Or,to put more plainly,what does Pakistan have to do with al Qaeda?
This was a gross error on the portion of a NEWSWEAK article several weeks back. It ignored the Yemen bombings as an event organic to the larger Middle East. It ,acting as Obamas Press Secretary,maintains the ''Pakistan nexis ''lede,without bothering to explain how the amorphus al Qaeda could easily move from nation to nation,much as it did in the 1990s. That it is taking up firm residence in Algeria,Yemen,Eritria,Morocco,and the sub-Sahara ,and almost certainly Kosovo,thus winning a European beachhead,is lost on both Obama and the ''Legacy Media'',now trying mightily to get their man in.
To ''go after bin Laden'' is to invite liberal comparisons to Bushs' ''whack-a-mole''during the unsettled,more violent period in Iraq. Obama turns a fixed gaze to Pakistan,while al Qaeda moves with surety in other regions,possibly ,indeed certainly,working beneath new Paladins whose names we know not of. Thus, either candidate will have to walk and chew gum at the same time. Obama has one thing going for him that McCain does not. The support of the jihadi system in the Middle East. [indeed,as much as 34 million dollars of his campaign support,according to a Federal Election Commission still sifting through Obamas incomplete donor records,comes from,among other nations, Libya,Saudi Arabia,Jordan,Nigeria,Iran,Lebanon,and the Palestinian territories]. Whether he can parlay this support into negotiation between the two sides remains to be seen.
www.fec.gov









Discuss