Wanted: A Bundle of Joy

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mandh @ 10/09/2008 12:35:05 PM

    Not sure where / how the last two lines appeared in my previous post. I did not put them there.

    My point is know the law. Once the adoption is finalized it doesn't matter if the birthparent "changes his / her mind", the law states you are the parent.

    Also, why is everyone so afraid of birthparents? I met my son's birthmother, bgrandmother and bgreatgrandmother. Birthparent truly love their children and want the best for them - and that is why they give up their rights. (I cannt comment on those parents whose rights were terminated by law enforcement)

  • Posted By: mandh @ 10/09/2008 12:18:36 PM

    To clarify some misstatements regarding domestic adoption.

    We are blessed with parenthood by domestic adoption. Once birth parents terminate their parental rights - with respect to newborns, in some states it is at least 72 hours after the birth. Once parental rights are terminated and the prospective adoptive parents has custody of the child that is a major milestone. The next step is to finalize the adoption, which typically can be done within a year of the childs birth. There are post-placement visits by social workers and other legalities that must take place. Once the adoption is finalized, that's it. There is no court that will reunite the child with it's birthparent - nor remove the child from its home to an agency - unless there was fraud involved - just because the birthparent changed its mind. However, if during the period of the termination of parental rights and the finalization takes place, there is the rare occurance of a birth parent changing its mind. Keep in mind, the child is not automatically returned. There are laws to protect everyone and the judge will look out for the best interest of the child - which may or may not be the birthparent.

    With respect to costs, it all depends on how you go about it. There are government agencies, adoption agencies, and we chose private adoption. I recommend working with an attorney who specializes in adoption to clear the way for you and let you focus on becoming a parent. Cost can be minimal - less than $1,000 to the extreme numbers some people posted here. Adoption web sites will tell you the typical cost for a domestic adoption runs from $10,000 - $15,000.

    If you want to be a parent, and are considering adoption you will be a parent. There are children from all over the world of all ages who want and need a loving home.

    that can cause major heartaches later and some (like my wife and I) didn't want the risk of said heartache later when the birth parents get their lives back together and want their kid bac

  • Posted By: barnespharmd @ 10/09/2008 12:01:04 PM

    As an adult, domestic adoptee who has a biological child and an internationally adopted child, I can't pass up this opportunity to comment. The only issue here is that there are children of all races and nationalities that don't have food to eat, a roof over their head, clothing on their back, and most importantly the love of parents and family. You've all argued your points correctly on both sides for domestic vs. international adoption, but does it really matter where the child was born? Should we not all be given the same treatment of food, clothing, shelter, and love? My domestic adoption was a private adoption many years ago when adoption laws were quite different, and we chose an international adoption because we didn't want to run the risk of a parent coming back looking to reclaim their child. Domestic vs. international is as personal a decision as the decision to adopt, and neither decision is wrong.

    Please look past the location of these children and acknowledge that we, as a society, need to do more for children everywhere. If you can't adopt, please explore the option of supporting those who do adopt or sponsoring children so they can have food, clothing, and shelter. It's the least you can do, plus it will make you think twice before you condemn someone else's decision of how they choose to support the children of our world.

  • Posted By: sieg6529 @ 10/09/2008 10:14:34 AM

    my wife and I have considered adoption, but I had no idea that it was so expensive. I know two collegues who happily adopted infants, but they did it domestically from teen mothers. Maybe that's the way to go, since our teens certainly aren't going to get less frisky any time soon.

  • Posted By: rossj @ 10/09/2008 9:32:58 AM

    For some, the process of American adoption is daunting. I wan to adopt when I am done with nursing school and have already been warned of the process in my state. After you pass background checks and home studies, you get to sit down with a "book" of available children. I have been told to pick 20-30 of these kids as chances are you wont get your first choice. After you chose the children, then their case worker is contacted and the childs case worker can "vet" you as a parent. My good friend wanted to adopt an African American child but the childs case worker said no because she wasn't African American. Unless she was williing to move to an African American neighborhood. After you get past the childs case worker then it goes to a state committee of three overseers. They want three families for each child before they decide on the final family. My good friend went through several of these processes and was about to give up before they decided she could have her daughter who was 3 at the time. The final adoption didn't take place for another year after that.

    The process is so daunting and emotionally draining. I understand that we need to protect the children, but, if you have passed a background and homestudy, why do 4 other people get to debate your worthiness? If they don't like your religon, color, sex (espeically if a single male), or sexual identity, they will deny it outright. Knowing what I do, I am still going to attempt to go through the process and am going through the process of being a mentor to a sibling group that is in foster care right now. I am just hoping that no one gets their heart broke in the process. It's very scary, but for those of us that want children, we are willing to risk it. But, it shouldn't be such a risky process. I think that quite a few people who go overseas to adopt have their own challenges, but are trying to avoid the nightmare of American adoption. Or, they want infants.

  • Posted By: Brammy @ 10/09/2008 6:32:03 AM

    I have always thought it disguting that people headed overseas indroves to adopt 'poor children'. Madonna and the Jolie-Pitt clan is the prime example. Why are these people heralded as heroes when there are so many children in need of homes in the US? Do these people really think the US welfare system that most of our children are in are one wit better than the deplorable conditions faced by the ones they pick and choose from overseas? Read the story about the two girls found in the freezer while the third was found wondering the streets battered and bruised. Our social system has gotten so desperate to place these children that they are placing them with anyone who will take them. I am sure any and all of them would have been proud to be a part of the Jolie-Pitt or Ritchie clan. Or if this just another sign of racisim in Amaerica? Its ok to adopt a BLACK child as long as they are not a Black American child.

    • Posted By: TheOptimist @ 10/09/2008 9:07:17 AM

      I think it is disgusting to judge how people form a family. You obviously have a limited experience with the adoption process, as you call Jolie-Pitt and Madonna prime examples. There are thousands of everyday families that deal with heartaches and frustrations during the adoption process - both domestic and international. Additionally, thousands more deal with the heartache of infertility. Whether these individuals form a family through international or domestic adoption or infertility treatments or surrogacy, is not up to me or you to judge. Imagine if the individuals that formed a family through natural childbirth were the minority and people on boards like this said "I have always thought it disgusting that people decided to have a child naturally." It sounds ridiculous, doesn't it? How would those individuals feel? Well now imagine a child that was adopted from China reading your post calling them "poor children" and their family "disgusting".

    • Posted By: TheOptimist @ 10/09/2008 8:59:51 AM

      I always think it is disgusting to judge how a family comes together. You're experience with the adoption system - both domestic and international - seems to come only from the latest entertainment news show, as you call Jolie-Pitt and Madonna prime examples. They are far from prime examples. There are thousands of every day families that go through the process year after year and deal with heartaches, frustration and, ultimately the greatest love they have ever known. Whether domestic adoption, international adoption, in-vitro fertilization, surrogacy, or through childbirth, I support the rights of individuals to form their family in the way that works bests for them.

  • Posted By: shannongibney @ 10/07/2008 1:05:19 AM

    The consumer mentality behind this "charming" story on international adoption is as transparent as it is offensive. I would encourage Newsweek to take a more balanced and complex look at the issue in the future, not only assuming its audience will be prospective and white adoptive parents, but also adult adoptees, birth parents, and readers from some of the sending countries -- all of whom may not see the removal of children from their families and home communities as an inherently good thing.

    -Shannon Gibney, Minneapolis

    • Posted By: jshamby @ 10/08/2008 4:07:39 PM

      Apparently you are no very educate on International Adoption. I have adopted one child from Ukraine and one child from Russia. My son from Ukraine ran away from because he was abused on a daily bases and my daughter from Russia was neglected by her drunken mother. These are the same conditions that if they happened here in the US would cause someone to loose their child. However, in these countries they don't give the parents tens of chance to try and get their child back. They terminate their rights and put them in an orphanage, maybe if we didn't try over and over to give a child back to an abusive parent here in the US we as a country wouldn't have as many kids dying at the hands of their biological parents.

      • Posted By: Kennebunker0201 @ 10/09/2008 9:05:59 AM

        The only way to change how our laws work (as far as fostering and the reunification processes go) is to be an advocate for the kids. WE MADE THESE LAWS! Us Americans voted on these at one time or another. I've been through the stress an ANGUISH of watching biological parents attempt to get their kids back while I am dying inside to adopt them. If we just say screw it, the laws suck- I'll adopt from another country... what good does that do our kids??? And the kids who go through the home-foster care-home-foster care roller coaster need us way more than we realize. That is traumatic and they need a good, safe, loving home just as much as a child overseas.

    • Posted By: simonbcat @ 10/08/2008 3:17:42 PM

      As an international adoptive parent, I did not have my daughter "removed" from her family and home community. Her first mother chose to relinquish because she could not properly provide for her. Having read the article, I don't see anything "consumer-oriented" about it. As someone who has followed the situation vis a vis my daughter's sending country, orphanages are overflowing with children while not having the funding to take proper care of them. Yes, the article barely skimmed the surface of what is a very complex situation with many perspectives but no matter where you stand I find it hard to believe that anyone would consider an orphanage a better place for a child than a loving home.

  • Posted By: Kennebunker0201 @ 10/09/2008 9:03:15 AM

    There are THOUSANDS of children in America who 'belong' to the government and are living in foster homes, group homes and correctional facilities! They aren't even 'bad kids'- we just don't have enough homes for them- whether it be foster homes or adoptive families. In Maine, it costs $100 to adopt a foster child and that's for your finger printing. Their healthcare is covered until they are 18. In most cases where the child is 'ready for adoption', their parents rights have long since been taken away and there is never a question of whether or not they can come back and 'take them'.
    I really wish people looked more into foster care/adoption. These kids are just waiting for homes and they have done nothing wrong.
    I have nothing against foreign adoptions- every child should have a loving and safe home. But, when I know there's a child right down the street who doesn't have a forever family... I'm not sure how I could justify spending tens of thousands of dollars to deal with governmental B.S. and adopt from overseas. That is just my personal opinion. We have a 3 year old adopted daughter and are in the process of adopting our 2nd child, through the foster care system. They been the most rewarding experiences of our lives.
    God Bless ANYONE who adopts of fosters a child, no matter what country they may be from!

  • Posted By: mjmackley @ 10/09/2008 8:05:39 AM

    A child is a child is a child...no matter where they were born.

  • Posted By: mjmackley @ 10/09/2008 8:05:14 AM

    A child is a child is a child...no matter where they were born.

  • Posted By: rsteacher @ 10/09/2008 7:48:52 AM

    It is incredibly unfair for people to pass judgment on anyone's choice to adopt children either domestically or internationally. Each family weighs the pros and cons and makes decisions best suited to for them. Much has been reported about potentially corrupt systems in foreign countries. However, the United States is by no means without its flaws. There is plenty of corruption to go around not to mention the incredibly difficult bureaucracy which exists in the U.S. Many families have chosen to go outside of the U.S. because of the bureaucracy in the U.S. and because of the push by many U.S. agencies to maintain contact/ties/rights to birth families in domestic adoption cases. If that system works for some, then great. However, if it does not, then international adoption might be the appropriate choice for others. Also, let's not use the few highly publicized cases of certain celebrities as examples of typical international adoption cases. Whether it is the bureaucracy in the U.S. or the complications with the Hague accreditation or interference by other international agencies, such as UNICEF, abandoned or orphaned children are the ones who lose. Both domestic and international adoptions are impeded by the bureaucracy and politics of governments. Many adoptable children, here and abroad, will not find families because of these impediments.

  • Posted By: rsteacher @ 10/09/2008 7:48:23 AM

    It is incredibly unfair for people to pass judgment on anyone's choice to adopt children either domestically or internationally. Each family weighs the pros and cons and makes decisions best suited to for them. Much has been reported about potentially corrupt systems in foreign countries. However, the United States is by no means without its flaws. There is plenty of corruption to go around not to mention the incredibly difficult bureaucracy which exists in the U.S. Many families have chosen to go outside of the U.S. because of the bureaucracy in the U.S. and because of the push by many U.S. agencies to maintain contact/ties/rights to birth families in domestic adoption cases. If that system works for some, then great. However, if it does not, then international adoption might be the appropriate choice for others. Also, let's not use the few highly publicized cases of certain celebrities as examples of typical international adoption cases. Whether it is the bureaucracy in the U.S. or the complications with the Hague accreditation or interference by other international agencies, such as UNICEF, abandoned or orphaned children are the ones who lose. Both domestic and international adoptions are impeded by the bureaucracy and politics of governments. Many adoptable children, here and abroad, will not find families because of these impediments.

  • Posted By: MiyasMom @ 10/09/2008 5:06:11 AM

    While there may be thousands of kids available for adoption in the US, there are too many rights and opportunities for the birth parents to come back and "retrieve" their child should they desire to do so. In China, the (mostly) girls are abandoned - as males are preferred to carry on the family name - and China still has a 1 child law (taxing the family if they want have more children). We adopted a little girl from China in 2006 and couldn't feel more blessed. My husband is of Chinese decent - his parents were born in China, so this little girl IS retaining her heritage. I guess BillsCatz doesn't know many adoptive families nor has he/she researched our reasons for doing so. I had a friend lose her son - the mother came back to get him after 90 days. That's 90 days of raising a child as your own, loving him unconditionally, only to have the him yanked from your arms - and you can't do a damn thing about it because the mother has "rights." I can't imagine the pain and suffering and the emotional rollercoaster they endured - especially since they were unable to have their own child in the first place. I didn't want to go through that and chose to separate my family from the birth parents by a big ocean.

    By the way, the US is corrrupt also - baby brokers, etc... don't think the US is above the fray...

  • Posted By: HoustonVol @ 10/08/2008 7:35:43 PM

    Maybe more people will now look at adopting domestically. There are over 100,000 children waiting in the US for a good permenant home. I have adopted two myself, and they are a blessing. Instead of taking another country's rejects, let us take care of Americans first.

    • Posted By: ZappoDaClown @ 10/09/2008 12:09:58 AM

      Rejects? Do you know what some women do, at risk to their families, their welfare and their lives, just to get their female babies to orphanages? You have no idea the sacrifices that happen in other countries just in HOPE that their children will survive better in an orphanage than on the street, or dead at a 'doctors' hands. Think before you write.

    • Posted By: noah2b62 @ 10/08/2008 11:05:07 PM

      In my opinion you are a disgrace to the adoption community domestic and Internamtional and a disgrace to this country. How dare you call my child and many others "rejects". I would like to know what agency you went through and if they may be corrupt to let you adopt ANY child. I adopted from the America's (south and central) because I was the one who could not get pregnant and my husband happens to be
      Spanish so for me it made sense. PLUS even though there is suppose to be a time limit as to how long a birth mother has to change her mind if she decides 5 years (or however long) she can take the AP to court and ultimately gets her /their child back and walk away and leave the AP's as if they never existed. You are truly a very uncaring and ignorant individual

    • Posted By: conservative latina @ 10/08/2008 10:38:58 PM

      I am offended by this post's comments. My children are not REJECTS!! They are blessings!
      Perhaps if the U.S. would get it's act together - more people would adopt from the U.S.
      The fact is the U.S. foster care system's goal is to "reunite" families not adoption. Their goal is to try get to the children back into the birth family, and children suffer as a result. I can not tell you how many families I personally know of who are going thru heck and back with their kids who they are trying to adopt from foster care. It is a nightmare!
      This post is so offensive. How can you even be approved to adopt a child when you call them a "reject".

    • Posted By: Juan Quintana @ 10/08/2008 9:03:13 PM

      I found this post offensive. I adopted two children from Guatemala. I had the opportunity to discuss the situation with each of the mothers involved. Both wanted the best for their children while recognizing that at their young age they would be incapable of providing financial support need to meet their basic needs.

      I have never thought of ANY child as a reject. Perhaps some have entered this world under unfortunate circumstances but ALL were children of God.

      This isn't about being American. It is about providing love to a beautiful child regardless of where they were born.

      IMHO,

      Juan F Quintana

  • Posted By: 1domestic1import @ 10/08/2008 11:47:30 PM

    I agree -- and I hope everyone here does -- that we ought not to go around calling one another unkind names. At the same time, the rest of us are tired of people who go bananas whenever they feel insulted and even more tired of people who escalate matters by returning perceived insult for insult. Several of you have done that. The individual who encouraged people to turn away from international adoption to domestic adoption was stating a valid opinion, albeit one I do not share. When (s)he referred to "other country's rejects" (s)he placed a finger on the heartbreaking reality of children who for various reasons are abandoned or disowned. My wife and I thank God to be adoptive parents of two happy and thriving rejects aged 9 and 10, one domestic and one import.

  • Posted By: 1domestic1import @ 10/08/2008 11:45:56 PM

    I agree -- and I hope everyone here does -- that we ought not to go around calling one another unkind names. At the same time, the rest of us are tired of people who go bananas whenever they feel insulted and even more tired of people who escalate matters by returning perceived insult for insult. Several of you have done that. The individual who encouraged people to turn away from international adoption to domestic adoption was stating a valid opinion, albeit one I do not share. When (s)he referred to "other country's rejects" (s)he placed a finger on the heartbreaking reality of children who for various reasons are abandoned or disowned. My wife and I thank God to be adoptive parents of two happy and thriving rejects aged 9 and 10, one domestic and one import.

  • Posted By: lilichaowen @ 10/08/2008 7:33:14 PM

    The whole China process is a joke - just another example in their long litany of human rights violations. It's all about the cash and how mych they can get for dumping their innocent - but often emotionally and physically abused - babies, tots into the loving arms of suckered Americans and Europeans. It's all stage-crafted to look great...but jujst try getting up-to-date medical records on prospective adoptees. You either can't, or they're filled with lies. The only good thing about this monumental scam that's been going on for years is that at least the kids are out of China and can get state-ofthe-art - not primeval - medical care. If most of those kids weren't adopted, they woulkd wind up sweeping streets. There's only one thing that counts in China: MONEY.

    • Posted By: dukeofearl @ 10/08/2008 10:44:28 PM

      My six year old adopted Chinese daughter is bright, talented and more loving than I could have ever hoped for. I can't imagine what situation you have observed that would cause you to think that any parent of an adopted child is a "sucker." I am incredibly blessed to have the child I received, but I went into the process with my eyes open and I would have been fully satisfied with an "abused" child. I didn't, and don't, care what China's motives are. These are orphans who need parents and I would readily do it again.

  • Posted By: jana310 @ 10/08/2008 9:46:05 PM

    Both our children are adopted - our son is from Russia and our daughter from Guatemala. We are saddened by the changes that are resulting in fewer adoptions from these countries - or the halt of adoptions from these countries. Our children are wonderul! There are so many more children that needs homes and I shutter to think what will happen to these children. I think to blame a country for corruptions is wrong - I was never told to place money in a glove compartment. Perhaps that has more to do with the agency than the country. My husband and I are blessed by our children each and every day and I wouldn't do one thing different and I would adopt again internationally in a heartbeat.

  • Posted By: jana310 @ 10/08/2008 9:44:30 PM

    Both our children are adopted - our son is from Russia and our daughter from Guatemala. We are saddened by the changes that are resulting in fewer adoptions from these countries - or the halt of adoptions from these countries. Our children are wonderul! There are so many more children that needs homes and I shutter to think what will happen to these children. I think to blame a country for corruptions is wrong - I was never told to place money in a glove compartment. Perhaps that has more to do with the agency than the country. My husband and I are blessed by our children each and every day and I wouldn't do one thing different and I would adopt again internationally in a heartbeat.

  • Posted By: samwyse @ 10/08/2008 9:08:05 PM

    While I can't speak for anyone's actual motivations, my experiences with foreign adoption are that the providing countries are corrupt while the domestic providers are answering to a higher calling. While out of the country, I and another father-to-be were taken to a bank where most the money we had earlier provided was wired to us. When we returned to the car, the driver instructed us to put the cash into the glove compartment. It was "legit", as we had our kids 24 hours later. When my family later had issues, though, it was obvious that the agency believed that it's role was to "rescue" as many kids as possible, not to help parents with post-adoption issues.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse