Liveblogging the McCain-Obama Presidential Debate

Factcheck.org states that Obama's statement about cutting taxes for 95% of Americans is false. It states that 20% will receive a tax increase.
So my calculations are: 40% out of the remaining 80% don't make enough to pay taxes. So only 40% of Americans will not receive tax increases. BUT Obama wants to repeal the current Bush tax cuts. SO THAT MEANS AN AUTOMATIC TAX INCREASE FOR ALL. Lots of double talk going on here. BEWARE OF THIS GUY ...he is a fast talking politician. No change there. He is worse than we have ever seen.
McCain does not plan to change any taxes He wants to leave things as they are.

Also just a quick comment notice all the states Obama has a lead in. Most if not all of those states are dealing the voter fraud as well lead by ACRON, a organization that is deeply involved with Obama. Just a thought, people, just a thought...I feel its just too many things coming up directly related with Obama and the American public doesnt care..... This is a joke of a election and the democrats and the media is all behind it.......

VERY IMPORTANT MESSAGE
The upcoming election is the most critical election in the history of our nation. The very future of our nation???s foundation is at stake. Every person will be affected. If the liberals win, then our foundation will no longer be based on traditional morality. It will gradually but assuredly be based on an ever shifting, ever moving foundation. If the liberals win, the damage can???t be stopped with elections two, four or forty years from now. America will forever be changed. We will keep seeing a gradual and growing hostility toward people of faith,. The morals of our nation will continue to decline. Our children and grandchildren will pay the price.

Obama is at 264 Electoral Votes, all thats needed is [270]

Aint that America.....Something to see.

John Cougar Mellencamp

Aint That America


This is a Young Country and it should be lead by a Young Man and having Joe Biden by his side, is a Good Thing....

Aint That America

Something to See Baby !!!!

Source: Washington Independent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Enpc6_lqw7Y

Petraeus Talk

By Spencer Ackerman 10/8/08 4:16 PM

Gen. David Petraeus (WDCpix)

Throughout Sen. John McCain???s presidential campaign, the Republican nominee has wrapped himself in the mantle of U.S. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, proclaiming himself the leading advocate of the former commanding general in Iraq who devised last year???s controversial troop surge. Yet during a talk Wednesday about Iraq at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington policy organization, Petraeus repeatedly made statements that bolstered the foreign-policy proposals of Sen. Barack Obama, McCain???s Democratic rival, or cut against McCain???s own lines.


Petraeus relinquished command in Iraq last month. He assumes responsibility for U.S. Central Command later this month, putting him in charge of U.S. forces in the Middle East and South Asia.

As a serving military officer, Petraeus attempted to avoid any explicit political discussion. ???I???m not walking into minefields now,??? Petraeus said, to laughter, when asked a question that referred to Tuesday night???s presidential debate. In fact, the general averred that he didn???t watch the debate.


Yet Petraeus, whether intentionally or not, often waded into areas of dispute between Obama and McCain involving Afghanistan, negotiating with adversaries and other recent campaign controversies. Each time, the general either lent tacit support to Obama or denied tacit support to McCain.


Unbidden, Petraeus discussed whether his strategy in Iraq ??? protecting the population while cleaving apart the insurgency through reconciliation efforts to crush the remaining hard-core enemies ??? could also work in Afghanistan. The question has particular salience as Petraeus takes over U.S. Central Command, which will put him at the helm of all U.S. troops in the Middle East and South Asia, thereby giving him a large role in the Afghanistan war.


???Some of the concepts used in Iraq are transplantable [to Afghanistan] while others perhaps are not,??? he said. ???Every situation is unique.
???

Petraeus pointed to efforts by Hamid Karzai???s government to negotiate a deal with the Taliban that would potentially bring some Taliban members back to power, saying that if they are ???willing to reconcile,??? it would be ???a positive step.
???

In saying that, Petraeus implicitly allied with U.S. Army Gen. David McKiernan, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan. Last week, McKiernan rejected the idea of replicating the blend of counterinsurgency strategy employed in Iraq.

Source: Washington Independent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Enpc6_lqw7Y

Petraeus Talk

By Spencer Ackerman 10/8/08 4:16 PM

Gen. David Petraeus (WDCpix)

Throughout Sen. John McCain???s presidential campaign, the Republican nominee has wrapped himself in the mantle of U.S. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, proclaiming himself the leading advocate of the former commanding general in Iraq who devised last year???s controversial troop surge. Yet during a talk Wednesday about Iraq at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington policy organization, Petraeus repeatedly made statements that bolstered the foreign-policy proposals of Sen. Barack Obama, McCain???s Democratic rival, or cut against McCain???s own lines.


Petraeus relinquished command in Iraq last month. He assumes responsibility for U.S. Central Command later this month, putting him in charge of U.S. forces in the Middle East and South Asia.

As a serving military officer, Petraeus attempted to avoid any explicit political discussion. ???I???m not walking into minefields now,??? Petraeus said, to laughter, when asked a question that referred to Tuesday night???s presidential debate. In fact, the general averred that he didn???t watch the debate.


Yet Petraeus, whether intentionally or not, often waded into areas of dispute between Obama and McCain involving Afghanistan, negotiating with adversaries and other recent campaign controversies. Each time, the general either lent tacit support to Obama or denied tacit support to McCain.


Unbidden, Petraeus discussed whether his strategy in Iraq ??? protecting the population while cleaving apart the insurgency through reconciliation efforts to crush the remaining hard-core enemies ??? could also work in Afghanistan. The question has particular salience as Petraeus takes over U.S. Central Command, which will put him at the helm of all U.S. troops in the Middle East and South Asia, thereby giving him a large role in the Afghanistan war.


???Some of the concepts used in Iraq are transplantable [to Afghanistan] while others perhaps are not,??? he said. ???Every situation is unique.
???

Petraeus pointed to efforts by Hamid Karzai???s government to negotiate a deal with the Taliban that would potentially bring some Taliban members back to power, saying that if they are ???willing to reconcile,??? it would be ???a positive step.
???

In saying that, Petraeus implicitly allied with U.S. Army Gen. David McKiernan, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan. Last week, McKiernan rejected the idea of replicating the blend of counterinsurgency strategy employed in Iraq.

Anyone who thinks theres much Difference between a Democrat or a Republican, needs to Deprogram yourselves Quickly.

All Politicians answers to the CFR and Most are Blood Related, as well as being Chosen or hand picked...fact

The Rockefeller's Control this Region, called North America.

David Rockefeller controls BOTH PARTIES.....

The CFR, The FED and other Organizations Control BOTH PARTIES...

Thats why there is an [Electoral College]

The Population Rarely Chooses the President.

34 of all your Presidernts in America are Blood Related ...Period.

This is a fact and its not by Accident.

John Kerry is George W. Bush's Blood Cousin and this will not Change, simple and plain.

You had better acknowledge the True Rulers-Controllers of this Society...

The Rockefeller's are this Nation's Royalty and you all had better pay Homage, because you can't do a Damn Thing about their System, but Exist in it or sink or swim in it !!!

You know I was leaning towards Mccain up until his GOP convention when he introduced Sarah Palin. My jaw dropped and my heart sunk, and thought if Mccain bites the dust and God forbid really God forbid Sarah Palin would be the President SCCAAAARRRRY! Good news is I am still undecided I wished there was a third party candidate though.

If this election cycle has demonstrated anything, it is that in order to preserve democracy in this country, it is passed time we reconsidered the additional protections provided the media by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), which protects the media from most slander and libel suits. While perhaps noble at the time in its conception, the media has abundantly demonstrated that for the advancement of their own political agenda, on both sides, and to fill the demands of the 24/7 news cycle, they are willing to abandon any pretense of objectivity or, more importantly, of journalistic ethics. Since they cannot exercise the power they have been given responsibly on their own, perhaps it is necessary to return the threat of legal sanction under which they operated prior to 1964.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan