SPONSORED BY:

The Naked Truth

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The final frontier in nudity was male, which apart from Michelangelo's "David" was a taboo in the arts until recently. Richard Gere broke a barrier with 1980's "American Gigolo" as the first mainstream heartthrob to appear fully nude in a big studio picture. But theater was probably where it became normalized. In 1994, The Washington Post ran an article about more nudity on stage, fuelled by dramas about the AIDS crisis—like "Angels in America" and "Love! Valour! Compassion!" where the entire casts goes skinny-dipping on stage. A 2005 survey in The New York Times found that in the previous 15 years, 25 plays featured full frontal nudity, and 40 of the 50 naked people in those plays were men. It was only then that Hollywood caught up, as homophobia waned and male actors took bigger risks. Among the most daring is Viggo Mortensen, who played an entire fight scene upon losing his towel in a steam bath in last year's "Eastern Promises." This year, Jason Segel lost his towel, too, in "Forgetting Sarah Marshall," though his nudity is played for laughs. Even Bart Simpson drops his shorts in "The Simpsons Movie." When Daniel Radcliffe does it onstage, it doesn't seem risqué anymore. Actually, it seems quaint.

With Sarah Ball

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: rlobn @ 09/26/2008 5:56:40 PM

    A few misguided parents may have objected. The evidence is quite conclusive, prudery is harmful and it is especially harmful to children. The differences are not small. Try comparing outcomes for teenagers in the USA with say Denmark or The Netherlands. Pregnancy and abortion both about ten times higher. young people become sexually active about 6 months to a year younger. STDs much more common. For example Gonorrhea about 70 times more likely. Attitudes that have that effect can only be described as child abuse.

  • Posted By: westwingpotus @ 09/26/2008 4:48:54 PM

    I realize that the media today has to make news when there isn't any news, but actually writing an article about the fact that there isn't any news is a first. Ramin Setoodeh has managed to make himself simply look out touch. (Honest to God Newsweek, where did you get this guy? A cave?)
    Think about it, he's managed to churn out an entire article about a NON-issue in the theatre and poses a question to which the answer has been "No", for 40+ years. Where has he been? Did he miss the non-issue that was "Take me Out" (or a dozen other shows I could name just in the last 20 years) What's next, a expose on the fact that no one cares seems to care that women were given the right to vote? LOL Going to the theater tends to take more planning and effort than wandering into your multiplex at the mall and theater patrons tend to be better educated about the productions they see. They want, expect, and accept more from theatre and always have.
    As for Radcliffe, I understand that he gives a very nice turn in this role, although I haven't had the opportunity to see it yet. (I have ticket for December) Sure, there are always going to be the few freaky HP fan that can't make the distinction between character and actor. But in reality, one only has to go to the multitude of harry potter fan boards to see overwhelming support for this young man and his endeavors to grow as an actor. JK Rowling has seen Equus and you're not going to get anyone who is much more protective of Harry Potter than that, and her fans to their credit, take their cue from her.
    Ramin, obviously you had a deadline and yet, had nothing to write about. But when you have nothing to say, it really is best that you just remain silent, you look less foolish that way. But I guess I can look forward to your next article telling me the sky may be blue, but no one seems to care.

  • Posted By: Fabrisse @ 09/26/2008 3:52:38 PM

    You obviously didn't check out the internet discussions at Harry Potter websites from when the original announcement was made before he appeared in this play in London.

    There was a great deal of outrage, particularly among parents, about his choice to expand his range as an actor by performing in Equus. The sense of betrayal floored me. Those of us without children saw a young man taking control of his career by choosing a classic play that hadn't had a major revival. This was not the most common reaction.

    Combined with the delay on the sixth movie, this may harm the Harry Potter franchise. It certainly will if all the people who were so vociferous about keeping their children away from the movie because Radcliffe betrayed the character actually do so.

    I hope it won't. I'm trying to get tickets for later in the run because I want to see Equus, and I want to see whether Radcliffe has as much promise as a stage actor as he does on screen.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now