Palin Reignites The Culture War

Yes Joe, you can see from the these clips, a Harvard education makes all the difference:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap2Cg_FDRy4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5R6kVry4_c

(Part IV)
I see and read articles claiming that the majority of Americans surveyed or polled say that they would support or vote for a qualified Gay Candidate. I know that gay people have strong financial and social resources. So where is the problem? So I tell myself that I will run for Presidency of the United States and in doing so not only will the world see the justice of the first Gay Presidential Candidate, but will also in double-benefit attain one that is also Hispanic and foreign-born, a naturalized American Citizen, who nowadays does, speaks and even thinks primarily in the English language. But wait a minute! Then I realize, if I am not mistaken, a foreign-born American Citizen cannot run for the Presidency of the United States. So there I go again, looking for articles on the subject in the Internet. And thus, I come across an article titled ???Schwarzenegger: Let foreign-born seek White House.??? But then just a little into the article I come across the following statement: ???Schwarzenegger reaffirmed his opposition to the gay marriages that are taking place in San Francisco. He said Mayor Gavin Newsom's refusal to obey the state's law against same-sex marriages could set a bad precedent [2].??? However, before he had made that statement he also said: "There are so many people in this country that are now from overseas, that are immigrants, that are doing such a terrific job with their work, bringing businesses here, that there's no reason why not," said Schwarzenegger, who became a U.S. citizen in 1983. "Look at the kind of contribution that people like Henry Kissinger have made, Madeleine Albright," he said, referring to two former secretaries of state who were born in Europe [2].??? And there is the great hypocrisy of seeking fairness for some, and denying the legal rights of others. It is a researched fact that marriages improve the propensity of human beings to being less promiscuous and thus to contribute to the betterment of the overall health of society. So why deny gay (and when I say ???gay??? I always project also the term for ???lesbian???) people the opportunity to have such a just legal standing. To me a marriage certificate is nothing more than a paper, because true loyalty to somebody or something cannot be written on paper, but it does provide for many legal protections that living in an imperfect and generally unfairly biased world necessitates. And in doing so more gay teenage individuals prone to much instability in their love affairs would seek to settle down in a faithful family life style with the person of their preference. That is something that intelligent heterosexual individuals accept in the comfort of their private lives, but which they selfishly deny in public.

(www.E-Medicine.org)

(Part III)
But here is the problem, perhaps the attempts have been made, but I found none when I searched the Internet. I cannot find articles about gay people running for office in this presidential campaign. So why the furious claim from gay/lesbian organizations that their political leaders are committing injustice, when what would give us the greatest advantage would be to postulate and support ourselves a Gay Person for the U.S. Presidency. I am very naïve and fairly ignorant in what it takes to get to this level of a presidential campaign, but I am certain that we can fight much harder and wiser in attaining our goals for a better, most just and civilized society. It has been done in the past with ???David McReynolds, who ran as the nominee of the Socialist Party in 1980 and 2000- gaining approximately 5,000 votes in each election (1).??? Whoever, to reach its destination a vehicle must keep running, and it is not for lack of good potential gay candidates that we must delay or weaken the momentum.

(www.E-Medicine.org)

(Part II)

How can we have the first Black candidate to potentially become the President of the United States, and the first woman with high chances of becoming the vice-president of the same government, to embrace the fact that the great freedom and justice that we enjoy today in the United States as the result of the struggle of black and women movements for civil rights have provided this most fair and great opportunity, and meanwhile, to publicly declare a blunt ???No??? to the civil rights of other oppressed minorities of the United States of America, those people who whether by genetic factors or by choice have come to embrace the fact that they love and wish to marry a person of their same gender? I ask you something: ???Do all heterosexual marriages go into their legal union with the imminent or long-term intention of having children, of procreating? The answer is a blunt, but in this case fair, ???NO.??? Many heterosexual couples who seek marriage do not wish to have children at all. While other heterosexual marriages cannot even genetically procreate. So why the difference in denying legal rights to homosexual couples because they can???t essentially at present procreate? Is that justice and fairness? What is there natural about heterosexual couples going to a reproduction clinic to alter the genetic makeup they were born with in order to being able to have children in ways that are artificial in essence? What is there natural about taking medications made from unnatural chemicals and processes? And yet, those medications have improved the overall health and have extended the life expectancy of human beings, while at the same time quite often preventing the death of those experiencing life-threatening situations. So why does the world, but especially politicians in their ability to bring about true justice and equality of opportunity, publicly embrace some legal rights and deny others? Why do they refuse to balance justice when they live and are sometimes the products of unnatural lives or lifestyles while at the same time denying Gay people who love each other the publicly legal declaration and rights of their union because the majority of the people, who unfortunately are usually led by face-value make-believe rhetoric and appearances, hold the greater voting power? Are they in this process of legal elections then primarily for the attainment of office, regardless of the known violations of people???s rights. The sad reality is that these are well educated, intelligent individuals, who similar to many religious people who favor hypocrisy to maintain their social standing, violate that which they know is right, in order to attain or maintain their selfish materialistic desires, and unfortunately the precursors of the downfall of a fair and humane society.

(www.E-Medicine.org)

Palin is a political blow up doll. Empty, except for the impromptu infusion of hot air from the McCain camp. We are a sexy nation of idiots.

Schwarzenegger: Let foreign-born seek White House

She is just like Obama... gibberish and words but no substance. Obama's problem is that like Mccain and Biden they have never even signed a check let alone run something. They are merely talkers who write laws. That is why senators should never and are rarely made president. Usually Americans are too smart to even consider a US Senator due to their inability to run anything and their desire to spend our money.

I guess the bailout was another lie to reward bad people who contribute to reelection campaigns. The stock market crashed and middle America is on the hook for $700 B to give to wealthy sleazy Wall streeters. I just wonder where these people selling this bailout (corporate wealfare) were 6 months ago. If it was that big an issue why didn't anyone know 6 months ago? This didn't happen overnight.

Palin is proving that we are the most sexist country in the world. We are worse than Iran.

Sarah Palin may or may not be a sweetheart. But she certainly is undereducated in many more ways than one.

Please!!-Ohio, Indiana and Florida- don't stick it to us ,and the rest of the nation, again.

We can't afford it and neither can you (admit it, it's the first step).

Sarah Palin may or may not be a sweetheart. But she most certainly is undereducated in far more ways than one.
Please, Ohio, Indiana and Florida- don't stick it to the rest of us again. We can't afford it and neither can you (admit it, it's the first step).

Sarah Palin is Fred Thompson with lipstick.

It seems to me more and more, the so-called culture war is a convenience for the right. They can constantly and consistently use it as the new boogie man, since they can't use blacks for that any longer. They need a cultural enemy to rally those who are unable or unwilling to listen and learn and decided. It is the most shameful way of politics but seems to be always used by parties on the extremes. Look what Hitler accomplished or the new Austrian right. Meanwhile, on "Main Streets" across the country what I've seen is a grand amelioration between the counter-culture of yesteryear, and the Chamber of Commerce of always. We have arts festivals that booster the local town economise. We have artists in residence in schools. We have people on local school boards, of any persuasion working together. And we certainly have people of any political persuasion smoking dope. What the culture war is really turning into is something nastier. It is a belief that anyone with intellect is suspect. This is something that Aldous Huxley warned us all about. I'm scared, with Palin at the helm, it could come true. Maverick sounds like a nice label, but when in essence it is a vote for being blind to facts, and science and disvalues intellectual endeavor, it is a grave danger indeed.

Day 5 of stealing Ohio's election!:
http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?maven_referralObject=3130656&maven_referralPlaylistId=&sRevUrl=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/

Thankfully the culture war has been re-ignited. Most Americans simply overlook the misery the self officiating intellectual elite have caused for married mom and dad familiies with children. That is sufficient reason for me to like Palin. If two parent families gain some respect, America will thrive again. Who is giving us a tax break? McCain that's who. He will double our child deduction, and God knows if you have a few kids you need a break, rather than a haughty Obamabot NOW scoul.

Thankfully the culture war has been re-ignited. Most Americans simply overlook the misery the self officiating intellectual elite have caused for married mom and dad familiies with children. That is sufficient reason for me to like Palin. If two parent families gain some respect, America will thrive again. Who is giving us a tax break? McCain that's who. He will double our child deduction, and God knows if you have a few kids you need a break, rather than a haughty Obamabot NOW scoul.

Only a fine God fearing woman such as Sarah Palin can bring America back to her traditions from the days men and dinosaur roamed the Earth.

So leftist media types are ridiculously biased? We are also very, very mean, and annoying with all our gotcha questions...or so I hear these days. Also, I hear that conservatives don't rant nearly as much as we liberals do. So the opposite of us is what? You? Then who would be the opposite of everyone then? We don't really need that diversity among her own familly and friends Palin was so proud of ranting about in the debate do we? Not in this country. Wait, I should be more patriotic (even though I am a sarcastic liberal)..Not in MY country (if I added "tis of thee" and spoke in tongues, would I get a place at that big wide GOP table then?). Ah, does anyone remember the good old days when Ann Coulter said we just mentally ill?

Newsweek is so biased and so left wing that it's been years since it's had any credibility with me and my family. Gibson and Couric were horrible interviewers who were out to get her from the start--it was obvious--condescending, impolite. Yes, the culture war continues and many of us are on the side of the USA, not the lefties! Frances Nystrom, California