SPONSORED BY:

Incoming

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Which is unusual, given McCain's professed love of the town-hall setting. It was the McCain camp, after all, that had proposed a town-hall forum every week during early discussions about the debate schedule. Given the instant polls gauging the outcome Tuesday night, McCain ought to be grateful that Obama said no: a CNN poll showed a 24-point lead for Obama.

Heading into the showdown in Nashville, the pressure was largely on McCain. Trailing in national polls and in a number of the key battleground states, he knew he needed to play up his national-security credentials, raise questions about Obama's experience—and try to reverse voters' rising confidence in the Democratic Party's ability to address their economic concerns. He came out swinging, as he had done in the first debate. He bashed Obama on earmarks, and hit him again over his diplomatic posture vis-à-vis talks with Iran.

But at times, McCain seemed to sense that the audience might not be buying it—as though he was aware of the risks of attacking when many surveys suggest that the blows have driven his own negatives up. Addressing a question that touched on the Bush administration's energy legislation, he said: "By the way, my friends, I know you grow a little weary with this back and forth. It was an energy bill on the floor of the Senate loaded down with goodies, billions for the oil companies, and it was sponsored by Bush and Cheney. You know who voted for it? You might never know. That one," McCain said, pointing to Obama. "You know who voted against it? Me." With that, he grinned like he'd just hit the jackpot on the slots.

Obama smiled through the attacks, but he was less generous with his praise than he'd been during their previous meeting in Mississippi. Gone were the frequent nods to "John" being "right," or absolutely right, on a whole host of issues. At one point, he feinted in that direction, allowing that his opponent regarded him as "green behind the ears" (cliché police: that's green, senator, or wet behind the ears). But even as McCain called out a thank you, Obama wheeled and stuck in the shiv, reminding audiences that the supposedly mature one on stage had been the guy who once sang "Bomb Iran" to the tune of a Beach Boys ditty, and called for the "annihilation of North Korea."

Obama also seemed determine to defuse another line of criticism—that he fails to connect with voters on a personal and emotional level. He talked about how his mother had scrapped with insurance companies on her death bed, how the family had been on food stamps and how his grandmother scrimped so that the family could afford to give him a first-class education. And he sought to express empathy with his questioners as they described their own financial struggles. He hardly rivaled Bill Clinton's ability to feel their pain—but he did express some of his own.

McCain remains a formidable presence—a tough debater relentlessly on the attack. But he needed a knockdown Tuesday night to help change the narrative of the campaign. At the end, Obama was still standing, and smiling. On to round three.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/23/2008 2:15:50 PM

    See: http://www.newsweek.com/id/164972
    Stating that Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act wasn't what caused the meltdown, and noting that "economists on both sides of the political spectrum have suggested that the act has probably made the crisis less severe than it might otherwise have been." And also:
    http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/who_caused_the_economic_crisis.html
    Even Bill Clinton points to liberal Congressional Democrats??? protection of Fannie and Freddie from scrutiny as a primary cause of the current economic meltdown.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsynspIqAoE

    Obama in the last half of the this youtube link, says so as well..

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related

  • Posted By: Dorothydotgale @ 10/20/2008 2:43:09 PM

    It is important to define "Capitalism" correctly because a proper definition is a prerequisite to a proper defense. Capitalism is the only moral political system because it is the only system dedicated to the protection of rights, which is a requirement for human survival and flourishing. This is the only proper role of a government. Capitalism should be defended vigorously on a moral basis, not an economic or utilitarian basis. People often use the term "Capitalism" loosely, "Laissez Faire Capitalism", as you have described is not true Capitalist system. "Laissez Faire Capitalism" is now redundant. I gather you do not agree with the Constitution of the United States. How sad.

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/16/2008 8:31:34 PM

    Baby I'll be there to take your hand,
    Baby I'll be there to share the land
    That they'll be giving away, when we all live together.

    So, in the exchange with "Joe the plumber" we find out that Obama really is as radical as his early political acquaintances, and is into the failed economic policy of wealth redistribution. Yahoo, back to the 70's we go! So now we know that an Obama presidency really would be as if it were Carter's lost second term after all.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now