What is it Really Going to Cost?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 09/28/2008 5:45:10 PM

    In 2005, for the first time in history, a serious Fannie and Freddie reform bill, S. 190, was passed by the Senate Banking Committee. The bill gave a regulator power to crack down, and would have required the companies to eliminate their investments in risky assets. If that bill had become law, then the world today would be different. But the bill didn't become law, for a simple reason: Democrats opposed it on a party-line vote in the committee, signaling that this would be a partisan issue. Republicans, tied in knots by the tight Democratic opposition, couldn't even get the Senate to vote on the matter.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0



    In support of S 190, also known as the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, John McCain said: "For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac--known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs--and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO's report this week does nothing to ease these concerns. In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO's report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay."

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=109-s20060525-16

    Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005 would have Amended the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 to establish: (1) in lieu of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), an independent Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Agency which shall have authority over the Federal Home Loan Bank Finance Corporation, the Federal Home Loan Banks, the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac); and (2) the Federal Housing Enterprise Board.
    Most importantly with regard to the CDS situation, S. 190 set forth operating, administrative, and regulatory provisions respecting: (1) assessment authority; (2) authority to limit nonmission-related assets; (3) minimum and critical capital levels; (4) risk-based capital test; (5) capital classifications and undercapitalized enterprises; (6) enforcement actions and penalties; (7) golden parachutes; and (8) reporting. Adoption of these regulatory provisions would have undoubtably affected the way CDSs were dealt with in "private" enterprises.
    The bill would have also amended the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to establish the Federal Home Loan Bank Finance Corporation., and transfered the functions of the Office of Finance of the Federal Home Loan Banks to such Corporation. If this had been in place three years ago, this whole situation might have been averted.

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-190&tab=summary

  • Posted By: jccalif @ 09/28/2008 4:46:42 PM

    What it's going to cost is the collapse of the dollar and hyperinflation

    The $700 billion bailout plan will result, very quickly, in the collapse of the dollar and hyperinflation.

    The US economy does not have $700 billion in spare cash to buy up the $700 billion in Treasury notes that need to be issued to finance this bailout. If our economy did have that kind of surplus money, we would not be in this "liquidity crisis" that is locking up our financial system . We will need foreign investors to buy even more of our debt. But already a huge amount of our national debt and private debt is being held by foreigners, including sovereign governments like China. When the Federal Reserve prints up an additional $700 billion in money to be be sold as Treasury notes, the result is a significant devaluing of the dollar. (Consider, too, that the Bush administration is already running up a $400 BILLION budget deficit this year that needs to be financed, so that brings us up to $1.1 TRILLION for the year.) That means the dollars that foreign investors hold will be worth less. But foreign investors aren't stupid, they can see this coming. To protect themselves they will start selling off dollars before they get devalued. Once the dollar starts dropping, the decline will accelerate, as no one wants to be stuck with dollars as they spiral down. (This is what happened to stocks in financial companies recently, the downward trend scared investors and everyone starting bailing out.) When the dollar is going down, no one wants to be the "last man standing", the one still holding dollars that are now worth
    a fraction of what they were after everyone else has dumped theirs. It's going to be "sell quick or
    be left holding the bag." Thus, a collapse of the dollar.

    With a collapsed dollar and the Fed still printing money to finance this $700 billion bailout, we end up with hyperinflation.

  • Posted By: JoelP @ 09/27/2008 8:24:15 AM

    How much of the bail-out money will go directly to the CEOs and executives who caused the problem, and how much of it will go to lobbyists for the banking industry?

    • Posted By: Holly Garfield @ 09/27/2008 10:44:56 AM

      The bailout is buying stuff that is worth about (since nobody really knows for sure) what the government is paying for it, or at least will be worth what the government pays for it when the economy recovers. The negotiations include limits for management golden parachutes. Your answer is nothing goes directly to Wall St. bigwigs. It goes into the bank's balance sheets so that the banks can make loans to their customers. The Wall St. bigwigs may end up losing if they decide to take an 'early retirement.'

      Another related question is what do everyday people get? The answer is they get to buy cars and homes, get home improvement loans, credit cards, personal loans, etc. Businesses get payroll loans, capital improvement loans, loans for raw materials and operating expenses. This is the logjam the bailout is designed to end. Banks don't have cash to make loans because they can't sell these toxic debts for any price now. Banks are leery of making short term loans to each other, which is the normal way for them to get cash for loans. Once the economy turns around the bad debts will end up with a market where the Treasury can sell them back.

      It means people get to keep their jobs, buy homes and cars and get their paychecks on time. Retired people can stay retired.

      I have my home mortgage through Ind Mac, my credit card and a home equity loan are through WaMu. What has changed for me??? NOTHING. I pay online and the websites don't even change. I did receive a rebate offer through WaMu, so I'm coming out ahead. I may even get a better deal if I end up defaulting on my mortgage.


      • Posted By: jccalif @ 09/28/2008 3:40:43 PM

        Holy Garfield, you are wrong, the banks CAN sell that toxic debt, and have been doing so, and one sale was noted last week at 22 cents on the dollar. The problem is that banks DON'T WANT to sell at those prices, because it hurts their bottom line so badly. Ben Bernanke has made it clear that the intention is NOT to buy this toxic debt at the going price or an auction price, but at a hypothetical "mark to book" value which is much higher and far more that this toxic debt is worth, his rational is that that is how we provide "liquidity:" "Liquidity" is just a euphemism for "bailout". And to pay more for these assets than they're worth means that there is no chance taxpayers will ever get their money back.

        To talk about "what do everyday people get", well, we can "get" all those loans we still need WITHOUT dumping these funds on Wall Street banks that have made some very bad business decisions. You know, MOST of the banks in this country don't have a problem, and small and regional banks are still lending and doing just fine. The same with credit unions. If we need to inject liquidity into the economy, we can lend money to these smaller banks and credit unions, accomplishing what we need to do without bailing out the badly managed institutions that got us into this mess to begin with.

        150 economists, including 3 Nobel Prize winners, have come out against this bailout! Google it to find the story.


  • Posted By: westerlu @ 09/28/2008 2:17:46 PM

    I totally agree with gizzy8z8. Why not solve the problem from the ground up and not reward the people and companies that caused the problem in the first place. I would love to be able to pay my debts, buy a house a car and know where my next meal is coming from. (I am a former classroom teacher with a master???s degree) due to chronic illness I am unable to work full time. This would help so many people in my and worse situations to have pride and feel useful in today???s money run society. By Paying off my debts the creditors will have more money to lend, by paying off my student loans more people will get financial aide. By buying a house, someone will be out from under a mortgage. Getting my finances caught up will allow me to mend my credit and borrow money from the companies that are still in business due to good practices and in the long run it will do more for the economy than putting a band aid on the issue to be ripped off later when it makes things worse. It is common sense that this will work. But, congress and big business will not go for it because it will take money out of their pockets and they would not be able to control what we spend it on which will drive them mad.

    • Posted By: gizzy828 @ 09/28/2008 3:00:00 PM

      I have sent this to every congressman, woman, senator, governors, vice pres. Pres. and anyone I could think of..Maybe if more of the United States Citizens of the United States would do this, our tiny voices might be heard...Enough is Enough, we have been puppets on the government strings long enough..We as Americans should not be afraid of the government, it is time the government become afraid of the American Citizens...Thank you

  • Posted By: westerlu @ 09/28/2008 2:17:27 PM

    I totally agree with gizzy8z8. Why not solve the problem from the ground up and not reward the people and companies that caused the problem in the first place. I would love to be able to pay my debts, buy a house a car and know where my next meal is coming from. (I am a former classroom teacher with a master???s degree) due to chronic illness I am unable to work full time. This would help so many people in my and worse situations to have pride and feel useful in today???s money run society. By Paying off my debts the creditors will have more money to lend, by paying off my student loans more people will get financial aide. By buying a house, someone will be out from under a mortgage. Getting my finances caught up will allow me to mend my credit and borrow money from the companies that are still in business due to good practices and in the long run it will do more for the economy than putting a band aid on the issue to be ripped off later when it makes things worse. It is common sense that this will work. But, congress and big business will not go for it because it will take money out of their pockets and they would not be able to control what we spend it on which will drive them mad.

  • Posted By: gizzy828 @ 09/28/2008 12:36:59 PM

    I am against the bailout of AIG. Instead, I'm in favor of giving 85 billion to America in a We Deserve it Dividend. To make math simple, lets assume there are 200,000,000 bonifide US Citizens 18+. Our population is about 301,000,000+/- counting every mn, woman and child. So 200,000,000 might be a far sta at adults 18 and up. So divide 200 million adults 18+ into 82 billion, that equals 425,000.00. My plan is to give that to every person 18+ as We Deserve It Dividend. Of course it would not be tax free so lets assume a tax rate at 30%. Every individual 18+ would pay 127,000.00 in taxes, thatsends 25,500,000,000 right back to Uncle Sam, but it means that every adult 18+ has 297,500.00 in their pocket. A husband and wife has 595,000.00. What would you do with that money in your family? Pay off your mortgage, housing crises solved..repay college loans, a great boost to new grads..Put away money for college, it'll be there..Save in a bank, create money to loan to entrepreneurs..Buy a new car, create jobs..invest in the market, capital drives growth..pay for your parents medical insurance, health care improves..Enable Deadbeat Dads to come clean or else..Remember this is for every adultUS Citizen 18+ includingthe folks who lost their jobs at Lehman Bros., and every other company that is cutting back. And of course, for those servg in our Armed Forces. If we're going to re-disribute wealth let's do it, instead of trickling out a puny $1,000.00 (vote buy) economic incentive that is being proposed by one of our candidates for President. If we're going to do an $85 billion bailout, let's bail out every Adult US Citizen 18+..As for AIG, liquidate it, sell of its parts. Let American General go back to being American General. Sell off the real estate. Let the private sector bargin hunters cut it up and clean it out.. Here's my rational. We deserve it and AIG doesn't. Sure, it's a crazy idea that can never work. Maybe???? But can you imagine the Coast to Coast Block Party? How do you spell Economic Boom? I trust my fellow adult Americans to know how to to use 85 billion. We Deserve It Dividend...more than I d the geniuses at AIG or in Washington DC. And remember, this plan only costs 59.5 billion because 25.5 billion i returned instantly in taxes to Uncle Sam

  • Posted By: gizzy828 @ 09/28/2008 12:09:22 PM

    I wonder if the bailout takes place what kind of bonus checks the politicians will be receiving? They should all give up those bonus checks to the poverty sticken people of the United States, they should all give up half of their pay checks to the American people. Why should we continue to pay for their lavish life style? They should all be made to live like the rest of us. Their silk suits, lavish lunches, million dollar homes, xpensive cars, etc. and live like they have forced us to live..I for one am tired of being their puppet on their strings..We as the American People should start fighting back. Not be afraid of them, they should be afraid of us and what we could do and not do. We have abided by their rules long enough. Why are so many Americans afraid to stand up and fight back? I have written every congressman, woman, senator, president, vice president, every elected official I can think of voicing my opnion, where it will get me? I have no idea, but I am letting them know how discusted I am with all of them and their scare tactics. I will continue to voice my opnion to them and let them know what they have done to us....We can't take it anymore...We are living in poverty and it has got to stop....

  • Posted By: williambanzai7 @ 09/27/2008 10:28:12 PM

    TARP BAILOUT THRILLER NIGHT (Final version)
    (Michael Jackson's Thriller)
    WilliamBanzai7

    It's Midnight this late September night and the street is full of Politicians, Lurking in the Dark.
    Under The Moonlight, You See A Sight That Almost Stops Your Heart.
    You Try To Scream, But Terror Takes The Sound Before You Make It.
    Debt Markets Start To Freeze, As Horror Looks You Right Between The Eyes,
    Your Paralyzed

    You Hear The Door Slam, And Realize There's Nowhere Left To Run.
    You Feel The Cold Take Hold, And Wonder If You'll See the Mother of All Bear Runs
    You Close Your Eyes, And Hope That This Is Just Imagination,
    But All The While, You Hear The GOP Pachydermata Creepin' Up Behind
    You're Out Of Time

    They're Out to Get You, There's Demons Closing In On Every Side.
    They Will Possess You, Unless You Change The Number On Your Skype.
    Now Is the Time for You and Your Trading Quants to huddle Close Together
    All Thru The Night, It'll Save You From The Terror On The Reuter Screen,
    It'll Make You See:

    (narrated by Vincent Price)
    Darkness Falls Across The Land, The Asian Trading Day Is Close At Hand.
    Bottom Feeders Crawl In Search Of Blood To Foreclose on Your Neighborhood
    And Whosoever Shall Be Found Without The Soul For Economic Bust
    Must Stand And Face The Hounds Of Subprime Hell, And Rot Inside WaMu's Bankrupt Shell.

    The Foulest Stench Is In The Air The Funk Of 700 Billion Bailout Bucks
    And Shortselling Ghouls From Every Trading Room Are Closing In To Seal Your Doom
    And Though You Fight To Stay Alive Your Net Worth Starts To Shiver
    For No Investing Mortal Can Resist The Evil Of The TARP Bailout Thriller

    'Cause this Is Thriller, TARP Bailout make or break Night
    and No-ones Gonna Save You from the Beast about to Strike.
    You Know its Thriller, TARP Bailout Thriller Night
    You're fighting for Your Monetary Life inside a Killer, Thriller.

    Thriller, TARP Bailout Thriller Night
    'Cause I can thrill you More Than Any Market Ghoul Could ever try. (Thriller, Bailout Night)
    So Let Me Hold You Tight And Share A Killer, Chiller, Fiscal Massacre
    Thriller Here Tonight.

    'Cause this Is Thriller ,TARP Bailout Thriller night
    It Will Thrill You More Than Any Ghoul Could ever dare try
    Any Ghoul could ever Dare Try

    (Daddy, can I be TARP for Halloween? No deary...its too scary! Be something funny
    like the McCain campaign )

    http://williambanzai7.blogspot.com/

  • Posted By: it's about the future @ 09/27/2008 3:01:23 PM

    TO NEWSWEEK FOLKS:
    Please REMOVE the racist and inflammatory remarks by
    "Iatethe whole thing".
    Please keep the credibility of this site.

  • Posted By: it's about the future @ 09/27/2008 2:56:39 PM

    Please take off the nasty and demeaning comments by
    "Iate the whole thing"/
    Please let us know that this is not OK.
    I did press the
    Report Abuse button several times.
    Thanks a lot.

  • Posted By: perrin @ 09/26/2008 7:18:04 PM

    As Mr. Samulson states, "the whole idea of the bailout is to help banks and other financial institutions get rid of risky assets and replace them with cash that would encourage a resumption of normal lending and investing".

    Normal lending and investing? ... Yea right. If the "Lending Guru's" go back to biz as usual to pad their bottom line, we may never really know what their real worth is. How about investing in that?...... And don't think you can feed me crap about limiting execs compensation, I'm not a fool. Next time you pay your taxes just remember you're contributing to their kid's new jet ski fund.

  • Posted By: TonyZikesh @ 09/26/2008 3:25:36 PM

    Let's get a deal like Warren Buffet got where he was able to loan 5 billion and get 10% dividends with the option to buy more! WAMU went into bankrupsy and was bought out by another company not costing the FDIC or the taxpayers a penny. There has to be a way to force more responsibility on the corporations that mismanged corporate assets and those that took out morgages they could not pay.......

  • Posted By: TonyZikesh @ 09/26/2008 3:22:35 PM

    WHy can't we get a plan like Warren Buffet did - he gets 10% dividends and options to buy more! Look at the WAMU buy-ot - It didn't cost the FDIC a penny. Sure they went bankrupt, but that is what happens when they don't do their jobs and lend money to unqualified people!

    Tony Z.

  • Posted By: sieg6529 @ 09/26/2008 1:53:04 PM

    Witness the rise of socialism under a Republican president. All those comparisons between Dems and socialists ring so hollow now. So now, the biggest difference between the two parties is essentially gay rights and abortion?

    • Posted By: MoJabar @ 09/26/2008 2:34:44 PM

      I know what you mean, Republicans used to accuse Democrats of being "Tax and Spend"; Republicans are spendthrifts on a binge. They should take a lesson from the Democrats. Whatever social programs Barrack and Nancy P. want couldn't cost more than two wars and bailing out banks.

  • Posted By: votenic @ 09/26/2008 1:21:21 PM

    See what should be done about the bailout here:
    http://www.votenic.com

  • Posted By: panhandle @ 09/26/2008 1:14:32 PM

    Be nice now to have all the money wasted and stolen - and still being wasted and stolen - in Iraq reconstruction. Be nice to have a President who wasn't always begging Americans for more money. Be nice to have someone in the financial sector with a conscience. Be nice to just have some responsible leadership in this country. For a change.

  • Posted By: TruthForward @ 09/26/2008 12:31:55 PM

    $700B is almost a trillion ($300B short). I wonder how much it would cost the economy if there was a small bailout or no bailout. And frankly, it seems that there will be a recession anyway, but how bad will it be.

  • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 09/26/2008 9:44:01 AM

    You are all targeting the wrong crowd. The biggest culprits are the "average Joe???s" who over borrowed and now can???t repay what they owe. No one held a gun to their head and told them to buy a house they can't afford, or buy items on credit. Blame yourself people, you were the greedy "debt" addicts and now you are blaming those that gave you the "OPTION" to borrow. It is hilarious how no one on this board takes responsibility for this crisis - it's your fault.

    • Posted By: RO in Reno @ 09/26/2008 11:49:51 AM

      So you think the problem is caused by people who wanted a home so they bought into interest only loans becasue they were greedy "debt additcs"

      Most of these people don't know what amortization or even how to spell it. and were stunned when their payments doubled and then tripled. These people now have nothing to show for the years they were able to make their payments.
      A loan that doubles and then triples is a loan designed for foreclosure, and the banks knew that upfront.

    • Posted By: MoJabar @ 09/26/2008 11:32:19 AM

      Fred, I have perfect credit, I pay every bill on time, I pay my mortgage as agreed; I've never played fast and loose with credit. So, in fact, I don't deserve to pay the bill for irresponsible morons who signed up for exotic mortgages with balloon payments, etc. Nobody bails me out. I get nothing from this bailout aside from having to pay the bill; and firm knowledge that our 'free market system' is a sham.

  • Posted By: RO in Reno @ 09/26/2008 11:41:49 AM

    Paulson is missing the point as are most of these so called economic experts.
    The failure of the investment banks is due to mismanagement plain and simple, the bailout would only continue the mismanagement, at least for the short term and then we see failure rise again.

    These so called economists and economic experts continue to see only the short side. Touting "supply side economics is fine; but at some point they will have to come to the obvious conclusion, the people in the US are not the supplier who benefits, China and India is.

    Saving these same bankers because the bottom dropped out of the housing market is just as short sighted, the housing prices have and are making a correction based on supply and demand, Concern about so many people suddenly with upside down loans is not the fault or a problem that every single American should be responsible for, the fact is they paid too much in the beginning and now are faced with the true value of their purchase.

    Paulson is trying to again raise the price of housing when a recent survey in Florida concluded 85% of buyers could not qualify for a median priced home, so we want to raise housing prices? For what so 100% cannot qualify?
    Paulsons insight is just incredible, in view of its shortcomings, but it is true of most of the financial wizards, they see only the little picture, profit for the institutions.
    The real problem is people simply cannot afford to participate in the economy, because they have been excluded from it, the people Paulson and his ilk fail to see except for the occasional reference to the consumers.
    It's time for these people to come to the conclusion trickledown economics does not work for any but the very few and fix it from the bottom up.

  • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 09/26/2008 9:43:48 AM

    You are all targeting the wrong crowd. The biggest culprits are the "average Joe???s" who over borrowed and now can???t repay what they owe. No one held a gun to their head and told them to buy a house they can't afford, or buy items on credit. Blame yourself people, you were the greedy "debt" addicts and now you are blaming those that gave you the "OPTION" to borrow. It is hilarious how no one on this board takes responsibility for this crisis - it's your fault.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse