    Let's teach him we are smarter than that .

    Hold them accountable NOW! while it will still help.

    Elect Obama Biden 2008

  • Posted By: panda69 @ 09/26/2008 10:41:17 PM

    First, your post about the mortgage industry is off the topic of this thread on Sam's article. If you have a point, please do some web surfing to find a more appropriate thread to post whatever point you wanted to make. Second, your argument is of the form, "P, not P, ha-ha." That form of argument makes you feel superior, but for the people reading this thread, no, it does not help.

  • Posted By: Davole @ 09/25/2008 9:19:13 PM

    Differences in the 2 Candidates Approaches Toward Solving the Financial Crisis:

    John McCain
    - Intuitively ready to lead!
    - I will postpone for the balance of the week my political campaign in order to participate in helping to solve the national financial crisis by investigating the proposals, and then accepting, rejecting, or modifying them.

    Barack Obama
    - Bewildered as to whether and how to respond!
    - Why isn???t this darn teleprompter working?
    - What - you expect me to actually make a decision? Can???t I just say ???Present????
    - Bill Ayers is providing my talking points - I hope they don???t ???bomb???.
    - Come on mainstream media - cover for me!
    - Oh ...err ... ah ... Did I tell you that I received an affirmative action (no, STRIKE THAT) law degree from Harvard?
    - How do you like my new empty suit?
    David Axelrod thinks that it actually makes me look competent.
    Barbara Streisand gave it to me.
    - Did I tell you that I, let???s just say, acquired some new lipstick to give to Michelle, my belle?
    It should help her to look somewhat presentable, but nowhere near as good as that intelligent capable hot babe - Sarah Palin.
    - I need a vacation - can I take another one now? I never did like America.
    - You???re just being racist by expecting me to help solve this financial crisis.
    - Let???s just CHANGE the subject, and HOPE that I can look competent next time

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 09/26/2008 2:51:50 AM

      Obviously you never saw her interview with Couric. Can you look somebody in the eye, straight faced and say, this is a person I want to be a hearbeat away from being POTUS after that interview? Unless of course you enjoy lying to yourself. Frightening prospect. You cannot compare a Harvard graduate to mediocrity. Good God wake up!

      • Posted By: News and Notes @ 09/26/2008 10:48:22 AM

        Congratulations, you stayed up all night to learn how to cut and paste.

        • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 09/26/2008 4:37:26 PM

          Where did I cut and past when I wrote my opinion, unless you are talking about somebody else

          • Posted By: Davole @ 09/26/2008 8:20:00 PM

            marksgershenson -

            Posted By: marksgershenson @ 09/26/2008 2:52:13 AM

            Does that duplicate post "ring a bell" for you?

        • Posted By: AskPlus @ 09/26/2008 1:34:05 PM

          You paste too.

          • Posted By: News and Notes @ 09/26/2008 3:35:46 PM

            Every message is individually written

      • Posted By: Davole @ 09/26/2008 8:09:54 PM

        marksgershenson -

        Obviously you never heard of Obama's group of nefarious associates!

  • Posted By: liljojo42 @ 09/26/2008 12:41:22 PM

    Thanks for speaking up for those of us who abhor the fact that someone who believes in a religious doctrine that has evolved from one of blatent hatred, discrimination, and fear-mongering to a simply more latent version of it, may take over the second most important position in the world. Thank you for speaking up for those of us who believe in that silly old constitutional principle of "separation of church and state." It's interesting that people of Palin's ilk always seem to rely heavily on the constitution when it aligns with their beliefs (i.e. gun ownership), but find that the constitution does not apply when it comes to abortion rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment (see her view on abortion in ALL cases), First Amendment freedom of speach (see her attempt to ban books with GASP!....bad words) and, of course, the separation of church and state.
    Conservatives try to misrepresent us intellecutal liberals. We don't hate you or think we're better than you. We just don't want you making ANY important decisions.

    • Posted By: Davole @ 09/26/2008 7:56:41 PM

      liljojo42 -

      Why do many of the obamabots regularly post their rants more than once on the same discussion board?

      Are they so insecure in their opinion that they think (no, change that word to feel) that if they post the same rant more than once, it will somehow magically gain more validity and importance?

      Do you have any rational reason for posting your 3 identical blogs within a 2 minute interval?

      Are you demonstrating that the attention span of an obamabot is severely limited?

  • Posted By: liljojo42 @ 09/26/2008 12:42:58 PM

    Thanks for speaking up for those of us who abhor the fact that someone who believes in a religious doctrine that has evolved from one of blatent hatred, discrimination, and fear-mongering to a simply more latent version of it, may take over the second most important position in the world. Thank you for speaking up for those of us who believe in that silly old constitutional principle of "separation of church and state." It's interesting that people of Palin's ilk always seem to rely heavily on the constitution when it aligns with their beliefs (i.e. gun ownership), but find that the constitution does not apply when it comes to abortion rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment (see her view on abortion in ALL cases), First Amendment freedom of speach (see her attempt to ban books with GASP!....bad words) and, of course, the separation of church and state.
    Conservatives try to misrepresent us intellecutal liberals. We don't hate you or think we're better than you. We just don't want you making ANY important decisions.

    • Posted By: Davole @ 09/26/2008 7:52:57 PM

      liljojo42 -

      Why do many of the obamabots regularly post their rants more than once on the same discussion board?

      Are they so insecure in their opinion that they think (no, change that word to feel) that if they post the same rant more than once, it will somehow magically gain more validity and importance?

      Do you have any rational reason for posting your 3 identical blogs within a 2 minute interval?

      Are you demonstrating that the attention span of an obamabot is severely limited?

  • Posted By: gstarr69 @ 09/26/2008 7:31:45 PM

    Thank you Mr. Harris for a wonderfully written, and thoughtfully reasoned article on why we must not ignore one of this country's most important founding principles: the separation of church and state.

    Counterintuitively, half this country insists on picking the dumbest person in the room to lead them out of a burning building.

    They've done it twice in the last eight years, and look where that's gotten them. And us.

    The long view of history describes an arc towards enlightened progressivism.
    Here's hoping that we're in a small, and temporary trough.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse