What a nice article.
Picking Palin was a confession that McCain did not have control of the Republican Party.
What a nice article.
Has anyone noticed that Obama seems to be catching up in Arizona? And he is doing better than expected in Texas. McCain may loose his home state.
PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE TO BE HELD SUNDAY AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
The Free and Equal Elections Coalition (FREE) and the Columbia Political Union are pleased to announce that a Presidential debate will be held this coming Sunday, October 19th, 2008, on the campus of Columbia University.
ALL SIX of the Presidential candidates who appear on enough state ballots to acquire the 270 Electoral Votes needed to become President are invited. They are as follows (listed in alphabetical order by affiliation):
Constitution Party Candidate: Chuck Baldwin
Democratic Party Candidate: Barack Obama
Green Party Candidate: Cynthia McKinney
Independent Candidate: Ralph Nader
Libertarian Party Candidate: Bob Barr
Republican Party Can John McCain
The Columbia Political Union will present the debate from 8:00pm to 10:00pm in the Altschul Auditorium, located at 417 International Affairs Building. The debate will be moderated by Pacifica Radio's Amy Goodman, the host of "Democracy Now!". CSPAN will cover the debate, and live radio broadcasts are expected.
"The Columbia Political Union is committed to energizing political discourse on Columbia's campus," said Allon Brann, Columbia Political Union Publisher. "As a non-partisan organization, we work to provide students with opportunities to encounter and engage with political ideas across a wide ideological spectrum, and on a wide range of issues."
"It is with these goals in mind that we have organized this Presidential Debate: to give all candidates-- either within or outside of the political "mainstream"-- the opportunity to speak directly to students about their goals on the issues they deem critical for this country."
"We have invited all eligible candidates, and it is our sincere hope that all will participate, to ensure the substance and rigor of the dialogue which we believe is crucial at this time."
Certified letters officially inviting each candidate have been sent to the respective campaigns.
The Free and Equal Elections Coalition and the Columbia Political Union await the response from the candidates. All candidates' supporters are encouraged to contact the Presidential campaigns and urge them to attend.
The Columbia Political Union seeks to enhance involvement in the political process, domestic and international, and draw every member of the campus community into an ongoing discussion of political ideas.
FREE is a coalition of political parties, independent citizens and civic organizations formed to promote free and equal elections in the United States.
http://www.freeandequal.org/events.php?id=7
FREEDOM ISN'T FREE
Comment: by Ralph Nader
October 10. 2008
Rolling the Dice on Derivatives - The Nader Page
The derivatives markets of today have become a high stakes casino of unimaginable magnitude. Wall Street???s bets have gone bad, and now the whole financial system is in peril. In a best-case scenario, it appears, the taxpayers will be required to rescue the system from itself. This is why Warren Buffett labeled derivatives ???weapons of financial mass destruction.???
Amazingly, there seems to be some lingering sense that current-day derivatives properly perform an insurance function.
Case in point: Alan Greenspan, the former Federal Reserve Chairman. Greenspan says the world is facing ???the type of wrenching financial crisis that comes along only once in a century,??? but, reports the New York Times, ???his faith in derivatives remains unshaken.??? Greenspan believes that the problem is not with derivatives, but that the people using them got greedy, according to the Times.
This is quite a view. Is it a surprise to Alan Greenspan that the people on Wall Street ??? said to be ruled only by the opposing instincts of greed and fear ??? ???got greedy????
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/rolling-the-dice-on-derivatives-by-ralph-nader/
www.votenader.org
McCain is connected to Nazi supporters and Central American death squads.. so says
FoxNews and Washington Post (two Republican News publishers)
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/07/attention-ayers-renew-focus-mccains-iran-contra-connection/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/07/AR2008100700025.html
The old guy has a long infamous past.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30122043&l=0510b&id=1130236838
EL GRAN OBAMA PRESIDENTE 2008-14 El GOBIERNO DE LA DIPLOMACIA INTERNACIONAL. con (Cuba, Venezuela, Nuevo País patria Libre Independiente, y países del Medio Oriente), serán incluidos en la integración diplomática y respeto como nació. Después del debate, en donde fue definitivo, quedo claro, el perfil, visionario y las características de OBAMA PRESIDENTE 2008-14, que sacara de la crisis económica a los EE.UU y la región. OBAMA PRESIDENTE 2008-14 aplicara políticas de gobierno organizado, los mercados y la competencia, serán métodos que se enmarque en modelos económicos, dirigidos por los economistas (analistas y especialistas), y los métodos administrativos serán de expertos, de manera que el modelo conlleve una forma efectiva de llevar a la región al desarrollo económico, social, y cultural, en donde: prime el respeto y el equilibrio estado-el mercado, Que converja en beneficio de la sociedad y encamine todos los esfuerzos sincronizados de manera que se pueda erradicar la pobreza, erradicar la cultura de violencia, guerra y corrupción, 1ADELFA PINEDA TRANSPARENCIA Y ÉTICA: Por el Desarrollo del País; Dignidad Publica,:. 1
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30122043&l=0510b&id=1130236838
EL GRAN OBAMA PRESIDENTE 2008-14 El GOBIERNO DE LA DIPLOMACIA INTERNACIONAL. con (Cuba, Venezuela, Nuevo País patria Libre Independiente, y países del Medio Oriente), serán incluidos en la integración diplomática y respeto como nació. Después del debate, en donde fue definitivo, quedo claro, el perfil, visionario y las características de OBAMA PRESIDENTE 2008-14, que sacara de la crisis económica a los EE.UU y la región. OBAMA PRESIDENTE 2008-14 aplicara políticas de gobierno organizado, los mercados y la competencia, serán métodos que se enmarque en modelos económicos, dirigidos por los economistas (analistas y especialistas), y los métodos administrativos serán de expertos, de manera que el modelo conlleve una forma efectiva de llevar a la región al desarrollo económico, social, y cultural, en donde: prime el respeto y el equilibrio estado-el mercado, Que converja en beneficio de la sociedad y encamine todos los esfuerzos sincronizados de manera que se pueda erradicar la pobreza, erradicar la cultura de violencia, guerra y corrupción, 1ADELFA PINEDA TRANSPARENCIA Y ÉTICA: Por el Desarrollo del País; Dignidad Publica,:. 1
John McCain is a progressive Republican in the mold of Teddy Roosevelt. He might well have appealed to moderate Republicans and Independents by pursuing that course. Certainly he would have helped himself in that direction by selecting Mike Huckabee as his running mate, who seemed to give political voice to the more progressive form of evangelicalism of Rick Warren and others. There may have been a victory for him in this, as well as a way forward for a party whose revolution under Reagan has lost its ability generate new ideas, its affability, and its respect for its own conservative political and intellectual tradition.
MR. OBAMA HOW DO YOU PROPOSE TO SPREAD THE WEALTH. Well these were the headlines I was expecting. But no, the headlines are Joe the plumber does not have a license and owes some back taxes. Well folks lets spread the word. Let us SHARE THE WEALTH. How about it Oprah, Mr. Soros, Rev. Jackson, how do you feel about this. Yes Hollywood share your wealth. How about it teachers union, lets share the wealth and let our children attending failing schools share the wealth of private education. How about Teamsters, lets share the pension fund just handed over to you. What a novel concept for America. SHARE THE WEALTH. Will it be Castro style, Chavez style, Putin style, Mao style? Who cares? Today $250,000, tomorrow how much will it be? Please President BO tell us how it is going to work? Our news media is dying to know. Get busy bloggers, spread the word.
I WAS ARGUING WITH A POSTER ABOUT MCCAIN AND PALIN PRO LIFE POSITION WHEN MCCAIN-THIS DUMB HEARTLESS SOB-AIR QUOTES WOMEN'S HEALTH?!
ARE YOU F'N SERIOUS???!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT HE WOULD SAY THE LEFT USES WOMEN'S HEALTH FOR PRO-ABORTION STANCES( NO ONE IS PRO ABORTION). THAT TOTALLY MAKES MY POINT. THESE 2 HAVE NO BUSSINESS RECEIVING ONE DAMN WOMAN'S VOTE!! YOU THINK ROE V. WADE CANNOT BE OVERTURNED EVEN IF MCCAIN AND PALIN WOULD IN THE WHITE HOUSE? 1 QUESTION......................DID YOU EVER THINK THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WOULD EVER LIE ITSELF INTO A WAR? PALIN WANTS MORE POWER THAN CHENEY. THERE IS NOTHING MORE DANGEROUS THAN A AIRHEAD WITH TOO MUCH POWER (SEE: GEORGE BUSH) MCCAIN HAS SUCH A LOW VIEW OF WOMEN. NO WOMAN "WANTS' AN ABORTION AND A WOMAN'S HEALTH COMES INTO QUESTION BY HER DAMN DOCTOR............................................WHAT SELF RESPECTING WOMAN WOULD VOTE FOR THESE TWO?
Obama's view of the future of America - Socialism which is the next step to Communism!!
Under socialism a ruling class of intellectuals, bureaucrats and social planners decide what people want or what is good for society and then use the coercive power of the State to regulate, tax, and redistribute the wealth of those who work for a living. In other words, socialism is a form of legalized theft.
The morality of socialism can be summed-up in two words: envy and self-sacrifice. Envy is the desire to not only possess another's wealth but also the desire to see another's wealth lowered to the level of one's own. Socialism's teaching on self-sacrifice was nicely summarized by two of its greatest defenders, Hermann Goering and Bennito Mussolini. The highest principle of Nazism (National Socialism), said Goering, is: "Common good comes before private good." Fascism, said
Mussolini, is "a life in which the individual, through the sacrifice of his own private interests??realizes that completely spiritual existence in which his value as a man lies."
Socialism is the social system which institutionalizes envy and self-sacrifice: It is the social system which uses compulsion and the organized violence of the State to expropriate wealth from the producer class for its redistribution to the parasitical class.
Despite the intellectuals' psychotic hatred of capitalism, it is the only moral and just social system.
Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as traders--that is, as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent.
Capitalism is the only just system because the sole criterion that determines the value of thing exchanged is the free, voluntary, universal judgement of the consumer. Coercion and fraud are anathema to the free-market system.
It is both moral and just because the degree to which man rises or falls in society is determined by the degree to which he uses his mind. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one's birth or station in life.
Yes, there are winners and losers in capitalism. The winners are those who are honest, industrious, thoughtful, prudent, frugal, responsible, disciplined, and efficient. The losers are those who are shiftless, lazy, imprudent, extravagant, negligent, impractical, and inefficient. [What about the role of luckbeing in the right place at the right time or the wrong place at the wrong time? R. R. Pope}
Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice. This applies to both the business executive and the carpenter, the lawyer and the factory worker.
HILARIOUS!
LET'S TOTALLY FORGET THE FACT THAT THE TOP 4 REPUBLICANS ON THE PLANET(BUSH, CHENEY,BERNANKE,PAULSON) CREATED AND SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATS A 700 BILLION DOLLAR SOCIALIST PACKAGE THAT HAD TO BE DONE BECAUSE OF 8 YEARS OF REPUBLICAN RAN GOVERNMENT?
CAN I HIRE YOU FOR BIRTHDAYS AND BARMITZVAH'S?
jon-jon alter
Fact: ACORN has implemented the most sophisticated quality-control system in the voter engagement field but in almost every state we are required to turn in ALL completed applications, even the ones we know to be problematic.
Fact: ACORN flags in writing incomplete, problem, or suspicious cards when we turn them in,. Unfortunately, some of these same officials then come back weeks or months later and accuse us of deliberately turning in phony cards. In many cases, we can actually prove that these are the same cards we called to their attention.
Fact: Our canvassers are paid by the hour, not by the card . ACORN has a zero-tolerance policy for deliberately falsifying registrations, and in the cases where our internal quality controls have identified this happening we have fired the workers involved and turned them in to election officials and law-enforcement.
Fact: No criminal charges related to voter registration have ever been brought against ACORN or partner organizations. Convictions against individual former ACORN workers have been accomplished with our full cooperation, using the evidence obtained through our quality control and verification processes ??? evidence which in most cases WE called to the attention of authorities
Fact: Most election officials have recognized ACORN???s good work and praised our quality control systems. Even in the cities where election officials have complained about ACORN, the applications in question represent less than 1% of the thousands and thousands of registrations ACORN has collected.
Fact: Our accusers not only fail to provide any evidence, they fail to suggest a motive: there is virtually no chance anyone would be able to vote fraudulently, so there is no reason to deliberately submit phony registrations. ACORN is committed to ensuring that the greatest possible numbers of people are registered
ACORN will not be intimidated, we will not be provoked, and in this important moment in history we will not allow anyone to distract us from these vital efforts to empower our constituencies and our communities to speak for themselves.
http://www.acorn.org/index.php?id=12439&L=0%2Findex.php%3Fid%3D4201&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=22384&tx_ttnews[backPid]=12346&cHash=b898887651
max in fl- you've overdosed on the KoolAid. ACORN members are presently in jail for voter fraud. And it wasn't even inspired - in Ohio they used the names of Dallas Cowboys and out in Nevada they signed the same name over and over with the same signature. If you want specifics go to www.rottenacorns.com. Here's an example
PA 2008 An ACORN employee in West Reading, PA, was sentenced to up to 23 months in prison for identity theft and tampering with records. A second ACORN worker pleaded not guilty to the same charges and is free on $10,000 bail.
http://www.rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html
And that doesn't even address the $800,000 obama funneled to them. try googling. you can't possibly think you can get away with this anymore do you?
here's eyewitness testimony by an obama campaign worker in Gary Indiana describing how school kids were bussed to vote for obama. Gary and the entire Lake County, Indiana w3ere completely corrupted. Returns came in after midnight after CNN started complaining.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P2egIBfe7U
Thanks for the laugh. How many times have you pasted this? Moveon.org is next.
jjkk
A little history of RNC distracting the public with accusations of voter fraud while openly committing ELECTION fraud
As reported by Mitchell, in the 1934 race for governor of California, Republicans hatched perhaps the most sophisticated voter suppression scheme undertaken up to that time in America. Taking the shrewd advice of a former New York prosecutor, Eli Whitney Debevoise, opponents of Democrat Upton Sinclair leveled wild charges of voter registration fraud. A cooperative district attorney drew up a secret list of 200,000 allegedly illegal registrants.
The Los Angeles Times advanced the suppression campaign, writing on the front page that "it would be far better for a few honest persons to lose their votes than for a hundred thousand rogues to defeat by fraud the majority will of the people." The publicity, the conspirators knew, would frighten those who were afraid they just might be on that list. Rather than risk capture (for a vague crime they had no understanding of), they'd stay away from the polls.
Ultimately, the effort ended in some embarrassment when no actual voter registration fraud was uncovered and the state's Supreme Court tossed out the accusations. But not before the goal of the publicity was met.
There is some historical symmetry in the fact that in 1982, U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, a distant cousin of El Debevoise, the suppression guru who hatched the California scheme, ordered the Republican National Committee to forever halt its voter intimidation and suppression campaigns. In the 1982 New Jersey gubernatorial contest, the RNC launched a sophisticated "voter caging" campaign. Letters were sent to voters. If they were returned for bad addresses, the GOP challenged the addressees' registration. It raised doubts among citizens about whether they were illegally registered.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/shoptalk_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003874422
Interesting! Does McCain drink KoolAid or are you saying I believe an African American? If you read the same post so many times then your dial is stuck on stupid because you would have read that ACORN assisted with the prosecutions of the workers that simply wanted to earn a paycheck. Since you STILL didn't get it...READ IT AGAIN
Similar attacks were launched against ACORN and other voter registration organizations in 2004 and 2006. The bogus charges were at the heart of the U.S. Attorney-gate scandal that led to the resignations of Karl Rove, Attorney General Ablerto Gonzales and other top Justice Department Officials. It turned out that it was the charges that were fraudulent, and that they were part of a systematic partisan agenda of voter suppression. Republican U.S. Attorneys David Iglesias (NM), Todd Graves (MO), and John McKay (WA) all were fired primarily because they refused to prosecute similar bogus charges of ???voter fraud.??? Another U.S. Attorney, Bradley Schlozman, who did politicize prosecutions against former ACORN canvassers, was forced to acknowledge under cross examination by the Senate Judiciary Committee that ACORN was the victim of fraud by its employees and ACORN had caught the employees and had identified them to law enforcement.
They can't control the fraudulent forms they receive. The people committing "registration fraud" are the individuals who are filling out multiple forms for a buck. This is a non-issue that only has the rabid right-wingers frothing because they aren't smart enough to research the issue.
In a word----BULL!!! Yeah, ACORN is so dammed pure is why they are being investigated. Tell it to the squirrels, they don't care if you're rotten, they'll store you away for winter anyway, but people DO care, especially people who hate sneaky a-holes. Keep blathering your innocent little spill, we'll play out violin while you sing it, and, hey, we can even step up the beat a bit if you'd like to add a little dance to yout song.
McCain is a [Acorn Man] and other Republicans too !!!
40% of Acorn's Registered Voters have been [Republicans]
Hahahaha !!
On Monday, the Democratic-leaning group ACORN, which has been painted as a criminal enterprise by the GOP for its voter registration and housing policy efforts, pushed back against its critics by producing a photo of John McCain attending its March 2006 rally.
It was a reminder that, for all their electoral histrionics, Republicans have aligned themselves with ACORN in the past.
Indeed, in addition to the McCain photo, there is a host of examples of prominent McCain surrogates attending ACORN events, signing ACORN legislation, or complimenting the group's efforts.
Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, for example, partnered with ACORN in March 2008 for a "Homeownership Promotes The Economy" taskforce. More recently, Crist declared that -- contrary to GOP outrage -- he was not upset with the group's voter registration efforts in his state. The New York Times reported that ACORN supported a law signed by Governor Crist, which "changed the rules last year to restore the voting rights of about 112,000 former convicts."
In July 2005, meanwhile, another Republican governor, Rick Perry of Texas, signed ACORN's Lending Law Reform Bill that changed the state's homelending practices.
In July 2008, California Governor and McCain supporter Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that ACORN helped draft aimed at California homeowners facing foreclosure.
In June 2007, Minnesota Governor and McCain VP short-lister Tim Pawlenty signed a similar bill -- drafted by ACORN -- that helped homeowners get fairer deals on their mortgages.
"The legislation was drafted according to recommendations made by a predatory lending study group established by Swanson prior to the legislative session," wrote the Northwestern Financial Review. "The study group contained representatives from the banking industry and the mortgage brokers association, as well as consumer advocates from organizations such as Illegal Aid and ACORN."
As Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney signed an anti-predatory lending bill that ACORN supported. In February 2006, Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman met with the ACORN Katrina Survivors Association. And back in July 2005, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg actually got a kiss from ACORN's state leader, according to the publication City Limits, during an announcement that the city would protect or create 65,000 affordable units in a new housing proposal. Bloomberg, it should be noted, has not endorsed a candidate.
Mark, I would never have believed ANYONE could ever reach the heights that go BEYOND stupid, but I was wrong, as you have just proved. There just is no response that can reach you now that you have attained that level of stupidy,
Why is it stupid? Because you say so? Republicans have been involved with ACORN, including McCain. His post is spot on.
No, Johnson, not because I say so, but because its what I have believed, but to be fair, I will check it, and if I am proved wrong, I will eat my post---the key word here being "PROVED"; I realize that Republicians can be just as crooked as anyone else, they don't walk on water, anymore than Democrats do, but they are MY party, so, of course I want to believe the best, just as you do with your party. It really isn't so much that I am against Democrats as I am this particular candidate---and, before you start---NO! It has absolutely nothing to do with his being part black, I have never been racist, and have always felt it is a stupid way to judge people; it is simply that I do not trust what he is saying, I do not get a feeling of sincerity from him, and his wife, I feel, is more liberal than he is, if thats possible, so I can not honestly vote for someone I don't feel comfortable about. If other people see him differently, that is their right to vote the way they feel. I will do the same, and follow my basic instincts.
star3
Here is the post and a napkin. Enjoy
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/13/acorn-mccain-and-gop-used_n_134284.html?page=2&show_comment_id=16771761#comment_16771761
I listened to two people who personally witnessed Democrats who bombarded people at the polls in the last election, trying to convince them to vote Democrat, and when the Republicans tried to ask if that were legal (of course it isn't!) They even tried to get physical with them! Democrats are desperate to get control anyway they can! When you have to go to such lengths to recruit people to vote for your candidate as the Democrats do, that really says loudly that their candidate can not get voters on his own merits. How pathetic! Is this really the kind of party you want to lead your country? Then maybe you had better take all of the Democrats to a different country or even a different planet, and all of you do your thing there, because you sure as hell aren't going to do it here! Even if you should succeed in getting into the White House, as soon as you start your liberal crap rules, I am betting your butts will be out the door as fast as it takes for the redneck Americans to load their guns. The Americans I know will never stand for such nonsense as "politically correct" garbage, they will show you their version of "politically correct"! And anyone who wants to resort to that old favorite phrase of liberals: Racist! Racist! They will be told "Dam right, and staying that way. so sue me!" Even though they aren't racist, if liberals keep saying they are, well, then if we're going to have the name, might as well have the game. Most people resent being told what they think or feel, and if you think telling them they are racist will shut them up, you got some more think coming, as my dear mom used to say. They just may show you how racist the are NOT, by showing you how anti $hitheads they are!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paragraph
Lest you labor under the mistaken belief that all black people favor Obama....
http://www.atlah.org/broadcast/ndnr09-03-08.html
Any way I will vote for McCain, ... you paid speaker...
As a pro-life independent, who at this point is still undecided, I find pro-choice Democratic attacks on McCain's concession to pro-lifers to particularly irritating and certainly counter-productive in winning me to vote for Senator Obama. It would seem that in these pro-choicers minds everyone who defends a pro-life position is either corrupt or simple. And if a candidate speaks to their concerns, it makes the candidate ethically weak, corrupt, simple, or some combination of these. I find this to be a politicization of ethics and good sense, which lacks any force, except to those who are also pro-choice. McCain will probably lose, because with this economy he never had a chance. And his loss will have nothing to do with the abortion issue or with McCain's attempts to court social conservatives.
I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU ARE COMING FROM BUT UNDERSTAND WHERE WE ARE COMING.
JOHN MCCAIN AND SARAH PALIN REPRESENTS THE "TAKING" AWAY OF RIGHTS WOMEN HAVE WORKED SO HARD TO ACHIEVE. A PRO CHOICE CANDIDATE DOESN'T STOP YOU FROM CONTINUING YOUR PREGNANCY. SARAH PALIN BELIEVES THAT A RAPE VICTIM OR INCEST VICTIM SHOULD HAVE TO KEEP THE CHILD? MY QUESTION TO HER IS "HAVE YOU EVER VOULUNTERES AT A WOMAN'S SHETLER? HAVE YOU EVER SEN HOW MANY 13-14 YEAR OLD GIRLS GETTING GANG RAPED IN SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES AND BECOME IMPREGNATED BY THAT? CAN YOU LOOK INTO THAT GIRL'S EYES AND SAY "LEGALLY YOU MUST HAVE THIS CHILD?" THAT'S ALMOST INSANITY. NO ONE ON EITHER SIDE THINKS ABORTION IS A GREAT CHOICE AND YOU HAVE A HARD TIME FINDING A WOMAN WHO DOESN'T THINK ABOUT IT EVERYDAY OF THEIR LIFE AFTERWARD. TO BE SO CALLOUS IN TO NOT GIVE A WOMAN A CHOICE WITH THEIR OWN BODY IS THEE ULTIMATE GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION.
And a pro life candidate does not stop anyone from having an abortion if they are determined to do so. Murder is illegal, too. but it still happens, theft is illegal, but people still steal, so if abortion is illegal, how will that prevent anyone from still having one if they decide to do so anyway? Women have not lost any rights, but perhaps many babies have gained their rights. If a female does not want to be pregnant, or a male does not want to get a female pregnant, ok, then don't have sex is the safest way, but if you do have sex, use protection, and don't go into that old spill about how using protection, or being on the pill is not fool proof or the pill gives you bad side effects; there are many types of protection, find one that workks for you. Killing a baby is not the correct way to the situation. If all the birth control methods fail for you, then you're unique, and maybe your body is trying to tell you that sex is not for you. USE COMMON SENSE!!!!
RAPE VICTIMS DON'T HAVE A CHOICE TO GET RAPED OR NOT.
TOO BAD YOU MISSED THE ENTIRE MEANING OF MY REPLY. ALSO-THEIR ARE PUNISHMENTS FOR MURDER, THEFT.....ETC AND THOSE ARE DETERRENTS SUCH AS JAIL TIME AND FINES. IF THEIR WERE NO DETERRENTS THERE WOULD BE ALOT MORE MURDERS AND THEFTS. ARE WE GOING TO PUNISH 14 YEAR OLD RAPE OR INCEST VICTIMS?......................................PLEASE STOP TRYING TO CHALLENGE ME WITH INANE ARGUEMENTS AND VIEWPOINTS. ARE YOU SARAH PALIN?
Jim Johnson, no matter how many times people tell you that Obama is against socialism, you keep posting these blogs that accuse Obama of socialism and communism. It is not true and you know it. You are just trying to smear Obama and make people afraid.
In his book Audacity of Hope, Obama writes at length about the FAILURE of SOCIALISM and the failure of communism. He enthusiastically states that American democracy is the greatest political system on earth. Obama is not a socialist, and he does not admire socialism.
To you, Jim, and to all of the conservatives out there who think that Obama is a flaming liberal, I would like to remind you of what he did when he was elected President of the Harvard Law Review. The Law Review President gets to name ten individuals to write articles for the Review, and these ten people also get to control the content of the publication. All of the minorities and the liberals thought they finally had it made, that Obama would appoint ten left wing editors. Instead, Obama appointed three conservatives, three liberals and four moderates. That year the Law Review was critically acclaimed as the best run and best written Harvard publication in decades.
So when he wins in November, conservatives don't have to freak out. Obama is a centrist and will appoint a balanced cabinet full of active people who will really get things done. Kind of like the way our multi-cultural society is supposed to be.
If Joe the Plumber thinks he can't afford to buy the business under Obama's tax plan then he really needs to consult a good accountant. Obama's plan lowers taxes on the first $250,000 Joe makes. On the money over $250,000, Joe would pay 39% under Obama, instead of the 36% he now pays. That's 3% more taxes, not exactly a break-the-bank if you have already made $250,000 at a low rate. Plus, Obama will give him a tax credit for every job he creates, and tax credits for every employee that he provides health insurance for. Under Obama's plan, Joe's business will pay LESS TAX than it does now.
McCain's plan will tax the first $250,000 at a higher rate, then drop the taxes on anything over $250,000 by an unspecified amount. McCain's plan does not give him a tax credit for every job he creates. If he provides health care for his employees he will now have to deduct yet another tax from their paychecks, adding administrative burden to his company. Not to mention that Joe will have to pay this tax himself on his personal income, which amounts to an extra $4,200 a year he pays in taxes (35% of the $12,000 a typical policy costs). And if his company does not provide health care, he and his employees will pay out of pocket for their health care (average cost $12,000 per year), get a $5,000 tax credit under McCain, but be out of pocket at least $7,000 per year for their policy.
My impression is that Joe really should stick to plumbing and leave tax policy to Obama.
Furthermore, Joe the plumber says that Obama has a "very socialist view of taxes" This statement shows America how very uninformed Joe Wurzelbacher is. I would love to hear Joe define socialism and describe the tax policies of a socialist nation. He would start to sound like Sarah Palin on Katie Couric. Nor does he seem to recognize that all democracies socialize certain functions: police, fire fighting, military, roads, public schools, sewers, water. This is for the greater good and we all accept it. It does not make us socialists.
In his book Audacity of Hope, Obama writes at length about the FAILURE of SOCIALISM. He enthusiastically states that American democracy is the greatest political system on earth. Obama is not a socialist, and he does not admire socialism.
Joe the plumber should stick to plumbing and leave public policy decisions to people who actually know what they are talking about.
Oh, and maybe Joe and his boss should get plumbing licenses. Apparently neither of them is licensed, in violation of both state and county laws.
On October 10, the Alaska Legislative Council found Sarah Palin guilty of abusing power. Immediately Ms. Palin said "if you read the report you'll see that there was nothing unlawful or unethical about replacing a cabinet member." This quote by Palin is only 50% true. The Legislative Council report says it was LEGAL for her to fire Commissioner Monegan, since as Governor she has the right to hire and fire her staff at will. The report also says that her firing of Commissioner Monegan was an UNETHICAL abuse of power.
Palin tells you half of the truth, and lies outright about the other half. You know the old saying: If you tell a lie, make sure it contains some truth so it will be believable.
From the report:
Palin tried to force the Commissioner to prosecute Trooper Wooten (her former brother in law) for illegally shooting a moose. The Commissioner explained to Palin that if they charged Wooten they would also have to bring charges against Palin's sister, who was present on the hunt, had the moose permit and illegally let her husband use it. They would also have to prosecute Palin's father, who cut up the moose and stored it in his freezer, sharing the meat with the Palin family. In other words, the Palins were OK with Wooten illegally shooting the moose when it happened. They participated in the hunt and kept the meat. But a year later when Wooten was divorcing Palin's sister, suddenly the Palins turned him in for illegally killing a moose.
The Palins turned Wooten in to the State Troopers disciplinary commission about a year and a half before she became Governor. The Troopers investigated Wooten, finding that some of Palin's allegations were true and some were false. The Troopers disciplined Wooten with a few days' suspension. When Palin tried to get Monegan (the new Commissioner) to re-open the case once she was Governor, Monegan told her he couldn't do it. All the allegations had already been investigated and Palin had no new evidence. Trooper Wooten belongs to a union, and he can not be fired just because the Governor doesn't like him.
So, the Palins hired a private investigator to trail Wooten, trying to catch him doing something wrong. The investigator took photos of Wooten dropping his kids off at school, using his patrol car. The Palins file a complaint, saying it is illegal for him to ferry his kids in a patrol car. They try and get him fired for this, except it turns out that since Wooten was working a swing shift, his Commander had given him a waiver to bring his kids to school in the car.
Wooten and Palin's sister have been divorced 3 years, yet the Palins continue to persecute Wooten. Palin just can't forgive and get past this family drama.
Read the report yourself (it takes a few seconds to load):
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Components/Interactives/Politics/Election2008/branchflower
_report_to_the_legislative_council.pdf
Obama's view of the future of America - Socialism which is the next step to Communism!!
Under socialism a ruling class of intellectuals, bureaucrats and social planners decide what people want or what is good for society and then use the coercive power of the State to regulate, tax, and redistribute the wealth of those who work for a living. In other words, socialism is a form of legalized theft.
The morality of socialism can be summed-up in two words: envy and self-sacrifice. Envy is the desire to not only possess another's wealth but also the desire to see another's wealth lowered to the level of one's own. Socialism's teaching on self-sacrifice was nicely summarized by two of its greatest defenders, Hermann Goering and Bennito Mussolini. The highest principle of Nazism (National Socialism), said Goering, is: "Common good comes before private good." Fascism, said
Mussolini, is "a life in which the individual, through the sacrifice of his own private interests??realizes that completely spiritual existence in which his value as a man lies."
Socialism is the social system which institutionalizes envy and self-sacrifice: It is the social system which uses compulsion and the organized violence of the State to expropriate wealth from the producer class for its redistribution to the parasitical class.
Despite the intellectuals' psychotic hatred of capitalism, it is the only moral and just social system.
Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as traders--that is, as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent.
Capitalism is the only just system because the sole criterion that determines the value of thing exchanged is the free, voluntary, universal judgement of the consumer. Coercion and fraud are anathema to the free-market system.
It is both moral and just because the degree to which man rises or falls in society is determined by the degree to which he uses his mind. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one's birth or station in life.
Yes, there are winners and losers in capitalism. The winners are those who are honest, industrious, thoughtful, prudent, frugal, responsible, disciplined, and efficient. The losers are those who are shiftless, lazy, imprudent, extravagant, negligent, impractical, and inefficient. [What about the role of luckbeing in the right place at the right time or the wrong place at the wrong time? R. R. Pope}
Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice. This applies to both the business executive and the carpenter, the lawyer and the factory worker.
Obama picking BIDEN shows the lefties and the liberals ( polite terms for Marxists) in the DNC don't fully trust Obama and are saddling him with a "minder" they can trust!
Ayres and ACORN are a radical and corrupt entity extended from the Weather Underground, which sought to import all the violence around the world to the streets of the USA under the banner of Bring The War Home!
Obama is trusted with the valuable DNC hate campaign against achievers, gun owners , Christians, police and military professionals of the USAF, and to run this multi-faceted discrimination campaign from the Oval Office as Bill Clinton did for 8 years.
But smart old lefties like Biden, Schumer, Pelosi and Feinstein all do know that Ayres is all about TAKING OVER things he works with or for at some point. And maybe the Ye Olde Lefties won't like that!
Besides, McCain as President should NOT have "control of" the things of American freedom, Alter. Only lefties see things in terms of CONTROL! Joe the plumber got the wiff of Marxism on Obamas breath. It's all about control and how THAT is great thing in all cases!
Obama is not in control.Your hope is that some day he will be. If Biden does not give him the political lethal injection if should Ye Olde Marxists decide an ACORN Presidency, and ACORN it's self, can't be controled by them!
Obama had his VP picked for him.
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss