Greg Ceo / Getty Images
HEALTH

Part-Time Vegetarians

Advocates call it flexitarianism, but critics say being a little bit vegetarian is like being a little bit pregnant.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

For the last 15 years, Dawn Jackson Blatner has been what's now called a "flexitarian" or "almost vegetarian." She eats lots of fruits, vegetables, nuts, barbecued tempeh and veggie burgers with guacamole. But she sometimes indulges in a pork chop or her grandma's pot roast.

It might seem like being a vegetarian of convenience isn't particularly inspiring, but a growing number of experts and even some famous foodies are fans. They say that cutting back on meat, rather than abstaining completely, may be a practical compromise that benefits our bodies and our environment.

"It gives you the health benefits of a vegetarian diet without having to follow the strict rules," says Blatner, a registered dietitian and author of "The Flexitarian Diet: The Mostly Vegetarian Way to Lose Weight, Be Healthier, Prevent Disease, and Add Years to Your Life" (McGraw-Hill, October 2008). "We know that people live longer and live healthier when they eat vegetarian, but it's just too darn hard to do it 100 percent of the time."

Even gourmet food writers, used to nightly courses of filets and pates, are advocating the eat-less-meat movement. In January, Mark Bittman, author of "How to Cook Everything" (Wiley, 1998), is coming out with new book called "Food Matters," (Simon & Schuster) about how our diet affects global warming and "globesity" (global obesity). Bittman has been very critical of what he calls America's "meat guzzling" tendencies. "I am an advocate of what I like to think of as a much saner diet—a largely plant-based diet," he says. A meat-based diet is, he says, "not even close to sustainable." Last year, Bittman published "How to Cook Everything Vegetarian," (Wiley, 2007), though he is not a vegetarian himself.

Bittman notes that Americans eat about 200 pounds of meat, poultry and fish a year—twice as much as the global average. He argues that not only is a heavily vegetable diet healthier for us physically, but that it's also true that the industrial production and processing of grain-fed livestock consumes a huge amount energy and has a negative impact on the environment.

It's unclear how many people are official "flexitarian" converts, but nutritionists believe there are a growing number of people who are simply eating fewer meat entrees whether it's for health, or economic reasons or because there are more good meatless dishes on offer. Think how many Americans regularly eat peanut-butter and jelly sandwiches, pasta, bean burritos and cheese pizzas as their main courses, says Blatner. "I do feel like that is a shocking thing, when you think about how much vegetarian food we eat without even trying."

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: hungry vegan @ 11/23/2008 11:33:58 PM

    Comment: Thank you for this article. It is heartening to know that a growing number of people are seeing the benefits of vegetarian food. A vegetarian diet is beneficial for health, the environment and the animals.

  • Posted By: duster @ 11/22/2008 6:28:39 PM

    Comment: I thank those who respect vegetarianism and flexitarianism whether for moral or health or both reasons, and I believe that people should be able to call themselves whatever the hell they want. None of you has a monopoly on any dietary label or moral category. If one wants to be "vegan" on Tuesday and a "carnivore" on Wednesday, that's his or her own business. Everyone else should just shut up. Especially the annoying self-righteous folks who feel they wrote the dictionary on non-omnivorous dietary practices. For the record, the majority of people on the Indian subcontinent have historically been omnivores without contradicting Hindu religious teachings. The popularity of vegetarianism has spread in India as it has spread throughout the rest of the world, which itself is in large part--do not doubt this--because of wider options, improved storage and transportation, and greater capacity for processing vegetable-based products.

  • Posted By: chris s. @ 11/21/2008 9:12:14 PM

    Comment: It's about balance. What iritates me is when I say no thank you to meat, someone will insist by putting a piece of steak or whatever in front of me and insist that I am missing out. Cooking a vegetarian meal [ not talking salad here] is a lot more creative than slapping a piece of meat on the grill. How many times have I heard " oh that looks funny" after I've knocked myself out making a vegetarian dish. People won't even taste it. before judging. Ever notice how the meat eating animals [lion etc.] lay around all day sleeping while the vegetarians [deer etc.] have more energy?] I have no problem if someone wants to eat their steak or hamburger, just don't sit there and tell me what I'm missing, insisting that I'm not nourished because I make different choices. I'm just thankful there are enough choices on the table or menu for all, without anyone having to defend what they choose to eat.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu