Palin Is Ready? Please.

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: tedglines @ 09/30/2008 2:31:49 AM

    Someone, please send Palin back to Alaska where her major concern will be how to spend her treasury surplus generated by selling Alaskan oil at more and more inflated prices. Do it now before we all suffer the embarrassment of watching her torn to pieces in her upcoming debate with Bidon. Palin has no answers in this campaign, and she certainly has no answers for the Oval Office, Next to his own frail age, Palin is McCain's worst liability.

  • Posted By: Newsmonger @ 09/30/2008 2:21:54 AM

    Listen people,

    I am a foreigner living in NYC. Before I start I must tell you that English is my second language; you will know it immediately I start speaking. I must also say that English is Palin's second language!

    From her interviews, it is obvious that we both learnt English as a second language, the only difference is that I skipped or did not attend the America accent training class and Palin skipped or did not attend the class that teaches how to user nouns, pronouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, etc to construct simple and logical sentences.

    They do not teach American civic classes in my country; since that class is taught in the US grade schools, it is very evident that Palin skipped that as well.

  • Posted By: Adeline @ 09/30/2008 2:15:55 AM

    Thanks Fareed, for saying candidly what many are not: Sarah Palin just does not have what it takes, she does not have the knowledge base nor does she realize that she does not, except that it is now clear she has become nervous and fragmented in her public exchanges with the press.

    John McCain is putting himself first and politics first. He is playing a game and using strategy to win the White House, but he has not a Plan for the People. He is as unpatriotic as it gets. Shame on him.

  • Posted By: Sam10 @ 09/30/2008 12:13:58 AM

    Please Fareed. I would like someone in the national media to come out as is happeing with Governor Palin and state/ declare that Obama should step aside. Seems fairly easy to print why Sarah Palin is not qualified to be vice president, and somehow all the naivete and inexperience is brushed aside when Obama paints himself in a corner. This is not sexism, this is not RIGHT. Still have not found someone to answer why Obama was chosen as the nominee. But it's not likely to find someone with journalistic values to bring out the true socialistic campaign Obama is running.

    • Posted By: Rose Black @ 09/30/2008 1:59:33 AM

      Obama is the nominee because the people voted for him and received over 18 million votes to become the Democratic nominee. Do you kno how many votes Palin received to enter this presidential race? One. The only reason she is in this race is due to McCain's propensity for gambling. It's wants to gamble in his personal life that is his choice, but he is not going to gamble with my future and I will use my vote to let him know this. Hopefully, the majority of Americans with sense will prevent another Bush era in the White House.

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 09/30/2008 12:26:15 AM

      The article is about Palin, not about Obama. You are wasting time on this blog. There are other blogs that address your issue. See the blue and red discussion elsewhere.

  • Posted By: Independentforobama @ 09/30/2008 1:52:58 AM

    Zack i agree with you Mccain pick her because he thought that we hillary suporters are idiot dummies that we will follow any damn ass ignorant who can't even answer a simple question you know as more and more American see this lady they will wonder how in the world Alaskans pick her as a governor is she the most qualified person in Alaska? if yes i feel sorry for them. even the 5th grader can understand a question and give clear answers than this lady. very very scary

  • Posted By: jtwardmo @ 09/30/2008 1:52:20 AM

    Independent1980 is correct is saying that feninists should not be included in the list of McCain supporters. However, Independent1980 also said "Sarah Palin sets women's rights back about fifty years."
    First of all, Palin supports women receiving abortion if they are in danger of physical death. and this is appropriate. Personally, I find it is acceptable to allow abortion in cases of rape or incest when it is done in less than three days following the criminal act on the woman. Whether Palin finds this acceptable is unknown to me. The Roe vs. Wade ruling in 1973 did not give women the right to protect their physical lives in cases where they were endangered. The ruling gave women the right to "be fruitful" with new life within their wormbs and then, instead of actiing to "multiply and replenish the earth", choose to have the new life destroyed. Women, do you want to have the freedom to kill your child six months after he or she is taken out of your womb? Do you wnat the have the freedom to kill that life six months before he or she is taken out of your womb? What;s the difference? (Barbara Boxer said that life begins when a mother arrives home from the hospital.) Some claim that if the child after birth would should a disability or disease, then abortion is best.
    In other words, people who have disabilities are inferior to others, right? One thing you could do is give the baby to a married couple that is childless. There are always more childless couples waiting to adopt then babies to adopt. Or you could request a ruling like the one in 1973 that would allow you to give birth to the child and, if he or she does have a disability that bothers you, kill the baby. If the life is killed in the womb or right after it comes out of the womb, what's the difference? WGAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?

  • Posted By: jtwardmo @ 09/30/2008 1:17:00 AM

    pjoe listed some of the comments tthat Obama has made. If you support electing Obama, then read those comments and explain them to people by placing comments on this website.
    And explain to readers how the great Senator Barack Obama can state that he is a "devout Christian" while carrying an attitude that is Marxist (as he has acknowledged). Explain how he can sit in a "church" for at least twenty years, take his wife and the two children God blessed them with to that "church", allow his children to hear such profanity and nonsense from Reverend Wright (who few people will ever revere) and even have the children baptized by the "Reverend". (If Obama was to say "I was never a Chrisitan, I attended that church only for social interaction and, as a father, I think it was healthy for my children to hear all that Reverend Wright stated", then he would be easier to understand. Certainly, if he had left that church with his wife and his two children in less than three weeks and had never returned, then he would have shown some common sense.)

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 09/30/2008 1:49:12 AM

      Tell you what, there is another blog called McCain vs Obama that is the cover story for the Newsweek magazine for this week. Thank you.

  • Posted By: Independentforobama @ 09/30/2008 1:48:54 AM

    Zack i agree with you Mccain pick her because he thought that we hillary suporters are idiot dummies that we will follow any damn ass ignorant who can't even answer a simple question you know as more and more American see this lady they will wonder how in the world Alaskans pick her as a governor is she the most qualified person in Alaska? if yes i feel sorry for them. even the 5th grader can understand a question and give clear answers than this lady. very very scary

  • Posted By: beaker63 @ 09/30/2008 1:47:56 AM

    Reading these comments, one can only come to one conclusion. Most citizens of our nation are inflexible regarding their political view of the world. The divisive cancer that grows in our nation will not allow unbiased reasoning of the issues. This article makes a statement based on fact. Most of the contrary comments do not attempt to rebut the conclusion with facts pertinent in the argument. Just as demeaning, many of the positive comments do not recognize the merit of the position, but take glee in the conclusion and then gloat.


    I have come to the same conclusion as Mr. Zakaria, and with remorse. In times of trouble, great people have risen in our nation in times of need. Soon we will need greatness.

  • Posted By: daplane @ 09/30/2008 1:46:02 AM

    Palin is the female George W. Bush. He was chosen for his name. She was chosen for her gender. They both lack intellectual curiosity. If, by some terribly predictable act of God, McCain died in office she would be as much of a puppet as Bush is. Cheney and Rove run him. Who knows what lobbyist dirtballs would run her.

  • Posted By: Earl W @ 09/29/2008 12:21:23 PM

    Thre truth is Palin is a former mayor and a sitting governor. Obama has never earned his living in business, only eat at the public trough. He does not qualify as a McDonalds or Wal-Mart manager when his news media
    famous name is taken away. No accomplishments in life. NONE=ZILCH And you want him as president = Are you totally nuts??

    • Posted By: Montana450815 @ 09/30/2008 1:25:48 AM

      Prior to becoming a Community Organizer and after his graduation from Columbia, Senator Obama was employed by Business International Corporation (a company that provided international business information to corporate clients) and NYPIRG. He then moved to Chicago and became a Community Organizer. After a little over three years, he went to Harvard Law, became the first black man and Democrat elected to the Harvard Law Review, graduated the following year Magna Cumm Laude, went back to Chicago and worked for the law firm of Miner, Barnhill & Galland. He also taught at the University of Chicago Law School. What impresses me the most is what he said, while still a state senator, about the possible invasion of Iraq. His words follow:

      "I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars," he said. "What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne."

      "He's a bad guy," Obama said, referring to Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. "The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him. But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history."

      "I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U. S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences," Obama continued. "I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda."

      How true his words have become. Too bad he wasn't in the US Senate at that time.

    • Posted By: tessgonzalez @ 09/29/2008 1:29:50 PM

      You are ill-informed, and obviously not doing anything to correct that deficiency. To say that he
      Barak Obama was an Attorney with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland for 12 years. He was a Lecturer of constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School for over 10 years. To say he has not earned a living shows how ignorant you are.

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 09/29/2008 12:59:02 PM

      Palin has "earned her living in business"? What did McCain do in the private sector before he became Senator? It's ok to have a contrary view, but your post makes about as much sense as Palin's rambling in the Couric interview.

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 09/29/2008 12:24:10 PM

      Here you go Palin fans...What has been exposed of Palin is called the Peter Principle. I will even provide the link....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle Every person with the exception of Bush and his administration reaches it some point in their life. Eight years late, and this article has nothing to do with him.

      When a person is properly vetted, they go through an interview process. When a person is improperly vetted, things come out sometimes in the worst possible fashion. When you saw Palin being interviewed by Couric, the answers that were given by her were unscripted. Unfortunately, questions were not asked of Palin like Couric and the three other interviews she gave as part of the vetting process. If she was asked anything like that before she was introduced, she would never have made the cut.

      Sure you can practice for the debate. Sure you can even memorize some things, and perhaps we may see some improvement on her answers Thursday. However it does not change the fact she has gone way over her head with her abilities.

      Btw George Will, David Frum, and David Brooks and Kathleen Parker have asked her to step down. Zakaria is now joined in the chorus of concern. I think that everyone should be taking a close look and think about one thing. Do you think based upon her interviews, that you can look at someone in their eye and say, I think Palin is presidential, and can take over in a moments notice?

  • Posted By: Agitator @ 09/30/2008 1:16:11 AM

    Saying that McCain might die in office is not really a good way to sell your candidate. That's basically saying McCain is the better man for the job, but his health is of a concern.

  • Posted By: mpb2105 @ 09/30/2008 1:03:43 AM

    For everyone trying to show that the Democratic ticket is no better, the occasional slips of the tongue or faux pas that you can cherry pick from Obama and Biden are no where near the category of what Zakaria is pointing to. I don't care what your ideology is, will you just sit down and read those quotes in their entirety? Those aren't slips or faux pas, these are extended rants with hardly a hair of logic to connect one barely complete sentence to the next. This is beyond even George Bush. This isn't something you point and maybe smirk or chuckle at. This is something you just have to stare at in amazement. This is a complete train wreck. It's like she's someone who has never swam before stepping off the deep end thinking, "how hard could it be?" and then immediately just starts thrashing. Palin is so obviously and completely in over her head. If she can't formulate even remotely coherent responses to what are really pretty straightforward questions, how can she be expected to deal with the day in day out responsibilities of presidential office, to say nothing of sudden complex crises. I personally would feel safer in a world where Ahmadinejad had access to nuclear weapons than one in which Sarah Palin had access to nuclear weapons.

    And for those who want to brush aside Palin's truly appalling performance and say this election should be about issues, I would say that McCain's pick of Palin as his VP shows that this election was never going to come down to anything so rational or as responsible as issues. He could have picked any number of people who hold the same views as Palin and can also articulate a complete thought, but he chose a pretty, folksy, hockey mom in the hopes of pulling one over on the American people.

  • Posted By: johnny78745 @ 09/30/2008 1:01:33 AM

    "But read Gov. Palin's answers and it does appear that she doesn't have any understanding about the topic under discussion."

    Read some of Zak's tripe and you'd likely say the same thing about him.

  • Posted By: johnny78745 @ 09/30/2008 1:00:33 AM

    "But read Gov. Palin's answers and it does appear that she doesn't have any understanding about the topic under discussion."

    Read some of Zak's tripe and you might say the same thing.

  • Posted By: gluchnurse @ 09/30/2008 12:58:07 AM

    Bless you for putting it succinctly and clearly. This woman is just woefully unprepared,and that is so scary considering McCain's age and medical history! John McCain displayed a woeful lack of judgement and a frightening impetuosity by picking her. And he needs to be judged on that pick as an example of how he would govern or make decisions. The entire team frightens me! And I was a Republican for 30 years-but now am definitely taking a chance on Obama. I don't want to have a beer with him, or have him be my BFF. I want someone who is smarter, more focused, more knowledgeable, hardworking, and picks good people to be around him. I want to have a President, not 'the guy next door', or a 'maverick'. Maverick seems to be another definition for a person who impulsively and randomly jumps into things without thinking through the consequences-just like his gambling and Vietnam war days indicate as well. By the way, since when did being 'intelligent' become such a bad thing? When did we start to want 'dumb' presidents? Are the American people so shallow and frankly stupid that they feel threatened by someone who has a good education (which they worked for), speaks well, and is thoughtful? Being President isn't a case of the Amazing Race, American Idol, or Survivor-it is serious business, my fellow citizens! Pick the right guy-and in this case, I really think it is Obama!

  • Posted By: Mariann Pepitone @ 09/29/2008 11:29:52 PM

    Zakaria doesn't know what he is talking about. He is an Obama supporter like Parker and big mouth Campbell Brown. Obama doesn't have any experience in politics for being in the senate three years. Why did he need three days in Florida to be advised on foreign policy. He should know that already. Palin understands the questions, Couric wants her to answer the questions according to what Couric would say. That's not logical. And Palin didn't have to know foreign policy as the governor of Alaska. So why did Couric ask her dumb questions. Couric worked for ABC, then left for another job and was released from that job because there was a complaint from an executive of CNN who did not like her voice. I never liked her and when she went to NBC they said she couldn't handle the Today Show. Couric is no Diane Sawyer or Robin Roberts. She has no personality whatsoever. Palin did well for not being involved with foreign policy. I believe she can match Biden one on one. The only reason CNN gave the edge to Obama is because they support him. And that's why they say he is leading in the polls. Its all bogus. His 9 points was bogus. They had to change that because Rush caught it.

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 09/30/2008 12:46:53 AM

      Here you go Palin fans...What has been exposed of Palin is called the Peter Principle. I will even provide the link....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle Every person with the exception of Bush and his administration reaches it some point in their life. Eight years late, and this article has nothing to do with him.

      When a person is properly vetted, they go through an interview process. When a person is improperly vetted, things come out sometimes in the worst possible fashion. When you saw Palin being interviewed by Couric, the answers that were given by her were unscripted. Unfortunately, questions were not asked of Palin like Couric and the three other interviews she gave as part of the vetting process. If she was asked anything like that before she was introduced, she would never have made the cut. Or you can speculate that she was given questions like that, and McCain liked the answers she gave. We will never know.

      Sure you can practice for the debate. Sure you can even memorize some things, and perhaps we may see some improvement on her answers Thursday. However it does not change the fact she has gone way over her head with her abilities.

      George Will, David Frum, and David Brooks and Kathleen Parker have asked her to step down. Zakaria is now joined in the chorus of concern. I think that everyone should be taking a close look and think about one thing. Do you think based upon her interviews, that you can look at someone in their eye and say, I think Palin is presidential, and can take over in a moments notice?

      And one other note, if Palin did step down, she would not be the first one either. Think Spiro Agnew and Thomas Eagleton in modern times. Sure saving face is ideal, however, under these circumstances, is it better to save face, or think of the good of our country. And this my fellow bloggers is coming from an Independent who would not have hestitated to vote for McCain in 2000.

  • Posted By: yh132 @ 09/30/2008 12:43:47 AM

    I was reading what I thought was the transcript to the SNL spoof of the Palin/Couric interview. I thought so b/c Palin's comments were beyond incoherent and dumb. Then...to my absolute horror...I realized that I was reading a transcript of the ACTUAL INTERVIEW.

    Bottom line: Palin is dumb as a rock!! Egad! If McCain is elected, there is only the uncertain health of a 72-year-old cancer patient between us and President Palin. It's time to rum screaming.

  • Posted By: kennse @ 09/30/2008 12:40:49 AM

    As someone who up until recently has been undecided the 'choice' of Palin by John McCain has been one that has turned the tide. I think she has presented herself very respectfully and has been the spark plug the McCain campaign was looking for but did they really expect her inexperience (and I'm not talking about as an executive, but her complete lack of exposure to the national stage) not to shine through?

    What makes this decision even harder to stomach is the fact that McCain could have covered what have now become glaring inefficiencies with a better choice for VP.

    Liberman may have been a 'maverick' choice but at least he would have brought national and international experience, as well as a being pillar of the hope for bipartisan politics. Or with some foresight, McCain could have looked like a genius by picking Romney for his financial expertise in the face of a economic crisis. Instead he chose Palin to sway Hillary voters and sure up conservatives (which he proved this week he still can't deliver).

    Playing politics should have never suited a man of your stature...

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse