THE MARKET MELTDOWN

In Search Of The Tycoons Who Lost The Largest Fortunes

 
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

The credit crisis has taken many barons of Wall Street (and their $10,000 suits) to the cleaners. Who, though, has suffered the biggest losses? One way to get at that question is to look at leaders of the hardest-hit companies, and how much the value of their in-house shares has fallen from recent peaks. We asked Insiderscore.com, which tracks executives' trades in the stock of their own companies, for the number of shares held by some Wall Street titans, and then crunched the numbers to see how far they've fallen.

In fourth place is James (Jimmy) Cayne, the former chief executive of Bear Stearns. Over the course of 2007, during which Cayne took extended vacations to play bridge and golf and purchased two Plaza hotel apartments for $28 million, investors' faith in the firm evaporated. Bear's stock, which traded as high as $170 in 2007, sank lower and lower until a bank run forced the Fed to intervene. In March 2008, JPMorgan Chase snapped up Bear for a bargain: $10 a share. Cayne sold his 5.8 million shares for $63 million, a loss of $850 million on their value the year before.

Third place goes to former CEO Richard Fuld of Lehman Brothers, who went down with the ship when the 158-year-old firm went bankrupt on September 14. His 10.8 million shares in LEH were worth about $882 million in June 2007. He recently sold a quarter of them for less than a quarter a piece; the remaining 8 million shares have a market value of less than $2 million. That makes for a total loss of more than $880 million.

Second-place finisher Joe Lewis is the only outsider on the list. The septuagenarian English currency trader never ran a big financial company—he merely made big bets on them. Starting in July 2007, Lewis bought a roughly 10 percent stake in Bear Stearns, at an average purchase price of $104 a share. He made his last stock purchase on March 13, 2008, less than a week before the collapse. Assuming he sold his shares for the takeover price of $10, his total loss comes to $1.1 billion.

The biggest losses by far, however, hit Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, the former CEO of insurance giant AIG. Greenberg spent 38 years building the company into the world's largest insurer, until he was forced by AIG's board to step down in 2005. Through various trusts and holding companies, he controls about 11 percent of the company, according to Insiderscore.com, although it's impossible to know how much of that he owns directly. Between mid-2007 and now, the 95 percent fall in AIG's stock price wiped out at least $3 billion in Greenberg's personal wealth, and possibly as much as $7 billion.

None of these tycoons had all their wealth tied up in one company, and there may be many other financial titans who lost much more on various Wall Street holdings. Nor is anyone worrying about plutocrats going hungry just now. But by any measure, nine- to 10-figure losses have got to hurt. Perhaps too much to talk about: none of the men cited here returned NEWSWEEK's calls seeking comment on the accuracy of their estimated losses.

© 2008

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/07/2008 12:57:54 PM

    The link below contains a purported list of the top 25 in Congress who got contributions from the folks at Fannie and Freddie. Obama is listed third, after Dodd and Kerry, even though Obama is just a junior Senator. Obama is followed next by Clinton. Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi are on the list as well.

    http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=16&artnum=1&issue=20080918

    Then there is the Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd who allegedly got special mortgage deals from Countrywide, who gave preferential rates to 'friends' of company's chairman.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25140560/

    For an interesting article purporting to detail the House Financial Services Committee Chairs long history with Fannie Mae, See http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2008/20080924145932.aspx

    "House Financial Services Committee Chair promoted GSEs while former 'spouse' was Fannie Mae executive."

    The link below describes how some in Congress tried to use the original version of the bailout bill to divert money eventually recovered to groups like ACORN, a group Obama has a long association with. See:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122247015469280723.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

    And then there is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who allegedly has directed nearly $100,000 from her political action committee to her husband's real estate and investment firm.

    http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/oct/01/pelosis-pac-pays-bills-for-spouses-firm.

  • Posted By: cani77 @ 10/06/2008 5:10:32 PM

    In a few weeks we will make a choice that will decide our future.
    I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly.
    Also, he perfectly predicted the current real estate market meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen in the next couple years
    is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.
    The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide the largest morgage bank in the world,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch which are 3 out of the top 5 wall street firms. Also, Fanny and Freddy Mae which hold 50 percent of the home loans in the United States.
    The government took them over because they are essentially bankrupt.If they didn't the entire financially system would virtually shut down, the stock market would crash and we would suffer beyond what any of us have seen before.

    McCain just like Bush " doesn't understand the economy".
    That not just my opinion its his own words. Not only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand exactly what is broken.
    It is no surprise that he doesn't. The people that make up these securities use complex mathematical models very few people understand.
    Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.

    Bush's economic advisor Phil Graham wrote the deregulation bill that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.
    Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain's economic policy.He is also McCain's choice for the next secretary of the treasury.
    No one in this country can afford for that to happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He either didn't care or didn't realize that anything was wrong. Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime.
    It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be
    even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a surplus like Bush did but a tanking economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit. Most of it Bush created and it will take decades to pay it back.
    If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.
    When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.
    So why are the polls even close then ?



    Mccains team just said they no longer want to talk about the economy.Instead they would like to spend time
    running the biggest smear campaign in history.



    They think they can just tell you lies and you wont be smart enough to see through it
    Let's teach him we are smarter than that .
    Elect Obama Biden 2008


    Check out this video of sarah palins interview it will blow you away
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg