The Changing Face of Abortion

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: getthepoint @ 09/23/2008 10:20:06 AM

    I think it is discrimination against women to say that they wont be able to understand that

  • Posted By: bloopfish @ 09/23/2008 9:56:56 AM

    Anti-Abortion Laws are Discrimination against woman???s Rights
    How can anybody allow filthy old men, usually in there 60???s and Republican, to decide what???s good for our daughters?
    Oh, and I almost forgot to mention their new puppet, A.K.A. Sarah Palin!

    check the full article at www.chilitoz.com

    • Posted By: jim43 @ 09/23/2008 10:09:01 AM

      As a Republican, Man. I may disagree a bit with you an a few issues but agree you have the right to raise your daughters as you wish. I do not agree that a woman should loose the right to choose. I do believe women are being used my men that see abortion as a choice.

  • Posted By: iveseen2much @ 09/23/2008 10:07:22 AM

    Maybe we should help women who choose life with their children.

  • Posted By: bloopfish @ 09/23/2008 10:07:15 AM

    Anti-Abortion Laws are Discrimination against woman???s Rights
    How can anybody allow filthy old men, usually in there 60???s and Republican, to decide what???s good for our daughters?
    Oh, and I almost forgot to mention their new puppet, A.K.A. Sarah Palin!

    check the full article at www.chilitoz.com

  • Posted By: juliesatx @ 09/23/2008 9:47:55 AM

    comment sadamerican2008 : Another tell, tale sign of the way the state 'cares' for women................more insurance companies cover Viagra than birth control. As long as men are able to get it up.......who cares about the consequences of his actions or impulses. If you were a woman you would know how hard it is just to convince a man to put on a condom. Women know the consequences....aside this, they still lack choice or education in many circumstances. It amazing to me that women are told to stay chaste and close your legs. Who is scrutinizing men's behavior..........no one.

    • Posted By: sadamerican2008 @ 09/23/2008 10:00:15 AM

      Juliesatx: I am a women and I have taken control. Yes, the system is screwed up when it covers Viagra but not birth control. It is also screwed up by covering the treament of cancer but not covering programs to help those stop smoking. All that said, as a woman I HAVE the right to say NO! We are not some little weak daisy;s that have to give in to the wilds of a man. With all the sex education that is covered in the schools, I dare say anyone over the age of 16 knows the pontential consequences of unprotected sex. Why do we make it so easy to erase a heartbeat for women and men not using their brain. Humans are not some wild anaimal. We have a choice not to choose unprotected sex.

      • Posted By: juliesatx @ 09/23/2008 10:05:28 AM

        I will agree to outlaw abortion when the state finds a way to stop all rape, incest and sexual abuse. As long as 1 out of 4 women will experience some form of sexual assault in their lifetime, the point is moot.

  • Posted By: rogerhall @ 09/23/2008 10:00:43 AM

    Conception and development is a natural process that spontaneously aborts more than 60% of the time (and possibly as much as 80% of the time). That means 3 or 4 out of 5 conceptions never become babies. Nature knows when a fetus shouldn't be born. Perhaps mothers know too.

  • Posted By: iveseen2much @ 09/23/2008 9:56:32 AM

    What is truly sad in this country is that, all to often, especially for women who already have children, abortion is a choice made in absolute desperation. Real choice would mean that they could raise their children in safety, health, and with all of the advantages of living in a land of opportunities. I believe many women would chose life, if life did not seem to be the more desperate choice.

  • Posted By: jim43 @ 09/23/2008 9:52:43 AM

    To all females out there. Read some comments about this article. You can debate when life starts, but I will say without and Studies being made less than 2% of women have sex so they can have an abortion. If every abortion required an operation removing a sperm sample from the man. Abortions would drop below 2%, Some men would go to jail, and Society would see how abortion as a womans right is really mans way out.

  • Posted By: CMK211 @ 09/23/2008 9:47:01 AM

    This article makes it sound like the abortion rate has gone down due to educated teens on safer sex. But couldn't it be that teenagers and women in general are still getting pregnant, but making a different decision either to keep her child or adoption, rather than abortion? This article doesn't give the entire story. They just want to pat the experts on the back for educating teens on birth control, but maybe they should pat the women on the back fo rmaking a decision other than abortion.

  • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 09/23/2008 9:36:53 AM

    One of the factors in reducing teen pregnancy rates, and therefore teen abortion rates, is the contraceptive depo provera. It is an injection given 4 times a year. Studies have shown that teens are notoriously forgetful about taking a pill once a day, but getting an injection once every few months is much easier. Once they turn 18, however, many lose their health insurance - depo is expensive - and their contraceptive choices involve more work, and more money. Contraceptive failure - or no contraceptives at all - is more common.

    It is no surprise that poorer women have more abortions - knowing you may be bringing a child into the world that you can't provide for is frightening. Remember the scene from "The Good Earth" by Pearl S. Buck? The lead character kills her infant child at birth because her family is starving.

    Historically, when times are tough, women are forced to make tough choices.

    If we want to lower the incidence of abortion, we must take better care of women, and provide them with affordable contraceptive choices, for all age groups.

  • Posted By: lunahumming @ 09/23/2008 2:10:12 AM

    Isis Skye, While I am decidedly pro-choice, I DO think abortion in and of itself IS a negative thing. It really should be a last resort after proper education and birth-control. I, however, think this article is asking the wrong question. They're discussing education of 20-29 year olds........I don't think we are meant to education them now........they are the product of their time.........we should be asking, what were we, as a society, doing when THEY were teenagers? What is the message we were sending about sex to them THEN?

    • Posted By: VAMOM2-2 @ 09/23/2008 9:32:19 AM

      I do not think the problem is education. You are correct, these 20-29 year olds already know that unprotected sex could lead to pregnancy. Perhaps they are just immature and reckless, but it is probably more likely that these women do not have the money to get birth control, or lack of good health care insurance. Also, I am 35, married for 15 yrs., have 2 children and my husband promised after the 2nd (if it was a boy) that he would get a vasectomy. My son will be 3 in a few weeks, still no snip. He doesn't want to use condoms, so at this point we are having very little sex, which he complains about. Some people need to remember that men and women decide to have sex, it is a joint decision, not just the woman's.

  • Posted By: mco2008 @ 09/23/2008 9:30:39 AM

    The decline in abortion rates among teens mirrors a decline in teen pregnancies--from 107 for every 1,000 teenagers ages 15-19 in 1982, to 75 per 1,000 teenagers in 2002 (the most recent year for which data is available).

    sicntired, don't you read?

  • Posted By: clduckett @ 09/23/2008 9:28:35 AM

    As a sexually-active male, I have always felt responsible for making sure that birth control was properly used, however i've been with female partners who really didn't think about it until I broached the subject. Come on! If these woman had been with a partner less amenable then myself who knows where they'd have ended up? I realized that these women were likely dim-witted, so didn't want to be with them anyway. If they didn't respect themselves enough to practice a modicum of sexual intelligence, they sure as heck weren't going to respect me down the line or respect the life of their fetus should they become impregnated.

  • Posted By: forklift girl @ 09/23/2008 9:27:34 AM

    As someone who had an abortion, I have some thought as well. I am a minority (American Indian) and at the time, I was 21, still in college and could not see how I could disappoint and hurt my family by telling them about my pregnancy. I also could not fathom taking care of a child, going to school, etc. It was too much for me mentally - and I was on birth control. It has been 5 years, I am on a stronger form of birth control (I am limited because of a genetic clotting disorder so that makes it more diffiicult) and I am still dating the same man. There are some negative effects from abortions emotionally but I feel that it was the best decision for me at the time, although not necessarily the right decision from a Christian perspective. But I knew I would not be a good mother as I was too young and selfish and I would resent my own child. How fair would that have been? I also knew the likelihood of that child ending up as a ward of the state and I didn't think that was fair, either. So I made a decision that I have to live with. It does not haunt me every day as it used to but people need to understand the consequences of such an action and be prepared to live with it. My boyfriend also experienced some of the same thoughts, etc. because he went through this with me. Sometimes, it just is what it is.

  • Posted By: sicntired @ 09/23/2008 9:27:06 AM

    So we have numbers on abortion rate, but do we have numbers on teen pregnancy? I don't think this is any reflection on the sex education these youth are receiving but simply a relfection in the shift in moral standards. My guess is that teen pregnancy is at an all time high... just a thought

  • Posted By: Horace F. @ 09/23/2008 9:16:52 AM

    What do you mean by "But the news isn't all good." Isn't Newsweek a news magazine. I think your editorializing opinion is out of place in a "news" piece.

  • Posted By: GlobalNomad @ 09/23/2008 6:15:33 AM

    When I was in my early 20s I lacked health insurance (like so many others). I put off doctor visits because I simply couldn't afford them. Since a prescription is needed for birth control pills (and many other of the most-effective contraceptives), I would have had to rely on other, less-reliable, methods of contraception. I am thankful for the availabiltiy of Planned Parenthood where I lived, where I could continue to affordably renew my birth control prescriptions, but that is not an option in many places in the country.

    What is pro-life about lack of access to health care? Why does concern for the health of a child and its mother seem to end at birth? The U.S. has one of the highest rates of infant mortality in the developed world, largely due to lack of pre- and post-natal healt care. A conservative, Catholic, pro-life (at least, anti-abortion) friend of mine seems to find no logical disconnect in her opinion that she should not have to support (through Medicare, Medicaid, or any other government program) people who can't afford doctors and medicines, even if they die because of the lack. Is this pro-life?

    • Posted By: Bearfur @ 09/23/2008 6:46:49 AM

      GlobalNomad
      Just a quick note, I have to get some sleep. The lack of affordable healthcare is a BIG problem in our country. Anyone who doesn't know that is, well, you know. I have to ask you though, knowing that contreceptives and even most-effective contreceptives are not a guarantee that you won't get pregnent, if Planned Parenthood really cared about you as a women, why would they be so willing to give them to you? (For a price of course, even if it is less) Did anyone at Planned Parenthood tell you about the dangers of the contraceptives you were taking? Did they provide you with any research at all about the dangers to you and your future children when using them? The pill is one of the most dangerous medications (if you want to call it that) a woman can take. If your still taking it please look into it's long term dangers. If they were selling you condoms were they giving you the staggering statistics on STDs at the same time. I am thinking they didn't but if they did please let me know, it would be a first and I have talked to many many many women that said they didn't.
      Pro-life is about life, we, the human race, men and woman alike need to be about the business of preserving life in and out of the womb. Supporting an organization that destroys life behind a front of providing (dangerous) contaceptive products to women is something most people do not want to do. There should be proper care for all man kind. Planned Parenthood doesn't fit that bill, not even close. Please get the following book about abortion in America "Line 5". No doubt society has a long ways to go in helping women with unplanned pregnancy. However, Planned Parenthood kills babies. 4000 die every day from abortion, that truly is not in the catagory of "access to health care".

      • Posted By: VAMOM2-2 @ 09/23/2008 9:15:01 AM

        I would disagree with your comment that birth control pills are dangerous. I took them for at least 8 yrs. I was never concerned about my health because I read the information pamphlet in the pack that warned against smoking and other conditions. Also I believe that they have done studies that show that women who take birth control have lower rates of some cancer. Today's BCPs are more safe that when I was taking them 18 yrs. ago. They have the smallest effective doses. As with anything else, you as the consumer must do your research to help and protect yourself.

      • Posted By: GlobalNomad @ 09/23/2008 7:53:42 AM

        I am very informed about risks and statistics, and Planned Parenthood certainly made certain I was. Condoms are highly effective against STDs - if they are used properly. The current birth control pills have limited dangers, and most of those apply to specific risk groups such as smokers. All are a better option than using nothing. Abstinence is the only 100% effective method of prevention for individuals, but has never been an effective method to rely on as a society (even without accounting for rape - which adds a whole new level to the conversation). And singles are not the only ones who have no desire for an unplanned pregnancy. I was in a long-term, monogamous relationship (so STDs weren't an issue) and eventually married that person. I still needed access to affordable birth control. While birth control isn't 100% effective across the population, it was 100% effective for me. Access to contraceptives and health care can help prevent abortions to begin with. I never had to face the decision on whether or not to continue a pregnancy because I was able to avoid an unwanted pregnancy until such time as it was no longer unwanted.

    • Posted By: Bearfur @ 09/23/2008 6:54:15 AM

      Sorry, the name of the book is "Lime 5".

      Goodnight

  • Posted By: agmcallister @ 09/23/2008 9:10:49 AM

    I would also wager that once women reach the 20 -24 year range they may have less access to contraception. As teens they are on the parents plan and as they get older they may be on their employers or spouses plan. The most vunerable age for not having health care is probably within this age group so the women use less safe methods of contraception. Unfortunately, once pregnant, they realize they don't have the emotional or financial ability to have the child so they consider abortion as a valid option. Universal health care would probably decrease the rate.

  • Posted By: agmcallister @ 09/23/2008 9:09:47 AM

    I would also wager that once women reach the 20 -24 year range they may have less access to contraception. As teens they are on the parents plan and as they get older they may be on their employers or spouses plan. The most vunerable age for not having health care is probably within this age group so the women use less safe methods of contraception. Unfortunately, once pregnant, they realize they don't have the emotional or financial ability to have the child so they consider abortion as a valid option. Universal health care would probably decrease the rate.

  • Posted By: jomack @ 09/23/2008 8:57:57 AM

    The reason the abortion rate for teens is dropping is because more and more teens are having babies. Teen pregnancy seems to be on the rise and becoming very common here in Texas. That and the fact that the gov't has been slowly chipping away at Roe v. Wade. It's less shameful to have a baby at 14 then it is to have an abortion that is completely private. I'm not so sure this is a good statistic.

    • Posted By: summer4077 @ 09/23/2008 9:07:49 AM

      The rates have fallen since 1990, considerably so. However, they have increased slightly in the past 2 years. Overall, though, fewer teens are having babies than in previous decades. I think that since it's more acceptable these days you just see it more. Gone are the days of the pregnant teen being hurried off to a hiding spot until she gave birth, only to pass the child off as a sibling or niece.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse