SPONSORED BY:

Perp Street

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The essence of fair criminal law, however, is adequate notice to the defendant that his actions were criminal, not merely that he was doing something he was "not supposed to do." If the law wants to make it a crime to "manipulate" then it should define that concept and make it a specific crime rather than including it within the vague concept of fraud, or the even vaguer concept of honest services.

There is a considerable risk of scapegoating individuals who honestly believed they were going right up to the line but not over it. After an economic catastrophe, there is a tendency to move the goal posts and to make criminal that which was deemed acceptable before the catastrophe, but is now—retroactively—regarded as something investment bankers "were not supposed to do." This violates the spirit, if not the letter, of the constitutional prohibition against ex-post facto laws.

It is not easy to generate public sympathy for former "masters of the universe"—whiz kids who made tens, sometimes hundreds, of millions of dollars by taking risks that ended up costing taxpayers billions—all while they kept their bonuses and profits. But sympathy is not the issue. Potential misuse of criminal law is. If government is given the power to redefine crimes in order to retroactively punish previously lawful predatory conduct, we are all at risk.

That is why white collar criminal lawyers are busy preparing their clients for investigations, subpoenas and flipping witnesses. The race to the courthouse has already begun, with lawyers trying to be the first to offer up their clients as witnesses against former friends and colleagues, instead of themselves becoming defendants. The race, however, is not always to the swiftest but rather to the lowest on the totem pole—the underling who can provide evidence or testimony against the higher ups. The first rule of criminality in the U.S. is "always commit crimes with people more important than you are, so that you can turn them in rather than having them turn you in!"

So, a word to the formerly wise Wall Street whiz kids. Watch out for your friends. Pick your lawyers wisely. Make sure they are representing you and you alone—not your company. And hope and pray that you are not targeted as one of the scapegoats for the mortgage meltdown.

Alan M. Dershowitz is a professor of law at Harvard. His most recent book, The Case Against Israel's Enemies: Exposing Jimmy Carter and Others Who Stand In The Way of Peace, is being published by Wiley in early October.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/07/2008 12:21:31 PM

    The link below contains a purported list of the top 25 in Congress who got contributions from the folks at Fannie and Freddie. Obama is listed third, after Dodd and Kerry, even though Obama is just a junior Senator. Obama is followed next by Clinton. Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi are on the list as well.

    http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=16&artnum=1&issue=20080918

    Then there is the Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd who allegedly got special mortgage deals from Countrywide, who gave preferential rates to 'friends' of company's chairman.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25140560/

    For an interesting article purporting to detail the House Financial Services Committee Chairs long history with Fannie Mae, See http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2008/20080924145932.aspx

    "House Financial Services Committee Chair promoted GSEs while former 'spouse' was Fannie Mae executive."

    The link below describes how some in Congress tried to use the original version of the bailout bill to divert money eventually recovered to groups like ACORN, a group Obama has a long association with. See:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122247015469280723.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

    And then there is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who allegedly has directed nearly $100,000 from her political action committee to her husband's real estate and investment firm.

    http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/oct/01/pelosis-pac-pays-bills-for-spouses-firm.

  • Posted By: kr100 @ 10/04/2008 7:18:52 PM

    The Wall St. firms and institutions were no doubt reckless, but they were not the ones who ultimately set the stage that allowed the recklessness to occur in the first place. To blame them for creating the current debacle would be like blaming the foot soldiers in Iraq for creating that situation (assuming you consider Iraq a fiasco; not taking sides, just providing an example).

    The top of the causality chain is government (Congress) and its Fascist Reserve and FMae / Mac. The interest rate and money supply manipulations by these organizations created the loose money environment enabling the economic implosion to gain traction in the first place.

    Assertions about a "lack of controls" or accusations against the "free market" are stunningly shallow and anti-intellectual. The U.S. banking industry is among the most heavily government-controlled "industries" of all; it is the polar antithesis of a "free market."

    Value can neither be defined nor added in an environment of coercion. Banking's government-centric lack of a market essence makes it literally a non-industry, in fact a Fascist environment, enabling legislated "value" to dominate against competitive choice-based factors that allow real valuations to manifest. Specific to the meltdown, competitive market factors would have established the cost of money at levels of risk averting the reckless behaviors in the first place.

    Wall St. et al were facilitators and exascerbators of the problem, however the ultimate root-source culpability belongs squarely with government / Congress and the noted agencies it controls. Without the legislated actions of government creating artificially low interest rates in conjunction with its games of manipulating currency valuations via money supply tampering, the current mess could not have even begun its spiral.

    When it comes to identifying root source culpability, people should quit focusing on the secondary contributors or effects, e.g. the "fat cats," lenders, CEOs, borrowers, etc. before root causes are identified. Consider moving emotions of envy and hatred out of the way IN ORDER to be honest IN ORDER to be neutrally objective IN ORDER to think logically IN ORDER to make intelligent assessments (about anything).

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/04/2008 1:05:46 AM

    The link below contains a purported list of the top 25 in Congress who got contributions from the folks at Fannie and Freddie. Obama is listed third, after Dodd and Kerry, even though Obama is just a junior Senator. Obama is followed next by Clinton. Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi are on the list as well.

    http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=16&artnum=1&issue=20080918

    For an interesting article purporting to detail the history of the House Financial Services Committee Chair's relationship with Fannie Mae, See

    "House Financial Services Committee Chair promoted GSEs while former 'spouse' was Fannie Mae executive."

    http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2008/20080924145932.aspx

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.


 
 
PHOTOS
What About Us?
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.