Pulling Away

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: newsweek is garbage @ 10/13/2008 6:11:01 PM

    While neither Barack Obama nor John McCain want to reinstate a military draft, the two candidates diverge over whether to include women as part of any future conscription efforts.

    The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported Monday that McCain does not think women should have to register with the Selective Service, while Obama supports a requirement for both men and women to register.

    The Post-Gazette also reported that McCain supports current restrictions on women in combat positions, but Obama would consider opening those positions to women.

    "Women are already serving in combat [in Iraq and Afghanistan] and the current policy should be updated to reflect realities on the ground," Obama national security spokeswoman Wendy Morigi told the newspaper

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/14/2008 2:29:59 PM

      I vote this the weakest attempt by a troll yet to try and make a point against Obama.

    • Posted By: dustytrails @ 10/13/2008 6:22:36 PM

      So whats your point i thought you was going to make one

  • Posted By: newsweek is garbage @ 10/13/2008 8:15:40 PM

    The Sun Times today gave a major clue that Barack Obama will indeed go down with Tony Rezko, sooner rather than later. It looks as though Rezko is about to turn on Alexi Giannoulias, the 30-year old State Treasurer of Illinois (who was elected only because Obama backed him).

    Here???s where all the clues are???and then we???ll walk you through the local Chicago politics on how today???s hint by the Sun Times has us convinced, for the first time ever, that prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald could indeed send Barack Obama to jail. We need to repeat that: we never believed, until now, that Obama would go to jail for anything related to Rezko. Today, this breaking news about what Rezko is singing to the Feds about makes us reconsider all of that. Barack Obama will serve a prison sentence in the next few years ??? because knowing Fitzgerald, there is no reason he would be going through all of this if that was not the targeted goal in the long term.

    It's time to stop playing games with Obama and question him about Rezko and his birth certificate. This guy is slippery as a snake. he should be in jail right now......


    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/14/2008 2:28:39 PM

      Wishful thinking is going to do you in. Rezko is nothing. Ayers is nothing. Obama will not be swift-boated, no matter how hard the kooks try.

  • Posted By: newsweek is garbage @ 10/13/2008 8:26:24 PM

    West Palm Beach Congressman Tim Mahoney (D-FL), whose predecessor resigned in the wake of a sex scandal, agreed to a $121,000 payment to a former mistress who worked on his staff and was threatening to sue him, according to current and former members of his staff who have been briefed on the settlement, which involved Mahoney and his campaign committee.

    The affair between Congressman Tim Mahoney and Patricia Allen began, according to current and former staffers, in 2006 when Mahoney was campaigning for Congress against Foley, promising "a world that is safer, more moral."
    (ABC News)
    Mahoney, who is married, also promised the woman, Patricia Allen, a $50,000 a year job for two years at the agency that handles his campaign advertising, the staffers said.


    A Mahoney spokesperson would not answer questions about the alleged affair or the settlement, but said Allen resigned of her own accord and "has not received any special payment from campaign funds."


    Senior Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives, including Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL), the chair of the Democratic Caucus, have been working with Mahoney to keep the matter from hurting his re-election campaign, the Mahoney staffers said.

    Here we go again...another Democrat involved in a sex scandal......

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/14/2008 2:27:28 PM

      Larry Craig
      Mark Foley
      Ted Haggard

  • Posted By: Krohn @ 10/12/2008 8:25:49 PM

    THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CANDIDATE!

    NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF THIS COUNTRY HAS A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BEEN GIVEN SUCH A FREE PASS BY THE PRESS AND JUST ABOUT EVERYONE ELSE!

    I AM WAITING FOR A BLACK PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE TO MAKE IT ON HIS OWN MERIT.

    COLIN POWELL COMES TO MIND!

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/13/2008 2:17:48 PM

      I hope Obama makes posting in all-caps, a crime.

      • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 10/14/2008 12:05:39 PM

        While he's at it, he can go after unnecessary commas.

        :D

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/14/2008 2:02:43 PM

          It's not unnecessary. It's written as it should be read aloud. After all, commas denote a pause.

    • Posted By: neos @ 10/12/2008 8:35:17 PM

      I know that it is hard for you 'traditionalists' to come to grips with the increasingly post-racial nature of America, but Senator Obama is as much 'white' as he is 'black.' Now go back to yelling at kids on your lawn...

  • Posted By: ICYEYES800 @ 10/13/2008 10:38:52 PM

    Hardleyabrain, YOU ARE THE ESSENCE of what white AMERICANS see wrong in the black community...you are vulgar, disrespectful and YOU are a
    N
    I
    G
    G
    E
    R
    I
    A
    N......................................AND A PEA BRAIN......................................McCain/Palin '08

    • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 10/14/2008 11:42:04 AM

      Wow. Some things never change.

