Yes, It’s A Wreck, But We Can Fix It

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

A Possible Solution in Private Equity
Wilbur Ross, chairman of his own private-equity firm, and chairman of AHMSI, the second-largest U.S. servicer of subprime mortgages
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act ("EESA") may provide $700 billion of liquidity to the financial system, but the liquidity crisis is continuing. Banks have reduced their total lending over the past six months, and are charging other banks unprecedented premiums for overnight borrowing because they are especially wary of bank failures. As of the end of September, banks will have written off at least $150 billion more than the amount of new capital they have raised over the last twelve months. Regulators limit the amount of loans a bank can make to a multiple of its capital in order to provide a cushion for losses. As a rule of thumb, each dollar of loans requires 10 cents of equity. This means that the $150 billion shortfall must constrain lending by $1.5 trillion, or more. The taxpayers' $700 billion fills less than half of the hole. We need another $80 billion, or better yet, $100 billion of equity (not liquidity) simply to bring things back to normal and reopen the credit spigots. Otherwise banks will continue to shrink their lending and exacerbate the problems of sky-high interbank lending rates and declining purchases of commercial paper and other notes that raise cash for businesses and municipalities. The economy cannot grow without liquidity and liquidity cannot grow until banks have enough capital on their books.

There is a solution, and, happily, it requires neither federal funding nor congressional action, only a change in regulations. Private-equity funds have as much as $450 billion they could invest in banks. But under the current rules any private-equity fund that bought a majority of a depository institution would have to sell its other nonfinancial investments. Yet investment banks and depository institutions have been allowed to own each other since the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act. Why would it be worse for a bank to be owned by a private-equity firm than an investment bank? Private-equity firms have long and proven track records of recruiting good management for their portfolio companies. Some argue that new management would vanish should the fund sell, but in fact, recent history in other countries shows that this is not so. Private-equity firms like mine and others have already helped Japan, Korea and Germany resolve banking crises by purchasing and rehabilitating failed banks.

The Federal Reserve has begun to allow private-equity funds to buy more of a bank without tripping the ownership wire. Let us hope for further action along those lines. Private investment is a better solution than the undesirable alternative of risking tens of billions of dollars of taxpayers' funds.

Time to Bet on the Consumer
Susan Sterne, chief economist, Economic Analysis Associates
It might well be time to bet on the consumer.net consumer borrowing has already dropped 80 percent since last year and it rarely goes negative.   Energy prices have come down, and so has the cost of food. Home prices have become more stable in some regions. Despite panic on Wall Street and hurricanes elsewhere, consumer sentiment is positive. To reduce the cost of living, consumers have been trading down but now that prices are slowing, they can buy again. In the second half of next year, we would expect to see a rebound in car sales and housing. This rebound could be stronger than it was in the last cycle, in 2001, which was not preceded by much of a decline. We are also coming out of a period with the most modest job gains in history, so it isn't unreasonable to expect job losses to be muted as well. In fact, the recent spike in the unemployment rate was not so much caused by lost jobs as by an increase in workers, which is common during a recovery. During the early stages of any recovery, workers sense opportunity and return to the labor force long before most of us realize the environment has improved, reinforcing the adage that by the time everyone realizes we are in recession, it is over.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: kpwood @ 03/23/2009 11:28:14 PM

    I believe two things would tremendously help the economy back onto it's feet: 1) Stop laying people off and hire people. Most companies laying people off are still posting profits each quarter, USE THEM. 2) Bring jobs back from overseas. Bring back help desk and manufacturing jobs to Americans, bring money back into America. Then, and only then, will there be money to spend in America.

  • Posted By: 4carol @ 11/25/2008 3:55:15 PM

    Paulson is a train wreck happening as we speak!! Helping ease credit will not work when people have no jobs to get credit. We need jobs; jobs create wealth and spending and borrowing. Without them, all the money being issued to prop up our economy only, as usual, helps the affluent!! Asking them to borrow, when they have no means to pay back is like asking a bull to step inside a china shop and expect no damage. This is NOT rocket science; it is common sense, which unfortunately Mr. Paulson nor anoyone associated with this administration and this plan, is purely lacking!!! PEOPLE NEED A HAND UP RIGHT NOW; PEOPLE NEED JOBS TO RENEW THEIR PRIDE, TO SAVE THEIR HOMES, TO PURCHASE!!! tHIS IS THE ONLY THING THAT WILL BRING US BACK, NOT ASKING US TO BORROW MORE!!!

  • Posted By: SC-HOPEFUL @ 11/13/2008 9:13:39 AM

    Please investigate this idea to help American. A straight fix is better than working all around the problem. To create main street jobs, have middle Americans to put money back into the economy, and get rid of fear, will be to stabilize the American people first. Could this work ? A stable home could stimulate the economy. Instead of working all around the problem, The government should use taxpayers money directly on the taxpayers by paying off our mortgages to be paid back to us taxpayers with little or no profit at first. Start by fixing the root of the housing crisis will implode new money as well as bailout money into the economy at the same time. Free American families from the threat of becoming homeless will have Americans ready ,willing, and most of all able to help our economy out of crisis. Middle class and upper class united will be a blessing for the American economy. Freeing up cash to spend is better than trying to freeing up credit to charge, because, the misuse of credit is the problem. 911 has proved that we all are Americans and we will come together for the greater good of America because we all know that together we stand, and if we stay divided we will all keep falling. Even the wealthy can lose parts of their American dream. Our government MUST invest in the American people ,in turn, the American people WILL invest back into America. When everyone unite for a common good you get results. We MUST stop giving presidential power to the industries to help Americans. The power of America belongs to WE THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA. In return we can install solar panels, buy hybrids , conserve energy, create jobs, and invest in our American economy while being lead toward a unified America . Industries are getting taxpayers money to help us, but they are mostly helping themselves. Let's take the straight and narrow fix. Taxpayer money to taxpayer mortgages. This will pay only principal money, and banks only lose the rest of the interest. Homeowners in trouble due to the fault of the economic meltdown still owe the principle but at 1% for 3 years and in return we will be able to buy things, not charge things, to turbo charge the economy . banks will be saved because they will get their money back, and jobs will return because we have a demand for services again. To be productive, please add ideas that could help even more americans. we have to start somewhere. Be constructive not destructive and pass it on for more construction THANK YOU!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
PHOTOS
What About Us?
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.