I strongly believe that co-sleeping and nursing (two to three times at night in addition to daytime nursings) until my baby was almost three prevented him from SIDS--as well as a few other problems. Co-sleeping and night nursing (when mama makes the best and most milk) ensure that the baby is alert enough and breathing heavily enough to get much needed O2. Which I'm sure is why the fans seem to work so well. Just think about how humans evolved. We did not evolve with baby sleeping in the next cave over. We evolved with babies attached to the mother's (or someone elses) body, and co sleeping at night. A co-sleeping baby is always on his or her back,nursing as often as they desire. This whole discussion is the result of humans moving away from the evolutionary reality in which we evolved. I also would not be surprised in the least if the other big reason the current guidelines work so well (at reducing SIDS--and also why SIDS increased so much in the first place) is because of the toxic chemicals/fire retardants that our mattresses and sheets and pajamas are soaked in. Facing upwards OF COURSE decreases you exposure to this menace. I bet a baby sleeping on her belly, on an organic mattress with organic sheets sleeping in organic clothes (meaning not sprayed with chemicals to make them "safe.") would have no different of a rate of SIDS as any other group of babies.
Preventing Tragedy
Three new studies examine the mystery of SIDS—a condition that takes thousands of infant lives every year.
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
Understandably, Margo Parisi wanted to take every possible step to reduce the risk that her newborn son, Luca, would die of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. So the El Cerrito, Calif., mom followed the "Back to Sleep" guidelines from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), putting Luca to sleep on his back, shunning blankets and pillows and keeping the temperature cool. She also turned on the ceiling fan; she had read a newspaper article that said researchers were investigating whether that might help. After all, she and her husband already had the fan. "It's cheap, it's easy, it's not going to harm the baby," she says. "It's one more thing you can do as a parent that can prevent something horrible from happening." So far all the precautions have paid off: at 14 weeks, Luca is happy and healthy.
Parisi is one of a growing number of parents taking measures to reduce the risk of SIDS—defined as "the sudden death of an infant under 1 year of age, which remains unexplained after a thorough case investigation, including performance of a complete autopsy, examination of the death scene, and review of the clinical history." In fact, the campaign to educate people about the syndrome has been so successful that infant deaths due to SIDS have been cut in half since the NICHD introduced its Back to Sleep campaign in 1994. Nonetheless, each year SIDS kills about 2,300 U.S. babies, about one infant out of every 2,000 live births, according to the American SIDS Institute. Three new studies published today look at how that number might be further reduced.
In the October issue of the Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, researchers at Kaiser Permanente looked at whether the use of a fan in the room where a baby sleeps can help reduce the incidence of SIDS. In in-person interviews, they questioned mothers of 185 California babies who died of SIDS and the mothers of 312 randomly selected "control" infants matched by county, race, ethnicity and age to the first group. Kaiser researchers found that infants who slept in rooms ventilated by fans had a 72 percent lower risk of SIDS compared to infants who slept in bedrooms without fans. Using a fan appeared be most effective with infants in high-risk environments, such as those sleeping in overheated rooms or on their stomachs. Researchers hypothesized that fans may improve ventilation and decrease the chance that babies will rebreathe exhaled carbon dioxide (an explanation for SIDS known as the "stale-air hypothesis").
The two other new studies focused on how parents and caregivers are implementing existing guidelines for reducing SIDS deaths. While the campaign to have babies sleep on their backs has been very successful, the message isn't getting to everyone. A study in a special supplement to the journal Pediatrics revealed that at 3 months of age (the peak for SIDS is 2 to 4 months of age), 25 percent of parents are still not following recommendations to put their babies to sleep on their backs. And a third of parents were sharing a bed with their babies at that age, again contrary to NICHD and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines.
"This information was very concerning," says Fern Hauck, a coauthor of the Pediatrics study, an associate professor of family medicine at the University of Virginia and a member of the AAP task force on SIDS. Perhaps, she says, the Back to Sleep campaign is getting less attention than it was in the 1990s. "We need to highlight the importance of keeping all the Back to Sleep recommendations," she says. She also notes that La Leche and other pro-breastfeeding groups encourage bed-sharing as a way to promote nursing.
In another Pediatrics report, researchers found that increasing childcare providers' knowledge about the importance of supine sleep position made them more likely to put babies on their backs.
As researchers identify more ways to prevent SIDS, its causes are still unclear. "SIDS is a definition by exclusion," says Howard Hoffman, an epidemiologist at the National Institutes of Health. "If you can't pin it on something you really understand the basis for, then it becomes SIDS."
There is evidence to suggest that some babies are more susceptible to SIDS than others. Hunt explains that these children have an impairment in the way they regulate their breathing and heart rate during sleep. "We know that if body temperature, environmental temperature, is increased, it does put increased demand on these functions … If control or regulation of these functions is impaired in some way, [babies with the impairment] can't handle this thermal stress as well as other infants." (Fetal exposure to maternal smoking may contribute to an impairment in breathing and heart rate, he adds.)
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »







