One Hall Of Famer, Damaged Condition

Larry Sinclair accuses Barack Obama of homosexual acts and drug use in video posted on YouTube


WASHINGTON ??? The electrifying presidential campaign of Barack Obama faces a new challenge ??? a Minnesota man who claims he took cocaine in 1999 with the then-Illinois legislator and participated in homosexual acts with him.

When his story was ignored by the news media, Larry Sinclair made his case last month in a YouTube video, which has now been viewed more than a quarter-million times. And when it was still ignored by the media, Sinclair filed a suit in Minnesota District Court, alleging threats and intimidation by Obama's staff.

Sinclair, who says he is willing to submit to a polygraph test to validate his claims, will now get his chance ??? thanks to a website offering $10,000 for the right to record it and $100,000 to Sinclair if he passes.

"My motivation for making this public is my desire for a presidential candidate to be honest," Sinclair told WND by telephone. "I didn't want the sex thing to come out. But I think it is important for the candidate to be honest about his drug use as late as 1999."

(Story continues below)


Sinclair, who lives in Duluth and describes himself as "gay," claims he "personally engaged in sexual activity and personally used illegal drugs in November 1999" with the man who is now the leading Democratic presidential candidate. He claims the activity took place in the back of Sinclair's limousine and occurred again, later, in his hotel. Sinclair also says he personally no longer uses drugs.

In his lawsuit, filed last week, he charges his civil rights have been violated by Obama and the Democratic Party. Named as defendants in the case are the presidential candidate, David Axelrod of AKP Message and Media in Chicago and the Democratic National Committee.

Sinclair charges Obama smoked crack cocaine in the limo while Sinclair snorted powdered cocaine provided by the legislator. He says the two met in an upscale Chicago lounge before leaving in Sinclair's limousine where the drug use and sex took place for the first time.

Sinclair says he is a registered Democrat but has never voted for any candidate. He is 46 and claims to be physically disabled.

He says he was not physically impaired in 1999 when the alleged incidents with Obama took place.

Calls placed to the Obama campaign were not returned.

See Larry Sinclair's allegations:

Page 1

Comment: OMGoodness what a big Ass Dummie..First he gets off with a double murder, then he parades around the world thinking he's "Untouchable"..Hey I'm a black woman, and sorry to say but back in 1995 when he was Acquitted/Found Innocent, I FELT LIKE HE COMMITTED THE CRIME THEN JUST AS I STILL FEEL THE SAME NOW!! and I lost a lot of friends behind it but guess they weren't real friends to begin with. This OJSimpson Dummie should have lived the rest of his entire life (LAID BACK AND QUIET)...But Nooooo he wasn't satisfied without being a Media Clown..Now he'll live the life of Riley in jail with millions of dollars on his Commisary Prison Books...Hopefully the Goldmans and Browns can finally get some kind of emotional peace, but I hope they find a way to get some of OJ's money too...What a Damn Dummie...guess his book title was right..and this time "IF I DID IT"..well they caught him with his drawers down on camera cause "HE DID DO IT"

The fact here is that the due process had been followed. "Justice must be done even if Heavens mst fall". Whether there were black jurors or not is not the case; the fact was that their verdict was free and fair to the extent that the judge had no option than to follow and abide by it as 'ratio decidendi' in this case. At this juncture I had to qoute a Latin Maxim which said thus: QUID QUID MOVETUR AB ALIO MOVETUR meaning SOMETHING THAT CAN BE MOVED IS MOVED BY SOMETHING. Hence; OJ Simpson was propelled by a force tha led him out of Grace to the Grass. Philosophically, I had to bring it up that nemesis had taken place; though the jurrors did not avert their attention to OJ's previous murder acquittal case,but as well they were reminded of the past. Yet Legally, the evidence of one's bad character in the past makes no meaning with regards to his present alledged crime. Both counsel on prosecution and defence are called to serve in the temple of justice...the due process had been followed. ERNEST-NAKI esq. (Barrister in Equity, Nigeria)

The fact here is that the due process had been followed. "Justice must be done even if Heavens mst fall". Whether there were black jurors or not is not the case; the fact was that their verdict was free and fair to the extent that the judge had no option than to follow and abide by it as 'ratio decidendi' in this case. At this juncture I had to qoute a Latin Maxim which said thus: QUID QUID MOVETUR AB ALIO MOVETUR meaning SOMETHING THAT CAN BE MOVED IS MOVED BY SOMETHING. Hence; OJ Simpson was propelled by a force tha led him out of Grace to the Grass. Philosophically, I had to bring it up that nemesis had taken place; though the jurrors did not avert their attention to OJ's previous murder acquittal case,but as well they were reminded of the past. Yet Legally, the evidence of one's bad character in the past makes no meaning with regards to his present alledged crime. Both counsel on prosecution and defence are called to serve in the temple of justice...the due process had been followed. ERNEST-NAKI esq. (Barrister in Equity, Nigeria)

This trial was a set up to convict Simpson for the trial from 1994. Where he was found not guilty,When Yale Galanter was talking in the court room he was talking to himself not the jury .They did not want to hear a word he said . From the beginning when this jury was picked along with Rodger .The target was O.J they did not get him in California ,We will get Simpson in Las Vagas that is what the detectives said in the room being taped.
A set up for Simpson why the others got sweetheart deals to roll over on O.J. So Rodgers would win? You call this justice I call it a frame up to get Simpson for the past not the future.

Now, lets get Robert Blake and Phil Spector.

Although William Shatner's case didn't go to trial, there are people who feel he may have killed his wife too.

According to a Rolling Stone article, Jerry Lee Lewis may have killed one or perhaps two of his wives. His 4th wife drowned in a pool under mysterious circumstances shortly before their divorce settlement. (Shatner's wife was also found dead in a pool)
Lewis' 5th wife died under mysterious circumstances soon afterwards.

Read the 8th paragraph in this Rolling Stone article:

http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/jerryleelewis/biography

And anyone who feels sorry for OJ, think of it this way...would you feel sorry for a man who won the lottery one day, then went to Vegas and lost it all on the roulette table???

By the way, i wouldnt be surprised if OJ decided that, after a few years of lost appeals,court hearings and prison food, to take the easy way out and end his life. To bad he didnt give Ron and Nicole that same chance...

OJ wont make it too long in prison. After a couple years of lost appeals and court filings, he will lose hope and find a faster, easier way out of this world. I wish Ron and Nicole had that same chance. Needless to say, i dont think too many americans are going to lose much sleep over this. Bravo to the jury for doing what was right and just.