The Changing Face of Abortion

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: juliesatx @ 09/23/2008 3:36:30 PM

    Women cannot wait for men to get their act together. They have not done a very good job in my opinion of running the world. Maybe women should give it a try. I will always encourage women to live for themselves. When they empower themselves they can transcend this life. Our ability to control our fertility is vital to our liberty. Add modesty and chasteness to this, women will run the world. WE HAVE BEEN CHOSEN TO GIVE LIFE. I'm tired of reminding men of this. We have what YOU want and need. If you seek our love and self sacrifice you should earn it. Until then, look to Europe where the government is so desperate to get women pregnant that they pay you to have a baby. When this begins to happen everywhere, we will have a voice. Maybe even equal representation in government!!!

    Sex is not the problem. Sex is an absolutely vital part of who we are. The lack of embracing this fundamental part of our physiology is the real problem. Women don't often 'get it' because they are plagued with hang ups: abuse, rape, the 'good girl' 'bad girl' dichotomy, sexual dysfunction in 44% of American women, and selfish men who don't get it either. I promise if you're doing it right, your woman will want it. Men don't read self help books. They are guaranteed satisfaction in this matter, women are not. That's why the act itself has to be about us, women must demand this. Luckliy I have not experienced any of these things, only brushes with them. I have been multi orgasmic since I was 18. At 15 I was able to make a decision about my own life without my parents and because of Planned Parenthood, I was able to protect myself. I have had deep meaningful relationships with men who were unselfish lovers and I am so grateful for that. I have fantastic sex at least twice a week. I think everyone should have this. Sex is like food or water, natural, god given, and here for us to enjoy. The world would be a better place if everyone was having great sex.

  • Posted By: tjs84 @ 09/23/2008 3:36:28 PM

    In response to the comment (question?) by sj32. When one person's freedom infringes upon another person's basic human rights in a grave manner, the law must protect the weak. Neither the mother nor the child ("fetus") are more important than the other. To look at the issue like that creates a false dilemma. The real issue in this debate is about preserving basic human rights and establishing laws that will prevent individual from harming those who cannot speak for themselves (with regard to their basic human rights).

  • Posted By: mydiadem @ 09/23/2008 12:38:24 PM

    JC0101, you bring a great prespective to the debate. I've never heard anyone in the Republican party discuss the fall out of Roe v. Wade being overturned, and I've never heard MSM examine the issue and compare it with Ireland where abortion is illegal. That would be something worth discussing.
    If people want to overturn Roe. v. Wade that's their opinion, but if politicans want to and do not have concrete plans to discuss how to deal with the consequences of such an overturn in policy then they are just idealogues.

    • Posted By: JC0101 @ 09/23/2008 1:10:33 PM

      There really are a lot of issues relating to ending Roe V. Wade that are never discussed.

      Will it be illegal for someone who wants an abortion to travel from a state that bans abortion to a state that doesn't? Will police resources be used to prevent such travel? Will this conflict with an individual's constitutional rights?

      Will women who have abortions be charged with murder? Will their children be taken from them and put in foster care?

      What will be the burden of proof if a woman is claiming an exemption because her life is in danger? What if there is a 10% risk that she will die? Is this enough of a risk?

      If there is an exception for rape and incest, what is the burden of proof if a woman is claiming that she is a victim of rape or incest? Will a lot of women make fake rape claims simply to end their pregnancies?

      There really are a lot of things to consider that prolife politicians would rather not discuss.

      • Posted By: tomh_32 @ 09/23/2008 1:29:24 PM

        Put it all on the table, they'll discuss it, even if it takes hundreds of years.

        • Posted By: JC0101 @ 09/23/2008 1:36:18 PM

          Actually, they would rather not discuss it. For example, saying that there is an exemption for women whose lives are in danger sounds great. Or an examption for rape and incest. But how would these exemptions work? Do these politicians want to make it clear to all women that they will have to go to court and convince a judge to get these exemptions? Or that these requests may be denied? These politicians would come across as extremist jerks if they were honest.

          • Posted By: tomh_32 @ 09/23/2008 3:25:23 PM

            Why not make them go to court? I don't think it's asking too much to make it hard before killing a baby. Even convicted murderers have all kind of venues to appeal. Now you know what will happen if they have to go to court. A vast majority will go underground because they know they have no case. Frankly, for these mothers, I don't care if they die in the process. That would be the way nature weeds out those that don't play by her law.

  • Posted By: eva-84 @ 09/23/2008 2:26:49 PM

    Media and pro-abortion activists proclaim that it is an easy out for women who are not willing to provide for the child. There are a few types of women I can think of who use abortion as an easy way out
    1.women who have to many children
    2.women who are not married and struggling to make ends meet.
    3.prostitutes
    If these women would focus on what is important instead of sex then they wouldn???t have to visit an abortion clinic.There is more in life than sex. I wish TV shows and movies would spend less time focusing on it. But of course, America wouldn???t watch it.

    • Posted By: sj32 @ 09/23/2008 3:14:04 PM

      So are you saying that a married couple with 3 children, and don't want anymore, shouldn't have sex just because the birth control method they use might fail and she becomes pregnant with #4? What about that situation?

  • Posted By: remmah @ 09/23/2008 2:48:54 PM

    You seriously think that those "few types of women" are the only ones that have abortions??? Its time to for you to wake up and smell the coffee. There are 11 year rape victims, victims of of incest. There are military women who are raped while on duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. (of which I am a military rape crisis counselor, and yes there are many military men who are raped by other men) Do these woman deserved to be raped? And to follow that up, should they have to carry to term the result of that violent act? I sure would like to see you walk a mile in a rape victims shoes, where in addition to being sexually assaulted in a most heinous way, then having an abortion done. There is NOTHING more traumatic. Basically I am not a fan of anyone hides behind the pro-life banner...I have seen and held far too many hands and KNOW that not all women use abortion as a means of birth control. Women should be able to do whatever they want to their bodies. There are CEO's and church ministers daughters getting abortions. There are far too many "Christian" busy bodies that pre occupied with women and thier reproductive systems. Those busy bodies should spend that energy elsewhere.

    • Posted By: eva-84 @ 09/23/2008 3:11:15 PM

      I wasn???t talking about these women. They don???t use abortion as an easy way out. I believe abortion is ok when used in those circumstances. I believe abortions should be regulated so that women will not use it to run away from problems they made for themselves.

  • Posted By: littleson28 @ 09/23/2008 3:10:57 PM

    Your article fails to address the fact that older women may be opting for abortions after finding out that their unborn child has an issue of some sort, like a genetic problem. Women are able to get early prenatal diagnoses of potential issues and may be opting for abortion vs. having to deal with a child who has disabilities. Not saying I agree with it; just know that it happens.

  • Posted By: delicious @ 09/23/2008 8:47:25 AM

    Women should be able to monitor their own bodies without government interference. They want women to have this new shot that will prevent some types of cervical cancer but don't demand that men be circumcised to prevent certain types of cancer...hmmmmmm!

    • Posted By: kerryg @ 09/23/2008 2:59:01 PM

      there is no medical reason for men to be circumcised. It is a cosmetic procedure that is unnecessary unless backed by a religious or cultural belief. There is not enough evidence that the risk of penile cancer is reduced enough to warrant a circumcision mandate. Don't confuse your personal belief with medical necessity

  • Posted By: nickielane @ 09/23/2008 12:20:28 PM

    Right the 21 year olds have a brain fart and forget what they were taught when they were 12- 18???? Come on!!!! They just wanted to feel the real thing.... And then make everyone else pay for their pleasure. The same goes for the "single" mom still out there having sex when she has children at home to feed. Oh well I can't afford to feed the "result of my formicating" .... let the government and tax payers cover the cost of my bad decision. Sick! Sick! Sick! Women! Llearn to make your CHOICE before Sex!

    • Posted By: mydiadem @ 09/23/2008 12:25:16 PM

      So if a low income couple that loves each other, has children, and can't afford to have any more and also can't afford or access (if Bush and the neo-cons have their way) birth control the answer is simple. You are never allowed to have sex again. Make that 'choice' before you have sex. Makes sense to me!
      What this article does talk about is those that are still having abortions its because they can't access or afford birth control. Adults here, not children. How many 20 something women out there, happily married, can't afford to have a children right now and also can't afford $50 a month for the birth control pill?

    • Posted By: MeUnedited @ 09/23/2008 12:26:43 PM

      Uh.....where are they handing out free abortions? I don't know about anyone else but I had to pay for mine. They're not covered on insurance so you can't claim you pay for that either.

  • Posted By: teen advocate @ 09/23/2008 2:50:48 PM

    The real reason teen abortion rates have dropped is due to parental involvement laws in effect in 35 states. In all cases, rates of teen pregnancy, teen abortion and teen sexually transmitted diseases/infections have dropped. Perhaps a study needs to be done to examine why Planned Parenthood spends millions and millions of dollars to oppose these laws when they prove so effective at lowering abortion rates.

    • Posted By: JoBee20 @ 09/23/2008 2:56:25 PM

      Actually for the first time in 13 years teen pregnancy is on the rise in this country.

      And I personally oppose those "rescrictions" because they are condesending to women.

  • Posted By: Dolo @ 09/23/2008 2:55:35 PM

    The fact that fewer teens are having abortions is fabulous but the conclusion drawn that it is because teenagers have better access to birth control doesn't ring true. Rather the drop in teen abortions according to the CDC seems to be directly correlated to teens making better decisions about delaying sexual activity. States that have Parental Involvement laws surrounding abortion services are noticing the sharpest decline not only in teen abortions, but also teen pregnancies and the rate of sexually transmitted diseases. My home state of California has no reporting requirements so we cannot know what the actual teen abortion rate is and subsequently are unable to determine if it has increased or decreased over time.

  • Posted By: remmah @ 09/23/2008 2:49:11 PM

    You seriously think that those "few types of women" are the only ones that have abortions??? Its time to for you to wake up and smell the coffee. There are 11 year rape victims, victims of of incest. There are military women who are raped while on duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. (of which I am a military rape crisis counselor, and yes there are many military men who are raped by other men) Do these woman deserved to be raped? And to follow that up, should they have to carry to term the result of that violent act? I sure would like to see you walk a mile in a rape victims shoes, where in addition to being sexually assaulted in a most heinous way, then having an abortion done. There is NOTHING more traumatic. Basically I am not a fan of anyone hides behind the pro-life banner...I have seen and held far too many hands and KNOW that not all women use abortion as a means of birth control. Women should be able to do whatever they want to their bodies. There are CEO's and church ministers daughters getting abortions. There are far too many "Christian" busy bodies that pre occupied with women and thier reproductive systems. Those busy bodies should spend that energy elsewhere.

  • Posted By: thinking4myself @ 09/23/2008 2:31:17 PM

    any imbicile who would question why a mothers body is more important than that of a fetus is to ignorant to be breeding. without a health and happy mother, you get unhappy and unhealthy children. is that helping us evolve into a better society? no. it is propagating a cycle that needs to be stopped. as it is the world is over populated and people need to stop being so egomaniacal and so "oh-oh-me-me!!" and realize that this life isnt just about us or the millions of children that we wish we could have. its about the other 6.5 billion people, too. so wake up, put your bible down and try opening your eyes to the fact that the fittest are surviving much less often... and judging by your postings, wifenmother4ever, your an god-fearing nationalist. its not your duty to populate this land all by your self. have a little respect for what your putting your body through, not to mention the fact that the more children you have, the less time you have for all of them. only a republican can turn that into a lie. so in conclusion, i appreciate any educated opinion. i dont appreciate someone forcing their ideology on me or my vagina.

    • Posted By: wifenmother4evr @ 09/23/2008 2:42:31 PM

      It's just comical the assumptions that people come up with.

      • Posted By: thinking4myself @ 09/23/2008 2:47:10 PM

        i would really like to know what 'comical assumption' you are refering to.

  • Posted By: partridge @ 09/23/2008 2:43:05 PM

    What about the county health department, I always got free pills there? I have had an abortion before and they don't come cheap. My abortion in 1980 cost $300 and I had to beg borrow and steal to get the money for it. This story doesn't really ring true because it is cheaper to keep it than to abort it in the short run. Of course that isn't really true in the long run, but if you were thinking about things in the long term you wouldn't have gotten pregnant in the first place.

  • Posted By: josh22 @ 09/23/2008 2:13:33 PM

    I was wrong. I now get into it. Pro-choicers often miss they point. If you really believe the child in the womb is a person, then you in essence believe that abortion is akin to murder, and you can't sit by idly on the fence. Really, there are parallels between abortion and slavery. When the slave trade was going on a lot of people didn't think black people were 'real' people. It seems ludicrous now. And I'm a big believer in civil rights. But if you go back and read the literature, a lot of people questioned whether black people could really be considered the same as whites. Some of the things that even Abraham Lincoln said about blacks would look very racist today. And people who spoke up against the slave trade, were probably told things like if you don't believe in it, then don't own any slaves. . . don't impose your views on me, etc. In the name of freedom and so forth.
    I don't think abortion laws will be overturned in our country. I do think a baby in the mothers womb is a baby. I do think abortion is akin to murder and don't see a lot of difference between abortion and exposure, where you take a newborn and leave it out to die.
    But having said all that I don't think I can change the views of the majority in our country. We are all about 'me first' and doing what is right for me.

    • Posted By: JoBee20 @ 09/23/2008 2:42:49 PM

      Oh the irony of the tired ol??? slave analogy.

  • Posted By: zinka @ 09/23/2008 9:29:20 AM

    I have only this to say. NO ONE has the right to tell a person what to do. The government, the churcha and the Pro Life people DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT to tell another person how to live or what to do with their bodies.
    Yes an abortion should be the last resort and SHOULD NOT be used as birth control. If ROE-vs-WADE gets over turned we will force the "back alley abortion" and many women and teens will die or be unable to children.
    This is the womens choice. As always just my opinion.

    • Posted By: buddyandtricia @ 09/23/2008 9:41:23 AM

      If Roe vs Wade is overturned, it does not outlaw abortion. It gives the decision back to the state for the people of each state to vote on. One state may vote it legal, another may not. Get some education on the facts before getting all worked up and assuming anyone wants to dictate back alley abortions..

      • Posted By: zinka @ 09/23/2008 2:33:36 PM

        Where do think women who can't afford the cost of an abortion would go. They will find someone who does not apply the clean conditions and would only charge a couple hundred dollars. I do get worked up because NOBODY has the right to tell me what to do with body period. If they over turn Roe-vs-Wade, who pray tell is going to pay for these children and oh by the way who is going to pay for woman's medical treatment until the child is born. I know the Pro Lifers and bleeding hearts and maybe the churches. No that won't happen it is the tax payer who will pay. How many of these children are going to abused or killed by parents who couldn't afford them or didn't want them. most of these children will come from rape, incest or have medical probems that can't be treated in the womb or right after birth. I am done I get to upset with people who do not look at the whole picture, it is not just the woman who will have to face this problem, it will involve a whold lot more people. As always just me opinion.

      • Posted By: rogerhall @ 09/23/2008 10:19:14 AM

        That's a fairly naive assertion. History shows that many women would not have the means to travel to a legal jurisdiction to have a safe abortion. Even those that did (in times past) faced procsecution upon returning home, since the anti-liberty crowd was never satisfied simply making it illegal where they were, but also sought to persecute those who thwarted their control.

        • Posted By: tbourlon @ 09/23/2008 10:42:40 AM

          Rogerhall, that is still a problem even with abortion in all 50 states. Abortions are elective surgeries, so they are not generally done in hospitals, and most doctors refuse to perform elective abortions (even the pro-choice ones). Therefore, the number of abortion clinics is actually down. Don't you remember last year, when the state of South Dakota was in the headlines voting on whether to ban abortion? The measure failed, so that meant the ONE ABORTION CLINIC IN THE STATE was able to stay open. And in Oklahoma City (where I live) there is only one clinic, and I'd be willing to bet there are zero clinics in the small towns surrounding OKC. So yes, poor women will have to hitch a ride with someone and travel in these states, that's just the way it is.

          • Posted By: rogerhall @ 09/23/2008 10:46:36 AM

            Good point; thanks for adding. We are lucky enough to have several places in my small-big-town of ~200,000. I forget that my neighbors are already suffering.

  • Posted By: McQuirter @ 09/23/2008 1:03:37 PM

    Posted By: mydiadem @ 09/23/2008 12:25:16 PM
    Comment: So if a low income couple that loves each other, has children, and can't afford to have any more and also can't afford or access (if Bush and the neo-cons have their way) birth control the answer is simple. You are never allowed to have sex again. Make that 'choice' before you have sex. Makes sense to me!
    What this article does talk about is those that are still having abortions its because they can't access or afford birth control. Adults here, not children. How many 20 something women out there, happily married, can't afford to have a children right now and also can't afford $50 a month for the birth control pill?

    This is such a good point it needs to be posted again.

    • Posted By: jalba @ 09/23/2008 1:16:02 PM

      I'd like to know what medically necessary birth control pill costs $50 monthly? I pay $10 a month for a generic prescription but I have had many different ones over the years between children. When my doctor recently prescribed a prescription that was $40 monthly, I told her I couldn't afford it and with a simple phone call my prescription was changed. When I was in college, I used the local health department in inner city Chattanooga where I was often the only white person in the family planning area (other than one of the nurses) and they charged me on a sliding scale. I almost never even had the money to pay for what the sliding scale determined was portion but that NEVER prevented them from providing my pills and they always sent me away with a ton of free condoms. They did that for everyone automatically. I think it boils down to your personal feelings on the issue. If you don't see abortion as a sinful choice, then you'll provide reasons (excuses) all day long as to why abortion is a reasonable method for dealing with the "burden". Those of us who don't see abortion as an option, will take all precautions to prevent a pregnancy from ever taking place. It's funny, when a woman is pregnant with a child she wants, she celebrates it, telling her friends and family that she's with child. She doesn't tell them that she is with zygote, embryo, or fetus. I think you'll find this to be the case with mothers on both sides of this issue.

      • Posted By: JoBee20 @ 09/23/2008 1:26:26 PM

        No one asked for your life story. Antiodotal evidence means nothing. The cost of birth control has gone up 300% in the last two years for your information and affordable access is dependent on the state. Birth control is more affordable in California than it is in Kentucky.

        • Posted By: summer4077 @ 09/23/2008 2:03:44 PM

          I'm in Ohio and it's free if you're under a certain income...then even a sliding scale if you're over the income restrictions.

          • Posted By: JoBee20 @ 09/23/2008 2:30:02 PM

            Exactly, it varies. I grew up in California which has an excellent program set up for women that pays for reproductive health. We often used PP to get free bc because of it.

            Now I live in Nevada which has no such program and, while you can get them for a reduced cost, you still have to pay for the bc.

      • Posted By: sj32 @ 09/23/2008 1:31:20 PM

        My particular prescription for birth control pills, without using my insurance, would cost $60.00 a month. Some women are unfortunately unable to take just any old generic brand of birth control pills. For some the estrogen is too high, too low, etc. for it to be effective or for the woman to tolerate taking them. Some women have to try several types to see what works for them. If you are uninsured that can get very expensive.

        • Posted By: MoJabar @ 09/23/2008 1:43:19 PM

          So you don't use condoms? Aren't you risking all manner of S.T.D's? Go to your local S.T.D. clinic and grab a handful of condoms and save put the $60 in an rainy day abortion fund just in case.

  • Posted By: juliesatx @ 09/23/2008 4:32:34 AM

    Possibly part of the problem is the fact that Mississippi has only one abortion clinic in a state with a healthy population of minorities. I guess you only get to have choices if you can afford it. Who cares bout the women forced to have children they cannot feed? The state of kansas wanted to overturn abortion even thought they have less than 5000 a year. What no one cares about is the 200,000 children in the state who live below the poverty line.

    • Posted By: Bearfur @ 09/23/2008 4:49:05 AM

      Juliesatx
      I understand what you are saying, I know the concerns of women that feel trapped by economics when faced with an unplanned pregnancy. There really are people in the communities of our country that can help them, they are really there. I want to encourage you though to think about the baby that is going to be killed simply because of monitary concerns. It is a life, it also has rights and it also needs our help and protection. Abortion destroys women, it does not serve them. Aborting a child only compounds any and all other problems or concerns a woman is facing when unexpectantly pregnant. I work with women that have had abortions, are facing a decision about abortion and women that give of their time, money, love and compassion for those who are in this position. Please please look at the real issue, the life of the baby is the most important aspect of a woman's pregnancy, it is instinctual to love and care for her baby. A woman is to be honored and charished, she is to be loved and supported. Abortion destroys and degrades women and leaves them holding the bag when she gets off the table. May the women of the world see that there are so many who care about them, and we want to help. Please hear my heart, all of this I say to with love for you and all the women of America faced with this very hard season in their lives. There are so many of us that are here to help, please look for us before you believe the lie that you are all alone.

      • Posted By: Phoenix77 @ 09/23/2008 2:29:49 PM

        Apperantly not enough for you to make a difference. Not all women share that intict to care for their child, just open the news paper on look on the internet and you see women killing their childern after they are born, by putting them in microwaves or drowing them. If you truely believe in making a difference you should work with organizations like Planned Parenthood, instead of picketing outside their office. Put down the signs that call women whores or sinners, and truely help them. Go to places of low income and truely help them.

      • Posted By: obgynluke @ 09/23/2008 12:09:53 PM

        Julie, you live in la-la-land...i dont know where you think this utopia can exist, but it never will. you need to focus on reality, and not on some crap hypothetical existance where everyone is loved and everyone loves...

        • Posted By: roo in an igloo @ 09/23/2008 2:07:12 PM

          This is an issue about the right to choose. Not about what individuals feel is right or wrong. By taking away the right to choose you are taking away a woman's ability to make her own decisions regarding HER body. And to go back to back alley abortions is far more disturbing then people realize. Imagine a coat hanger being used to abort a pregnancy. No antiseptic, no pain killers and no way to quickly react if something should go wrong. Is this really what we want to go back too?

    • Posted By: eenar @ 09/23/2008 7:43:05 AM

      I love you! We are on the same page on everything. I live in Michigan and there are 3000 children in foster care and another 2000 with special needs. I don't see these people taking these children in their home and taking care of them. Its all fine and good in theory to save everyone, but life isn't rainbows and puppies.

  • Posted By: eva-84 @ 09/23/2008 2:24:50 PM

    Media and pro-abortion activists proclaim that it is an easy out for women who are not willing to provide for the child. There are a few types of women I can think of who use abortion as an easy way out
    1.women who have to many children
    2.women who are not married and struggling to make ends meet.
    3.prostitutes
    If these women would focus on what is important instead of sex then they wouldn???t have to visit an abortion clinic. There is more in life than sex. I wish TV shows and movies would spend less time focusing on it. But of course, America wouldn???t watch it.

  • Posted By: jim43 @ 09/23/2008 2:17:06 PM

    OK so I can understand. Abortion is Legal. OK I have no problem with a woman having the right to make a decision. I just don't understand how Abortions became illegal many years back because it was bad for women. Now its been legal for 30+ years and people are so onesided. If I sleep with 20 women 5 have a child, 6 get an abortion, 9 dont return my calls. All I hear is it's not my issue. Men Choose and Women dealwithit.

  • Posted By: Headshot @ 09/23/2008 10:16:02 AM

    First, this article shows a definite right-to-life bias when it says, "the news isn't all good" meanings that less abortions is better. The women in the higher age groups received the same education that teens are receiving. It is just that, having weighed all of their options, they made a choice. Like it or not, as long as Roe vs. Wade stands, there is no right or wrong to this question according to the law. When the founding fathers wrote the constitution, they included freedom of religion. They wanted to make sure that one religious doctrine did not unduly control the choices of others who did not believe similarly. Here, we are not allowed to force our religious beliefs on others. Without that protection, the United States would be no better place to live than Saudi Arabia or Iran.

    Second, considering that abortion statistics include all cases where morning-after pills or RU486 were prescribed (even though a viable pregnancy may not have been established), the statistics shouldn't surprise anyone. Many women have adverse mental, emotional or physical effects due to regular birth control pills and patches, and would rather just take care of any "problems" if they arise. Even though most unmarried American women usually prefer condom use during intercourse, sometimes intoxication, the heat of the moment, or faulty condoms require them to use other methods to prevent pregnancy. In addition, most men would rather not use a condom during intercourse, if given the choice by either circumstances or consent. Because of all of these reasons, how she prevents an unwanted birth is each woman???s choice.

    • Posted By: bojack27 @ 09/23/2008 11:21:43 AM

      If you read the Declaration of Independence it does say "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Now I will ask you a question.... Is this part of the declaration only refer to those who are living at that time or even this time or for future generations? It is obvious that it refers to all people living and future generations.... and if so why are we denying the unalienable rights to Life to the unborn citizens of this great country?

      • Posted By: son_shine @ 09/23/2008 11:44:29 AM

        Ok. So, maybe we should harvest sperm and eggs because together they comprise the future generations. We do not know everything and to say that a fetus, a blastocyst a cluster of cells, or whatever should have rights that supercede those of the only possible vessel they can come into the world is absurd. I don't think you baby worshippers think about how reversal of Rowe v. Wade can backfire on you too. Before you know it you'll be told how, when, where, to have your precious groves of babies. We won't be alble to help you because you turned your head when they came for us so you'll have to go to. A recent, 2008 case where for religious reasons a woman rejected a caesarian section and she and her spouse chose to try for natural birth despite the risk. The hospital WENT TO COURT and won and order forcing her to have a caesarian section. Are we in Nazi Germany? WTF?

        • Posted By: bojack27 @ 09/23/2008 2:11:35 PM

          Baby worshippers! LOL..... there is no worship here and God forbid that a child is born when a woman gets pregnant!!!! Unbelievable reasoning that you got there.... the consequences of Roe vs. Wade being overturn is just another way of saying you cannot stop me from being a murderer.... I will kill my child if I want too....

          As for the Nazi Germany comment ... I think Hitler and other racist would be proud of the form of Eugenics that is prevalent in the world today.... 42 million children are systematically murdered in the name of population control, getting rid of un-dersirables, and just to think the founder of Planned Parenthood was a racist dog.... ......

    • Posted By: rogerhall @ 09/23/2008 10:24:38 AM

      Headshot - I'm solidly pro-choice, but I feel that reducing abortions is a worthy goal in and of itself. I understand your perception of bias - but I'm not sure that it is the bias you think it is. :}

      • Posted By: Headshot @ 09/23/2008 10:43:34 AM

        As long as there is unprotected intercourse (and there will always be unprotected intercourse), due to any cause, women will need the ability to prevent unwanted births. Personally, I am against abortion, but I will always defend another person's right to choose for themselves. Whether they choose to have a child or prevent it is neither a good nor a bad thing for me because it is their choice and not mine. Morals cannot be dictated.

        • Posted By: rogerhall @ 09/23/2008 10:48:13 AM

          Right there with you. Best thing for ever'body.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse