SPONSORED BY:

Best and the Brightest

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The Abu Dhabi government has proposed a project similar to ARPA-E, hoping to make itself a hub for alternative-energy research. It has allocated $15 billion. Your allocation is $15 million . Are we taking this seriously enough?
Well, the $15 million is what you might call stopgap funding to get up and going. The authorization has a $300 million initial funding followed by $1 billion a year. We set that on the recommendation of experts that have seen these kinds of startups before.

You ' re a Democrat, so maybe this isn ' t a fair question, but which presidential candidate would better support alternative-energy research?
Well, they both have better plans than the current one. We win in that regard. Senator Obama seems to put the biggest emphasis on alternative-energy research, but I think Senator McCain also understands the need. Being from Arizona, he has seen firsthand the benefits of solar energy there. This legislation has bipartisan support, and because of that I think you're going to see it's acceptable to either candidate. This is not a partisan issue.

The European Union has much stronger requirements in terms of its use of alternative energy. Are we losing the race?
Currently we are. But I don't think we're so far behind we can't catch up. The next step is really an international collaboration. If you look at carbon capture and sequestration, it's going to be very expensive [to develop it]. If we pool our resources and our minds, then we can work together to make this breakthrough, which would benefit all of us. And then we need to make it available to China and India and other countries that are large coal users.

You ' ve said we ' re on " the cusp of another Sputnik moment. " Do you think the American government will respond the way it responded then, by making massive investments in science and technology?
I would like to see us do that. We're looking at a multibillion-dollar bailout [for financial firms], we're looking at a large national deficit—but I certainly think that we can invest $1 billion a year. A few years ago we gave tax incentives to the oil companies, back when the price of oil was $50 a barrel. Since the price has doubled, those incentives are no longer needed. We can take the approximately $20 billion over 10 years in tax breaks [for oil companies] and shift them into alternative-energy research. That way we're not adding to the deficit, but rather we're shifting the incentives.

What happens if we don ' t commit ourselves to finding new types of energy?
I helped write a bipartisan letter to the National Academies three years ago, asking them to do a report on the competitiveness of America in the 21st century. Their bottom line was that my 7-year-old daughter and her generation are going to inherit a national standard of living that's less than their parents unless we make some changes. Part of the reason for that is [the lack of] energy independence—this is a very important area and we can't have incremental change. We need to make a major, out-of-the-box breakthrough.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jstepp590 @ 01/02/2009 3:42:02 PM

    OooohKay, people posting advertisements aside, I think it is a great idea for may different reasons. It will help promote science deveopment again, build the necessary pool of experienced scientists and engineers as well as probably solving some of our energy crisis. I just have a hard time thinking it will happen.

    The reason why I don't think it will happen is simple. The biggest problem we have in Washington today is special interests and lobbyists who will fight it every step of the way. They are a problem not faced at any other time in our history and are a major impediment to any progress we may attempt. It's not in their best special interests to let us do so. Since they are the ones paying our polititions for their campaigns we end up in the same old situation of saying one thing to us to get elected and then doing something else to appease the people investing in their campaigns, people who expect a return for their investment.

    Until we make very sure our govenrment is working for us, the people, instead of corporations it will be very difficult if not impossible to make anything happen. You can legalize corruption all you want, it's still corruption. These lobbyists and special interests are at the root of almost all our gridlock and partisonship and need to be thrown out of Washington, possible with the Clean Elections system. Otherwise, all the best ideas in the world will go nowhere.

  • Posted By: gaetanomarano @ 11/19/2008 10:47:39 AM

    the "revolutionary breakthrough" they're searching already exists and is the wind energy turbines STACKING to have MORE ENERGY DENSE wind power plants, as suggested 20 MONTHS AGO in MY "Wind Energy Skyscrapers" article:

    http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/028energy.html

    unfortunately, I haven't found (so far) the funds to start some basic research about MY idea

    SURELY, the solution of the energy needs CAN'T come from Space, as explained in my "Space Solar Power hoax/illusion DEBUNKED" article: http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/038sspdebunked.html

    .

  • Posted By: gary goldbladt @ 11/06/2008 7:09:58 PM

    Silicon valley coordinates a lot with the universities.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now