    • Posted By: KnightHawk @ 10/14/2008 9:11:36 AM

      I do trust that the above sentiment is not shared by the majority of white-Americans. Such bitterness can only lead to a repeat of the riots of the 1960's and I dare say that nothing good could come from such a recreation because blacks today are likewise armed to the teeth. Automatic weapons, 9mm and such are the weapon of choice in this day and time. The streets of America would flow red with blood and that is something all Americans should choose to avoid.

      All that needs to be done is for us to respect one another...please! The alternative might prove to totally self-destructive; truely an about face and a plunge into a dark abyss. Vote the facts, not the rhetoric!

    • Posted By: newsweek is garbage @ 10/14/2008 4:09:04 AM

      Please guys, do not use such vulgar and cruel attacks/remarks to each other. Thiat is how Newsweek and the political establishment wants us to be. They want us to attack each other and forget what criminials they are. You are placing your anger in the wrong direction. Cancel your subscription to Newsweek and you will feel much better. Both of you stay away from politics for awhile,, until you become levelheaded. Listen to some Led Zeppelin or Crosby, Stills, and Nash, then you'll feel new again.

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/13/2008 11:44:46 PM

      McCain is a [Acorn Man] and other Republicans too !!!

      40% of Acorn's Registered Voters have been [Republicans]

      Hahahaha !!

      On Monday, the Democratic-leaning group ACORN, which has been painted as a criminal enterprise by the GOP for its voter registration and housing policy efforts, pushed back against its critics by producing a photo of John McCain attending its March 2006 rally.



      It was a reminder that, for all their electoral histrionics, Republicans have aligned themselves with ACORN in the past.

      Indeed, in addition to the McCain photo, there is a host of examples of prominent McCain surrogates attending ACORN events, signing ACORN legislation, or complimenting the group's efforts.

      Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, for example, partnered with ACORN in March 2008 for a "Homeownership Promotes The Economy" taskforce. More recently, Crist declared that -- contrary to GOP outrage -- he was not upset with the group's voter registration efforts in his state. The New York Times reported that ACORN supported a law signed by Governor Crist, which "changed the rules last year to restore the voting rights of about 112,000 former convicts."

      In July 2005, meanwhile, another Republican governor, Rick Perry of Texas, signed ACORN's Lending Law Reform Bill that changed the state's homelending practices.



      In July 2008, California Governor and McCain supporter Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that ACORN helped draft aimed at California homeowners facing foreclosure.


      In June 2007, Minnesota Governor and McCain VP short-lister Tim Pawlenty signed a similar bill -- drafted by ACORN -- that helped homeowners get fairer deals on their mortgages.

      "The legislation was drafted according to recommendations made by a predatory lending study group established by Swanson prior to the legislative session," wrote the Northwestern Financial Review. "The study group contained representatives from the banking industry and the mortgage brokers association, as well as consumer advocates from organizations such as Illegal Aid and ACORN."

      As Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney signed an anti-predatory lending bill that ACORN supported. In February 2006, Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman met with the ACORN Katrina Survivors Association. And back in July 2005, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg actually got a kiss from ACORN's state leader, according to the publication City Limits, during an announcement that the city would protect or create 65,000 affordable units in a new housing proposal. Bloomberg, it should be noted, has not endorsed a candidate.

  • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 10/14/2008 11:39:13 AM

    Bill, is there any reason for spamming that article everywhere?

  • Posted By: billtill @ 10/14/2008 10:34:53 AM

    About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new constitution in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh , had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years earlier:

    'A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government.'
    'A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.'
    'From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.'

    'The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years'

    'During those 200 years, those nations always progressed through the following sequence:

    1. from bondage to spiritual faith;
    2. from spiritual faith to great courage;
    3. from courage to liberty;
    4. from liberty to abundance;
    5. from abundance to complacency;
    6. from complacency to apathy;
    7. from apathy to dependence;
    8. from dependence back into bondage'

    Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000 Presidential election:

    Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
    Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans: 2,427,000
    Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million Republicans: 143 million
    Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats: 13.2 Republicans: 2.1

    Professor Olson adds: 'In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of this great country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare...' Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the 'complacency and apathy' phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the 'governmental dependency' phase.

    If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegal's and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.

    If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message. If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.

    WE LIVE IN THE LAND OF THE FREE,
    ONLY BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE

  • Posted By: KnightHawk @ 10/14/2008 8:46:58 AM

    So many comments about voter fraud in this blog associated with ACORN. Surely none of these post are from past generations of white-Americans who sponsored a voter deception known as "Jim Crow" which did not count the votes of black-Amercians and/or did not allow blacks to even register at all. When one decides to decieve, chances are, more deception is likely to follow in due time.

    Life has a way of demanding that past debts be paid in full. Many white-Americans fear a black president because they likewise fear that the ghastly wrong-doing perpetrated by the KKK and others may be now visited upon today's generations of whites. Mass murder, lynch mobs, the burning and bombing of churches, hate speech against minorities and now; shouts of "hang that darky from a tree", "Terrorist", "Obama is an Arab", "Traitor" and "Bomb Obama" seem to have an all too familiar ring, doesn't it?

    I find this particular discourse to be quite fascinating because in the part of the U.S. that I live in; I see so many blacks and whites married to each other and they proudly display their beautiful mixed children as they travel to and fro. Amazing how all efforts to stamp out black America just didn't work! Now...how many mixed families do you think will support hate-speech that have half-black, half-white babies. Pure white America will never exist in these United States; give up the hate rhetoric, its doesn't apply now-a-days!

    Whites who hate blacks (mostly white-Republicans) simply cannot recruit liberals and that's where John McCain is loosing his base of supporters of real terrorism as they continue to try to equate Barack Obama to Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright. Be careful white-America that you do not label yourselves the world's greatest hypocrites...

    "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men (and women) are created equal."

  • Posted By: observer101 @ 10/13/2008 3:15:02 PM

    So there I was..Just sitting on the toilet dropping a righteous Harley...I had to strain a little but I got him out...After playing round of HotShots golf on the PSP, I wipe the remnants of that dirty harley from my rectum...I went to flush that nasty thing but he put up a fight...Just swirling, in the middle of that throwns vortex...I flushed again and almost got him...I took the plunger and squished that meaty chud, then flushed again...This time I had him...I could hear him exclaim as he went down to Davey Jones locker, "I hate you Repigs", but I didnt care..I got rid of the little fudge monkey and thats all that mattered...McCain/Palin 08'

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/13/2008 11:48:00 PM

      McCain is a [Acorn Man] and other Republicans too !!!

      40% of Acorn's Registered Voters have been [Republicans]

      Hahahaha !!

      On Monday, the Democratic-leaning group ACORN, which has been painted as a criminal enterprise by the GOP for its voter registration and housing policy efforts, pushed back against its critics by producing a photo of John McCain attending its March 2006 rally.



      It was a reminder that, for all their electoral histrionics, Republicans have aligned themselves with ACORN in the past.

      Indeed, in addition to the McCain photo, there is a host of examples of prominent McCain surrogates attending ACORN events, signing ACORN legislation, or complimenting the group's efforts.

      Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, for example, partnered with ACORN in March 2008 for a "Homeownership Promotes The Economy" taskforce. More recently, Crist declared that -- contrary to GOP outrage -- he was not upset with the group's voter registration efforts in his state. The New York Times reported that ACORN supported a law signed by Governor Crist, which "changed the rules last year to restore the voting rights of about 112,000 former convicts."

      In July 2005, meanwhile, another Republican governor, Rick Perry of Texas, signed ACORN's Lending Law Reform Bill that changed the state's homelending practices.



      In July 2008, California Governor and McCain supporter Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that ACORN helped draft aimed at California homeowners facing foreclosure.


      In June 2007, Minnesota Governor and McCain VP short-lister Tim Pawlenty signed a similar bill -- drafted by ACORN -- that helped homeowners get fairer deals on their mortgages.

      "The legislation was drafted according to recommendations made by a predatory lending study group established by Swanson prior to the legislative session," wrote the Northwestern Financial Review. "The study group contained representatives from the banking industry and the mortgage brokers association, as well as consumer advocates from organizations such as Illegal Aid and ACORN."

      As Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney signed an anti-predatory lending bill that ACORN supported. In February 2006, Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman met with the ACORN Katrina Survivors Association. And back in July 2005, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg actually got a kiss from ACORN's state leader, according to the publication City Limits, during an announcement that the city would protect or create 65,000 affordable units in a new housing proposal. Bloomberg, it should be noted, has not endorsed a candidate.

    • Posted By: Pallisor @ 10/13/2008 6:21:14 PM

      ROFLMAO!!! That is the best description of the imbecile I have ever seen on NW!

    • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 10/13/2008 3:50:17 PM

      After the recent business in Florida, I have come to expect that sort of post as par for the course with a certain type of republican.

      • Posted By: Pallisor @ 10/13/2008 6:15:19 PM

        Let me see, assho!e harley just attacked you several foul posts... (he's so stupid, he couldn't see you were on his side). hmmmm.... I'm certain harley is a democrat.....

        So much for "just what you expect from a republican."

  • Posted By: ICYEYES800 @ 10/13/2008 9:01:03 PM

    IT was also one of the BIGGEST DAYS FOR ACORN!!!! On the news tonight there was a young teenage boy who admitted to registering 73 times!!!!! He said he was just trying to help them guys get they money!!! GO FIGURE...Between ACORN and Rezko.......Obama is HISTORY!!!!!!!!!! McCain/Palin '08

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/13/2008 11:44:32 PM

      McCain is a [Acorn Man] and other Republicans too !!!

      40% of Acorn's Registered Voters have been [Republicans]

      Hahahaha !!

      On Monday, the Democratic-leaning group ACORN, which has been painted as a criminal enterprise by the GOP for its voter registration and housing policy efforts, pushed back against its critics by producing a photo of John McCain attending its March 2006 rally.



      It was a reminder that, for all their electoral histrionics, Republicans have aligned themselves with ACORN in the past.

      Indeed, in addition to the McCain photo, there is a host of examples of prominent McCain surrogates attending ACORN events, signing ACORN legislation, or complimenting the group's efforts.

      Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, for example, partnered with ACORN in March 2008 for a "Homeownership Promotes The Economy" taskforce. More recently, Crist declared that -- contrary to GOP outrage -- he was not upset with the group's voter registration efforts in his state. The New York Times reported that ACORN supported a law signed by Governor Crist, which "changed the rules last year to restore the voting rights of about 112,000 former convicts."

      In July 2005, meanwhile, another Republican governor, Rick Perry of Texas, signed ACORN's Lending Law Reform Bill that changed the state's homelending practices.



      In July 2008, California Governor and McCain supporter Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that ACORN helped draft aimed at California homeowners facing foreclosure.


      In June 2007, Minnesota Governor and McCain VP short-lister Tim Pawlenty signed a similar bill -- drafted by ACORN -- that helped homeowners get fairer deals on their mortgages.

      "The legislation was drafted according to recommendations made by a predatory lending study group established by Swanson prior to the legislative session," wrote the Northwestern Financial Review. "The study group contained representatives from the banking industry and the mortgage brokers association, as well as consumer advocates from organizations such as Illegal Aid and ACORN."

      As Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney signed an anti-predatory lending bill that ACORN supported. In February 2006, Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman met with the ACORN Katrina Survivors Association. And back in July 2005, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg actually got a kiss from ACORN's state leader, according to the publication City Limits, during an announcement that the city would protect or create 65,000 affordable units in a new housing proposal. Bloomberg, it should be noted, has not endorsed a candidate.

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/13/2008 11:44:02 PM

      The article repigs do not want you to see

      http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain/page/1

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/13/2008 8:31:42 PM

    Biggest one day increase in the Dow in market's history. However:

    "The Dow's lone decliner was General Electric (GE, Fortune 500), which reported weak quarterly earnings late Friday. It was also among the 18 components of the S&P 500 that didn't join the rally.???"

    http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/13/markets/markets_newyork/?postversion=2008101318

    Another reason might be that, having provided a soapbox for socialist through its NBC division, the market no longer trusts GE with investment capital, Buffet notwithstanding.

  • Posted By: quasqueton @ 10/13/2008 8:02:16 PM

    I see. This is the newsweak-ACORN poll, conducted by Princeton. A very fair poll, but since newsweak is so overwhelmingly pro Obama bin-Laden, it doesn't surprise me at all.

  • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 10/13/2008 4:34:21 PM

    "Posted at Free Republic"

    With that one phrase, your credibility went out the window.

    Hilarious.

  • Posted By: ICYEYES800 @ 10/11/2008 2:31:17 PM

    I think that the double digit lead may become much smaller, in light of the FACT that REZKO has been arrested and is opening up and will eventually HANG OSAMA.....he's gonna look great in the lovely shade of ORANGE in state prison.....Michelle will be going DOWN with the little man..........McCain/Palin '08

    • Posted By: muslimsforpresidents @ 10/11/2008 2:47:38 PM

      watch your language b4 you talk that way about a CHRISTIAN MAN. He is not of our faith. Your a bigot and racist PIG

      • Posted By: Independant Voter @ 10/11/2008 3:51:18 PM

        You're out of line too pal - let's try to be civil here and stick to the issues. You angry right wing zealots are not winning over any of us Independants with that tone!

        • Posted By: chris s. @ 10/11/2008 4:57:32 PM

          Don't you realize that McCain's supporters are a Mob, lacking one thing ,hoods.He's got them so fired up, they only hear sound bites. This is called the" low information voter". An elitist is someone who has teeth, a high school diploma and doesn't live in a double wide. When he corrected the people at the townhall meeting yesterday, they didn't even realize they had been shot down by their very own candidate. Let's see if the honorable McCain has enough courage to apologize to Obama face to face at the next debate. Doubtful! He has painted himself into a corner. He has said the same untruthful things about Obama so many times, his supporters are only going to hear what they want to. Even though he seemed sincere,the damage has been done. If things don't change, McCain could have blood on his hands. He knows it went too far , that's why he had to say what he did. If you have FOX on 24/7 you aren't inclined to think for yourself.

          • Posted By: Pallisor @ 10/12/2008 9:23:35 AM

            You're full of it. Both parties have their nut cases. Stop labeling in everyone.

            • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/13/2008 2:56:40 PM

              Republicans have many more of them.

    • Posted By: Independant Voter @ 10/11/2008 3:49:19 PM

      Icyeyes - you need to catch a clue. Rezco case is already over (year ago) - and there was nothing there. We can talk about meaningless issues - like why Todd Palin wants Alaska to secede from US - or we can talk about what matters - the economy, the wars, etc... You're an angry guy Icyeyes - take a break!

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/11/2008 3:45:43 PM

      Go back to the trailer where you came from, a$$ho!e.

  • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 7:31:41 PM

    This email comes in three parts: Read them all...

    Part 1
    In just one year. Remember the election in 2006?
    Thought you might like to read the following:
    A little over one year ago:

    1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
    2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
    3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.

    Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:

    1) Consumer confidence plummet;
    2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $4.05 a gallon;
    3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
    4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
    5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars; < BR>6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.

    America voted for change in 2006, and we got it!

    Remember it's Congress that makes law not the President.
    He has to work with what's handed to him.

    • Posted By: neos @ 10/11/2008 7:34:07 PM

      So, the conclusion is that we need a veto-proof 60 Democratic senators. Couldn't agree more. Vote Democratic!

      • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 7:51:51 PM

        The conclusiom since they went along with the dems continue to spend widely as does Bush we are in trouble. We don't need more govt. We need less far less our raveneuos entitlement hunger is destroying our country. But in reference to Clinton being responsible the GOP had to live with the highest tax increase in oour nations history but they set the agenda and balanced the budget not Clinton. Clinton even fretted that the GOP congress would not let him spend like he wanted too. Bush failed to veto the dem budget and spent just as widely as them bringing us to this mess.The dems are sure to hit us with massive tax increases so you who are having trouble paying your mortgage now sell before you lose your home despite the bailout. If you can't pay now imagine what it will be like when the Bush tax cuts disappear.

        • Posted By: neos @ 10/11/2008 7:59:15 PM

          Could not understand the first part of your post, but the gist of the rest of it seems to be that when a democratic president brings us to prosperity, give credit to the congress. And when a republican brings us to ruin, blame the congress. Well. OK then. You too funny, GI. Many of the nations who have a higher per capita GDP than we do also have higher taxes. I know this is heresy for the misinformed Fox crowd, but lower taxes do not equate to a healthier economy. Oh, and if entitlements bother you, than return the social security checks when they come, and don't sign up for medicare.

          • Posted By: neos @ 10/11/2008 8:06:07 PM

            p.s. The Democratic platform will give tax cuts to 95% of Americans, so stop lying on this issue. And the Bush tax cuts were for the uberwealthy and theri re-implementation and won't affect the middle class who are struggling to pay for their homes. well I guess it will affect them in the sense that the government will be back to Clinton level revenue and just might have a chance to balance the books.

            • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 11:24:46 PM

              Enter YoIn case you did not know this government revenue tripled under Reaga and doubled under GWB. The problem was for Reagan that the dems would not cut spending and he had deficits. The problem with GWB is the more unpopular he became the more he spent like a democrat instead of trying to rein spending in.

              • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/13/2008 2:51:35 PM

                It's not "spend like a Democrat" anymore. The phrase is now "spend like a neocon".

            • Posted By: Pallisor @ 10/11/2008 10:59:05 PM

              If you don't agree with Neos, you're a liar! That said, please explain how it's possible to cut 95 percent of Americans' taxes when the Tax Foundation reports that 40 percent of Americans don't pay any income tax?

              • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 11:19:48 PM

                Obama is going to give them more money back I guess since they don't pay any now it will really be a big pay day for the bottom 40 %

            • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 10:43:53 PM

              You are complaining about the Bush tax cuts hurtung our economy but Obama's aren't going too sounds like voo doo to me. Your argument will be he is going to make it up taxing the rich more. Well let's see since top 5% of wage earners pay 75% of the tax now where going to squeeze more out them. The top 10% already pay 90% of the bill so we'll squeeze more out of them for you and your constituients. Be a man and pay your own way instead of relying on the govt for everything. I make 75 K and have three in college. My SSI would worth over 750K if I could have invested it but instead I might not get the thousands I've paid in because I hve to give mine t otheras great system.

            • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 10:23:17 PM

              So your definition of rich reaches fown to 30 K at least Clinton/Gores only went to 50 K Look at the chaty I provided from the IRS I sick f givingmy money to a govt that can't/won't control itself.

          • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 10:20:16 PM

            If I could get out SSI I would gave when I was 18 The SSI fund is broke and only eranrs 2% if that. Every thinking perosn knows that they would 4 times the retirement money if they could invest it themsrlves instead of the govt. doing nothing wih it except emptying it every year with an IOU.

            • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 10:49:51 PM

              Your right it doesn't always produce a better economy because economies work in cycles, good times stagnation and recession. Never going to change that. But what has the federal govt ever run efficiently p- nothing. Lower taxes might not always produce a good economy but it helps a bad one. It also leaves me with more money to pay my bills instead of someone elses too.

              • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/13/2008 2:50:50 PM

                Wow. You are responding yourself. Lonely much?

          • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 11:45:38 PM

            Congress puts together their budget and the president his but it is congress who sets the tone especially when the otherr party controls congress.. In the Contract with America the GOP congress central theme was a balanced budget. They achieved it by cutting spending in a variety of areas. Clinton signed on. Reagan had to compromise, GWB went along with congress and spent as widely as they did. GWB is as guilty as congress.
            We need fiscal control to bring this insane govt spending under control.

            • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/13/2008 2:50:17 PM

              It was Clinton's focus on reducing the deficit that brought about a balanced budget. The Cons only came along when they saw the opportunity to regain control of the house in 1994.

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/12/2008 12:52:13 AM

      a one vote majority cannot override a fillibuster, nor can it override a veto. Your logic and argument skills are poor to say the least. Your over simplifying a complex issue, and to blame one party and not the other party is beyond stupid. They are both guilty.

  • Posted By: nook @ 10/11/2008 7:32:28 PM

    All this talk about Obama being the saviour, the expert on the economy, the one who would make things RIGHT is ludicrous and extremely laughable.. what is his track record? what has he ever done to deserve such accolade? Obama is a creation of the nauseating american media ably led by cnn and their so called experts.. The questionS to be asked ARE - (1) CAN OBAMA DELIVER? (2) HAS HE CONTRIBUTED ANYTHING POSITIVE DURING HIS SHORT TIME AT THE SENATE? (3) WHY DOES HE SEEM TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH SO MANY SCANDALS? (4) DOES HE HAVE A MIND OR OPINION OF HIS OWN? (5) IF HE DOES, WHY DOES HE FLIP FLOP EVER SO OFTEN? (6) BESIDE'S HIS CHARM AND RETHORIC, WHAT ELSE DOES HE HAVE TO OFFER? (7) WHAT ARE HIS ECONOMIC VIEWS AND HOW HAS HE ADVANCED OR PROMOTED THOSE VIEWS OVER THE YEARS? ( 8 ) HOW DID HE WIN THE 1ST DEBATE, WHEN HE HAPPENED TO AGREE WITH MCAIN 70% OF THE TIME? (9) WHY IS THE US MEDIA SHOWING SO MUCH BIAS FOR OBAMA? ( 10 ) IS HE THE RIGHT MAN FOR THE JOB? ( 11 )IS YOUR DISDAIN FOR MCAIN A TRANSFERRED AGGRESSION FROM YOUR LOATHING OF GEORGE BUSH? (12 ) WHO ARE THE PEOPLE ON THE BALLOT FOR NOVEMBER, ( A) GEORGE BUSH ( B) JOHN MCAIN ( C) BARRACK OBAMA ( D) JOHNMCSAME? (13) IF YOUR ANSWERS TO 12 WERE A & D, WHAT DOES THAT SAY OF YOUR VOTE, IS IT (A) A PROTEST VOTE AGAINST BUSH (B) A VOTE FOR CHANGE REGARDLESS OF WHO THE CLOWN IS ( C ) A VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE YOU KNOW HIM AND TRUST HIS JUDGEMENT (14 ) IF YOUR ANSWERS TO 13 WERE A & B, DO YOU THINK THAT IS A WISE WAY TO CAST YOUR VOTE FOR WHO WILL LEAD YOU IN THE NEXT 4 YEARS? THINK AGAIN, BEFORE YOU CAST THAT

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/13/2008 2:49:01 PM

      It's Obama vs. McCain. Every question of Obama can and should be asked of McCain....and he comes up wanting.

  • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 7:32:57 PM

    Taxes...Whether Democrat or a Republican you will find these statistics enlightening and amazing.
    www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.HTML
    Taxes under Clinton 1999 Taxes under Bush 2008
    Single making 30K - tax $8,400 Single making G 30K - tax $4,500
    Single making 50K - tax $14,000 Single making 50K - tax $12,500&nbs p;
    Single making 75K - tax $23,250 Single making 75K - tax $18,750
    Married making 60K - tax $16,800 Married making 60K- tax $9,000
    Married making 75K - tax $21,000 Married making 75K - tax $18,750
    Married making 125K - tax $38,750 Married making 125K - tax $31,250
    Both democratic candidates will return to the higher tax rates
    It is amazing how many people that fall into the categories above think Bush is screwing them and Bill Clinton was the greatest President ever. If Obama or Hillary are elected, they both say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen. This is like the movie The Sting with Paul Newman; you scam somebody out of some money and they don't even know what happened.

    • Posted By: lexi97701 @ 10/11/2008 9:33:13 PM

      Obama OR HILLARY? Where you been, under a rock?

      • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 10:55:21 PM

        This was from the IRS website and I put it together before Obama was the nominee I just didnt delete the last part the tax xhart is what I wanted people to see.

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/13/2008 2:47:47 PM

          It's called copy and paste, the last bastion of someone who has no ideas of their own.

    • Posted By: jarcher1 @ 10/11/2008 8:02:27 PM

      Gee, this canned disinformation packet must have been on your HD for a while now. I don't think Hillary is going to win. The Bush tax cuts have been worth about the price of a new muffler for the truck every year at my house.

      • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 10:58:33 PM

        If the tax cut was so small then it could not have contributed too the deficit like I hear all your fellow dems say.

    • Posted By: neos @ 10/11/2008 7:37:38 PM

      So under Clinton we responsibly paid for government services instead of the disasterous 'borrow and spend' policies of the republicans which has left us 10 trillion in debt to the Saudis and Chinese, etc. Defense and entitlements aren't free. Time to ante up and stop living on credit.

      • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 10:57:23 PM

        EnteToo bad for you your accountant must be a democrat. For me it has reduced my federal income tax 5K and my return went up 1K. My accountant is me!!

      • Posted By: neos @ 10/11/2008 7:39:46 PM

        And by the way, uh, Senator Clinton is not running anymore. Just so ya know...

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/11/2008 7:58:01 PM

    Lou Dobbs reports on ACORN corruption and ties to Obama, including Obama Campaign paying ACORN $800,000 for voter registration activities.

    http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/10/09/ldt.tucker.acorn.under.fire.cnn

    The link below describes how some in Congress tried to use the original version of the bailout bill to divert money eventually recovered to groups like ACORN, a group Obama has a long association with. See: Wall Street Journal

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122247015469280723.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/12/2008 1:37:05 AM

      It is the economy stupid, not acorn that people care about.

      • Posted By: Pallisor @ 10/12/2008 1:09:18 PM

        So sh!tty associations and now corruption from someone who wants to be the president... even if people were killed you would call it a "side show." The issue of the economy means other issues suddenly don't exist. Wow, mark... you must be dead broke and out on the street! BTW, if it's only about the economy, you should be voting for McCain... he and Bush were trying to stop the horrible mess were in as far back as five years ago.... while Barney Frank and Chris Dodd put up road blocks and Obama was writing his second memoir!

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/13/2008 2:45:47 PM

          He's trying to help your side focus on what the American people care about. You are free to concentrate on conspiracy and guilt by association, but it won't win you the election.

    • Posted By: neos @ 10/11/2008 8:16:33 PM

      nowforthedistraction, did you know that the NON-PARTISAN group Disabled Veterans of America gave a rating of 80% to Senator Obama and a rating of only 20% to Senator McCain?? Didya?? Oh, and don't worry, i wont tell Rush and Sean that you have been watching the MSM

  • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 8:22:45 PM

    Just a question Since Bush was blamed for gas going to over $4 a gallon why hasn't he recieved credit for it going down a dollar a gallon. The simple answer is the market dictates the price period he had no more control of it going up then he or anyone else. Remeber when Nancy Pelosi assumed her najority position the dems were going to address the high cost of gas it was $2:50 then and very quickly skyrocketed to $4.The truth is that oil companies make a lot of money but only because we use a lot of oil. They make about 4 1/2 cents out of every dollar. The federal govt on the other hand makes 15 cents from every dollar. We all want to lillianize the oil companies but their profit margin is far lower than almost every business in America. Remember Al Gore wanted $5 a gallon gas

    • Posted By: neos @ 10/11/2008 8:34:52 PM

      What you are failing to get is that because of Cheney/Bush and their big oil agenda, we have lost 8 years that we could have used to start cutting off our dependence on foreign oil and stopping the incredible transfer of wealth that only works to the advantage of nations that do not have our best interests at heart. Add to that the environmental damage....

      • Posted By: Pallisor @ 10/11/2008 11:48:12 PM

        Please get educated neos... Bush called on congress for this in his January of 2003 state of the union address: Tonight I am proposing 1.2 billion dollars in research funding so that America can lead the world in developing clean, hydrogen-powered automobiles.

        Just like the Fannie/Freddie reform, Bush was there fighting for something you think he wasn't.

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/13/2008 2:44:00 PM

          Bush mentioned oil dependence in all of his state of the union speeches, yet never did anything substantive about it.

      • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 10:14:38 PM

        In addition to my previous comment Gore owned more oil stock than both Bush and Cheney when he ran against Bush in 2000.

        • Posted By: neos @ 10/11/2008 10:20:12 PM

          And IF this is true, isn't it all the more remarkable that he was pushing for a higher tax on gas? Makes you think, doesn't it. Well maybe not you, but others who haven't turned their minds over to Rush....

          • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 11:03:34 PM

            Well of course he was and is advocating higher taxes he's a democrat. He's never seen a hard earned dollar that he didn't want to take from the hardworking and give to his constituates to keepthe BASE in line.

            • Posted By: neos @ 10/11/2008 11:41:43 PM

              You are what old Rumsfield called a deadender. You say something is blue, and when I show you that it is red, you start talking about sealing wax. You will never learn.

              • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 11:54:36 PM

                The tax on gas would not effect the stock price for Gore it would just bring in more money to washington to spend probably by putting an IOU into the Green Fund like they do with social security.If you want to pay higher taxes with cradle to the grave government financial control of your life move to Sweden.

                • Posted By: neos @ 10/12/2008 10:56:18 AM

                  I have been to Sweden and it is a wonderful place. But I am a patriot and I want my country to be as good as if not better than anywhere else. So I am here fighting the good fight against the lunatic fringe on the right who have brought this once proud nation to near ruin.
                  And your argument about Gore's proposed tax doesn't wash, although I am glad to see you get off the topic of sealing wax for a moment to return to the topic of discussion. A higher tax would have resulted in what we have today, reduced gas consumption along the realization that we MUST develop alternate sources of energy. We just would have had this realization EIGHT YEARS EARLIER. Do you think that won't or wouldn't affect oil stock? Remember, I am asking you. If I want Fox talking points, i can watch their infomercial.

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/13/2008 2:43:02 PM

      The gas price went down because the economy tanked. Unless you want to claim that Bush purposefully tanked the economy in order to reduce demand and lower gas prices, then your argument is worthless.

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/11/2008 8:37:32 PM

      The $5 gas price was based on taxes to go to green fuel alternatives.

      • Posted By: John Dough @ 10/11/2008 10:12:55 PM

        Any green fuel alternatives that could meet our demands are decades away. This is just another Washington money grab led by the dems. There are over 18 billion barrels of identified oil in our ocean shelf areas that we cannot drill because the dems still refuse to budge from the fifty mile limit where all the oil is located. There is more oil shale in the Rockies than in a lot of Middle eastern counties but again we can't touch it due to the dems. We need both while se work on alternatives t reduce our depednce of foriegn oil.

        • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/12/2008 1:14:49 AM

          And to blame the dems for everything is ridiculous. Both parties are at fault. Finger pointing will not solve our energy issues. Start by watching Pickens by going to his website. The man has vision that we need to follow. The rest is all political bs and posturing.

        • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/12/2008 1:12:57 AM

          Not decades away at all. We were able to put people on the moon in less than ten years after Gemini went up. It is up to the political will of our country to make energy independence the same type of priority as space flight.

    • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/11/2008 8:34:15 PM

      This year's sky-high oil prices are partly responsible for the drop. Since oil hit $100 a barrel for the first time early this year, Americans (who consume one-quarter of the world's energy) began cutting back. When gas began selling above $4 a gallon, American consumers made "a psychological shift into the sense of crisis and a sense of permanence," says Greg Priddy, oil analyst for the Eurasia Group in Washington. Instead of believing that gas prices would finally fall again, many began changing their daily habits ??? they started driving the smaller car in a two-car garage or consolidating shopping trips. That has meant a huge slump in Americans' gas use. Even before the market meltdown, Americans consumed 800,000 barrels of oil a day less during the first half of this year than the same period last year. As demand fell, so did prices, and as prices have fallen, investors have begun pulling money out of the oil market, fearing a collapse, says Leila Benali, an expert on Middle East oil for the Cambridge Energy Research Associates in Paris, adding: "People are getting nervous about demand next year. There is talk of a global recession."

  • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 10/13/2008 11:54:25 AM

    Wow. That's a lot of rage from the republicans. Why, next you'll be baying for Obama's blood, like your pals in Florida.

    • Posted By: newsweek is garbage @ 10/13/2008 1:48:35 PM

      Just like the election in 2004, Newsweek did a poll and indicated Kerry was ahead of Bush 51-45, and we know who won the re-election. Newsweek can never get any poll correct. Always bias, liberal reporting. Most Americans know they are liberal and ignore their polling. Obama needs to come clean about where he was born, certainly not Hawaii. He was born in Kenya. An investigation will be forth coming. Why does he hide his medical records? Some reporters and few doctors looking at him physically indicate he may have a STD, possibly HIV, and other maladies. Obama is hiding his physical state because he knows it will cost him the election. But, soon to be President McCain revealed all his medical information. Go figure. Obama is good at hiding things, but not that good.

      • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 10/13/2008 1:58:00 PM

        HAR HAR! Pull the other one, it has bells.

        Where do you guys come up with this crap?

        • Posted By: newsweek is garbage @ 10/13/2008 2:15:30 PM

          Um excuse me, it's not crap, it's factually supported. I have studied political science and can tell you looking objectively to what Obama and McCain does and says, that McCain will get the needed 270 electoral votes and more. Some people need to quit being a liberal robot and think for themselves. You drink too much of the Obooma kool-aid. Nobama in 2008. Obama will go back to being a senator and mull over what he did wrong and try and run again. The clintons need to stay outta the picture, they are just a thorn in Obama's side. I cant wait until all those female supporters of Clinton vote for McCain, what a great day that will be. President McCain and V.P. Palin, what a nice sound it will be............LOL

          • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 10/13/2008 2:42:59 PM

            Factually supported?

            Okay, show us some facts that Obama has an STD, and was born in Kenya. Seeing as how it is "factually supported", you should have no trouble posting a credible link or two.

            I won't be holding my breath, of course, seeing as how there won't be such a link forthcoming.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse