I believe two things would tremendously help the economy back onto it's feet: 1) Stop laying people off and hire people. Most companies laying people off are still posting profits each quarter, USE THEM. 2) Bring jobs back from overseas. Bring back help desk and manufacturing jobs to Americans, bring money back into America. Then, and only then, will there be money to spend in America.
Yes, It’s A Wreck, But We Can Fix It
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
For years, regardless of the business cycle, American consumers were the Energizer bunnies of the world economy. Their spending kept it going. But now the Energizer bunnies have turned into scared rabbits, and they're going back into their holes. The global market is less dependent now on American consumers than it was 10 years ago—consumers in China and India and Europe now comprise a significant force—yet Americans remain at the center of global demand. So when American consumers slow down their purchases, the entire world economy slows.
What to do? Trust can be restored only if we have better regulation of Wall Street in order to avoid the sort of bubbles and Ponzi-like schemes that have generated this credit crisis.
But we also need to get money back into the pockets of average American consumers. That means major public investments in job- creating infrastructure and affordable health care, as well as a more progressive tax code.
There Never Was a Plan
Allan Meltzer, professor of political economy at Carnegie Mellon and visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute
The principal problem with the $700 Billion Paulson plan was that there was never a plan. Proponents were unable to explain how the plan would work or why it would work. Instead of developing a plan, they spread fear and anxiety to gain public support, talking up Depression, job losses, and employers unable to pay wages. A falling stock market heightened public concern for pensions.
Alas, the stock market continued to fall after Congress approved the program, not least because the bailout was never supported by an explanation of how buying mortgages would help firms to borrow for payrolls and inventories. Then the Federal Reserve found it necessary to support the commercial paper market, where firms in fact borrow money to finance payrolls, employment, production and inventories. Passing the bailout did not solve that problem.
Democratic governments should never use fear to frighten the public into accepting a program that most knew for what it was—a bailout of the lenders who mismanaged their business. The problem isn't the mortgage market. The mortgage market reflects the problem in housing.










Discuss